APPENDIX A - T-6A ARP SOW Draft.pdf

United States Air Force

AFLCMC/WLDJ TINKER AFB OK

STATEMENT OF WORK

T-6A Avionics Replacement Program

12 August 2022

Version DRAFT 28 June 22 v.2

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction (Aircraft and ATDs)

1.1 Background

1.1.1 Technology Maturation Risk Reduction (TMRR) (Aircraft and ATD)

1.1.2 Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase

1.1.3 Production & Deployment (PD) Phase

1.2 Scope

2.0 Applicable Documentation (Aircraft and ATDs)

2.1 General

2.2 United States Government (USG) Documents

2.2.1 Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks

2.2.2 Other USG Documents, Drawings, and Publications

3.0 Program Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.1 Program Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.1.1 Program Management Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.2 Integrated Product Development (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.2.1 Integrated Master Plan

3.2.2 Integrated Master Schedule

3.2.3 Integrated Performance Management (Aircraft Only)

3.2.4 Program Status Report (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.3 Work Breakdown Structure (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4 Sustaining Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.5 Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) (Aircraft Only)

3.6 System Collaboration (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.7 Parts Standardization (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.8 Hazardous Materials (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.9 USG Property Management, Salvage and Disposal (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.10 Intellectual Property (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11 Data Rights (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.1 Technical Data Rights

3.12 Configuration Control and Data Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.12.1 Delivery Method for CDRL Deliveries

3.13 Audits (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.1 Configuration Audits

3.14 Meeting Support (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.1 System Requirements Review (SRR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.2 System Function Review (SFR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.3 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.4 Critical Design Review (CDR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.5 Test Readiness Review (TRR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.6 Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.7 Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.8 System Verification Review (SVR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.9 Production Readiness Review (PRR) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.10 Program Management Review (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.11 Other Meetings (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.12 Post Award Conference (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.13 Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.14 System Supportability Reviews (SSR) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.14.15 Aircraft Certification Working Group (ACWG) (Aircraft Only)

3.14.16 Technical Order In-Process Review (Aircraft Only)

3.14.17 Crew Station Working Group (CSWG) (Aircraft Only)

3.15 Service Information and FAA Directive Review (Aircraft Only)

3.16 Quality Assurance Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.17 Risk Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.18 Manpower (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.18.1 Contractor Manpower Reporting

3.18.2 Subcontract Management

3.19 USG Base Access (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.20 Facility/Runway/Security Management (Aircraft Only)

3.21 Program Protection and Cybersecurity (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.21.1 Program Protection Planning

3.21.2 Supply Chain Risk Management and Counterfeit Prevention

3.21.3 Software Assurance

3.21.4 Cybersecurity

3.21.5 Secure Configuration of Commercial Software

3.22 Heads-Up Display (HUD)

4.0 Logistics Support Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

4.1 Integrated Logistics Support

4.1 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages

4.2 Support Tools, Test Equipment, Tech Data and Hand Tool List

4.3 Supportability

4.4 Support Equipment (SE)

4.5 Facilities Requirement Plan

4.6 Base Site Survey

4.7 Supply

4.7.1 Packing, Packaging Preservation and Transportability

4.8 Supply Chain Risk Management

4.9 Initial Spares

4.10 Key Logistics Criteria

4.10.1 Long-lead Procurement

4.11 Aircraft Installation Kit Proofing (Aircraft Only)

4.12 Technical Publications

4.13 Calibration

4.14 Materials Property

4.15 Government Furnished Property (GFP) Resources

5.0 Systems Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.1 Digital Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.1.1 Authoritative Source of Truth (ASOT)

5.1.2 Product Life-cycle Management

5.1.3 Model Based Systems Engineering

5.1.4 Model Based Definition

5.1.5 Digital Thread

5.1.6 Aircraft ARP Installed System Digital Twin (Aircraft Only)

5.1.7 ARP Aircraft Installed System Virtual Prototype (Aircraft Only)

5.1.8 ARP ATD Installed System Virtual Prototype (ATD Only)

5.1.9 ARP ATD Installed System Digital Twin (ATD Only)

5.1.10 Open System Architecture

5.2 Systems Engineering Management Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.3 Requirements Traceability (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.4 Interface Control Documentation – MBSE (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.5 Reliability and Maintainability Program (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.6 Human Systems Integration (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.7 Frequency Allocation (Aircraft Only)

5.8 Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) (Aircraft Only)

5.9 System Safety Program

5.10 Technical Data Packages (TDP) (Aircraft and ATDs)

5.10.1 Aircraft TDP (Aircraft Only)

5.10.2 ATD TDP (ATD Only)

5.10.3 Software (Aircraft and ATD)

5.10.4 System Integration Lab (SIL) TDP

5.10.5 Temporary 2 (T-2) Modification TDP

5.10.6 Engineering Drawing Tree

5.11 Airworthiness (AW) (Aircraft Only)

5.11.1 Systems Engineering

5.11.2 Airworthiness Process

5.11.3 Support to Obtain Airworthiness Approval

5.11.4 Mishap Incident

5.11.5 Primary Flight Reference (PFR) Endorsement

5.12 Test and Evaluation (Aircraft Only)

5.12.1 Military and Federal Aviation Administration Requirements

5.12.2 Contractor Testing

5.12.3 First Flight Readiness Review (FFRR)

5.12.4 USG Testing

5.12.5 Integration Logbook

5.12.6 Physical Prototype Aircraft (Aircraft Only)

5.12.7 Prototype ATD (ATD Only)

5.13 Deficiency Reporting (Aircraft Only)

5.14 Avionics System Integration Lab and Mock-Up (Aircraft Only)

5.15 Temporary 2 Modification (T-2 Mod) (Aircraft Only)

5.16 Avionics Integrity Program (AVIP) (Aircraft Only)

5.16.1 Electrical Wiring and Information System (EWIS) Integrity Program (Aircraft Only)

5.17 Interface Control Documentation (Aircraft and ATDs)

6.0 Aircraft Modification Requirements (Aircraft Only)

6.1 Acceptance of Aircraft

6.2 Aircraft Induction

6.3 Corrosion Control Management

6.4 Aircraft Modification (Production)

6.5 Post Installation

6.6 Aircraft Delivery

7.0 Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs)

7.1 ATD System Design

7.1.1 System/Subsystem Specification (S/SS Specification)

7.1.2 Requirements Traceability Verification Matrix (RTVM)

7.2 ATD Technical Meetings and Reviews

7.2.1 Systems Requirements Review (SRR)

7.2.2 System Functional Review (SFR)

7.2.3 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

7.2.4 Critical Design Review (CDR)

7.3 Qualification and Test Activities

7.3.1 Test Planning

7.3.2 GAT Test Readiness Review (TRR)

7.3.3 Government Acceptance Testing (GAT)

7.3.4 Deficiency Reports (DRs)

7.3.5 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

7.3.6 Physical Configuration Audits (PCAs)

7.4 Installation Program

7.4.1 Kitting

7.4.2 Installation Tools and Test Equipment

7.4.3 Interim Contract Support (ICS)

8.0 Security Management

9.0 Software Management and Planning (Aircraft and ATDs)

9.1 Software Requirements Definition

9.2 Software Design

9.3 Software Development

9.4 Software Testing

9.5 Software Configuration

10.0 Technical Orders (Aircraft Only)

11.0 Training (Aircraft and ATDs)

11.1 Training Material

11.2 Instructions

11.2.1 Operator (Aircraft and ATDs)

11.2.2 Maintenance (Aircraft)

11.2.3 Maintenance (ATD)

12.0 Over and Above (O&A) (Aircraft and ATDs)

12.1 Emergency TCTO (Aircraft Only)

12.2 Mishap Investigation Support (Aircraft Only)

13.0 Warranties (Aircraft and ATDs)

14.0 Service Summary (Aircraft and ATDs)

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

1.0 Introduction (Aircraft and ATDs)

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required for the United States Air Force (USAF) T-6A Avionics Replacement Program (ARP). The effort will replace components impacted by Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Materiel Shortages (DMSMS) and modify the fleet of 442 T-6A trainer aircraft, one (1) T-6A Test Aircraft (located at Textron Aviation Defense), one (1) T-6A Static Display (SD) to be referred to as “all T-6A aircraft” for the remainder of this document. Twenty-six (26) T-6A Operational Flight Trainers (OFT), twenty-nine (29) T-6A Instrument Flight Trainers (IFT), nineteen (19) T-6A Unit Training Devices (UTD), six (6) T-6A Egress Procedure Trainers (EPT) and six (6) T-6A Ejection Seat Trainers (EST) to improve reliability and availability while reducing system sustainment and DMSMS costs via a modern, integrated, open-system avionics suite that is better suited to address evolving pilot training strategies.

1.1 Background

The T-6A Texan II is a commercial derivative of the Beechcraft Model 3000 (referred to as the Model 3000 in this document) aircraft with a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Type Certificate number A00009WI. The aircraft is a short-range, single-engine turbo-prop aircraft used for basic pilot training and Combat Systems Officer (CSO) training. T-6A Main Operating Bases (MOBs) with aircraft, OFT, IFT, UTD, EPT and EST quantities assigned are identified in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1 (MOBs w/ Aircraft, OFT, IFT, UTD, EPT, EST Quantities)

Base T-6A Test

A/C SD OFT IFT UTD EPT EST

Randolph AFB, TX 45 0 0 3 4 2* 1 1 Laughlin AFB, TX 99 0 0 6 7 5 1 1 Vance AFB, OK 99 0 0 5 7 5 1 1 Columbus AFB, MS 99 0 0 6 6 4 1 1 Sheppard AFB, TX 76 0 0 3 4 3 1 1 CSO Pensacola, FL 24 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 Textron Beech Field, KS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tinker AFB, OK 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 442 1 1 26 29 19 6 6 *One (1) UTD located in Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) facility (Broken Arrow, Oklahoma)

1.1.1 Technology Maturation Risk Reduction (TMRR) (Aircraft and ATD)

1.1.1.1 The role of technical reviews and audits in the USG acquisition life cycle This contract includes technology maturation and risk reduction (TMRR), engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) and production and deployment (P&D). Technical reviews and audits are assessment tools that the DoD program organization uses to provide decision-makers sufficient information on the program’s technical readiness to proceed to the next phase or to the next decision point within a phase.

1.1.1.2 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR) Phase Purpose The purpose of the Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR) Phase is to reduce technology risk, engineering integration, life-cycle cost risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system. The TMRR phase conducts virtual prototyping of system elements, refines requirements, and develops the Functional and Allocated Baselines of the end-item system configuration.

1.1.1.3 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR) Phase Objectives The objective of the TMRR phase is the buying down technical risk and developing a sufficient understanding of a solution in order to make sound business decisions on initiating a formal acquisition program in the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD) Phase.

1.1.1.4 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR) Phase Process Technology development is an iterative process of maturing technologies and refining user performance parameters to accommodate those technologies that are not sufficiently mature.

The JPATS Operational Requirements Document (ORD) and T-6A ARP System Requirements Document (SRD) guide the efforts of this phase, leading to an approved System Subsystem Design Document (SSDD).

1.1.1.5 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (TMRR) Phase Reviews The Technical Reviews conducted during the TMRR Phase are:

• System Requirements Review (SRR)

• System Functional Review (SFR)

• Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

1.1.2 Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase

The Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase is where a system is developed and designed before going into production. The EMD Phase starts after a successful Milestone B which is considered the formal start of any program. The goal of this phase is to complete the development of a system or increment of capability, complete full system integration, develop affordable and executable manufacturing processes, complete system fabrication, and test and evaluate the system before proceeding into the Production and Deployment (PD) Phase.

1.1.2.1 Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase Reviews Below are the major reviews conducted during the EMD Phase:

• Critical Design Review (CDR)

• Test Readiness Review (TRR)

• First Flight Readiness Review (FFRR)

• System Verification Review (SVR)

• Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)

• Production Readiness Review (PRR)

1.1.3 Production & Deployment (PD) Phase

The Production and Deployment (PD) Phase is where a system that satisfies an operational capability is produced and deployed to an end-user. The phase begins after a successful Milestone C review and Engineering, Manufacturing and Development (EMD) Phase. This will also include the installation to 441 T-6A aircraft, not counting the three (3) T-6A modified during

EMD.

1.2 Scope

This is a one-time modification utilizing a single integrator to permanently replace all of the USAF owned and operated T-6A aircraft avionics suites and provide corresponding and equivalent configuration modifications for the new T-6A avionics suites in all USAF owned and operated Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs). ATDs are comprised of two (2) sub-groups; Flight Training Devices (FTDs) and Procedures Training Devices (PTDs). The FTD sub-group is comprised of OFTs, IFTs, and UTDs. The PTD sub-group is comprised of EPTs and ESTs Use of the word ‘T-6A’ in this document applies only to USAF T-6A aircraft and ATDs.

The modification solution for this contract utilizes an existing Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) Avionics Suite as a baseline for Virtual and Physical Prototype approval, resulting in a FAA Model 3000 Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) solution for the T-6A fleet. Solution meets the performance requirements and replaces the components listed in the T-6A ARP System Requirements Document (SRD).

The modification solution for this contract provides these logistics needs for both the aircraft and ATDs: Supply, Spares, Training Materials, Training, Operations and Maintenance Manuals developed in (or converted to) USAF format, ATD/Trainer manuals, Data Rights, Technical Data Packages (TDP), Frequency Spectrum Data (aircraft only), Cyber Security Analysis, and other data, analysis, and support as described herein.

2.0 Applicable Documentation (Aircraft and ATDs)

2.1 General

The following specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of the documents are those listed in the latest issue of the Department of Defense Index (DODI) of Specifications and Standards and supplement thereto.

2.2 United States Government (USG) Documents

2.2.1 Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks

Table 2-1 (Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks)

Standards Document Number

Document Title Date

MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance 7 Feb 2001 MIL-PRF-32216 Evaluation of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Manuals 17 Oct 2006 MIL-HDBK-516C Airworthiness Certification Criteria 12 Dec 2014 MIL-STD-1472G Department of Defense HCI Style Guide 11 Jan 2012 MIL-STD-31000A Technical Data Packages 26 Feb 2013

MIL-STD-38784A Department of Defense Standard Practice for Manuals, Technical: General Style and Format Requirements 25 Aug 2011

MIL-STD-464C Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems 1 Dec 2010

MIL-STD-882E Department of Defense Standard Practice for System Safety 11 May 2012 MIL-STD-130-N Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property 26 Aug 2019 MIL-STD-1472H Human Engineering 17 Jan 2019

MIL-S-8512D Support Equipment, Aeronautical, Special, General Specs for Design 13 May 2002

MIL-T-28800E Test Equipment for Use with Electrical and Electronic Equipment 4 Jan 1994 TM-86-01Q Air Force Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) 1 Oct 2017 SPI 01-553-0693 Special Packaging Instruction

MIL-STD-2073/1E

Change 4 DoD Standards Practice For Military Packaging 22 Apr 2019

MIL-STD-129R

Change 2 DoD Standard Practice Marking for Shipment and Storage 27 Sep 2019

MIL-STD-1366E Interface Standard for Transportability Criteria 31 Oct 2006 MIL-STD-881E Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Material Items Oct 2020

MIL-STD-3022

Documentation of Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) for Models and Simulations

Apr 2012

ASTM D3951-10 Standard Practice for Commercial Packaging 18 Feb 2016

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) CDRL # Document Number Document Title Version

A001 DI-MISC-81397D Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMPP) Report Rev D

A002 DI-MGMT-80368A Monthly Status Report Rev A A003 DI-ADMN-81249C Conference Agenda Rev C A004 DI-ADMN-81373 Presentation Material A005 DI-ADMN-81250C Conference Minutes Rev C A006 DI-MISC-81241 Airworthiness Directives/Service Bulletins/Advisory Data A007 DI-ADMIN-81401C Contract Change Proposals (CCP) Rev C

A008 DI-MGMT-81861C Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR) Rev C

A009 DI-SESS-80642E Notice of Revision (NOR) Rev E A010 DI-MGMT-81453B Data Accession List (DAL) Rev B A011 DI-SESS-80640E Request for Variance (RFV) Rev E A012 DI-SESS-81732 Request for Waiver (RFW)

A013 DI-SESS-82329

Technical Report-Study/Services, Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program (MECSIP) Master Plan

(MP)

A014 DI-QCIC-80126B USG Industry Data Exchange Program Alert Response (GIDEP) Rev B

A015 DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report – Study/Services Rev B

A016 DI-SESS-80294B Maintenance and Test Support Equipment Requirements List Rev B

A017 DI-SESS-81022E Configuration Audit Summary Report and Certification Rev E A018 DI-SESS-81785A System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) Rev A A019 DI-IPSC-81431A System/Subsystem Specification (SSS) Rev A A020 DI-IPSC-81433A Software Requirements Specification (SRS) Rev A A021 DI-SESS-81731 Traceability Data

A022 DI-SAFT-81932 Critical Safety Items (CSI)/Critical Application Item (CAI) List

A023 DI-SESS-81766/T Airworthiness Specification, Certification Basis A024 DI-NDTI-80566A Test Plan Rev A A025 DI-QCIC-81536A Test Information Sheet (TIS) Rev A A026 DI-NDTI-80809B Test/Inspection Report Rev B A027 DI-NDTI-81284 Test and Evaluation Program Plan (TEPP) A028 DI-NDTI-80603A Test Procedure Rev A A029 DI-SESS-81248B Interface Control Document (ICD) Rev B A030 DI-IPSC-81436A/T Interface Design Description (IDD) Rev A A031 DI-SESS-81495B Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Report Rev B A032 DI-SAFT-81626 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) A033 DI-SAFT-80101C System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (SSHAR) Rev C A034 DI-SAFT-81563 Accident/Incident Report A035 DI-SESS-80776B Technical Data Package (TDP) Rev B A036 DI-MGMT-81501A Weight and Balance Report for Aircraft Rev A

A037 DI-FACR-80966A Training Facilities Report (TFR) Rev A A038 DI-IPSC-81432A System/Subsystem Design Description (SSDD) Rev A A039 DI-MGMT-81797 Program Management Plan (PMP) A040 DI-IPSC-81442A Software Version Description (SVD) Rev A A041 DI-IPSC-81427B Software Development Plan (SDP) Rev B A042 DI-IPSC-81438A Software Test Plan (STP) Rev A A043 DI-IPSC-81435B Software Design Description (SDD) Rev B A044 DI-IPSC-81439A Software Test Description (STD) Rev A A045 DI-IPSC-81440A Software Test Report (STR) Rev A A046 DI-IPSC-81441A Software Product Specification (SPS) Rev A

A047 DI-TMSS-80527D Commercial Off-The-Shelf Manuals and Associated Supplemental Data Rev D

A048 DI-MGMT-81948 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Plan

A049 DI-MGMT-80004A/T Management Plan, Airworthiness A050 DI-SESS-81121A Baseline Description Document

A051 DI-SESS-81984A Commercial Derivative Aircraft (CDA) Airworthiness Certification Rev A

A052 DI-SESS-81768/T Airworthiness Certification Criteria Report, Compliance Report

A053 DI-SAFT-80102C Safety Assessment Report A054 DI-MGMT-82133/T Requirements Traceability Verification Matrix A055 DI-ILSS-80095 Integrated Logistics Support Plan A056 DI-SAFT-80103C ECP System Safety Report

A057 DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report-Study/Services, Cybersecurity Risk Impact Evaluation Recommendation (CIER)

A058 DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report-Study/Services, Cyber Security Controls A059 DI-FACR-80976 Facilities Plan A060 DI-EMCS-81827 Spectrum Certification Spectral Characteristics Data A061 DI-ILSS-80872 Training Materials, Avionics System Integration Lab (ASIL)

A062 DI-IPSC-81443A Software User Manual (SUM), Avionics System Integration Lab (ASIL)

A063 DI-QCIC-80553A Acceptance Test Plan Rev A A064 DI-NDTI-80603A Test Procedure, Acceptance Test Procedures Rev A A065 DI-QCIC-81891 Acceptance Test Report A066 DI-MGMT-80004A Management Plan, Systems Integration Plan Rev A A067 DI-EMCS-81543A Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment (SSRA) Rev A A068 DI-MISC-81283 Specification Requirement Verification Matrix (SRVM) A069 DI-SES-81646C Configuration Audit Plan A070 DI-EMCS-81540B Electromagnetic Environmental Effects A071 DI-EMCS-81541B E3 Verification Procedures A072 DI-EMCS-81542B E3 Verification Reports

A073 DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report – Study/Services, Substantiating Analysis

A074 TBD TBD

A075 DI-FNCL-82162 Cost and Hour Report A076 DI-MGMT-82164 Quantity Data Report A077 DI-FNCL-81765C Contractor Business Data Report Rev C A078 DI-MGMT-82165 Technical Data Report A079 DI-SESS-80858D Supplier’s Configuration Management Plan Rev D

A080 DI-MGMT-81808 Contractor’s Risk Management Plan A081 DI-MGMT-81809 Risk Management Report

A082 DI-MISC-80508B Technical Report – Study/Services, ATD Architecture Analysis Report Rev B

A083 DI-IPSC-82249A Software Assurance Evaluation Report Rev A A084 DI-MGMT-82273 DMSMS Health Assessment Report A085 DI-ILSS-80868 Special Equipment Tools and Test Equipment List A086 DI-MISC-82104 Site Survey Report (SSR) A087 DI-SESS-82364 Digital System Model

A088 DI-SESS-82351/T

Acquisition and Sustainment Data Package (ASDP) Product Engineering Design Data and Associated Lists

(EDDAL)

A089 DI-SESS-81496B/T Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Block Diagrams and Mathematical Models Report Rev B

A090 DI-SESS-82322 Built-in-Test Fault Tree A091 DI-SESS-81497B/T Reliability and Maintainability Predictions Report Rev B A092 DI-MGMT-82188 Accident Incident Report

A093 DI-MISC-80508B

Technical Report – Study/Services, Primary Flight Reference (PFR) Endorsement – Display Information Package

Rev B

A094 DI-SAFT-81300B Mishap Risk Assessment Report (MRAR). Rev B A095 DI-DRPR-81961B Engineering Drawing Tree Rev B

A096 DI-CMAN-81516/T As Built Configuration List (ABCL) – Modified Item and Funding Source

A097 DI-MGMT-82099A Open Systems Management Plan (OSMP). Rev A A098 DI-MGMT-81468A Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR) Rev A A099 DI-MGMT-81334D Contract Work Breakdown Structure Rev D A100 DI-MISC-81398D Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan Rev D A101 DI-SESS-81903 As-Built Configuration (ABC) Bill of Material (BOM) List.

A102 DI-ADMN-81306 Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP) A103 DI-MGMT-80004A Management Plan, Anti-Tamper (AT) Plan Rev A

A104 DI-FNCL-80449 Design-To-Cost/Life Cycle Cost and Variance Analysis Report

A105 DI-HFAC-81833A Human Systems Integration Report Rev A A106 DI-MGMT-80258B Material Improvement Project (MIP) Report Rev A

A107 DI-SESS-80858D/T Supplier’s Configuration Management Plan, Software Configuration Management Plans Rev D

A108 DI-ILSS-80872/T Training Materials

A109 DI-MSSM-81751 Department of Defense (DOD) Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification and Validation (V&V) Plan

A110 DI-MSSM-81752 Department of Defense (DOD) Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification and Validation (V&V) Report

A111 DI-MISC-81562

Temporary Non-Standard Modification Documentation and Marking Requirements for Test Equipment in Aerospace Vehicles and Related Ground Support Equipment, T-2 Modifications for EMD Aircraft

A112 DI-PSSS-80134B Proposed Spare Parts List Rev B A113 DI-NDTI-80566A Test Plan/System Test Plan Rev A A114 DI-MGMT-82188 Accident Incident Report

A115 DI-PACK-80120D Preservation and Packing Data Rev D A116 DI-NDTI-81307A First Article Qualification Test Plan and Procedures Rev A A117 TM-86-01Q Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR)

A118 DI-MGMT-80368A Monthly Status Report-Frequency Allocation Application Status Rev A

A119 DI-QCIC-81794A Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) Rev A A120 DI-NUOR-81411A Engineering Evaluation Report (EER) Rev A

2.2.2 Other USG Documents, Drawings, and Publications

Table 2-2 (Other USG Documents, Drawings, and Publications) Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Document Number Document Title Version/Date FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting 26 May 2022 DFARS 252-246-7005 Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items 28 Apr 2022

DFARS 252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls 28 Apr 2022

DFARS 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting 28 Apr 2022

DFARS 252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support 28 Apr 2022

DFARS 252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment of Services 28 Apr 2022

DFARS 252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DOD Assessment Requirements 28 Apr 2022

NIST 800-37 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations 23 Apr 2021

Regulations, Instructions, and Technical Orders (TO) Document Number Document Title Version/Date Department of Defense 5500.7-R Joint Ethics Regulations (JER) Aug 2013

DoDI 4161.02 Accountability and Management of USG Contract Property

Change 2 31 Aug 2018

DoDI 5000.02 Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework 23 Jan 2020

DoDI 5230.24 Distribution Statements on Technical Documents Change 3 15 Oct 2018

DoDI 8500.01 Cybersecurity Change 1 7 Oct 2019

DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT)

Change 3 29 Dec 2020

TO 00-5-3 AF Technical Order Life-Cycle Management 15 Feb 2019

TO 00-35D-54 USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution 15 May 2015

TO 1-1-689-3 Cleaning and Corrosion Control 16 Apr 2014

TO 1-1B-50 Basic Technical Order for USAF Aircraft Weight and Balance 1 Apr 2008

Forms Document Number Document Title Version/Date DD Form 1149 Requisition and Invoice/Shipping Document 1 Jan 2016 E2ESS Stepstone Application for Equipment Frequency Allocation DD Form 2357 Hazardous Component Safety Data Statement Apr 1999 FAA Form 8130-3 Authorized Release Certificate, Airworthiness Approval Tag 1 Feb 2014 OSHA Form 3514 Material Safety Data Sheet DD Form 1653 Transportation Data for Solicitations 28 Apr 2022 AFMC Form 158 Packaging Requirements 24 Apr 2015

Other Documents Document Number Document Title Version/Date AETCMAN 36-2601 Special Contract Training 3 Mar 2020 AFI 11-2T-1, Volume 3 T-6A Operations Procedures 16 Jul 2015 AFI 17-101 Air Force Risk Management Framework (RMF) Program 6 Feb 2020 AFI 17-220 Spectrum Management 8 Jun 2021 AFI 62-601 Airworthiness 10 Jun 2022 AFI 64-106 Contractor Labor Relations Activities 3 Oct 2019 AFI 63-101/20-101 Integrated Life-Cycle Management 30 Jun 2020 DoDI 5000.89_DAFI99- 103 Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation 15 Mar 2022

AFI-91-202 The USAF Mishap Prevention Program 11 Mar 2020 DoDI 5000.83_DAFI63-

Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage 8 Mar 2022

AFPD 17-1 Information Dominance Governance and Management 12 Apr 2016 AIA NAS 411 Hazardous Materials Management Plan 30 Sep 2020

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Standard Process Cybersecurity Assessment and Authorization

Version: 3.3 (released 21 October 2021).

Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) No.

Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems 27 Mar 2014

DODI 5000 series Defense Acquisition Guidebook Feb 2014

DoD Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Preparation and Use Guide

Version 0.9, 21 Oct 2005

DoD Program Protection Plan Outline and Guidance Version 1.0

DoD Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition Version 1.0, August 2006

Software Assurance Countermeasures in Program Protection Planning Mar 2014

Technology Readiness Assessment Guidance Apr 2011

RTCA/DO-160G Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment 8 Dec 2010

RTCA/DO-178C Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification 13 Dec 2011

FAA Order 8110.101A Type Certification Procedures for Military Commercial Derivative Aircraft 25 Feb 2015

AS9100C Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation 15 Jan 2009

10 USC § 2320 Rights in Technical Data 31 Dec 2011 Title 44 USC Chapter 35 Coordination of Federal information Policy

14 CFR 21.101 Designation of Applicable Regulations 4 Dec 2012 AWB-130 Certification Basis 2 Jun 2021 AWB-140 Compliance Report 2 Jun 2021 AWB-150 Airworthiness (AW) Risk Assessment and Acceptance 30 Sep 2020 AWB-360 Commercial Derivative Aircraft Airworthiness 1 Sep 2021

IEEE 15288.1-2014 IEEE Standard for Application of Systems Engineering on Defense Programs 15 May 2015

IEEE 15288.2-2014 IEEE Standard for Technical Reviews and Audits on Defense Programs 15 May 2015

DoD 4500.9-R Defense Transportation Regulation 27 Dec 2019

3.0 Program Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall already have a proposed avionics suite with a Technical Readiness Level 8 IAW Technology Readiness Assessment Guidance, which utilizes standard COTS Line Replaceable Units (LRU) components versus unique to T-6A to facilitate future system growth.

The Contractor shall meet the requirements documented in the T-6A ARP SRD. The Contractor’s proposed avionics suite shall have demonstrated successful operation on Beechcraft Model 3000 or equivalent aircraft. Equivalent aircraft is defined as FAR Part 23 aircraft of similar size and weight. The Contractor’s proposed solution shall be FAA certified via STC for use in all USAF T-6A aircraft within twenty-two (22) months of contract award.

Issues, anomalies, findings or problems that arise during any phase of the T-6A ARP with regard to any existing or unknown T-6A aircraft conditions/sensor readings/configurations/installations/fit issues/interfaces/communications with any existing T-6A aircraft systems, avionics, structures, including but not limited to those that arise during design, development, prototyping, testing, kit proof installation, ground test, flight test, and production installations shall have the root cause and corrective actions identified, corrected and implemented at the expense of the contractor.

The Contractor’s solution shall consist of all efforts required to provide an industry standard avionics replacement suite IAW the T-6A ARP SRD. This effort includes, but is not limited to, the following:

a) Perform engineering and design for Physical Prototype efforts required to obtain the FAA STC for the replacement avionics suite on all T-6A aircraft. The Contractor modified T- 6A Physical Prototype shall, at the end of testing, be a fully operational and fully FAA certified aircraft and meet the requirements of the T-6A ARP SRD

b) Perform engineering and design for Physical Prototype efforts required to obtain USG approval for a Physical Prototype modification of a T-6A UTD such that it fully represents the replacement avionics suite on T-6A aircraft, including avionics operations and visual representation as described in the T-6A ARP SRD. The Contractor shall accomplish a Physical Prototype on a T-6A UTD. The Contractor modified T-6A Physical Prototype UTD shall, at the end of testing, be a production representative ARP modified UTD, fully operational, and meet the requirements of the T-6A ARP SRD

c) USG operational test and evaluation for aircraft and Government Acceptance Testing (GAT) for ATDs

d) Perform installation and operational checks of the approved modification on up to all T-6A aircraft (not counting Physical Prototype)

e) Integrated logistics support which includes initial spares for the aircraft and ATDs and any additional support/maintenance equipment required for the modification

f) Technical data development for aircraft and ATDs

g) Training development for Test Pilots, aircraft maintenance technicians, ATD maintainers and instructors

3.1 Program Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall provide internal management and control on all matters related to this SOW, from conception to final completion. A USG Program Manager (PM) shall be designated to serve as a Contractor focal point for the USG and will provide oversight and direction to contracting personnel to ensure successful fulfillment of all SOW requirements within given budget and time schedules. The Contractor shall track program progress, and immediately report (apart from status reports) to the PM and PCO any activity and/or deliverable which will not be achieved as scheduled, citing the cause, contributing factors, impacts, and resolutions to get back on schedule in writing (email acceptable). Failure to do so shall be viewed as an insufficient program management performance, justifying corrective measures to be taken by the USG. The Contractor shall provide programmatic support for the entire acquisition effort.

Programmatic support shall include, but not be limited to, development of schedules; evaluation of alternatives and development of necessary plans and procedures. Program Management Reports will be provided monthly or IAW CDRL A008, DI-MGMT-8186C, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR).

The Contractor shall establish a T-6A Avionics Replacement Program execution organization and shall apply sound management principles to assure success of the program. The Contractor shall provide all manpower, material, equipment, components, skills, expertise and knowledge, to meet all required Physical Prototype modifications, all T-6A aircraft and ATD modifications, to fully and successfully complete contract. The Contractor shall identify and maintain a single point of contact, PM, for all tasks required for the program. The PM shall be responsible and shall have authority for the control and coordination of all work performed under this contract.

The Contractor shall ensure the USG is provided unlimited access to the Contractor’s T-6A ARP work areas any time work is being performed.

The Contractor shall establish and maintain sufficient resources to support financial control, risk management, aircraft, and training device modification/production throughout the period of performance of the T-6A ARP.

The Contractor shall establish and maintain effective working relationships with the T-6A Program Office (PO), T-6 Ground Based Training Systems (GBTS) PO, and the OEM of the components being installed. The Contractor shall establish a vendor relationship via Letter of Intent (LOI) with OEMs to satisfy contractual expectations related to required intellectual property.

The Contractor’s T-6A ARP design solution shall comply with applicable federal, state, local, foreign and international Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) laws and regulations. Aircraft support requirements will comply with Air Force Occupational, Safety and Health (AFOSH) Standards.

The Contractor shall initiate all contract changes via a contract change proposal IAW CDRL A007, DI-ADMN-81401C, Contract Change Proposals.

3.1.1 Program Management Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall prepare a Program Management Plan (PMP) that coordinates all activities related to this SOW to ensure successful completion. It is incumbent upon the Contractor to coordinate all internal events and cooperate fully with USG personnel. The PMP shall be presented to the USG for review and approval, and shall illustrate an overall accomplishment plan, allocating responsibilities, and identifying interdependencies and agreements with all parties involved to systematically accomplish the SOW effort. This initial plan will serve as the basis for this work effort, providing a reference to track progress thereby giving the Contractor’s PM a way to measure program accomplishments and delays. The Contractor shall plan for, organize, manage, and control configuration management efforts to meet project objectives and document the results. All schedule, management, engineering, configuration and development issues shall be coordinated and reported to the USG IAW CDRL A039, DI-MGMT-81797, Program Management Plan.

3.2 Integrated Product Development (Aircraft and ATDs)

To facilitate management of the T-6A ARP, the Contractor’s program team shall be organized into Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), each responsible for specific elements of product development, deployment, and support. The Contractor’s IPTs shall jointly develop, maintain, and use a Contractor IMS that is completely integrated with the IMP and SOW. The IMS shall follow the guidance in the DoD IMP and IMS Preparation and Use Guide, Version 0.9, dated 21 October 2005, and Format 6 of DI-MGMT-81861C IAW CDRL A008, DI-MGMT-81861C, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report.

3.2.1 Integrated Master Plan

The Contractor shall update and maintain the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) to reflect changes in the program. Contractor shall use the IMP as a tool to manage the T-6A ARP effort. Contractor shall deliver to the USG IAW CDRL A008, DI-MGMT-81861C, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report.

3.2.2 Integrated Master Schedule

The Contractor shall develop an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) IAW CDRL A008, DI-MGMT-81861C, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report, that depicts the projects original, current and baseline schedules for all the USG activities, major milestones and key events. The IMS shall reflect/identify any changes in schedule, dates, milestones and events. The IMS shall include at a minimum, discrete tasks/activities, consistent with all authorized work, and relationships necessary for successful contract completion.

Subcontractor(s) discrete work shall be incorporated as tasks within the prime IMS at a level necessary for a realistic critical path. The IMS is a single integrated network that also contains significant external interfaces, USG furnished equipment/information/property and relationship dependencies for the entire contractual effort. The Contractor shall maintain the IMS and present updates at each monthly meeting.

All tasks in the Contractor’s IMS shall be logically networked with predecessors and successors.

The Contractor’s IMS shall contain the planned Events, Accomplishments, Criteria and Tasks from contract award through completion of the contract. At a minimum, the Contractor’s IMS and IMP shall include the events and milestones identified in Appendix E. If scheduled performance occurs on a USG installation, the Contractor’s IMS shall observe all federal holidays and local base closure procedures. Task completion in the Contractor’s IMS shall be updated to the USG

IAW CDRL A008, DI-MGMT-81861C, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report.

3.2.3 Integrated Performance Management (Aircraft Only)

3.2.3.1 Integrated Performance Management System

The Contractor shall establish, maintain, and use, in the performance of this contract, an integrated performance management system.

The Contractor shall provide a monthly Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR) IAW CDRL A098, DI-MGMT-81468A, Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR).

3.2.4 Program Status Report (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall submit program status reports. Separate reports shall be submitted for aircraft and ATDs. The report shall include a brief statement of the overall project status, covering the accomplished technical activities and development, objectives of efforts, summary results of efforts, identification of major problems/deficiencies with impact, and recommended solutions to the USG IAW CDRL A002, DI-MGMT-80368A, Status Report.

3.3 Work Breakdown Structure (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall submit a Level 2 WBS IAW guidance MIL-STD-881E and shall be incorporated in the IMS. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) IAW CDRL A099, DI-MGMT-81334D, Contract Work Breakdown Structure.

3.4 Sustaining Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall provide engineering support for T-6A aircraft fielded with the ARP modification. Contractor support shall include:

a) Respond to deficiencies found with the avionics components and the avionics integration IAW TO 00-35D-54 "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation and Resolution." CDRL TBD. Responses to Deficiency Reports (DRs), including repair/replace the deficiency if found to be a manufacturing or installation deficiency

b) Provide technical assistance and response when field maintainers find that repairs are needed beyond that are beyond the ARP technical data that supports field repairs, IAW TO 00-25-107 "maintenance Assistance."

c) Provide recommended updated verbiage for technical data when it is found by field maintainers and T-6A Program Office to be deficient.

d) Respond to T-6A Program Office inquiries about status of the above listed actions

3.5 Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) (Aircraft Only) The contractor shall systematically collect and report to Cost Assessment Data Enterprise (CADE) and the USG the actual contract costs and technical information based on the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Deputy Director Cost Analysis (DDCA), or delegated authority-approved CSDR plan (Appendix TBD) IAW the CSDR Manual, DoDM 5000.04. CSDR deliverables shall be prepared IAW the instructions contained in the most recently approved versions of the Data Item Descriptions (DIDs): Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) (DI-FNCL-82162); Quantity Data Report (DI-MGMT-82164); Technical Data Report (DI-MGMT- 82165); Contractor Business Data Report (DI-FNCL-81765C).

The Contractor shall submit electronically the Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) (CDRL A075), the Quantity Data Report (QDR) (CDRL A076), the Contractor Business Data Report (DD Form 1921-3) (CDRL A077), and the Technical Data Report (CDRL A078) using the CADE CSDR Submit-Review System. The required form and file type for each CSDR deliverable is specified in its DID.

Data submitters must register through the CADE website (http://cade.osd.mil) and possess a DoD-approved ECA digital certificate or DoD-issued CAC to obtain a CADE Portal account and be authorized to upload CSDR content. Users can obtain access by submitting user information about themselves and their organizations to the CADE Portal and requesting a CSDR Submitter user role. All CADE Portal accounts need to be renewed at least annually.

Prime contractors are responsible for flowing down CSDR requirements contained in their prime contracts to all subcontractors who meet the reporting thresholds specified in DoDI 5000.73, or as required by the Cost Working-Group Integrated Product Team (CWIPT). This requires subcontractors to electronically report directly to the CADE Portal using the CSDR Submit- Review System IAW a DDCA or delegated authority-approved subcontractor-specific CSDR plan.

IAW Statute 10 USC 2334 Sec. 842, DoDI 5000.02, DoDI 5000.73 and DFARS 252.234-7003 and 252.234-7004, “Notice of Cost and Software Reporting System”:

a) This solicitation includes:

1) The OSD DDCA or delegated authority-approved CSDR Plan for the contract, DD Form 2794; and

2) The related Resource Distribution Table (RDT). If a RDT is not complete, the contractor must prepare a RDT using the work breakdown structure on the approved CSDR plan

b) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall use:

1) A documented standard CSDR process that satisfies the guidelines contained in the DoDM 5000.04, CSDR Manual;

2) Management procedures that provide for generation of timely and reliable information for the Cost and Software Data Report (CSDR) deliverables required by the data items of this contract;

3) The OSD DDCA or delegated authority-approved CSDR Plan for this contract, DD Form 2794, and the related Resource Distribution Table as the basis for reporting according to the required CSDR DIDs;

4) The Contractor shall require and flow down the requirement for CSDR deliverables from subcontractors regardless of tier with a subcontract that exceeds $50 million or subcontracts valued between $20 million and $49 million that are designated by the USG as being high risk, high value, or high technical interest. If, for subcontracts that exceed $50 million the Contractor changes subcontractors or makes new subcontract awards, the Contractor shall notify the

USG.

c) CSDR Readiness Review (CSDR-RR), also known as CSDR Post Award Conference

(PAC):

1) A CSDR-RR Meeting will be held within sixty (60) calendar days of contract award to include a discussion of the CSDR process that satisfies the guidelines contained in the DoDM 5000.04, “CSDR Manual,” and the requirements in the OSD DDCA, or delegated authority-approved CSDR Plan for the contract, DD Form 2794, and related Resource Distribution Table.

d) The applicable required reports will be in the form of CDRLs listed below:

1) CDRL A075 Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile)

2) CDRL A076 Quantity Data Report

3) CDRL A077 Contractor Business Data Report (CBDR) (DD Form 1921-3)

4) CDRL A078 Technical Data Report

e) The CCDR requirements are outlined per Attachment TBD, CSDR Plan (DD Form 2794). Inclusive in the plan is the information required by WBS for the contractor, schedule for report submission, specific information regarding report configuration and format, and other pertinent facts.

3.6 System Collaboration (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall be required to collaborate with the USG and/or aircraft/ATD OEMs for the COTS integration to ensure an effort is made to minimize and standardize common support equipment, hardware, software and testing.

3.7 Parts Standardization (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall implement a parts control and standardization program to standardize parts to the maximum extent possible. The Contractor shall require all Subcontractor(s) and vendors to comply with these parts control requirements. The parts control requirements apply to all newly developed equipment and any modified portions of off-the-shelf equipment. The counterfeit protection plan will be accomplished IAW FAR 252.246.7007, FAR 252.246.7008, and SAE 5553.

3.8 Hazardous Materials (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local laws, regulations, and requirements and any additional military base hazardous material requirements when applicable.

The Contractor shall implement a Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP). The scope is to assure appropriate consideration is given to the elimination/reduction of hazardous substances, and to the proper control of hazardous substances that are not eliminated for the aircraft, aircraft components, ATDs, ATD components and associated support items (related to this modification) throughout all phases of the aircraft and ATD life-cycles. The guidelines of AIA NAS 411, HMMP, shall be used IAW CDRL A001, DI-MISC-81397D, Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMPP) Report, IAW CDRL A100, DI-MISC-81398D, Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan.

The Contractor shall review all drawings and processes for compliance with Environmental Protection Agency guidelines on ODSs. Hazardous materials contained in or generated by the T-6A aircraft avionics suite or ATD equipment shall be documented in the review findings by including the following information for each instance:

a) Material identification as to type, quantity, and potential hazards

b) Safety precautions and procedures necessary during handling, use, storage, transportation, and disposal

c) A copy of the Material Safety Data Sheet (OSHA Form 3514 or DD Form 2357), as appropriate

d) Recommended substitutes for hazardous material that cannot be employed at the military sites

3.9 USG Property Management, Salvage and Disposal (Aircraft and ATDs) The Contractor shall safely protect and retain all USG property and provide the USG a monthly Contractor managed “Government Property” report IAW CDRL A002, DI-MGMT- 80368A, Monthly Status Report. This includes any LRUs, their supporting parts, and equipment (including all obsolete parts) during the EMD phase.

At Post EMD and movement to the Production contract, all GFP assets will be transitioned to the COMBS contract. The USG has contracted all T-6 supply support/supply chain management functions to include property management, salvage, and disposal issues to be managed by the

COMBS contract. A transition will be agreed and coordinated between the COMBS contract, USG, and T-6A ARP Contractor/integrator prior to and as part of the production contract.

If and when any disposal or salvage issues must be resolved during EMD, a specific request will be submitted to USG PCO with a proposed solution, and any associated costs.

Upon USG written approval, the ARP Contractor shall properly dispose of specifically named LRUs, supporting parts and equipment, and unused wiring as the result of the execution of this contract.

Disposal shall be IAW all applicable local, State, and Federal Regulations.

The Contractor shall safely return all requested Contractor managed/removed LRUs, supporting parts, and equipment to the USG per written USG instructions.

No less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to commencement of Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP), the USG will provide disposition instructions for the specifically named LRUs to be returned. The Contractor shall make a shipment of these accumulated LRUs every ninety (90) calendar days to a location to be determined by the USG.

3.10 Intellectual Property (Aircraft and ATDs)

Intellectual Property (IP) delivery and licensing rights shall be negotiated according to Title 10 USC Code 2320. The Contractor shall identify all IP rights associated with the Technical Data Packages (Drawings, Tech Orders, and specs) as well as Commercial Computer Software to include (source, executable and…