25-RFP2009 - Part F - Evaluation and Method of Award - Final.pdf

PDF 131 KB Posted

Attached to
Computer-Aided Dispatch / Automatic Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL) System Replacement
Solicitation number
2009
Issued by
Alexandria City, Virginia

About this file

This is an Evaluation and Method of Award document for the City of Alexandria's Request for Proposals (RFP No. 2009) to procure a Computer-Aided Dispatch/Automatic Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL) System Replacement on behalf of DASH, the local transit authority. The RFP seeks proposals from qualified, licensed firms to provide a next-generation, turnkey CAD/AVL system that enables real-time bus tracking, wayside displays, schedule adherence monitoring, customizable reporting, incident management, historical playback, and broadcast messaging capabilities. The City will utilize the competitive negotiation method to evaluate proposals and may conduct discussions, clarifications, interviews, presentations, demonstrations, and negotiations with qualified offerors prior to final award determination.

The evaluation will be conducted using a competitive scoring methodology allocating 100 total points across seven criteria: Company Experience and Qualifications (15 points), Offeror's Understanding and Approach and Ability to Meet Required System Requirements (30 points), Innovation and Vision (10 points), Customer Support and Training (10 points), Work Plan and Timeline (10 points), References (10 points), and Cost Competitiveness (15 points). The City reserves the right to make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award; waive informalities or minor irregularities; request revised proposals or best-and-final offers; and cancel the solicitation at any time prior to contract award. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful offeror(s), but performance cannot commence until a fully executed contract and any required authorizations have been issued by the City.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
18-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit K - ITS Data Classification Policy - Final.pdf PDF
10-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment L - City of Alexandria Cloud Vendor Assessment Tool (On Premise).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
22-RFP2009 - Part C - Special Terms and Conditions - Final.pdf PDF
1-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment A - Authorized Signatory Statement - Final.pdf PDF
8-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment J - Current DASH Fixed-Route Vehicles - Final.pdf PDF
5-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment F - Subcontractors List - Final.pdf PDF
2-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment C - Required Information Form - Final.pdf PDF
17-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit J - COA - Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement - Final.pdf PDF
9-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment K - Current DASH Fixed-Route On-Board Vehicle Systems - Final.pdf PDF
23-RFP2009 - Part D - General Terms and Conditions - Final.pdf PDF
20-RFP2009 - Part A - General Information - Final.pdf PDF
16-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit I - MAPT Cooperative Rider Clause - Final.pdf PDF
7-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment I - System Requirements Matrix - Final (Updated).pdf PDF
12-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibits Title Page - Final.pdf PDF
21-RFP2009 - Part B - Scope of Work - Final .pdf PDF
19-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit L - Security Controls Contract Language - Final.pdf PDF
4-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment E - Reference Sheet - Final.pdf PDF
13-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit A - Definitions - Final.pdf PDF
11-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment M - City of Alexandria Cloud Vendor Assessment Tool (Cloud).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment D - Certifications - Final.pdf PDF
24-RFP2009 - Part E - Instructions to Offerors - Final.pdf PDF
26-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment G - No Response Form - Final.pdf PDF
15-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit H - Information Technology Ts and Cs - Final.pdf PDF
14-RFP2009 - Part H - Exhibit D - Federal or Grant Funding Provisions - Final.pdf PDF
6-RFP2009 - Part G - Attachment H - Offeror Pricing Schedule - Final (Updated).pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

City of Alexandria Request for Proposals

RFP: Computer-Aided Dispatch / Automatic Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL)

System Replacement RFP No.: 2009

Part F – Evaluation and Method of Award

This section describes the evaluation factors, evaluation process, and Method of Award applicable to this Request for Proposals (RFP). Proposals will be evaluated using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act, the requirements of this RFP, and the procedures set forth in this Part F.

The City’s evaluation is intended to identify the Proposal or Proposals that are most advantageous to the City, considering the evaluation factors identified in this RFP and their relative importance.

The City may conduct discussions, request clarifications, and negotiate with Offerors as permitted by law and as described in this Part F.

1. Evaluation Factors

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFP.

Evaluation factors may include, but are not limited to:

Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Points Company Experience and Qualifications 15 Offeror’s Understanding and Approach and Ability to Meet the Customer’s Required System Requirements

Innovation and Vision 10 Customer Support and Training 10 Work Plan and Timeline 10 References 10 Cost Competitiveness 15

2. Evaluation Process

2.1. Competitive Negotiation

2.1.1. The City will evaluate Proposals using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and the requirements of this RFP. Proposals will be reviewed to determine whether they are responsive to the requirements of the RFP and whether the Offerors are responsible and qualified to perform the requested services.

2.1.2. The City may utilize an evaluation committee or other evaluation process as deemed appropriate to review and evaluate Proposals based on the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP and their relative importance.

2.2. Discussions, Clarifications, and Negotiations

2.2.1. After initial evaluation, the City may conduct discussions and negotiations with those Offerors determined to be fully qualified and reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. Discussions may be conducted for

RFP: Computer-Aided Dispatch / Automatic Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL)

System Replacement the purpose of clarification, to ensure full understanding of the Offeror’s Proposal, or to facilitate selection of the Proposal that is most advantageous to the City.

2.2.2. As part of the evaluation process, the City may, but is not required to:

2.2.2.1. Request written or oral clarifications of Proposals;

2.2.2.2. Conduct interviews, presentations, or demonstrations;

2.2.2.3. Request revised Proposals or best-and-final offers; or

2.2.2.4. Negotiate scope, approach, staffing, schedule, or pricing.

The City may conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors concurrently or sequentially, and may discontinue discussions with any Offeror at any time.

2.3. Final Evaluation

Following completion of discussions and negotiations, if any, the City will evaluate final Proposals or best-and-final offers in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFP. The City is not obligated to conduct discussions or request revised Proposals and may make an award based on the initial Proposals received, if deemed to be in the best interests of the City.

3. Method of Award

3.1. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful Offeror(s), and a Solicitation Disposition Letter will be issued to unsuccessful Offerors.

3.2. Issuance of a Notice of Award does not authorize the Contractor to begin performance. Performance may not begin until a Contract has been fully executed by the City and any required authorizations have been issued.

4. Reservation of Rights

The City reserves the right, as permitted by law, to:

4.1. Make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award at all;

4.2. Waive informalities or minor irregularities in Proposals;

4.3. Request clarification of Proposals and conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors;

4.4. Accept or reject any Proposal, in whole or in part; and

RFP: Computer-Aided Dispatch / Automatic Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL)

System Replacement

4.5. Cancel this Solicitation at any time prior to contract award.

5. Responsibility Determination

Prior to award, the City will determine whether the apparent successful Offeror is responsible in accordance with the requirements of the Solicitation, the Virginia Public Procurement Act, and applicable provisions of the City of Alexandria.

Part F – Evaluation and Method of Award
1. Evaluation Factors
2. Evaluation Process
2.1. Competitive Negotiation
2.1.1. The City will evaluate Proposals using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and the requirements of this RFP. Proposals will be reviewed to determine whether they are responsive to the requir...
2.1.2. The City may utilize an evaluation committee or other evaluation process as deemed appropriate to review and evaluate Proposals based on the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP and their relative importance.
2.2. Discussions, Clarifications, and Negotiations
2.2.1. After initial evaluation, the City may conduct discussions and negotiations with those Offerors determined to be fully qualified and reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. Discussions may be conducted for the purpose of clarificati...
2.2.2. As part of the evaluation process, the City may, but is not required to:
2.2.2.1. Request written or oral clarifications of Proposals;
2.2.2.2. Conduct interviews, presentations, or demonstrations;
2.2.2.3. Request revised Proposals or best-and-final offers; or
2.2.2.4. Negotiate scope, approach, staffing, schedule, or pricing.
2.3. Final Evaluation
3. Method of Award
3.1. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful Offeror(s), and a Solicitation Disposition Letter will be issued to unsuccessful Offerors.
3.2. Issuance of a Notice of Award does not authorize the Contractor to begin performance. Performance may not begin until a Contract has been fully executed by the City and any required authorizations have been issued.
4. Reservation of Rights
4.1. Make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award at all;
4.2. Waive informalities or minor irregularities in Proposals;
4.3. Request clarification of Proposals and conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors;
4.4. Accept or reject any Proposal, in whole or in part; and
4.5. Cancel this Solicitation at any time prior to contract award.

5. Responsibility Determination

Evaluation Points
Evaluation Criteria
15
Company Experience and Qualifications
Offeror’s Understanding and Approach and Ability to Meet the Customer’s Required System Requirements
30
10
Innovation and Vision
10
Customer Support and Training
10
Work Plan and Timeline
10
References
15
Cost Competitiveness

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .