View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to T-6A Avionics System Replacement Request For Information (RFI), newest first.
File Type Posted
Pre-Soliciation Conference Industry Questions-Responses_Part VII.pdf PDF
T-6A ARP Section L- Instructions to Offerors_31 Oct.pdf PDF
T-6A ARP Section M- Evaluation Factors for Award_31 Oct.pdf PDF
STC Clarification.pdf PDF
RFI_LOI_ACA.pdf PDF
RFI_Incentive Plan.pdf PDF
Pre-Soliciation Conference Industry Questions_Responses_Part V.pdf PDF
Pre-Soliciation Conference Industry Questions-Responses_Part IV.pdf PDF
Pre-Soliciation Conference Industry Questions-Responses_Part III.pdf PDF
LIST_OF_ATTACHMENTS_20 Sep 22.pdf PDF
ARP_CDRL_NSP_DRAFT_PACKAGE_14Sep2022.pdf PDF
T-6A_ARP_SOW_20Sep22_DRAFT.pdf PDF
T6A_ARP_Pricing_Matrix_DRAFT_20Sep22-PROTECTED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
T-6A_ARP_SectionL_InstructionsToOfferors_15Sep.pdf PDF
FA810622R0004_DRAFT II.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation Conference Industry Questions-Responses Part II.pdf PDF
RFI IV - ARP SRD Due NLT 8Aug22.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation Conference Industry Questions-Responses.pdf PDF
DRAFT RFP FA8106-22-R-0004_1 August 2022.pdf PDF
ATTACH - List of Attachments Draft (Updated 25 July 2022).pdf PDF
DRAFT RFP FA8106-22-R-0004_25 July 2022.pdf PDF
ATTACH - T-6 ARP Section L Draft_25 July 2022.pdf PDF
ATTACH - T-6 ARP Section M Draft_25 July 2022.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation Conferencce 11 July 20 FINAL.pdf PDF
ATTACH - List of Attachments Draft (Updated 12 July 2022).pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation Conference Registration Form.pdf PDF
DRAFT RFP FA8106-22-R-0004.pdf PDF
APPENDIX A - T-6A ARP SOW Draft.pdf PDF
ATTACH - T-6 ARP Section M Draft.pdf PDF
ATTACH - ARP Incentive Fee Plan Draft.pdf PDF
RFI III - Section II HUD Rev1 Due NLT 18May22.pdf PDF
RFI III - Section I ARP Due NLT 18May22.pdf PDF
RFI III - Section I ARP Due NLT 11May22.pdf PDF
T-6A ARP Industry Day Brief 7_Mar_22_Final.pdf PDF
Registration Form_ARP Ind_Day_3_7_2022_Final.pdf PDF
RFI II - Section III.pdf PDF
RFI II - Section III.pdf PDF
Nov Industry Questions (Gvt Response Nov 2021).pdf PDF
T-6A ARP RFI II.pdf PDF
Preliminary ARP SRD Industry Survey Matrix v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
T-6A ARP RFI II.pdf PDF
CFIT-P SRD T-6A_B 13MAR2020.pdf PDF
ARP hit list of Obsolete components.pdf PDF
2nd T-6A Industry day questions and Answers 7April2021.pdf PDF
ARP Industry Day Contractors.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
T-6A ARP Industry Day 20210319.pptx PPTX presentation
T-6A Questions and Answers 3192021.pdf PDF
T-6A Avionics System (1-on-1 Meetings) signed.pdf PDF
T-6A Avionics Industry Day Registration Form.pdf PDF
T-6A Avionics System Replacement ARP RFI.pdf PDF
Show all 50

T-6A Avionics System Replacement Request For Information (RFI) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

This is a Request for Information (RFI) only, which, as part of market research, is being issued in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 10 Market Research. This is not a solicitation, no solicitation exist.

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Training Aircraft Section (AFLCMC/WLK) is seeking to identify sources that may be capable of providing Avionics Replacement Program for the T-6A fleet, located at five

(5) CONUS operating locations with a total of 442 aircraft.

9 March 2022

Request for Information (RFI) II – Section IV

Avionics Replacement Program (ARP) (Responses due on or before 12:00 pm CST on Friday, 18 March 2022)

The purpose of this RFI is to request responses to the following sets of questions.

1. The United States Government (USG) intends to install the ARP solution across five (5) CONUS United States Air Force (USAF) bases utilizing installation teams provided by the successful Contractor.

Installations will be conducted simultaneously at:

a. Columbus AFB, MS (99 aircraft)

b. Laughlin AFB, TX (102 aircraft)

c. Vance AFB, OK (99 aircraft)

i. Plus TP-4 from Wichita, KS (1 aircraft)

d. Randolph AFB, TX (41 aircraft)

i. Plus CSO from NAS Pensacola, FL (24 aircraft)

e. Shepard AFB, TX (76 aircraft)

*Note: Aircraft quantities at location(s) are subject to change.

2. Please provide the total estimated time period (hours/days) required to install your ARP solution from beginning to completion with the aircraft ready to return to the USG.

a. What is the expected number of installation members required per aircraft team?

b. Are there any special tools, support equipment and/or testing equipment expected to be required during installation or testing prior to aircraft return to the USG?

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE OKLAHOMA

This is a Request for Information (RFI) only, which, as part of market research, is being issued in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 10 Market Research. This is not a solicitation, no solicitation exist.

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Training Aircraft Section (AFLCMC/WLK) is seeking to identify sources that may be capable of providing Avionics Replacement Program for the T-6A fleet, located at five

3. Provide details on how your company intends to fulfill the required logistical support for your ARP solution. This will be in support of 442 aircraft at five (5) CONUS USAF bases over a multi-year period.

a. Production

b. Packaging

c. Shipment

d. Storage

e. Installation

f. Testing

g. Training and Training Support

h. Special Equipment or Support Equipment

i. Product Support Plan/Lifecycle Support

4. What previous experience does your company have with USG contracts?

a. What contract types do you have experience with (i.e. Cost Type or Fixed Price)?

b. Has your company ever used Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) for payments?

c. Has your company ever participated in a USG source selection competition?

5. Does your company have an approved Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) system? YES / NO

6. How does your company plan to gain capital to support the T-6 ARP effort across five (5) CONUS USAF operating locations? Please explain.

7. Will your company require USG financing? Please explain.

8. Does your company anticipate the ability to provide a firm fixed price proposal for the T- 6 ARP effort? Please explain.

9. The USG is interested in reducing the timeframe to complete the prototype and testing phases. What types of incentives would most motivate your company to accomplish this without sacrificing quality and/or driving excessive costs?

This is a Request for Information (RFI) only, which, as part of market research, is being issued in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 10 Market Research. This is not a solicitation, no solicitation exist.

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Training Aircraft Section (AFLCMC/WLK) is seeking to identify sources that may be capable of providing Avionics Replacement Program for the T-6A fleet, located at five

10. If you are a small business interested in being the Prime contractor, is your company able to comply with FAR Clause 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting as shown below?

YES / NO. Please explain for both Services and Supplies as provided below.

52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting.

As prescribed in 19.507(e), insert the following clause:

(e) Limitations on subcontracting. By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Contractor agrees that in performance of a contract assigned a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for—

(1) Services (except construction), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. When a contract includes both services and supplies, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the service portion of the contract;

(2) Supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. When a contract includes both supplies and services, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the supply portion of the contract;

Similarly situated entity, as used in this clause, means a first-tier subcontractor, including an independent contractor, that—

(1) Has the same small business program status as that which qualified the prime contractor for the award (e.g., for a small business set-aside contract, any small business concern, without regard to its socioeconomic status); and

(2) Is considered small for the size standard under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code the prime contractor assigned to the subcontract.

Please provide responses to RFI II – Section IV questions via email to Welth Cooper at Welth.Cooper@us.af.mil and Gale VanDeventer at Gale.VanDeventer@us.af.mil on or before 12:00 pm CST on Friday, 18 March 2022.

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/19.507#FAR_19_507 mailto:Welth.Cooper@us.af.mil mailto:Gale.VanDeventer@us.af.mil

52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .