Answers to RFIs - 36C77624R0087 amendment 0006 Mass..docx
DOCX document 124 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C77624R0087
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to a federal contract opportunity for the construction of a replacement outpatient clinic for the Providence VA Medical Center in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. The key details are:
The project involves the construction of a new outpatient clinic, project number 650-318, with a solicitation number of 36C77624R0087. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Technology Acquisition Center Austin is the federal agency issuing the solicitation. The solicitation includes several deductive alternates related to the building materials, systems, and features. Responses to technical questions from offerors are provided, covering topics such as utilities, controls, fire alarm, plumbing, electrical, and telecommunications. The VA indicates the project is not tax-exempt and the Buy American Act requirements apply. The VA also confirms certain key personnel, such as the Superintendent and Safety Officer, must be separate individuals. Additionally, the VA clarifies that a lump sum divisional breakdown of pricing is acceptable for proposal submission.
View the file
Other files
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION # 36C77624R0087
Construction of Replacement Outpatient Clinic Project No. 650-318- Buzzards Bay, MA
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS AND VA RESPONSE TRACKING SHEET
| # |
| QUESTION RECEIVED |
| QUESTION ANSWERED |
| QUESTION |
| GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
| 1. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Can the deadline for questions be pushed to 5/31/24? |
| See Amendment 0003. |
| 2. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Can the deadline for proposals be pushed to 6/18/24 at a minimum, or maybe further? |
| See amendment 0003, amendment 0004. |
| 3. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| In consideration of the Vets First Act, can this clause be added under INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO OFFERORS, 2.7 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, Part E. Evaluation Methodology, sub-part Factor 2 Price? Veterans Preference |
Solely for purposes of price evaluation and implementation of the veteran’s first act, the proposed price of any CVE SDVOSB offeror shall be evaluated as if it were 3% less than the offerors actual proposed price so as to afford the SDVOSB a competitive advantage.
The proposed price of any CVE VOSB shall be evaluated as if it were 2% less than the actual proposed price so as to afford the VOSB a competitive advantage.
These price adjustments as solely and only for implementation of the preferences of the Veterans First Act and the price evaluation in the LPTA phase. In the event an SDVOSB or VOSB is in line to receive an award, the actual award value and the actual obligation to an SDVOSB or VOSB shall not reflect any such 3% or 2% reduction but rather the true offeror proposed price.
The requested is not required to be used as part of a LPTA FAR 15 unrestricted solicitation. There is no change to the instructions to offerors regarding this request.
| 4. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Can this clause be added under INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO OFFERORS? VAAR 852.215-70 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors |
| The requested is not required to be used as part of a LPTA FAR 15 unrestricted solicitation. There is no change to the instructions to offerors regarding this request. |
| 5. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Are there any liquidated damages associated with this project, besides those in FAR 52.219-16 pertaining to subcontracting plans? |
| There is no reference to liquidated damages other than FAR 52.219-16. |
| 6. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Reference INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO OFFERORS, 2.7 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, Part C. Technical Proposal Requirements, sub-part Factor 1, Experience (Technical). Since the 5-year window encompasses the COVID era and not as much work was performed over this period, can the time frame for past performance of projects be extended to 8 years from the date of this solicitation? |
| Section 2.7 Proposal requirement C. Factor 1, Experience is revised to the following: |
“The Offeror shall demonstrate experience by providing recent and relevant construction experience. The Offeror shall provide no more than five (5) examples of recent and relevant experience performed within the last eight (8) years from date of this solicitation.”
| 7. |
| 5/21/24 |
| VA Interior Designer |
| Reference spec section 12 24 00 and drawing AE608 Basis of Design Schedule. Neither identifies a specific fabric from Mecho, i.e. “Solar Collections ThermoVeil 0900 Series” or “Equinox Blackout 0100 Series”. There is a wide price range from least expensive to most expensive. Please specify the fabric that is supposed to be used for this project, or at a minimum provide a fabric selection for both the light filtering and blackout fabrics for bidding purposes. |
| Finish selections shall follow typical submittal process. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY. |
AG Response:
· Light-filtering shadecloth to be EcoSheer 6750 in 3% openness
· Blackout shadecloth to be Chelsea 0250 Final color selections to be made with other interior finishes
| 8. |
| 5/21/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference drawing AE605 details D6 and D9. Both details show a shade trim enclosure trim and the note states they are “by the ceiling manufacturer”. Should this read “by the shade manufacturer” in lieu of ceiling? |
| Finish selections shall follow typical submittal process. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY. |
AG Response: Correct, shade manufacturer to provide noted trim.
| 9. |
| 5/21/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference drawing AE605 details D6 and D9. Both details show a shade in a recessed pocket labeled as a “shade trim enclosure clip”. There are multiple issues with this illustration. The manufacturer’s recessed pocket enclosure is used primarily when the shade is above the ceiling line, or hidden, and they do not come prefinished. The manufacturer offers a similar surface mounted pocket, but it will not accommodate dual roll shades and only comes in white. Is it acceptable to utilize the manufacturer's “SnapLoc Fascia” to satisfy this requirement? It takes up less space, is designed for this purpose and comes in a variety of finishes and colors to choose from. See https://www.mechoshade.com/products/shade-options/fascia/ |
| ALL selections shall follow typical submittal process. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY. |
AG Response: Mecho’s SnapLoc Fascia is acceptable.
| 10. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec section 34 71 13, 1.1.A. where it mentions “operable gates”. We are assuming this was left in the spec inadvertently and there are no gates and just the fixed bollards. Is this correct? |
| AG Response: Yes, this is correct. Just the fixed bollards. |
| 11. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Concerning Testing Laboratory, 01 00 00, 1.2.D states “retained by Department of Veterans Affairs” and 01 45 29, 1.1.A. states “retained by the General Contractor”. Which is correct? |
| Retained by the general contractor. |
| 12. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing FP501, Detail 5, Drawing FA103, Coded Note 2, and Fire Alarm Riser Detail 1 on Drawing FA601. Note 2 states that we are to install flow and tamper switches as shown on the riser detail (detail 5). Detail 5 shows four (4) shut off valves (OS&Y) with just one (1) tamper switch. How many tamper switches are required for the incoming fire service main? |
| AG Response: FA103 could not be found; should be FA102. |
All four shut-off valves require a tamper switch, including the lowest shut-off gate valve.
| 13. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing FA601, Detail 2 (fire alarm matrix). The fire alarm matrix indicates that the pressure switch should activate the horns and strobes throughout the clinic. Is this the correct sequencing for the pressure switch? |
| AG Response: Yes, if water flow is detected then the horns/strobes should activate. |
| 14. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference Contract Drawing FA601, Detail 2 (fire alarm matrix). The fire alarm matrix doesn’t indicate a supervisory trouble for the loss of communication to either the central station or the VA. Which is it? |
| How would we know if we lost communications with the central station (local FD). None of our facilities have supervisory indications of the city side of the municipal loop indicating a loss of comm with the local authorities. None of our remote facilities have the ability to directly report to the fire alarm system at the PVAMC. We use a series of relays on the fire alarm system that are interconnected with the PACS system to indicate supervisory, trouble, and fire alarm conditions in the remote facility. The PACS system is monitored by the VA Police Dispatcher 24/7/365 and reports the conditions to the appropriate personnel at the PVAMC. |
AG Response: Please provide supervisory trouble in the event that there is a loss of communication to either of the signal monitoring stations (local fire department).
Fire department at the Joint Base (508-968-7998).
| 15. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference Contract Drawing FA601, Detail 1 (fire alarm riser). The fire alarm riser notes the fire alarm control panel shall transmit a signal to the local fire department and the Providence VAMC, building 1, using both an ethernet connection and integral dialer. The diagram also shows a fiber optic cable connection from the fire alarm panel to the telecom closet (room 152). |
a) Please provide information on the available inputs for the existing Notifier Fire Alarm Panel located in building 1
b) Is the existing Notifier panel (NFS2-640) connected to the VA’s network?
c) Can we be provided with information on the current central station monitoring company?
15a): The FACP at the new CBOC will not be connected to the FACP or fire alarm network at the PVAMC. At best we will have an interlock between the new CBOC FACP and the PVAMC PACS system for system status notification (trouble, supervisory, fire alarm).
15b): No. The PVAMC fire alarm system is a stand-alone fiber optic network that is separate and not connected to the VA telecom network; nor is it possible to make that interconnection or place the fire alarm system on the VA’s network.
15c): VA do not have a central station monitoring company.
| 16. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing P-502, Details 3, 6, & 9, and Drawing P-801, Thermostatic Mixing Valve Schedule. The detail for the domestic hot water loop notes a hot water loop temperature of 140 degrees to a tempering valve with a discharge temperature of 110 degrees and a recirculating pump on the domestic water loop serving the building with a programmable timer. Detail 3 shows another thermostatic mixing valve below the lavatory sinks. Detail 6 for wheelchair lavatory does not show a thermostatic mixing valve. The thermostatic mixing valve schedule (P-801) shows various temperature settings which differ from the piping details. |
a) Please clarify the temperature settings for the domestic hot water loop and the temperature setting for the remote thermostatic mixing valves at the individual lavatories.
b) Please clarify if the wheelchair lavatory requires the same thermostatic mixing valve as the standard lavatory, i.e., detail 3.
c) Also, please confirm a mixing valve for the eyewash.
AG Response:
a) The water heater shall maintain a tank temperature of 140°F to control legionella. The master mixing valve shall reduce the temperature to 125°F in the recirculating loop (per the P-801, not 9/MP502). The point-of-use TMVs at each sink and lavatory will reduce the temperature to 105°F.
b) The wheelchair-accessible lavatory does require a TMV.
c) The TMV at the eyewash will be set to an output of 95°F.
| 17. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawings P-401, Coded Note 1, Drawing P-503, Detail 4, and Drawing P-801, Ultraviolet Water Disinfection (System) Schedule. Please confirm that a Model S2400C (Sanitron) or equal is acceptable for the UV system as noted in the schedule, (reference Coded Note 1 on P-401)? |
| AG Response: UV-111001 serves the 3” CW main line serving the building. The calculated peak load in the building is 80 gpm. Therefor a Sanitron S5000 is required, equivalent to two of the scheduled S2400C units arranged in series. |
| 18. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawings P-401, Coded Note 3, Drawing P-503, Detail 1, Drawing P-601, Pressure Isometrics, and Drawing P-801, Reverse Osmosis System (schedule). Please provide a piping diagram which details the equipment served by the RO system and the size of the piping for the RO system, i.e., incoming, outgoing (good water), and membrane wash (bad water – shows 3/8”- just confirm for the wastewater). |
| AG Response: The R.O. Water system is provided to provide feedwater to the steam humidifier adjacent to it. There is a floor drain in the area intended for wash water discharge. Refer to VA PG-18-4, detail SD226719.16-01, available at www.cfm.va.gov/TIL . Final installation details should be submitted for approval by the Installer based on the manufacturer’s guidelines. |
| 19. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA and A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing M-701, Drawing Note 1. Please provide information on the location of the existing building control system and the available inputs for interfacing the new control system into the existing Johnson Controls’ Metasys Building Management System (BMS). |
| AG Response: There is no existing building control system or campus-level control system. All BAS components will be new. |
VA: The Metasys BMS that will be installed in the new CBOC will not rely on inputs or outputs on the existing BMS located in the PVMAC facilities. The Metasys Extended Architecture BMS at the new CBOC will interface with the Metasys ADX server located in B-1, room D005 of the PVAMC via a secure network VLAN connection. The network architecture for the controls installed in the new CBOC relies on a daisy chain BACNET MSTP communications bus that connects all of the individual Metasys DDC controllers (VAV, AHU, etc.) and BACNET integrated devices (chillers, boilers, humidifiers, etc.) to a Metasys supervisory engine (SNE or NAE). The centralized nature of access to the Metasys network allows the end user to access all Metasys control systems from a single login regardless of the physical location of the facility as they are all connected on the same Metasys VLAN.
| 20. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Please advise if the existing Johnson Control System is connected to the VA network or if the system uses just a web link with user id and password for the communication protocol? |
| Reference response on RFI #19 (above). |
| 21. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference Contract Drawing M-701, Detail 1 and Coded Notes 1, 2, & 3. Please clarify if the controls for the miscellaneous plumbing and mechanical systems, i.e., steam humidifier, exhaust fans, mini-splits, hot water heaters, hot water boilers, pumps, etc., are required to have BACNET METASYS Controls/Outputs? Or just provide the required sensors to provide the local inputs required for the points noted in the Input/Output (point) Summary (schedules)? |
| If the piece of equipment (chiller, boiler, Mini split, humidifier) is not directly being controlled by Metasys via a Metasys DDC controller with Metasys sensors, actuators, inputs/outputs/logic; they need to have their own manufacturer controls with BACNET MSTP capabilities built into the internal controls so they can be integrated on the MSTP comm bus and report data, be controlled (start/stop, setpoint changes, schedules, etc.) from/by Metasys. BACNET IP integration does not meet this intent. |
| 22. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Is this project located on Federally owned property, and does the state of MA have any jurisdiction on or over this project? |
| This project is located on a Federally owned property; however, contractor should follow state of MA regulations for Environmental Regulations, etc. |
| 23. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Reference spec section 01 00 00, 1.3 Statement of Bid Items. The Alternate numbers shown in the various groups do not correlate with the alternates listed in the Bid Schedule. Please clarify. |
| The grouping of deduct alternatives in the pricing schedule of the RFP are not the same as the statement of bid items in spec section 01 00 00. Offerors shall submit pricing from the revised deduct groupings provided with amendment 0005. |
See amendment 0005 Price/Cost Schedule from June 20 2024.
Do not submit pricing from the groupings in section 1.3 statement of bid items of section 01 00 00 general requirements.
| 24. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec section 01 00 00, 1.3 Statement of Bid Items and A.3 Price / Cost Schedule. |
a) The description list for Item 0004 (Deduct Alternate No. 03) does not match the list under Group 3. Which is correct?
b) The description list for Item 0005 (Deduct Alternate No. 04) does not match the list under Group 4. Which is correct?
The grouping of deduct alternatives in the pricing schedule of the RFP are not the same as the statement of bid items in spec section 01 00 00. Offerors shall submit pricing from the revised deduct groupings provided with amendment 0005.
See amendment 0005 Price/Cost Schedule from June 20 2024.
Do not submit pricing from the groupings in section 1.3 statement of bid items of section 01 00 00 general requirements.
| 25. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA PCAC and A/E |
| Reference spec section 01 00 00, 1.3 Statement of Bid Items and A.3 Price / Cost Schedule. In Item 0002 (Deduct Alternate No. 01) it states to change the folding partition from automatic to manual. In Item 0005 (Deduct Alternate No. 04) it states to delete the folding (operable) partition. |
a) In Item 0005 (Deduct Alternate No. 04) are we deleting the automatic or manual one?
b) If we are deleting the automatic one, please note that since a version of the folding partition is carried in two different deductive alternates this prevents BOTH alternates being accepted, as this would cause a portion of the value of this item to be deducted twice.
AG Response: In Deduct Alternate 1, the partition is being changed from automatic to manual. In Deduct Alternate 4, the partition is eliminated altogether.
VA Contracting Team: The grouping of deduct alternatives in the pricing schedule of the RFP are not the same as the statement of bid items in spec section 01 00 00. Offerors shall submit pricing from the revised deduct groupings provided with amendment 0005.
See amendment 0005 Price/Cost Schedule from June 20 2024.
Do not submit pricing from the groupings in section 1.3 statement of bid items of section 01 00 00 general requirements. 00 general requirements.
| 26. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E and VA PCAC |
| Reference spec section 01 00 00, 1.3 Statement of Bid Items and A.3 Price / Cost Schedule. In Item 0003 (Deduct Alternate No. 02) it states to omit brick wainscotting and foundation brick shelf. In Item 0004 (Deduct Alternate No. 03) it states to change the brick wainscotting to ground face CMU. |
a) Please note that since a version of the brick scope is carried in two different deductive alternates this prevents BOTH alternates being accepted, as this would cause a portion of the value of this item to be deducted twice.
AG Response: Remove lime item from Deduct Alternate 2.
VA contracting Team: The grouping of deduct alternatives in the pricing schedule of the RFP are not the same as the statement of bid items in spec section 01 00 00. Offerors shall submit pricing from the revised deduct groupings provided with amendment 0005.
See amendment 0005 Price/Cost Schedule from June 20 2024.
Do not submit pricing from the groupings in section 1.3 statement of bid items of section 01 00 00 general requirements.
| 27. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference 01 00 00, 1.5.B.1. Considering the location of this site, will badging be required for this project site? If so, please describe the process for obtaining badging. |
| No required. |
| 28. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference 01 00 00, 1.5.E.1. Considering the location of this site, will vehicle authorization / registration be required for this project site? If so, please describe the process for obtaining such. |
| No required. |
| 29. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| FAR 52.236-7 is incorporated by reference under 4.19 of the RFP. This states that the Contractor shall, without additional expense to the Government, be responsible for obtaining any necessary licenses and permits……etc. 01 00 00, 1.9.4 reads as though the VA will apply for and have the NPDES permit available for the awarded contractor. Who is responsible for obtaining and paying for the NPDES permit? |
| The General Contractor is responsible for obtaining and paying for the NPDES permit. |
| 30. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference 01 00 00, 1.17. concerning the Resident Engineer’s Field Office. Is this section applicable to this project? |
| Yes, this is applicable. Field office is required for VA resident engineer. |
| 31. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference 01 00 00, 1.20 Availability and Use of Utility Services. Please confirm that on this site it is the responsibility of the General Contractor to coordinate with the local utility providers, obtain services and pay for all costs of installation and usage charges associated with any temporary utilities. If so, can we be provided with the contact information for the local utility providers that would service this site? |
| Confirmed. Utility contact is: |
| 32. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference 01 00 00, 1.26. concerning Storage Space for Department of VA Equipment. Is this section applicable to this project? |
| The site will be made clean, and no VA storage will take place. |
| 33. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference 01 35 26. Can the SSHO also serve as the Superintendent, or do they have to be single and not have any other duties? I can’t find where it states either way. |
| SSHO and superintendent must be two different individuals. |
| 34. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference 01 45 00, 3.4.C. The list shown in the Experience Matrix does not match the list shown just above it in the paragraph where it lists additional CQC personnel. Please clarify which is correct? |
| AG Response: Please use the Experience Matrix. |
| 35. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference 01 45 29, Part 3 Execution. There are several sections under this part that are not applicable to this project. Please confirm that we should only consider the parts that are applicable to this project. |
| Confirmed. |
| 36. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference M-501, Details 1 & 2. Please advise if Pressure and Temperature Test Plugs (see below) are acceptable for the reheat coils for temperature and pressure checks. |
| AG Response: For terminal unit reheat coils, test plugs are acceptable instead of pressure gauges & cocks. |
| 37. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing M-703, Flow/Control Diagram for heating hot water system. Please clarify if we are to pipe the hot water boiler (B-111001) per the manufacturer’s recommendation of as shown? Note: We have found that most of the pre-packaged hot water boiler manufacturers recommended a primary loop with a secondary loop to stabilize the loop temperature and avoid short cycling of the burner controls. Most package hot water boilers come with their internal circulating pump to control the primary loop temperature. |
| AG Response: The Aerco boiler scheduled is designed for a variable primary flow configuration. However, other boilers do require a primary-secondary arrangement. If the manufacturer’s installation and operating instructions differ from the design documents, note the deviation in the submittal and include information on the preferred configuration for the engineer’s approval. |
| 38. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing M-801, Mini-Split Ductless Heat Pump Schedule, Note 11, and Contract Drawing M-701, Detail 1, BACNET System Architecture. Note 11 on M-801 notes the installation of a 7 day programmable thermostat for controlling the mini-splits. Detail 1 on M-701 indicates a BACNET connection for the mini-splits. Please clarify the controls for the mini-splits? |
| AG Response: Mini-split heat pumps should be controlled from a local thermostat. But the status of the system should be monitored by the BAS. (Note: the units should be active continuously, and will not be adjusted based on occupancy schedules.) |
| 39. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing M-801, Air Cooled Water Chiller Schedule, Notes 3, 4, and 11. Please clarify if the standard control package and starters for a Trane CGAM Chiller or equal is acceptable? We are assuming that the project requires the standard chiller controls with BACNET output and single point power connection with disconnecting means. Please clarify if an additional cross the line starter is required per Note 11. |
| AG Response: If the Trane control provides the functions described in Spec 23 64 00 and M-702, then it is acceptable. It is acceptable if the starter is provided as part of the equipment’s onboard package. |
| 40. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawings M-801, Fan Schedule, and M-701, Detail 1, BACNET System Architecture. Please clarify if BACNET controllers are required for the exhaust fans which are serving the restrooms and the waiting area? Or just provide standard combination starters to support the control functions noted for the exhaust fans per the sequencing of operation for the air handling system. |
| AG Response: The BAS will monitor the status of the exhaust fans, but the operation will be controlled as indicated on M-703. |
| 41. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing E-204, Coded Note 13, and Detail 1/E204. Please confirm that the generator remote emergency power off button is to be located in the Main Electrical Room (161)? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. Per coded note 13, please install in Main Electrical Room 161. Also reference specification section 263213, part 2.14 for additional remote emergency stop requirements. |
| 42. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing E-204, Coded Notes 14, 15, & 16, and Detail 2/E-204. Please confirm that the head-end equipment for the CCTV System, Nurse Call, and Access Control are to be installed in the Communications Room (152)? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. Also reference sheet T-401. |
| 43. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing E-206, Coded Notes 6 and 7. Please confirm that the mechanical contractor’s fan/air handler manufacturer shall provide the variable frequency drive with the equipment, i.e., return fan and air handling unit? |
| AG Response: The mechanical contractor is furnishing the VFDs, which are to be installed and wired by the electrical contractor. |
| 44. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawings E-206, Chiller location, Drawing E-601, Detail 1, and drawing E-801, Panelboard MDP. Please provide a revised single line (detail 1 on E-601) that shows a 175-amp breaker for the chiller along with the wire size, conduit size, and disconnect switch. In addition, please correct the single line for Panel MDP to reflect the breakers shown in the schedule on E-801. Please add the chiller circuit and disconnect on drawing E-206. |
| AG Response: Thank for bringing this to our attention. The 100/3 spare breaker in MDP indicated on the One-Line diagram on sheet E-601 should be a 175/3 breaker serving CH-111001. Chiller circuit, wire size, conduit size and disconnect are indicated in the Equipment Schedule on sheet E-801; not to be duplicated on the One-Line diagram or floor plan. |
| 45. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing T-501, Detail 1. Please confirm the wiring detail for the modular jacks? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. 568B is the correct wiring standard. |
| 46. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
| Reference Contract Drawing T-601, Detail 1. Please advise on the CATV provider that the VA is planning to use for the new clinic. |
| Shanix. |
| 47. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Please provide a single line drawing for the following Technology Systems: (a) telephone, (b) data, (c) public address, (d) nurse call, (e) access control, (f) cctv, (g) intrusion detection, and (h) cable tv. |
| AG Response: Please see sheet T-601 for system riser diagrams. The referenced systems require risers, system drawings, schedules and details to be provided by system supplier and submitted as part of shop drawing review. Please refer to specifications for submittal requirements. |
| 48. |
| 5/22/24 |
| VA |
Please confirm that the VA is providing and installing the following Technology Headend Equipment in the furnished racks: (a) data switch for security systems (cctv & ids), (b) network records for cctv system, (c) WiFi equipment, (d) network switches, (e) fiber patch panels, (f) VOIP switches (telephone), (g) patch panels for cctv system, (h) equipment for emergency phone (voip), (i) PA equipment, and (j) access control.
AG Response:
a) Contractor to provide data switches as part of ESS systems. Per specification 280500, the contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional ESS system.
b) See part (a) response.
c) The VA will provide and install wifi equipment.
d) The VA will provide and install network switches.
e) The contractor is responsible for providing fiber patch panels.
f) The VA will provide and install VOIP switches.
g) See part (a) response.
h) See part (a) response; EPPS system.
i) See part (a) response.
j) See part (a) response.
VA response:
1. Data switch for security systems (cctv & ids) - The GC will sub to the camera company to purchase and supply the Switches for the cameras system. There is not really an IDS we are using PACS instead of IDS. The PACS will use VA Network Switch to report back shall be furnish and install by the general contractor.
1. Network records for cctv systems - The Network records, and as a matter of fact all equipment, is a part of construction funds. The GC will sub to Shanix or HurtVet, who furnish and install.
1. All WiFi equipment is supplied by VA IT to include wireless controllers, WiFi patch panel, cabling, and wireless access points.
1. Network equipment to include a router and network switch is supplied by VA IT.
1. Fiber patch panels are not supplied by VA IT (all copper and fiber network patch panels, with the exception of WiFi, are not supplied by the VA). The GC shall furnish and install.
1. VOIP switches are supplied by the VA IT
1. Path panels for CCTV system (h) equipment for emergency (voip) - CCTV functions are simple, the camera is IP to a switch which is IP to a workstation and Server. The GC shall be furnish and install.
1. Emergency phone equipment (voip) - is supplied by the VA IT., reference (g).
1. PA equipment shall be furnished and install by the contractor.
Note: Pegasys P2000 is obsolete. Current system is CCure 9000 and CCure 9000 physical server. See attached letter name: “P2000 End of Life May 2023 - Customer Letter”.
| 49. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Please confirm that the project includes just the raceways, racks, and cabling for the technology systems? It would be very helpful if single line drawings can be provided which show what is VA provided and the length of cabling we are to have within the individual racks for connection to the VA provided equipment. |
| AG Response: The project includes telecommunication raceways, racks, patch panels and cabling. The VA shall be responsible for furnishing and installing all telecommunication active equipment, including but not limited to controllers, switches and wifi equipment. The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional ESS system with all components as described in specification section 280500. |
| 50. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Please confirm that the cable tv provider will provide all the equipment and programming for the cable tv system? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. See CATV Riser Diagram on sheet E-601. The contractor shall provide CATV ports/faceplates and wiring back to rack. CATV supplier shall provide distribution equipment in rack and incoming service wiring. |
| 51. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Please confirm that the VA is providing both the equipment and programming for the Technology Equipment that is notes as provided by the VA? |
| AG Response: See previous RFI responses. |
| 52. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
Reference A.3 Price/Cost Schedule, Item 0003 (Deduct Alternate 02). There is no specification provided in the documents for the asphalt shingles called for in the alternate. Please provide a specification.
AG Response:
The following basis of design is provided for reference only and an example of the required performance criteria for pricing. A full specification will be provided if the deduct alternate is accepted.
Basis-of-design:
Asphalt Fiberglass Shingles A. CertainTeed Landmark Pro: Conforming to ASTM D 3018 Type I – Self-Sealing: UL Certification of ASTM D 3462, ASTM D 3161/UL997 80-mph Wind Resistance and UL Class A Fire Resistance; glass fiber mat base; ceramically colored algae resistant granules across entire face of the shingle; two-piece laminated shingle.
B. Weight: 250 pounds per square (100 square feet) (14.6 kg/sq m) C. Color: As selected by Architect from manufacturer’s standards.
Sheet Materials
1. Eaves Protection: CertainTeed “WinterGuard”, ASTM D 1970 sheet barrier of self-adhering rubberized asphalt membrane shingle underlayment having internal reinforcement and “split” back plastic release film; provide material warranty equal in duration to that of shingles being applied.
1.CertainTeed WinterGuard HT.
B.Waterproofing Underlayment: CetainTeed “WinterGuard”; ASTM D 1970 sheet barrier of self-adhering rubberized asphalt membrane shingle underlayment having internal reinforcement, and “split” back plastic release film; provide material warranty equal in duration to that of shingles being applied.
1.CertainTeed WinterGuard HT.
Warranty
1. Certainteed lifetime limited warranty to be provided for material.
1. 10yr supplemental warranty to be provided to cover labor and materials in the event of material defect.
| 53. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec. section 11 73 00, 2.3.B.1. where it states the lifting capacity is 750-1000 lbs. Reference also sheet S-106 where it states, “Truss Designer to Include 600 lb. Dead Load Due To Patient Lift”. Which is correct? |
| AG Response: Spec section 11 73 00 is correct |
| 54. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec. section 27 52 23, Part 1 General. Are there any compatibility requirements with existing nurse call equipment either at this location or other affiliate locations? |
| AG Response: There are no compatibility requirements with existing nurse call equipment. |
| 55. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec. section 27 52 23, 1.8.G.2. In reference to page 7, required nurse and/or code blue growth, does this apply to system wide growth availability? |
| AG Response: Yes, this applies to system wide growth availability. |
| 56. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec. section 27 52 23, 2.4.H. concerning Reporting. Is reporting required for this proposal, or is future reporting capability the requirement? i.e. can be turned on? |
| AG Response: Yes, reporting is required as part of this proposal. It should be able to be turned on. |
| 57. |
| 5/22/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference spec. section 27 52 23, Part 4 Testing, 4.2.B.2. |
a) item b.4: what is an STR?
b) Item b.14: What is NS?
c) Item b.8: Are wireless integrations to be included in this proposal? Who is the current wireless provider?
AG Response:
a) Stacked Telecommunications Room
b) Nurse Stations
c) No wireless integrations are required as part of this proposal.
| 58. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 21 13 13, Paragraph 1.3.A.5. Please provide an updated flow test for the incoming water supply. The information provided in the specifications is almost 2 years old and the information on the drawings indicates the water supply was low due to maintenance on a water tower. We need a flow test within 1 year. |
| AG Response: For bidding purposes, assume the previous test data is still accurate. The owner should schedule an updated flow test prior to construction. The fire sprinkler contractor should receive the updated flow test from the owner. |
| 59. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 22 05 19, Paragraph(s) 2.1. A – I; 2.3. A – E; 2.4. A.; 2.5. A; Contract Drawings P-502, Detail 8, and P-601. Detail 8 notes the water meter is furnished by the local utility company. Please clarify who is to provide the meter and provide a corrected detail or specification that aligns with the drawings or specification, i.e., meter with remote readout, BACnet communication, dry contracts for alarms, |
| AG Response: The contractor shall provide a water meter per Specification 22 05 19, not the utility company. The water meter shall be mounted in the mechanical room. Provide a water meter equivalent to Badger Recordall Compound Series meter, 2” diameter |
| 60. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 22 07 12, Paragraph 3.4.A. Please clarify if the cold water lines within the building are required to be insulated and the thickness for the insulation? |
| AG Response: Domestic cold water is not required to be insulated interior to the building. |
| 61. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 22 11 23, Paragraph 1.5.C. and Contract Drawing P-601. Please clarify if a domestic water booster pump is required. If one is required, please provide a pump schedule, and information on the power for the pump along with a sequence of operation, i.e., timer controls, pressure controls, etc. |
| AG Response: A domestic water booster pump is not required. |
| 62. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification 22 67 19.16, Paragraph 1.6.A. & B. Please provide water quality analysis for the incoming domestic water along with the design parameters for the R.O. system? |
| AG Response: |
We recommend the contractor perform their own water analysis to confirm the filtration required. A water treatment company should have local data from the general region that can be used for bidding. The design parameters are provided here:
Normal System Flow: 0.60 gpm Max system Flor: 0.60 gpm Daily Water Usage: 500 gpd Daily Hours of Demand: 14 Operating Temp Range: 48-54°F
| 63. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 22 67 19.16, Paragraph(s) 2.1. A – L ., 2.2. A – E, and Contract Drawing P-503. Please provide a point summary list along with the alarm settings for the RO System for the building automation system (DDC)? |
| AG Response: Controls are described in Spec 22 67 19.16 Section 2.1.I. The onboard automatic controller will control basic functions. The following Warning alarms will be connected to the BAS: Low Quality Product, High Feed Temperature, & High Feed Temperature. |
| 64. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Contract Drawing P-503, Detail 4. Please provide a specification for the UV Disinfectant System? |
| AG Response: Bid may be based on a Sanitron S5000. -CB |
| 65. |
| 5/23/24 |
| VA |
| Reference Specification Section 23 09 23, Paragraph 1.1, Paragraph(s) A - V. Please provide a copy of the as-build/record drawings for the existing Johnson Controls (JC) Metasys? Please provide an overall sight plan that indicates the location of the existing BMS Master Control Room which is currently in Building No. 1. |
| AG Response: There is no existing building control system or campus-level control system. All BAS components will be new. |
VA Response: JCI will tie in the Metasys to the BMS via the VA IT Network
| 66. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 23 22 13, Paragraph 2.8.C.8. Please clarify the BACnet output requirements for the humidifier controls, i.e., point list. |
| AG Response: Controls functions are described in the specifications. |
| 67. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 29 11. Please clarify if the variable speed motor controllers (VSMC) are to be furnished under section 26 29 11 or provided with the equipment per the mechanical drawings. Section 26 29 11 outlines the furnishing and installation? |
| AG Response: VSMC’s are furnished with equipment per the mechanical drawings, and are not furnished under section 26 29 11. Also, see Equipment Schedule on sheet E-801 and Electrical Equipment Plan on sheet E-206 for further details and requirements. |
| 68. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 32 13. Please provide a sketch or drawing that details the emergency generator system, i.e., generator control panel/cabinet/cubical, fuel piping, day tank, fuel tank, fuel filters, alarms, control panel/cabinet, monitoring panel, remote annunciator panel, alarm panel/cabinet, battery charger, volt and ammeter, fuel tank, fuel level indicators (day and main tanks), pump transfer pumps (main tank to day tank & generator return fuel to day tank or main tank or just a base tank for both the main tank and day tank), etc. |
| AG Response: Sketch or drawing is to be provided by the contractor as part of submittals package. See specification 26 32 13 section 1.5. Also, please note that the fuel tank is a sub-base tank, as described on the One-Line diagram on sheet E-601. |
| 69. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 32 13, Paragraph 2.8.C. Please confirm that the batteries shall be nickel-cadmium? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. Please provide nickel-cadmium per standard VA requirements. If the contractor wishes to provide an alternate battery type, please follow the division 01 substitution request procedures. |
| 70. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 32 13, Paragraph 2.15. Please advise where the remote annunciator panel should be installed. |
| AG Response: Please see sheet E-203, coded note 16 for remote annunciator panel location. |
| 71. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 32 13, Paragraph 2.16.B. Please provide a panel size and directory for the factory installed/factory wired panelboard. |
| AG Response: Please disregard the factory installed panelboard requirement from paragraph 2.16.B. |
| 72. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 36 23, Paragraph(s) 1.1.A. and 2.1.A.7.b. Please confirm that the automatic transfer switch shall include a fully isolated bypass switch. |
| AG Response: Confirmed. |
| 73. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 36 23, Paragraph 2.1.A.7. Please advise if the transfer switch housing should be a NEMA 3R or 4X? Note: specification is based on a standard indoor wall or floor mounted unit. |
| AG Response: Please provide NEMA 3R enclosure as indicated on One-Line diagram on sheet E-601. |
| 74. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 36 23, Paragraph 2.3. A & B. Please advise on the location for the remote annunciator system. |
| AG Response: Please disregard paragraph 2.3 A & B. A transfer switch remote annunciator is not required. |
| 75. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 26 05 11, and the Technology Drawings T-001 – T-601. Please clarify the testing requirements noted in section 26 05 11. Based on the notes on the drawings, it appears the telecom equipment is furnished and installed by the VA. Please clarify and if possible, provide a single line drawing for the systems which shows the technology racks and the cabling with a note that the equipment is furnished by the VA or if we are missing something, please advise? We understand that we must provide test reports on the installed cabling and assist the VA’s installation team with the equipment racks provided for the telecom. |
| AG Response: The project includes telecommunication raceways, racks, patch panels and cabling, which must be tested by the contractor. The VA shall be responsible for furnishing and installing all telecommunication active equipment, including but not limited to controllers, switches and wifi equipment, which are not required to be tested by the contractor. The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional ESS system with all components as described in specification section 280500, along with testing of all ESS equipment. |
| 76. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 27 05 33, Paragraph 3.1.A. Please clarify the equipment installation requirements based on the systems list. |
| AG Response: Please disregard any referenced specification sections (271000, 274131, 275123, 275231, 275241, 275319, 281316) that were not included in the specifications. |
| 77. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 27 05 33, Paragraph 3.2.C. Please clarify the simple continuity test after cable installation. |
| AG Response: Please provide continuity testing to verify that metallic pathways are bonded to TGB or TMGB. Also, please reference specification 270526, paragraph 3.2.C and 3.2.D. |
| 78. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 27 08 00. Please clarify the commissioning requirements for the communication systems. Note we understand the requirements for cabling testing, but the equipment appears to be VA furnished and installed. Please clarify? |
| AG Response: Correct, the telecommunication active equipment (controllers, switches, etc.) is VA furnished and installed, and does not require testing by the contractor. Cabling testing is required by the contractor. |
| 79. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 27 51 15 and Technology Drawings T-401 & T-601. We understand the requirements noted on the contract drawings to install an Atlas AA200PHD PA system or equal which will interface with the existing PA system and to interface with the new fire alarm system for a fully functional zoned PA system. Please clarify the submittal requirements for section 27 51 15 and provide a plan that shows the zoning of the new PA system? |
| AG Response: Please provide submittals in accordance with paragraph 1.8. Please provide a separate zone for the waiting area; total of 2 zones for the building. |
| 80. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 27 52 23. Please clarify the submittal requirements for the nurse call system, i.e., do we have to submit to VACO Special Telecommunications Team (005OP3B)? |
| AG Response: Confirmed. Please submit to VACO Special Telecommunications Team as indicated in the specifications. |
| 81. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 05 00. Please clarify the project scope for the Electronic Safety and Security System for this project, i.e., conduit, cabling, and devices only, or a fully functional ESS system as specified? |
| AG Response: The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional ESS system with all components as described in specification section 280500. |
| 82. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 13 00. Please clarify the project scope for the Physical Access Control System for this project, i.e., conduit, cabling, and devices only, or a fully functional access control system with system server, workstations, software (piv middleware, 3 factor authentication, etc.), database, verification of credentials, id cards, and management software, etc.? |
| AG Response: The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional PACS system with all components as described in specification section 281300. |
| 83. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 16 00. Please clarify the project scope for the Intrusion Detection System (IDS) for this project, i.e., conduit, cabling, and devices only, or a fully functional IDS? |
| AG Response: The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional IDS system with all components as described in specification section 281600. |
| 84. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 23 00. Please clarify the project scope for the Video Surveillance System for this project, i.e., conduit, cabling, and devices only, or a fully video surveillance system with network recorders, viewing station, server, workstations, video management system, etc.? |
| AG Response: The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional Video Survillance System with all components as described in specification section 282300. |
| 85. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 26 00. Please clarify the project scope for the Electronic Personal Protection System for this project, i.e., conduit, cabling, and devices only, or a fully functional emergency phone system (blue phones). |
| AG Response: The contractor is to provide a complete and fully functional EPPS system with all components as described in specification section 282600. |
| 86. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference Specification Section 28 31 00, Paragraph 2.5.B. Please clarify if a printer is required for the fire alarm system? Please advise on a location for the printer, is it is required? |
| AG Response: Please disregard section 2.5.B. A printer for the fire alarm system is not required. |
| 87. |
| 5/23/24 |
| A/E |
| Will you accept brand name or equal for the Hill-Rom LikoGuard Patient Lift? |
| AG Response: No, per paragraph 2.1.A, no substitutions are allowable on this project per VA request |
| 88. |
| 5/24/24 |
| VA |
| Reference: Project Tax Status. Please confirm this is a taxable project & is not tax exempt per page 44 of the RFP. |
| The “special notes regarding FAR 52.229-3” is applicable for the state of Massachusetts . The project is not tax exempt. |
| 89. |
| 5/24/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference: Lightning Protection. Specifications say “no aluminum allowed” for the lightning protection portion, however, there is a standing seam roof and metal coping on the flat roof. It is not suggested we use copper on aluminum due to corrosion that would result, please confirm Aluminum Conductors are acceptable. |
| AG Response: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Aluminum conductors are acceptable. |
| 90. |
| 5/24/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference: Conformed Documents. Please clarify which sheets have been removed from the set, we understand AF705 through AF708 have been eliminated from the project, Please confirm. Should AF709 through AF711 also be eliminated? |
| AG Response: No drawings have been removed. See drawings list for all sheets. |
| 91. |
| 5/24/24 |
| VA |
| Reference: FFE / Equipment Schedule. With these sheets being eliminated (AF705 through AF708) are we to use the Equipment Plan & Schedule on AF705? Please confirm how to proceed. |
| AG Response: No drawings have been removed. See drawings list for all sheets. |
| 92. |
| 5/24/24 |
| VA/AE |
| Reference 05 12 00, 1.5.A. and B. Can the requirement for both the fabricator and erector having to have the AISC certification be waived for this project considering the amount of structural steel is minimal? |
| AG Response: See spec section 07 42 43. |
VA Response: No waiver, AISC certification is required
| 93. |
| 5/24/24 |
| A/E |
| There appears to be a prefab canopy at exterior doors 164A and 164B, but I cannot find a specification for them. Please provide a prefab canopy specification? |
| AG Response: The basis of design is Awnex Colorado Canopy System. |
| 94. |
| 5/24/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference F4/AE503. Please provide a specification for wood look plank system that occurs at the ceilings of all the exterior canopies. This note does state that the BOD is Trespa Pura, but there are a lot of options for this product with prices varying greatly. Please provide a more specific selection. |
| AG Response: See spec section 07 42 43 |
| 95. |
| 5/24/24 |
| VA PCAC |
| Per. 2. Volume I Technical: (a) Offerors are instructed to use "...Microsoft Times New Roman 12 font...". (b) "Text lines will be single-spaced, and proposals shall be submitted using Times New Roman, with font no smaller than 12 point with normal proportional spacing." (b) "Fonts other than Times New Roman are permissible in the presentation of graphic material only." Microsoft has updated their default font twice since "Times New Roman". The most recent default being "Calibri". The new default font is now "Aptos". Please allow the font exception applied to "graphic material" to apply to an offeror's entire proposal. Specifically, current professional fonts styles that are clear and legible but at the stated 12-point size. |
| Revised to state: fonts styles that are clear and legible but at the stated 12-point size |
| 96. |
| 5/30/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference sheet AE101. Keynote F4 is shown in the upper left (plan NW) corner of Corridor 100. Is this correct? Please clarify what this note is. |
| AG Response: That keynote is incorrect, disregard |
| 97. |
| 5/30/24 |
| A/E |
| Reference sheet AE101. Keynote F7, shown in Closets 130 and 149 is for “Adjustable Wall Shelving”. I see detail F9/AE520 concerning this, but is there a specification for this product? |
| AG Response: See spec section 06 20 00 |
| 98. |
| 5/30/24 |
| A/E |
| Specification section 087113 Part 2.4B calls out dormakaba ED250s (Door 103A), ED100s (Door #163A, #163B, #163C), and ED50s (Door #110, #111, #129, #137, #141, #142, #151, #152) but some of these door numbers do not align with the door schedule and hardware sets. Please clarify which is correct? |
| AG Response: Door Schedule on Sheet AE604, Door hardware sets in Spec Section 087100 and Electrical Power plans all show the correct locations for the required auto openers. |
| 99. |
| 5/30/24 |
| A/E |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .