B09_Amendment_3__Project_Experience_Questionnaire_0003.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- YELL 326141 YELLOWSTONE MODULAR HOUSING
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0078
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template used as an evaluation subfactor for solicitation 140P2026R0078, a Department of the Interior National Park Service procurement for Yellowstone Modular Housing. The questionnaire is designed to collect and evaluate contractor experience on referenced projects relevant to the proposed work.
The template requires offerors to submit information on specific past projects, including project title, location, description, owner, and point of contact details. Offerors must list all contractors (prime and subcontractors) whose experience is being evaluated, documenting their role, trade, contract price (original and final), and performance period in calendar days (original and final). The questionnaire then requires detailed responses addressing seven key evaluation criteria: description of work performed by all listed contractors; identification of which Project Experience elements from solicitation section L each contractor's work addresses; explanation of any price changes with supporting reasons; explanation of any schedule changes with supporting reasons; description of problems encountered and resolutions implemented, with how the proposal accounts for similar issues; description of successful means and methods and whether they would be implemented on the proposed project; and any additional relevant project information. Offerors are instructed to expand response sections as needed and may use multiple pages to adequately address each question.
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0078
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .