36C10F18R0581-042.docx
DOCX document 148 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F18R0581
About this file
36C10F18R0581 36C10F18R0581_2.docx
View the file
Other files
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C10F18R0581
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
3. DATE ISSUED
PAGE OF PAGES
4. CONTRACT NUMBER
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER
6. PROJECT NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY
CODE
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
a. NAME
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date) 12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
12b. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)
STANDARD FORM 1442
Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 52.236-1(d)
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
SOLICITATION
SOLICITATION
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
9. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within ____________ calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See _____________________________).
YES
NO
a.
Sealed offers in original and ___________________copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _____________ (hour) local time _____________________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, the date and time offers are due.
b.
An offer guarantee is, is not required.
c.
All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
d.
Offers providing less than _______________________ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
36C10F18R0581 X 07-3 -2018 None Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (003C4B) 425 I Street, NW Washington DC 20001
SAME AS BLOCK 7
E.J. Jean-Jacques 202-632-5472 The contractor shall provide all labor, materials, transportation, supervision, supplies and tools necessary to fully construct the expansion of the Sacramento Valley National Cemetery.
This project will develop approximately 50 acres of undeveloped land to provide approximately 29,300 gravesites, including both casket and cremation sites. The project will include 9,000 pre-placed crypts, 8,500 traditional in-ground cremains, 11,500 columbarium niches and 300 Hybrid Natural Burial Sites in a “green” burial section located within an open naturalized field area. The project will also add a Committal Service Shelter, expanded cortege lanes and visitor parking, and extended roadways, utilities, lighting, signage, landscaping, GPS/GIS and irrigation in accordance with the attached specifications and drawings.
This acquisition is being advertised as a 100% set-a-side for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB).
The estimated magnitude for this project is between $20,000,000 and $50,000,000.
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)of 237990 (Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction) with the size standard of $36.5 Million.
Request for Information (RFI) cut-off date and time is August 31, 2018 at 4:30 p.m. ET Offerors must be listed and verified in the Vendor Information Pages database, (http://www.VetBiz.gov) as a SDVOSB upon submission of its proposal.
The resultant contract shall be firm-fixed-price.
x x 52.211-10 X 4:00 p.m. ET 09-12-2018 X
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR
15. TELEPHONE NUMBER
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
CODE
FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within __________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
AMENDMENT
NUMBER
DATE.
20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) (
26. ADMINISTERED BY
27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
PHONE:
FAX:
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
29. AWARD
Your Contractor agrees offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further cont-this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract ractual document is necessary.
shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
TO SIGN
30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. AWARD DATE
BY
OFFER
AWARD
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK
(Include ZIP Code) (Include area code) (Include only if different than Item 14.)
(Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each) (Type or print) (4 copies unless otherwise specified) (Type or print) (Type or print) (Contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)
(Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
(Must be fully completed by offeror) (To be completed by Government)
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
Complete CLIN Schedule 101F Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (00CFM3B1) 811 Vermont AVE, NW Washington DC 20420 Department of Veterans Affairs
FMS-VA-2(101)
Financial Services Center PO Box 149971 Austin TX 78714-9971 X Evenel Jean-Jacques Contracting Officer
| CLIN |
| CLIN DESCRIPTION |
| EXPRESSED AMOUNT ($) |
| WRITTEN AMOUNT |
| 001-Base Bid |
| Construction of all work designated Phase 2 Construction of all work designated Base Bid in the contract documents including, but not limited to, temporary trailers, roads, walks, grading and utilities. |
| 002-Base Bid |
| Manufacture, deliver, off-load at site, and store 9,232 3’ x 8’ pre-placed double depth crypts. The cost for placing the crypts is included in CLIN 001. |
| 003-Add Alternate #1 |
| Construction of all work in the contract documents associated with provision and installation of 2,080 columbarium niches. |
| 004-Add Alternate #2 |
| Construction of all work associated with burial sections 45, 53 and 54 with associated roadways. |
| 005-Add Alternate #2 |
| Manufacture, deliver, off-load at site, and store 1,581 3’ x 8’ pre-placed double depth crypts. The cost for placing the crypts is included in CLIN 004. |
TOTAL CLIN 001 thru 005:
(a) Evaluation of Alternates – The Government intends to award a single contract for CLIN 001-CLIN 002 at the time of award, pending availability of funds. Add Alternates may also be awarded if there is available funding. Add Alternates are listed in the order of priority. The government will determine the amount of alternate work that each offeror can provide based upon the funds available. If only the base bid and Alternate 1 of an offer are within the available funding, then only the base bid and Alternate 1 will be considered for award to that offeror. Similarly, if the addition of both alternates in an offer remains within the funds available, then both items will be considered for award to that offeror. The government’s ability to award one or both of the Alternates may be a consideration in determining which offeror presents the best value.
Table of Contents
| PART I - THE SCHEDULE | 1 |
| SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM | 1 |
| SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Construction, Alteration, or Repair) | 1 |
| INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS | 6 |
| INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS | 7 |
| 2.1 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) | 21 |
| 2.2 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) | 21 |
| 2.3 52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999) | 21 |
| 2.4 52.222-33 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT (MAY 2010) | 22 |
| 2.5 52.225-12 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNDER TRADE AGREEMENTS (MAY 2014) | 23 |
| 2.6 52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996) | 24 |
| 2.7 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006) | 25 |
| 2.8 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) | 25 |
| 2.9 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 26 |
| 2.10 VAAR 852.228-72 ASSISTING SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED AND VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES IN OBTAINING BONDS (DEC 2009) | 26 |
| 2.11 VAAR 852.233-70 PROTEST CONTENT/ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JAN 2008) | 26 |
| 2.12 VAAR 852.233-71 ALTERNATE PROTEST PROCEDURE (JAN 1998) | 27 |
| 2.13 VAAR 852.270-1 REPRESENTATIVES OF CONTRACTING OFFICERS (JAN 2008) | 28 |
| REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS | 29 |
| 3.1 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2018) | 29 |
| 3.2 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JUL 2013) | 32 |
| 3.3 52.209-13 VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROLS TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS—CERTIFICATION (JUN 2018) | 33 |
| GENERAL CONDITIONS | 36 |
| 4.1 52.203-14 DISPLAY OF HOTLINE POSTER(S) (OCT 2015) | 36 |
| 4.2 52.204-21 BASIC SAFEGUARDING OF COVERED CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JUN 2016) | 36 |
| 4.3 52.209-9 UPDATES OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JUL 2013) | 38 |
| 4.4 52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984) | 39 |
| 4.5 52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES—CONSTRUCTION (SEPT 2000) | 39 |
| 4.6 52.211-18 VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY (APR 1984) | 39 |
| 4.7 52.219-28 POST-AWARD SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REREPRESENTATION (JUL 2013) | 40 |
| 4.8 52.222-34 PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT (MAY 2010) | 41 |
| 4.9 52.222-35 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (OCT 2015) | 42 |
| 4.10 52.222-40 NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT (DEC 2010) | 42 |
| 4.11 52.223-3 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA (JAN 1997) | 43 |
| 4.12 52.225-11 BUY AMERICAN—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNDER TRADE AGREEMENTS (OCT 2016) | 45 |
| 4.13 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS | 49 |
| 4.14 52.236-4 PHYSICAL DATA (APR 1984) | 49 |
| 4.15 52.244-2 SUBCONTRACTS (OCT 2010) | 50 |
| 4.16 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 52 |
| 4.17 VAAR 852.203-70 COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING (MAY 2018) | 55 |
| 4.18 VAAR 852.211-74 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (JAN 2008) | 56 |
| 4.19 VAAR 852.211-75 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS (JAN 2008) | 56 |
| 4.20 VAAR 852.219-10 VA NOTICE OF TOTAL SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (JUL 2016)(DEVIATION) | 56 |
| 4.21 VAAR 852.228-70 BOND PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT (JAN 2008) | 57 |
| 4.22 VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2012) | 57 |
| 4.23 VAAR 852.236-71 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 58 |
| 4.24 VAAR 852.236-72 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR (JUL 2002) ALTERNATE I | 59 |
| 4.25 VAAR 852.236-74 INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 59 |
| 4.26 VAAR 852.236-76 CORRESPONDENCE (APR 1984) | 60 |
| 4.27 VAAR 852.236-77 REFERENCE TO "STANDARDS" (JUL 2002) | 60 |
| 4.28 VAAR 852.236-78 GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION (APR 1984) | 60 |
| 4.29 VAAR 852.236-79 DAILY REPORT OF WORKERS AND MATERIAL (APR 1984) | 60 |
| 4.30 VAAR 852.236-80 SUBCONTRACTS AND WORK COORDINATION (APR 1984) ALTERNATE I (JUL 2002) | 60 |
| 4.31 VAAR 852.236-83 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (INCLUDING NAS) (JUL 2002) ALTERNATE I (JUL 2002) | 61 |
| 4.32 VAAR 852.236-85 SUPPLEMENTARY LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIONS (APR 1984) | 65 |
| 4.33 VAAR 852.236-86 WORKER'S COMPENSATION (JAN 2008) | 65 |
| 4.34 VAAR 852.236-87 ACCIDENT PREVENTION (SEP 1993) | 65 |
| 4.35 VAAR 852.236-88 CONTRACT CHANGES--SUPPLEMENT (JUL 2002) | 65 |
| 4.36 VAAR 852.236-89 BUY AMERICAN ACT (JAN 2008) ALTERNATE I (JAN 2008) | 67 |
| 4.37 VAAR 852.236-91 SPECIAL NOTES (JUL 2002) | 68 |
| 4.38 VAAR 852.246-74 SPECIAL WARRANTIES (JAN 2008) | 69 |
| 4.39 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING-- MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE (JUN 2011) | 69 |
| 4.40 MANDATORY WRITTEN DISCLOSURES | 69 |
| 4.41 IT CONTRACT SECURITY | 70 |
INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS
(a) Bidding materials consisting of drawings, specifications and contract forms may be obtained by qualified General (Prime) Contractors interested in submitting bids direct to the Department of Veterans Affairs. A maximum of 0 sets may be issued when requested. Up to 0 sets of drawings and specifications will be furnished upon request to subcontractors for their use in preparing subbids for General (Prime) Contractors. Suppliers and subcontractors listed above shall show in their requests the work or equipment for which they intend to prepare subbids.
(b) One set of drawings and specifications may be obtained by Builders Exchanges, Chambers of Commerce, Quantity Surveyors, trade and microfilming organizations.
(c) Bidding materials may be obtained only upon written application to the issuing office. Bidders should allow 5 working days after receipt of their request by the issuing office for reproduction, in addition to mail delivery time when requesting bidding material.
(d) Subcontractors, material firms and others interested in preparing subbids may, upon application to the issuing office, obtain a list of organizations, such as Builders Exchanges, Chambers of Commerce, Contractors and others, who have received bidding materials.
(e) While no deposit will be necessary, return of the bidding material, postage prepaid, to the issuing office within 10 days after date of opening bids will be required. In case no bid is to be submitted, the return of the bidding material, as soon as this fact has been determined and before the date of opening bids, is requested. If you decide not to bid on this project, please advise the issuing office of your reasons (the contracting officer should modify accordingly if a deposit is required).
(f) A bid guarantee is required in an amount not less than 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3,000,000. Failure to furnish the required bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, will require rejection of the bid in all cases except those listed in FAR 28.101-4, and may be cause for rejection even then.
(g) If the contract will exceed $100,000 (see FAR 28.102-1 for lesser amount), the bidder to whom award is made will be required to furnish two bonds, a Payment Bond, SF 25A, and a Performance Bond, SF 25, each in the penal sum as noted in the General Conditions of the Specification. Copies of SFs 25 and 25A may be obtained upon application to the issuing office.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: See Block 10 of SF1442, Page 1.
Cost Range: $20,000,000.00 to $50,000,000.00.
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS
PART I - GENERAL
1. Gender: Whenever the masculine gender is used in this solicitation and contract documents, it shall be considered to include feminine.
2. The Government makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of the electronic copies of drawings.
3. Federal Acquisition Regulations require that federal contractors register in the System for Award Management (SAM) database at http://www.sam.gov and enter all mandatory information into the system. Award cannot be made until the contractor has registered. Offerors are encouraged to ensure that they are registered in SAM prior to submitting their proposal.
4. Mailing List: Offerors are encouraged to enter their contact information in the FedBizOpps website at www.fedbizopps.gov.
5. Amendments: Amendments to Solicitation No.36C10F18R0581will be posted at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Paper copies of the amendments will NOT be individually mailed. By registering to Receive Notification list at http://www.fedbizopps.gov, you will be notified by e-mail of any new amendments that have been issued and posted. No other notification of amendments will be provided. Potential Offerors are advised that they are responsible for obtaining and acknowledging any amendments to the solicitation. Failure to acknowledge an amendment may result in your proposal being considered non-responsive.
6. A public bid opening will not occur under this RFP solicitation.
8. VETS 100: Title 38, USC Section 4212(d) and Public Law 105-339, requires that federal contractors report, at least annually, the number and category of veterans who are within their workforce. Submission of the VETS 100 reporting information can be done electronically at: http://www.dol.gov/vets/programs/fcp/main.htm. For procurement awards in excess of $25,000, this report must be completed and accepted prior to any Federal contract award. Therefore, all potential contractors are encouraged to file every year.
9. Required registration with contractor performance assessment reporting system (CPARS)
(a) As prescribed in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 42.15, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) evaluates contractor past performance on all contracts that exceed $550,000, and shares those evaluations with other Federal Government contract specialists and procurement officials. The FAR requires that the contractor be provided an opportunity to comment on past performance evaluations prior to each report closing. To fulfill this requirement, VA uses online databases located at the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) website; to include the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), the Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS), and the Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information Retrieval System (FAPPIS). This site is maintained by the Naval Sea Logistics Center. The CPARS database information is shared with the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) database, which is available to all Federal agencies.
(b) Each contractor whose contract award is estimated to exceed $7000,000 is required to register with the CPARS database at the following web address: http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/accessforms/userforms.htm (Corporate Senior Contractor Representative). Help in registering can be obtained by contacting CPARS Support E-mail (webptsmh@navy.mil) or by calling (207) 438-1690. Registration should occur no later than thirty days after contract award, and must be kept current should there be any change to the contractor’s registered representative.
(c) For contracts with a period of one year or less, the contracting officer will perform a single evaluation when the contract is complete. For contracts exceeding one year, the contracting officer will evaluate the contractor’s performance annually. Interim reports will be filed each year until the last year of the contract, when the final report will be completed. The report shall be assigned in CPARS to the contractor’s designated representative for comment. The contractor representative will have thirty days to submit any comments and reassign the report to the VA contracting officer.
(d) Failure to have a current registration with the CPARS database, or to reassign the report to the VA contracting officer within those thirty days, will result in the Government’s evaluation being placed on file in the database with a statement that the contractor failed to respond.
Project Labor Agreement Offerors may submit proposals with or without a Project Labor Agreement (PLA.) The PLA shall fully conform to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.5 Project Labor Agreement for Federal Construction Projects. No additional points or weight will be assigned to proposals submitted with a PLA. PLA proposals will not be given additional weight towards their technical proposals or towards selection of a proposal for award. Offerors who chose to provide a proposal including a PLA shall do so in compliance with FAR 52.222-33 and FAR 25.222-34 Pre-Submission Inquiries Submit inquiries, questions electronically to the Government's Point of Contact (POC). All requests for information or clarification must be submitted via email to: Evenel.Jean-Jacques@va.gov and cc Charles.Bolen@va.gov by August 31, 2018 at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time, email subject line shall include Sacramento Valley National Cemetery, RFP #: 36C10F18R0581. Unless the question deals with issues of a proprietary nature, responses to questions or comments will be posted to www.FBO.gov under Sacramento Valley National Cemetery RFP #: 36C10F18R0581. No hard copy replies will be issued. Regardless of the manner you choose to deliver your package; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to make sure it is received before the submission deadline.
Date, Time & Place of Submission Proposals shall be received at 425 I Street NW Washington, DC 20001, on or before September 12, 2018, 4:00 p.m. ET, by the Government's POC. Late submissions will not be accepted. All submitted materials will become the property of the Government and will not be returned.
Regardless of the manner you choose to deliver your package; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to make sure it is received before the submission deadline.
PART 2 – PROPOSAL PREPARATION
The government intends to solicit competitive proposals utilizing a request for proposal (RFP). This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract. The basis for award will be FAR 15 Best Value utilizing source selection procedures. The government will award a contract resulting from the solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation requirements and will provide the best value to the government considering both technical and cost factors.
A Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) shall evaluate the Offeror’s technical proposal using the following technical factors:
| Factor1 | Past Performance, |
| Factor 2 | Relevant Experience, |
| Factor 3 | Technical Approach, |
| Factor 4 | Construction/Project Management |
Technical factors are equal in importance and sub-factors within factors are equal in importance. When combined, Technical factors (Factor 1, Factor 2, Factor 3, and Factor 4) are significantly more important than cost or price The TEB will not be privy to any costing data during the evaluation of the technical proposals. Cost will be evaluated by an independent Board made up of the Source Selection Authority, CFM cost estimating team, and others as the SSA deems appropriate.
2.1 SELECTION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTINGS:
In general, proposals will be evaluated and award will be made on the basis of both cost and technical considerations most advantageous to the government as per FAR Part 15. Offerors are advised that if the technical proposals are essentially equal, the award will be made on the basis of the lowest cost. Responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors.
| 3.0 | EVALUATION PROCEDURES |
| 3.1 | TECHNICAL EVALUATION RATING SCALES |
The evaluation team will utilize the adjectival definitions below to assess each Offeror.
Factor 1 - Past Performance Rating Definitions
Past Performance Evaluation Rating Standard
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Very Low Risk |
| Performance met contract requirements and exceeded many to the Government's benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner. Performance was generally current and very relevant. Excellent probability of success with overall very low degree of risk in meeting Government's requirements. |
| Low Risk |
| Performance met contract requirements. Good quality. Minor problems may have been identified; however, contractor took satisfactory corrective action to resolve where appropriate. Performance was current and generally very relevant to relevant. Good probability of success with overall low degree of risk in meeting the government's requirements. |
| Average Risk |
| Performance met most contract requirements. Adequate quality. Problems may have been identified; however, contractor usually took adequate corrective action. Performance was current and somewhat relevant. OR Although performance exceeds expectations and was rated excellent to very good, the projects submitted were relevant or somewhat relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Fair probability of success with an average degree of risk in meeting the government's requirements. |
| Considerable Risk |
| Performance met some contract requirements. Fair quality. Problems may have been identified; however, contractor sometimes took corrective action, but not always to the owner’s satisfaction. Performance was current and generally somewhat relevant. Fair probability of success with an overall above average risk in meeting the government’s requirements. |
| High Risk |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a somewhat serious to serious nature. Contractor's corrective action was sometimes marginally effective to ineffective. Performance was current to not current and somewhat relevant to not relevant. Probability of success is questionable with an unacceptably high degree of risk in meeting the government’s requirements. |
| Neutral |
| No current and/or relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. Government personnel were unable to identify any relevant Past Performance information for the offeror or key team members/subcontractors or their key personnel. This is neither a negative or positive assessment. Unknown. |
Relevancy Rating Chart
| Adjective |
| Definition |
| Very Relevant |
| Past performance efforts involve the magnitude of effort and complexities which are essentially what this solicitation requires |
| Relevant |
| Past present performance efforts involved less magnitude of effort and/or complexities, including some of what this solicitation requires |
| Somewhat Relevant |
| Past present performance efforts involved much less magnitude of effort and/or complexities, including some of what this solicitation requires |
| Not Relevant |
| Past present performance efforts involved none or significantly less magnitude of effort and complexities, of what this solicitation requires |
Factor 2, Factor 3, Factor 4, and All Sub-factors
| Adjective |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies exceed many of the requirements identified in the RFP and will greatly benefit the Government. There are only a few minor issues identified with their technical proposal which can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions. Two or more significant strengths exist and no weaknesses or deficiencies are identified. Very low level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Very Good |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies exceed some of the requirements identified in the RFP and will have some benefit for the Government. There are some minor issues identified with their technical proposal which can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions. There is at least one significant strength exists and no more than one weakness and no deficiencies are identified. Low level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies meet all of the requirements identified in the RFP. There are some minor and major issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the major issues can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions. There may be both strengths and weaknesses, but the strengths outweigh the weaknesses and any deficiencies are minor and easily corrected. An average level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies do not meet some of the requirements identified in the RFP which will adversely impact the Government. There are serious issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the issues can possible be satisfactorily addressed through discussions. Weaknesses outweigh any strength that exist, will be difficult to correct and would require negotiations. Moderate level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies do not meet most of the requirements identified in the RFP and will adversely impact the Government. There are serious issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the issues cannot be satisfactorily addressed through discussions. The proposal has one or more significant weaknesses that will be very difficult and/or impossible to correct. High risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
3.2 PRICE/COST RATING DEFINITIONS
Offerors shall provide a detailed cost breakdown with costs itemized and totaled according to the corresponding specification section of the work. For General Condition items such as mobilization, etc. that are not specifically described shall be included in Section 01 00 00. The Government will evaluate two aspects of the Offeror’s cost proposal 1) reasonableness, 2) completeness.
The cost evaluation team will utilize the above sub-factors to evaluate the Offerors cost proposal. All sub-factors are of equal importance. The Offeror is directed to provide a cost breakdown of each CLIN Item by major feature and division of work. The Government will evaluate the breakdown against the IGCE to determine if the proposal for the various CLIN Items is balanced for the work to be performed which indicates that the Offeror understands the project requirements, and is complete in scope. Based upon the review, the Government shall assign an overall risk factor to each Offeror’s cost proposal utilizing the following ratings:
Cost Risk Rating
| Rating |
| Description |
| Low |
| Cost proposal indicates Offeror has a good understanding of the project scope and requirements, proposal is reasonable in comparison to other proposals and IGCE and within or less of the average deviation, proposal was accurate and complete, cost breakdown demonstrated a good understanding of the requirements for key construction features. |
| Medium |
| Cost proposal indicates Offeror has an average understanding of the project scope and requirements, proposal is reasonable in comparison to other proposals and IGCE and within the average deviation, proposal was complete but had one or two minor mathematical errors, cost breakdown demonstrated a some understanding of the requirements for key construction features. |
| High |
| Cost proposal indicates Offeror has a limited understanding of the project scope and requirements, proposal is or more of average of other proposals and IGCE, proposal was either not complete or had multiple mathematical errors, cost breakdown demonstrated a limited understanding of the requirements for key construction features. |
4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Technical qualifications evaluation factor consists of: (1) Past Performance, (2) Relevant Experience, 3) Technical Approach, and (4) Construction/Project Management.
4.1 FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE
Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective (How satisfactory was the Offeror’s performance on a particular recent project, 2013 to 2018). The Government may utilize PPIRS as a source for past performance data. The Offeror shall provide DUNS numbers for himself and the Offeror's core team members (Prime General Contractor, joint venture, and/or mentor-protégé partner). The focus of the Government's PPIRS query will be for construction projects recently completed or “well underway” within the past 5 years for projects of a similar size (exceeding $20M in construction costs) and complexity. A "well underway" construction project is 50-percent complete at time submission of RFP. The TEB shall consider all available PPIRS data and narrative not necessarily limited to contract amount, number and total value of contract modifications, award date, original and final completion dates, quality of workmanship, completeness of submittals, correction of deficient work; management of the work, subcontractor management, and relations between owner and General Contractor or team.
Offerors and their core team members shall provide a listing of project names (not more than ten) and current points of contact (name, phone number, and email address) so the TEB may contact them directly if need be. As noted above, the projects shall be for construction projects recently completed or “well underway” within the past 5 years and of a similar size (exceeding $20M in construction costs) and complexity. Offerors shall have their project references fill out a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form (See attachments) and email them directly to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date of the RFP. In order for the Government to solicit candid, fair comments, the Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror.
These PPQ ratings shall include the following data: current client contacts, NTP date, completion date, contract award amount, final cost, name of contractor submitting PPQ, Offeror's name, and brief description of work performed by submitting contractor. The Offeror may supplement the PPQ with additional information at their discretion.
Offerors are responsible for ensuring that the telephone numbers provided for the owner’s representative provided are accurate and that the representative is aware that the TEB may be contacting them regarding the questionnaire and the Offeror’s past performance.
At the government's discretion, past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government including but not limited to interviews with Project Managers, Contracting Officers, other VA personnel, local agencies and other outside sources.
The evaluation team will assign one overall rating to the Past Performance factor for each Offeror. The evaluation team will assign an adjectival rating based on the information provided by the references and any other sources. In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will receive a neutral rating. However, the proposal of an Offeror with no past performance history, while rated neutral in past performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government.
4.2 FACTOR 2 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Sub-Factor 2.1, Relevant Team Experience Sub-factor 2.1 holistically evaluates the Offeror, core team members, and major sub-contractors relevant project experience. Does the Offeror have the right team of major sub-contractors on board to successfully deliver the project on-time and within budget? The evaluation will focus on the specialized experience of the team and their specific experience constructing major features typical of a national cemetery including but not limited to administration building/PIC, maintenance complex, committal shelters, physical security measures including access control, intrusion detection, video surveillance, and fire alarm, mass and fine grading, wetlands mitigation, storm water management, pre-placed crypts, columbarium niches and in ground cremains, memorial walls, public assembly area with main flag pole, roadways, utility systems, site furnishings and signage, landscaping and irrigation, and geographic information system (GIS) site integration.
“Relevant” projects are defined as those construction contracts ongoing or completed within the last 5 years with comparable levels of size and complexity (construction value over $20 million and size exceeding 15-acres) to the Phase 2 Sacramento Valley National Cemetery project. Relevance/ complexity aspects include:
· VA/NCA National Cemetery projects
· State/local/private cemetery projects
· Construction/Installation of pre-placed Crypts, Columbarium Niches (NCA Standard), Memorial Walls (NCA Standard), Natural Stone Columbarium Caps, Stone Veneers, Turf Placement and Maintenance, Landscape Placement and Maintenance, Irrigation Systems, Roadwork, Cold Weather Construction, Wetlands/Environmental Remediation or Restoration.
· Building construction, Golf Courses, Regional Parks, Multiple Sport-Fields Complexes, Large Scale Site Developments with Civil Emphasis Offerors shall complete and submit summaries for up to ten (10) relevant projects. The projects must demonstrate relevant construction experience. A project performed by both the GC and partner that demonstrates relevant construction experience will be counted as one relevant project. Offerors without projects meeting the dollar and/or size thresholds described above should submit the requested information for the most relevant projects regardless of value or size.
Multi-division or regionalized firms should submit projects performed by the division/business segment that would, if selected, perform the construction of the National Cemetery project. Projects performed by other divisions/business segments may be submitted but may be considered less relevant than projects performed by the local division/business segment proposing on this project.
Offerors shall summarize the following information not to exceed two (2) pages for each project. Total page limit – 20):
· Describe the relevance to the Sacramento Valley National Cemetery project.
· Describe the project team composition (construction firms involved)
· Describe the magnitude of relevant cost and schedule
· Describe how sustainable design principles were incorporated into the project; indicate to what extent environmental program goals (e.g., Energy Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) were achieved.
· Provide project's Point of Contact (name, title, email, and phone number).
Sub-Factor 2.2, Key Personnel Sub-factor 2.2 evaluates the relevant experience of the Offeror's key personnel. Does the Offeror have the right key personnel in-place to insure a successful and timely delivery of the project? Offerors shall provide resumes for each key person identified below including their relevant experience for being assigned to this project. Though not required, consider using SF330, Part I, E. Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for presenting this information. (Total page limit – 8)
1) Project Executive
2) Project Manager
3) Project Engineer
4) Construction Superintendent
5) Quality Control Officer
6) Safety Officer
7) LEED Coordinator/Commissioning Agent
8) Qualified Project Scheduler (Resume must indicate scheduling software experience with Primavera P6)
4.3 FACTOR 3 - TECHNICAL APPROACH
This factor will be used to determine if the Offeror fully understands the project requirements, complexities, and constraints under which the work will be performed and has developed an acceptable strategy for managing and constructing the project within the given parameters. The Offeror shall demonstrate their ability to manage the contract proactively, schedule and satisfactorily complete the construction, manage project quality control and safety, incorporate procedures and plans for managing subcontractor performance, incorporate innovative techniques and practices, prioritize and address activities, respond to emergency situations/requirements, and identify any assumptions, deviations, or exceptions to the RFP.
The technical approach must clearly indicate how the Offeror would proceed if awarded the contract. The Offeror must provide a detailed description of how the proposed approach will enable the project to be constructed within time and budget, with minimal interference to existing cemetery operations and visitors, and to the highest quality standards worthy of national shrine stature. The Offeror shall demonstrate his capabilities to use various tools, processes, techniques, personnel, and sub-contractors to successfully manage and deliver this project.
· Understanding of the project, work requirements and anticipated challenges (construction)
· Description of critical construction materials & techniques to ensure timely delivery and installation
· Understanding of local conditions such as availability of materials, labor, potential impacts due to weather
· Working in an operational cemetery
· Coordination of temporary and permanent utility services.
· Punch List & Final Acceptance
· Training & Project Close Out (Total page limit – 25)
4.5 FACTOR 4 – CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
The Offeror shall demonstrate its ability to manage a project of this magnitude and complexity. The Offeror shall describe its management capabilities and demonstrate that it has the necessary organization, experience, accounting, operational controls, and technical skills (including, as appropriate, such elements as budget and schedule control procedures, quality control measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be procured and stored or services to be performed by the prospective contractor employees and its subcontractors) to design and build a National Cemetery.
Sub-Factor 4.1, Project Organizational Chart and Narrative:
The Offeror shall provide an Organization Chart and supporting narrative which includes the Offeror’s key personnel as well as major sub-contractors and their key personnel. Offeror shall demonstrate its ability to manage a project of this magnitude and that it has the necessary organization, experience, accounting, operational controls, and technical skills to build a National Cemetery. Clearly describe the prime responsible firm and key personnel as well as the roles and responsibilities of major sub-contractors (Total page limit – 2).
Sub-factor 4.2, Capacity to Perform the Work:
The Offeror and major sub-contractors shall demonstrate they have the resources and capacity to perform the work as required by the contract documents. The narrative shall include their company’s bonding capacity commitment letter (single project and aggregate) and current workload and existing staff utilization. (Total page limit – 4) Sub-factor 4.3, Quality Control Plan:
The Offeror shall describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. The Offeror shall describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. There is no need to submit a detailed quality control plan as the successful Offeror will provide that after award. The Government is interested in demonstrable capabilities to assure control quality and how the Offeror can achieve or exceed the contract’s minimum quality control system requirements. (Total page limit – 2) Sub-factor 4.4, Safety Plan:
Similar to the quality control plan submittal requirement, the Offeror shall describe the team’s approach, systems and/or procedures in-place, and capabilities to maintain a safe work environment and to respond to emergencies that may arise during the course of construction. (Total page limit – 2) Sub-factor 4.5, Schedule:
The Offeror shall submit a proposed Level 3 project schedule in the format of a Gantt chart specific to this acquisition. The schedule’s time frame shall be from Notice to Proceed through Final Acceptance in accordance with the performance period specified in the Standard Form (SF) 1442 and project description. The schedule shall be broken down by Phase and major division of work showing start and completion dates. The major work divisions shall be further broken down in sufficient detail to demonstrate the Offeror understands of the project requirements, critical path, and major milestones. The Offeror shall specify allowances for bad weather, days of the week and hours of operation, and the percentage of contract completion achieved at the end of each month of the contract period. The schedule shall be presented in 11” x 17” format, maximum 6 sheets plus a maximum 1 page (letter size) supporting narrative. (Total page limit – 7) Technical Proposal Page Limitations
| Tab |
| Description |
| Total Page Limit** |
Volume I – Technical Proposal
Factor I - Past Performance
| CPARS List and Past Performance Questionnaire List |
| No limit |
Factor 2 – Relevant Experience
| Relevant Projects |
| 20 |
| Key Personnel |
| 8 |
Factor 3 - Technical Approach
| Technical Approach |
| 25 |
Factor 4 – Construction/Project Management:
| Project Organizational Chart and Narrative |
| 2 |
| Capacity to Perform the Work |
| 4 |
| Quality Control Plan |
| 2 |
| Safety Plan |
| 2 |
| Schedule |
| 7 |
**NOTE: Cover pages and index pages do not count towards page limitations. The Government will not review any information that exceeds the page limitation, including attachments, enclosures, charts, etc. For instance, if the total page limitation for a section is 10 pages, the Government will only review 10 pages. Information submitted on the 11th page and beyond will not be reviewed.
5.0 COST/ PRICE PROPOSAL:
Under separate volume, Offerors shall provide a detailed cost breakdown with cost itemized and totaled according to the corresponding specification section of the work. For General Condition items such as mobilization, etc. that are not specifically described shall be included in Section 01.00.00. The Government will evaluate two aspects of the Offeror’s cost proposal 1) reasonableness, 2) completeness.
5.1 PRICE PROPOSAL
The offeror shall submit the following as a separate volume (Volume II).
Price Proposal - Volume II (One Original and Two Copies)
| Intro Page |
| First page of volume II must include: |
Name and address of offeror Business Arrangement Contact Name and Phone Number Email Address DUNS Number
| TAB 1 |
| Executed Solicitation, Offer and Award Form (SF1442) including supplemental pages with CLIN pricing complete on the Offer Schedule (page 6 of solicitation). Offeror shall complete Blocks 14-20C. Signed acknowledgement of all solicitation amendments. Detailed cost breakdown. |
| TAB 2 |
| Executed Bid Guarantee (SF-24) |
| TAB 3 |
| Printed copy “Representations and Certifications” as submitted on https://www.sam.gov/portal/public /SAM |
| TAB 4 |
| CD of Price Proposal |
5.1.1 Reasonableness:
FAR Part 15 does not explicitly define the term “fair and reasonable.” The concept of a fair and reasonable price has elsewhere been described as the price that a prudent businessperson would pay for an item or service under competitive market conditions, given a reasonable knowledge of the marketplace. Regardless of the precise definition, the FAR clearly establishes the need for determining a price to be fair and reasonable price before a Government contracting officer or ordering officer may award contracts or place orders. For this evaluation, the Government will utilize a comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation. The Government anticipates adequate price competition to establish price reasonableness. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal against all proposals received and as it compares to the independent government cost estimate (IGCE).
5.1.2 Completeness:
The Government shall review the Offeror’s cost proposals include verification for completeness and accuracy. The Government shall verify the proposal includes costs for all CLIN Items. The Government shall also perform a general review of the submission to verify math calculations in the schedules and perform a cross-check of amounts that are common to two or more of the schedules.
Based upon proposed cost for the CLIN Items, a determination will be made as to whether the Offeror properly understands the cost proposal instructions and properly completed the pricing tables. A determination will be made regarding whether the price appears unbalanced either for the total price of the proposal or separately priced line items. An unbalanced proposal is one that incorporates prices that are less than cost for some items and/or prices that are overstated for other items. An unbalanced cost proposal will be considered grounds for rejection of the proposal as non-responsive.
The Government intends to award a single contract for CLIN 001‐CLIN 002 at the time of award, pending availability of funds. Add Alternates may also be awarded if there is available funding. Add Alternates are listed in the order of priority. The government will determine the amount of alternate work that each offeror can provide based upon the funds available. The government’s ability to award one or both of the Alternates may be a consideration in determining which offeror presents the best value.
2.1 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price contract resulting from this solicitation.
(End of Provision)
2.2 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) (a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, of this solicitation.
(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.
(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.
(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.
(End of Provision)
2.3 52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)
(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.
(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.