AMENDMENT 2 W91QVN24R00070002.docx

W91QVN24R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

1. The purpose of this amendment is to revise the PWS, delete CLIN 0004 and answers to questions received as follows:

a. Delete CLIN 0004, Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) from the bidding schedule. As a result, the Offeror shall not propose the price for this CLIN.

b. As a result of the above, the Para. 9.1.8 CMMS of the Attachment#1 PWS was revised.

c. The below is the answers to the questions received.

Q1. PWS 9.6, if the facility systems or equipment has reached the end of its life and needs to be replaced entirely, and the total cost is less than $500, is repair considered unscheduled repair and maintenance?

A1. The facility systems or equipment are considered as parts/material so when the total cost including parts/ materials and labor hours more than $500.00 per one repair is interpreted as unscheduled maintenance and repair work. Para. 9.6. was revised to add labor hours.

Q2. PWS 9.1.8 Computerized Maintenance Management System. (CLIN 0004). Is the contractor required to buy the software program referred to in section 9.1.8? If that's the case, could you provide details about the buyer to determine the purchase price?

A2. CLIN 0004 was removed from the bidding schedule and revise the PWS 9.1.8, CMMS. Therefore, the Offeror shall not propose the price for this CLIN. Please refer to the revised PWS.

Q3. The $500 of PWS 9.1.2 is based on the total amount of parts/materials and labors, while the $500 of 9.6 is based on the parts/material amount. Which of the two criteria is correct?

A3. Refer to the A1 of this amendment.

Q4. FACTOR 2 - KEY PERSONNEL. Can someone who is not currently employed by a prime contractor be acknowledged as a key individual if they possess the necessary practical experience and certification, provided that they will join and work at the prime contractor after receiving the award?

A4. Refer to the A3. of the Amendment 0001.

Q5. RFP 46-47 Page. (3)Section 3 (Subcontracts): "If there is nothing applicable to this item, do I not have to fill it out?"

A5. If it is not applicable, please fill out “None”.

Q6. RFP Page 47. (4)Section 4 (New Corporate Entities): If there is nothing applicable to this item, do I not have to fill it out?"

A6. Refer to A5.

Q7. RFP Page 47. (5)Section 4 (Submission): If there is nothing applicable to this item, do I not have to fill it out?"

A7. Refer to A5.

Q8. PWS 9.1.8 Computerized Maintenance Management System. (CLIN 0004). "Is it correct that the CLIN for the Computerized Maintenance Management System only includes the BASE YEAR and does not have the 1ST OPTION to 4TH OPTION?"

A8. Refer to A2.

Q9. SUBFACTOR 2- QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER (QCM). "Can the higher qualifications of 'Professional Engineer' or 'Master Engineer' be recognized as valid credentials for this role?"

A9. Yes, it could be eligible if the higher or above licenses issued by ROK: 'Professional Engineer' or 'Master Engineer' existing in same category required to be QCM to meet the solicitation requirement.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0004

The CLIN description has changed from Computerized Maint. Management System to Reserved.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall perform the Service for Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) IAW Para 9.1.8. of PWS.Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLIN

To:

Reserved The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 1.00 from 1.00 to 0.00.

The unit of issue Job has been deleted.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0004 has been changed from:

POP 16-NOV-2024 TO

15-AUG-2025

W3BH USA GARRISON HUMPHREYS

348TH QM CO SP 52

CAMP HUMPHREYS BLDG 1603

PYEONGTAEK 17982

KOREA, SOUTH

011-82-53-470-65 FOB: Destination

WT4KBR

To:

POP 16-NOV-2024 TO

15-AUG-2025

W3BH USA GARRISON HUMPHREYS

348TH QM CO SP 52

CAMP HUMPHREYS BLDG 1603

PYEONGTAEK 17982

KOREA, SOUTH

011-82-53-470-65 FOB: Destination

WT4KBR

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (SEP 2023)

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Each paragraph should be single spaced and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape mode.

b. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

c. Pre-Award Survey: A pre-award survey may be conducted on firms, to include joint venture partners and subcontractors indicating firm commitments to this acquisition that were included with the proposals. The pre-award survey is to determine the prospective contractor’s responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1. Information may be requested as required by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three (3) working days of the request.

d. Site Visit: Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the price of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award. The site orientation schedule is as follows:

Time and Place: 9 MAY 24, Thursday at 14:00 hrs at Adams (도두리) Gate at Camp Humphreys.

· Maximum of 2 individuals per offeror be attended.

· The attendee must bring a photo identification card (주민등록증 또는 운전면허증).

NOTE: Any Offerors who are interested in participation of the site orientation should be present at not later than 9 MAY 24 at 14:00 hrs and also provide a list of attendants’ information (company name, attendant name, address & telephone number, ROK ID number and vehicle license plate number) to Yi, Hye Kyong at hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil and Chong, Hyon Suk at hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil by 30 APR 24 13:00 hrs for the installation access process.

e. Each volume shall be submitted electronically via email to hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil and hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil by 1300 hours on the closing date of RFP as follows:

· Write Solicitation Number (including amendment number, if applicable) in the Subject Line

· Identify Company Information including Company Name, POC, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in the Proposal.

· Provide Name and Phone Number of the email sender at the bottom of the email.

· The only acceptable file formats are PDF, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel.

· The maximum size of e-mail is limited 10MB to the Government email address.

· Emails sent from Commercial email services of Gmail and Hotmail are acceptable. Other commercial email addresses may be blocked.

The confirmation of receipt of email to ensure that all submittal requirements are received prior to the solicitation closing date and time is Offeror’s responsibility. Contact number is (0503) 355-0633 or (0503) 355-3373.

f. All questions should be emailed to Yi, Hye Kyong and Chong, Hyon Suk within 3 calendar days after the site visit is conducted. Questions received after this date and time may not be answered.

Representations and Certifications: The Offeror shall submit the following:

(1) Complete Standard Form 1449 and Standard Form 30 (if any amendment is issued)

(2) “Tax Exemptions-Republic of Korea”: The offeror shall complete/SUBMIT the certifications, Special Exercise (Petroleum) Tax for the total five years (Base plus four options)-POL fuel coupon.

(3) FAR Clause 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment AND 52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES--REPRESENTATION (OCT 2020): The Offeror shall check mark in checkbox on the representation whether the Offeror WILL or WILL NOT provide the covered telecommunications equipment or services and DOES or DOES NOT use covered telecommunications equipment. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph of this section if the Offeror responds “WILL” or "DOES" in paragraph of this section. (If the both Clauses have been in SAM (https://www.sam.gov) already, you are not required to check mark).

g. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the Source Selection Evaluation Board to fully ascertain each Offeror’s capability to perform all of the requirements of this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make a contract award determination without any discussions with Offerors. The Government intends make a final determination as to whether an offer is acceptable or unacceptable solely on the basis of the proposals as submitted, without requesting any further information.

Nevertheless, Offerors may, at the discretion of the Government, be asked to provide minor clarifications regarding their proposals. Furthermore, if it is deemed necessary the Government may, at its sole discretion, establish a competitive range in order to conduct discussions in accordance with FAR 15.306(a)(3). In that case, the Government retains the right to limit the competitive range to the “most highly rated proposals” for the purpose of efficiency.

Contractor Team Arrangements: A contractor team arrangement (CTA) means an arrangement in which two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor or a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. A CTA is not an arrangement in which two or more companies form a separate legal entity, such as a corporation or limited liability company, to act as a potential prime contractor.

(1)The Government will, when applicable, recognize the integrity and validity of CTAs when identified and fully disclosed to the Contracting Officer. Offerors proposing a CTA must identify and fully disclose contractor team arrangements relationships in their offer/proposal. A CTA must be in writing.

(2)For offerors proposing a partnership/joint venture CTA: The CTA must do business under the CTA name, must register in SAM under the CTA name, must provide documents vesting an individual with the authority of the partners to bind the CTA, and must designate a single point of contact for the CTA.

(3)The Government will perform a responsibility determination on a CTA just as it would on any prospective contract awardee.

2. PROPOSAL FILES:

a. Format: The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging: All of the proposal files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price information (CLIN structure of the RFP and Submission of Offer Breakdown under Factor 6) to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007.

c. Content Requirement: All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion.

(i) VOLUME I – TECHNICAL: The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

FACTOR 1- PRIME CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS REGISTRATION AND LICENSES. The Offeror shall provide a copy of Prime Contractor's Mechanical and Gas Facility Construction business license (기계가스설비공사업) to include main business category in mechanical equipment work issued by ROK Government . The license of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime Contractor’s license.

FACTOR 2 - KEY PERSONNEL: The Offeror shall provide an individual (personal) resume for each of key personnel listed as below. All resumes must clearly identify the following, as required:

-Name of Key Personnel -A description qualifying work experience include contract/project information -Complete point of contact of employer (including name and phone no) and validating personnel -Length of work experience (year/month/date – year/month/date) -A Copy of License if applicable -A Copy of certificate of experience issued by the Korea Construction Engineers and Association (한국건설기술인협회) or Health Long-term Nursing Insurance Payment Certificate (가입자 건강.장기요양보험료 납부확인서) issued by National Health Insurance Corporation (국민건강 보험공단).

SUBFACTOR 1-CONTRACT MANAGER (CM): The Offeror shall provide CM's resume with at least two (2) years of experience as a CM in repair and maintenance of indoor/outdoor matural Gas Lines, Boilers, Heating Systems and Cooling Systems within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

SUBFACTOR 2- QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER (QCM). The Offeror shall provide QCM's resume with at least three (3) years of experience as QCM in the field of Heating System and Cooling system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide a copy of valid QCM's license of Engineer General Machinery (일반기계기사) or Engineer Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Machinery (공조냉동기계기사) or Engineer Energy Management (에너지관리기사), or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 3- SAFETY OFFICER (SO): The Offeror shall provide SO's resume with at least three (3) years of experience as SO working with the design, construction or maintenance of indoor/outdoor Natural Gas Lines, Boilders, Heating Systems, Coolding Systems and Kitchen Equipment within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide a copy of valid SO's license of Engineer Industrial Safety (산업안전기사), or higher grade issued by ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 4- AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEER: The Offeror shall provide Air-Conditioning Engineer's resume with at least three (3) years of experience in the field of repair and maintenance of Cooling system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide a copy of valid Air Conditioning Engineer's license in Engineer Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Machine license(공조냉동기계기사), or higher grade issued by ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 5- GAS ENGINEER: The Offeror shall provide Gas Engineer’s resume with at least two (2) years of experience in in repair and maintenance of gas lines and equipment within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide a copy of valid Gas System Engineer's license of Engineer Gas (가스기사) or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

FACTOR 3 – PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE: The Offeror shall provide evidence of experience during calendar years of 2020, 2021 and 2022 amounting to over W15,000,000,000 (150억 - 3 years total) in any one area of the construction, repair and maintenance of buildings with HVAC. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime Contractor’s prior experience.

The Offeror shall be evaluated on providing evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Title of the contract/Project

- A detail description of work completed

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount and Square Footage

- Name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization (Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Construction Association of Korea (대한건설협회), or Mechanical Construction Contractors Association of Korea (대한기계설비건설협회), or Facility Maintenance Association of Korea (대한시설물유지관리협회), or a copy of contract include value (total amount) and length of contract.

Note: The prior experience without a copy of performance certificate (실적증명서) issued by Construction Association of Korea (대한건설협회), Korea Mechanical Construction Contractors Association (대한기계설비건설협회), or Facility Maintenance Association of Korea (대한시설물유지관리협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered. Amount of contract is multiple contracts that add up to W15,000,000,000 (150억) for three (3) years.

FACTOR 4 - TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT

SUBFACTOR 1- TECHNICAL APPROACH: The Offeror shall provide Technical Approach that demonstrate how the Contractor will complete all tasks contained in PWS paragraph 9.0 and show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements specifically heating, cooling, kitchen equipment and gas system. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. The Offeror will be evaluated on providing Staffing Plan that clearly demonstrates how the contractor plans to provide the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, retention policy, and any other information pertinent to the execution of this requirement. The Offeror will be evaluated on providing the proposed Key Personnel and Non-Key Personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license and responsibilities of each position supporting ITM of Mechanical Equipment. The feasibility of the proposed Staffing Plan will be assessed against the Offeror’s overall Technical Approach to ensure the Offeror has proposed an adequate number of qualified personnel in appropriate labor categories to satisfy all PWS requirements.

SUBFACTOR 2- QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QCP): The Offeror shall provide a QCP that demonstrates the Offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call responses, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QCP, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP. The plan shall include followings at minimum:

· A description of the preventive maintenance system to cover all services. The description shall specify the areas to be inspected on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspection, and the title and organizational placement of the inspectors.

· A description of the methods to be used to identify and prevent defects in the quality of service performed.

· A description of the methods to update inventory of the equipment of the operation and maintenance of Communication center.

· A description of the methods to maintain and utilize computerized maintenance management system for accounting maintenance works and track the status of maintenance works.

· A description of the method to maintain the record for preventive maintenance and repair works.

SUBFACTOR 3-PHASE-IN PLAN (PIP): The Offeror shall provide Phase-In Plan that clearly demonstrate how the Offeror will prepare for 100% full performance in accordance with the PWS and transition. The Offeror shall include all general and administrative (G&A) functions and pre-hiring activities normally accomplished by contractor prior to physical phase-in performance. The Offeror shall describe in detail how the contractor will provide required personnel to perform the tasks in accordance with the PWS and milestone driven schedule of key events and procedures needed to assure readiness and 100% full performance under the contract by the end of the three (3) months phase-in period. The approach must be designed to ensure successful transition to full performance of work by the conclusion of the phase in period.

(ii) VOLUME II – PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE: This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts.

*NOTE: Major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that will perform more than 10% of the Offeror’s proposed price. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during calendar year of 2020, 2021 and 2022, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 238220 required by the RFP. Data concerning the Offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 (Contract Description): This section shall include the following information in the following format:

a. Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and Unique Entity Identity (UEI) number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

b. Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’s name, e- mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

c. Government’s technical representative/Contracting Officer’s Representative and current email address, telephone and fax numbers.

d. Government’s contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.

e. Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award Monitor’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

f. Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.

g. Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc).

h. Awarded price/cost.

i. Final or project final price/cost.

j. Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

k. Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 (Performance):

a. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.

b. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The Offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The Offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the Offeror or proposed subcontractor. The Offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

c. For all contracts, the Offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the Offeror’s delivered product.

(3) Section 3 (Subcontracts): Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the Offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime Offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% percent of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors.

(4) Section 4 (New Corporate Entities): New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its offices and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

(5) Section 5 (Submissions): Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an Offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

(iii) VOLUME III - PRICE

FACTOR 6 - PRICE: The Offeror shall provide complete price proposal to include:

Schedule of Services (CLINs/SubCLINs) of the RFP for base year plus four (4) one-year options (total five (5) years).

Any escalation in additional option year pricing shall be identified.

The Offeror(s) shall round all unit prices to the nearest whole Korean Won (KRW) thereby eliminating the use of any decimal points.

The Offeror(s) shall submit a Summary Sheet of total proposed amount per each year.

Price Proposal by: Identify Offeror’s Name

CLIN 0001

CLIN 0002

CLIN 0003

CLIN 0004

TOTAL AMOUNT

GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT FOR BASE+4 OPTION YEARS

Submission of Offer Breakdown: In accordance with FAR 52.212-2 (Evaluation – Commercial Items), price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness, reasonableness, and balance as specified in the Evaluation Factor 6. In order to perform price analysis, the Government requires that Offerors submit a complete offer breakdown list including sufficient details relative to direct and indirect rates, subcontracts, material, equipment, and other necessary direct costs.

--------- End of ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS -----

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

A. BASIS FOR AWARD (ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEM):

(1) In accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 15, the award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the RFP# W91QVN24R0007 evaluation factors: Prime Contractor’s Business License, Key Personnel, Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience, Technical and Management, Past Performance, and Price/Cost.

(2) In accordance with FAR 15.101-1, Trade-Off process, an award may be made to other than the lowest priced Offeror. However, the Government will not pay a substantially higher amount for a minimal increase in capability.

(3) The Governments intends to execute a single Requirements with Firm Fixed Price (FFP)CLINs contract for Inspection, Testing and Maintenance (ITM) of Mechanical Equipment at USAG Humphreys.

(4) The Offeror must receive an Acceptable rating for the Factor/Subfactor under Technical Phase I in order to be considered under the Technical Phase II Tradeoff criteria. Technical Phase I, Factors 1, 2 and 3 will be rated as Acceptable/Unacceptable only (The unsuccessful letter including debriefing instruction will be sent to the Offerors who rated as “Unacceptable” under Technical Phase I).

(5) Under the Technical Phase II, the Technical Evaluation Factor 4 (Technical and Management), 5 (Past Performance), and Factor 6 (Price) are listed in descending order of importance from Factor 4 (most important) down to Factor 6 (least important). In order to be considered, for award, the offeror must receive an at least an Acceptable rating in all factors and subfactors in Phase II. A rating of Marginal or Unacceptable under any Subfactor would result in a Marginal or Unacceptable rating for that Factor.

(6) Under Technical Phase II, only Factors and Subfactors will receive a rating. All subfactors under Factor 4 are of equal importance. All evaluation factors and significant subfactors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more importance than cost or price.

(7) Evaluation Factors Relative Order of Importance: All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than the price factor.

B. FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS TO BE EVALUATED:

The following factors/sub-factors will be used to evaluate offers:

TECHNICAL PHASE I (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE):

FACTOR 1 - PRIME CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS LICENSES:

FACTOR 2 - KEY PERSONNEL:

SUBFACTOR 1 - CONTRACT MANAGER (CM)

SUBFACTOR 2- QUALITY CONTROL MANANAGER

SUBFACTOR 3- SAFETY OFFICER (SO)

SUBFACTOR 4- AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEER

SUBFACTOR 5- GAS ENGINEER

FACTOR 3 - PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE

TECHNICAL PHASE II (TRADE-OFF)

FACTOR 4 -TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT

SUBFACTOR 1-TECHNICAL APPROACH

SUBFACTOR 2-QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QCP)

SUBFACTOR 3-PHASE-IN PLAN (PIP)

FACTOR 5-PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 6-PRICE

C. EVALUATION APPROACH: All proposal will be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST)

(1). The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors are as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response: The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the Offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.

(2). The technical evaluation is divided into the following two phases:

TECHNICAL PHASE I (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE): Under Technical Phase I, proposals will be evaluated in accordance with following rating method:

RATING DESCRIPTION

FACTOR 1-PRIME CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS LICENSES.

The Offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of Prime Contractor 's Mechanical and Gas Facility Construction business license (기계가스설비공사업) to include main business category in mechanical equipment work issued by ROK Government . The license of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime Contractor’s license.

FACTOR 2 - KEY PERSONNEL: Key personnel will be evaluated based on the individual (personal) resume for each of key personnel listed as below. All resumes must clearly identify the following, as required:

-Name of Key Personnel -A description qualifying work experience include contract/project information -Complete point of contact of employer (including name and phone no) and validating personnel -Length of work experience (year/month/date – year/month/date) -A Copy of License if applicable -A Copy of certificate of experience issued by the Korea Construction Engineers and Association (한국건설기술인협회) or Health.Longterm Nursing Insurance Payment Certificate (가입자 건강.장기요양보험료 납부확인서) issued by National Health Insurance Corporation (국민건강 보험공단).

SUBFACTOR 1 - CONTRACT MANAGER (CM): The Offeror will be evaluated on providing CM's resume with at least two (2) years as a CM in repair and maintenance of indoor/outdoor Natural Gas Lines, Boilers, Heating Systems and Cooling Systems within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

SUBFACTOR 2- QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER (QCM). The Offeror will be evaluated on providing QCM's resume with at least three (3) years of experience as QCM in the field of Heating System and Cooling system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of valid QCM's license of Engineer General Machinery (일반기계기사) or Engineer Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Machinery (공조냉동기계기사) or Engineer Energy Management (에너지관리기사), or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 3- SAFETY OFFICER (SO): The Offeror will be evaluated on providing SO's resume with at least three (3) years of experience as SO working with the design, construction or maintenance of indoor/outdoor Natural Gas Lines, Boilders, Heating Systems, Coolding Systems and Kitchen Equipment within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of valid SO's license of Engineer Industrial Safety (산업안전기사), or higher grade issued by ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 4- AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEER: The Offeror will be evaluated on providing Air-Conditioning Engineer's resume with at least three (3) years of experience in the field of repair and maintenance of Cooling system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of valid Air Conditioning Engineer's license in Engineer Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Machine license (공조냉동기계기사), or higher grade issued by ROK Government.

SUBFACTOR 5- GAS ENGINEER: The Offeror will be evaluated on providing Gas Engineer’s resume with at least two (2) years of experience in repair and maintenance of gas lines and equipment within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of valid Gas System Engineer's license of Engineer Gas (가스기사), or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

*NOTE: Proposed key person only serve one position. For example, CONTRACT MANAGER (CM) cannot be both CONTRACT MANAGER (CM) and QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER (QCM).

FACTOR 3 – PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE: The Offeror will be evaluated on providing evidence of experiences in calendar years 2020, 2021 and 2022 amounting to over W15,000,000,000 (150억 - 3 years total) in any one area of the construction, repair and maintenance of buildings with HVAC. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime Contractor’s prior experience.

The Offeror shall be evaluated on providing evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Title of the contract/Project

- A detail description of work completed

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount and Square Footage

- Name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization (Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Construction Association of Korea (대한건설협회), or Mechanical Construction Contractors Association of Korea (대한기계설비건설협회), or Facility Maintenance Association of Korea (대한시설물유지관리협회), or a copy of contract include value (total amount) and length of contract.

*NOTE: The prior experience without a copy of performance certificate (실적증명서) issued by Construction Association of Korea (대한건설협회), Korea Mechanical Construction Contractors Association (대한기계설비건설협회), or Facility Maintenance Association of Korea (대한시설물유지관리협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered. Amount of contract is multiple contracts that add up to W15,000,000,000 (150억) for three (3) years.

TECHNICAL PHASE II (TRADE-OFF)

FACTOR 4 -TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT

Technical Approach and Related Risk will be evaluated as shown on Table 1 below. This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, certainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings as shown below definition:

Strength. An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Blue

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

SUBFACTOR 1-TECHNICAL APPROACH: The Offeror's Technical approach will be evaluated the Offeror's demonstrated ability to complete all tasks contained in PWS paragraph 9.0 and show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements specifically heating, cooling, kitchen equipment and gas system. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. The Offeror will be evaluated on providing Staffing Plan that clearly demonstrates how the contractor plans to provide the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, retention policy, and any other information pertinent to the execution of this requirement. The Offeror will be evaluated on providing the proposed Key Personnel and Non-Key Personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license and responsibilities of each position supporting ITM of Mechanical Equipment. The feasibility of the proposed Staffing Plan will be assessed against the Offeror’s overall Technical Approach to ensure the Offeror has proposed an adequate number of qualified personnel in appropriate labor categories to satisfy all PWS requirements.

SUBFACTOR 2: QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QCP): The Offeror will be evaluated on providing for QCP that demonstrates the Offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call responses, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QCP, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP. The plan shall include followings at minimum:

- A description of the preventive maintenance system to cover all services. The description shall specify the areas to be inspected on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspection, and the title and organizational placement of the inspectors.

- A description of the methods to be used to identify and prevent defects in the quality of service performed.

- A description of the methods to update inventory of the equipment of the operation and maintenance of communication center.

- A description of the methods to maintain and utilize computerized maintenance management system for accounting maintenance works and track the status of maintenance works.

- A description of the method to maintain the record for preventive maintenance and repair works.

SUBFACTOR 3: PHASE-IN PLAN (PIP): The Offeror will be evaluated on providing for Phase-In Plan that clearly demonstrate how the Offeror will prepare for 100% full performance in accordance with the PWS and transition. The Offeror shall include all general and administrative (G&A) functions and pre-hiring activities normally accomplished by contractor prior to physical phase-in performance. The Offeror shall describe in detail how the contractor will provide required personnel to perform the tasks in accordance with the PWS and milestone driven schedule of key events and procedures needed to assure readiness and 100% full performance under the contract by the end of the three (3) months phase-in period. The approach must be designed to ensure successful transition to full performance of work by the conclusion of the phase in period.

FACTOR 5- PAST PERFORMANCE:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS.

(1) Evaluation of past performance shall be in accordance with the proposal of the past performance.

(2) The Government will focus its inquiries on the Offeror’s (and major subcontractor’s) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including cost, schedule, performance and management of subcontractors. A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process. Therefore, Offerors will be reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts within the last three (3) years (calendar year 2020, 2021 and 2022) in their proposal. Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror will be assigned a “neutral confidence rating” and its proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its proposal and data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Government or commercial contracts for same or similar services as compared to the NAICS 238220.

(3) Offerors shall submit Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded within the last three (3) years (calendar year 2020, 2021 and 2022) which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources but is not compelled to rely on all of the information available.

(4) The past performance factor considers each Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in repair and maintenance of administrative building with heating, cooling, kitchen equipment and gas system system during calendar year of 2020, 2021 and 2022. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. Offerors’ recent and relevant past performance may consist of Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror performed during calendar year of 2020, 2021 and 2022 using the licenses as specified in Technical Phase I, Factor 1 above. Relevant past performance is that constitutes the same or similar services based on size, scope, complexity and contract type.

· RECENCY: The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the Offeror’s past performance. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information.

· RELEVANCY: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Relevancy is not rated separately; however, the following criteria (see Table 2) will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include similarity of service/support, complexity; dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming.

TABLE 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

- QUALITY ASSESSMENT: The third aspect assesses the overall quality of the Offeror’s past performance. Documented results from telephone interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

(5) Performance Confidence Assessment: Utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

TABLE 3 – PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS