Top 100 Department of the Air Force Contractors, FY2024
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024 Agency page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 46% of FY2024 Department of the Air Force contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $115,917,496,675 Net of deobligations, by the Department of the Air Force and its offices
- Contractors
- 13,177 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Lockheed Martin Corporation $14.8 billion, 12.3% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV · Free to reuse with credit to GovTribe (CC BY 4.0)
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $14,846,201,535 | |||
| 2 | $14,305,165,007 | |||
| 3 | $8,417,082,552 | |||
| 4 | $6,983,008,748 | |||
| 5 | $2,707,424,640 | |||
| 6 | $1,671,645,011 | |||
| 7 | $1,643,469,776 | |||
| 8 | $1,595,353,767 | |||
| 9 | $1,396,020,563 | |||
| 10 | $1,394,484,401 | |||
| 11 | $1,351,602,546 | |||
| 12 | $1,334,046,970 | |||
| 13 | $1,161,483,653 | |||
| 14 | $1,156,208,083 | |||
| 15 | $1,129,164,670 | |||
| 16 | $969,878,110 | |||
| 17 | $858,845,073 | |||
| 18 |
General Atomic Technologies Corporation
|
$811,949,194 | ||
| 19 | $715,082,196 | |||
| 20 | $714,746,460 | |||
| 21 |
L3HARRIS Aviation Products Inc
|
$679,541,718 | ||
| 22 | $650,577,127 | |||
| 23 | $605,714,780 | |||
| 24 | $559,005,237 | |||
| 25 | $555,057,698 | |||
| 26 | $512,788,695 | |||
| 27 |
Dell Federal Systems L.P.
|
$497,522,269 | ||
| 28 | $471,717,835 | |||
| 29 | $458,410,925 | |||
| 30 | $449,597,987 | |||
| 31 | $423,534,355 | |||
| 32 | $385,562,157 | |||
| 33 | $363,537,680 | |||
| 34 | $316,429,472 | |||
| 35 | $313,608,828 | |||
| 36 | $304,365,306 | |||
| 37 | $302,740,099 | |||
| 38 | $298,816,265 | |||
| 39 |
Alsalam Aerospace Industries Company
Top NAICS codes
|
$296,982,868 | ||
| 40 |
Odyssey Systems Consulting Group Ltd.
|
$293,889,829 | ||
| 41 | $291,418,818 | |||
| 42 | $286,090,898 | |||
| 43 | $278,744,830 | |||
| 44 | $268,790,759 | |||
| 45 |
Michael Baker International, LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$247,376,437 | ||
| 46 | $238,407,360 | |||
| 47 |
Rolls-Royce Solutions America Inc.
|
$236,599,324 | ||
| 48 |
CFM International Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$236,366,953 | ||
| 49 | $236,020,210 | |||
| 50 | $231,875,520 | |||
| 51 |
National Aerospace Solutions, LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$226,584,674 | ||
| 52 | $222,659,735 | |||
| 53 | $215,623,092 | |||
| 54 | $214,497,624 | |||
| 55 | $213,169,351 | |||
| 56 | $208,852,154 | |||
| 57 | $198,093,771 | |||
| 58 |
Jacobs Government Services Company
|
$195,689,397 | ||
| 59 |
Range Generation Next LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$186,574,863 | ||
| 60 |
Caci Technologies LLC
|
$183,737,632 | ||
| 61 | $183,656,066 | |||
| 62 | $183,370,077 | |||
| 63 | $177,482,068 | |||
| 64 | $175,152,951 | |||
| 65 | $174,993,529 | |||
| 66 | $174,262,078 | |||
| 67 |
IAP Global Services LLC
|
$172,117,466 | ||
| 68 | $171,358,642 | |||
| 69 | $167,919,621 | |||
| 70 | $164,191,456 | |||
| 71 | $159,885,958 | |||
| 72 | $153,077,727 | |||
| 73 | $148,205,570 | |||
| 74 | $142,175,856 | |||
| 75 | $140,769,901 | |||
| 76 | $138,658,464 | |||
| 77 | $137,828,328 | |||
| 78 | $137,327,228 | |||
| 79 | $136,630,433 | |||
| 80 | $135,843,472 | |||
| 81 |
Reliance Test & Technology, LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$132,601,315 | ||
| 82 |
Bechtel Corp
Top NAICS codes
|
$127,949,377 | ||
| 83 | $126,817,645 | |||
| 84 | $126,154,135 | |||
| 85 | $122,100,398 | |||
| 86 | $120,194,539 | |||
| 87 | $117,217,354 | |||
| 88 |
Maersk Line, Limited
Top NAICS codes
|
$111,482,407 | ||
| 89 | $111,409,428 | |||
| 90 | $110,480,688 | |||
| 91 |
Rolls-Royce Military Aero Engines Ltd
|
$110,391,931 | ||
| 92 | $108,227,963 | |||
| 93 |
Omnicom Group Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$108,115,798 | ||
| 94 | $108,016,578 | |||
| 95 | $107,974,113 | |||
| 96 | $107,010,052 | |||
| 97 | $106,455,315 | |||
| 98 | $105,045,472 | |||
| 99 | $104,996,100 | |||
| 100 | $104,218,393 |
Show 75 more
100 of 13,177 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $121 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2024 ran Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2023. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2023 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 Department of the Air Force contractors in FY2024?
1. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($14.8B), 2. The Boeing Company ($14.3B), 3. Northrop Grumman Corporation ($8.42B), 4. RTX Corporation ($6.98B), 5. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. ($2.71B), 6. Sierra Nevada Company, LLC ($1.67B), 7. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. ($1.64B), 8. United Launch Alliance, L.L.C. ($1.6B), 9. Massachusetts Institute of Technology ($1.4B), 10. BAE Systems ($1.39B).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work