Section_J_Attachment_11.docx
DOCX document 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DY-12-R-0046
About this file
This document contains an investor deal summary template for an energy savings performance contract project. The template requires information on the project investment breakdown by energy conservation measure, key project dates from task order award through agency acceptance, one-time pre-acceptance payments and utility rebates, the ESCO's portion of financing costs, guaranteed annual cost savings amounts subject to measurement and verification and from operations and maintenance, estimated versus guaranteed savings comparisons, post-acceptance performance period payments, thresholds for savings shortfalls triggering withheld payments, likelihood of events triggering withheld payments, the applicable financial index, and the risk assignment matrix. The frequency of government payments under resulting contracts is also to be specified.
A separate federal contract opportunity notice indicates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center in Huntsville intends to solicit energy savings performance contract proposals with a total program capacity of $1.5 billion. The objective is to acquire energy project design, construction, and operation services to meet Energy Policy Act goals. Multiple indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts with a 5-year base and option are planned, including at least three set aside for small businesses. Services may include improvements to boiler and chiller plants, building automation systems, HVAC, lighting, building envelopes, distribution systems, power generation, and process improvements. The geographic scope covers the U.S., territories, and overseas locations in Germany and Korea.
Section J Attachment 11
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION J, ATTACHMENT 11 (J-11)
INVESTOR DEAL SUMMARY TEMPLATE
Project: [Insert Project Title here]
Date: [Insert date here]
ESCO: [Insert ESCO Name]
1. Project Investment Note: Data to be taken from Schedule TO-2
ECM description
Direct Expense ($) Percentage of total direct expense (%)
Indirect Expense ($)
Profit ($)
Implementation price ($)
Totals
2. Key Project Dates Note: Provide anticipated dates for the milestones listed
| Key event |
| Date |
a. Period over which to hold firm:
(i) offered premium over index interest rate
(ii) financier’s component of financing procurement price
b. Anticipated TO award
c. Anticipated financial closing
d. Index rate lock
e. Notice to proceed w/constructiona
f. Construction progress milestonesa
25% completion
50% completion
75% completion
100% completion
g. Agency acceptance aThe ECM Progress Schedule, which is required in the final proposal, may be substituted for these items.
3. Payment to Reduce Total Financed Amount Note: For payments such as those listed below, provide dollar amounts and anticipated dates in which payment is expected to be made
| Type of payment |
| Amount ($) |
| Anticipated date |
a. One-time pre-acceptance payments
b. Utility rebate
c. Other ECM financial incentive (i.e., state system benefit fund)
4. ESCO’s Portion of Financing Procurement Price Note: Provide estimate of the ESCO’s portion of the finance procurement price.
Amount ($)
ESCO's portion of financing procurement price (FPP), (e.g., payment and performance bonds, contractor costs for arranging financing, etc)
5. Summary Risk Analysis on Guaranteed Cost Savings (Payment Stream) Note: In this section, the guaranteed cost savings for Years 1, 2 and 3 shall be “sorted” based upon its level of M&V. The first category of savings would be those savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements such as M&V Options B, C, and D. The second category of savings would be guaranteed savings subject to annual verification that ECM is in place and functioning, and savings from ECMs verified by M&V Option A. The third category of savings would be guaranteed savings from energy-related O&M. The sum of all categories is equal to the total level of guaranteed annual savings specified in TO-1 (final). In addition the percentage of each listing relative to the total shall be calculated and reported in the space provided.
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Year 3 |
| Guaranteed annual cost savings |
| $ |
| % |
| $ |
| % |
| $ |
| % |
Subject to verification by ongoing measurements
Subject to annual verification that ECM is in place and functioning
Guaranteed savings are from energy-related O&M
Total guaranteed savings
6. Comparison of estimated and guaranteed cost savings Note: For the total project savings and the level of savings associated that fall into the “Subject to verification by ongoing measurements” category, specify amount by which annual estimated cost savings exceed guaranteed cost savings (values for Year 0, no escalation applied). In addition, calculate the percentage by which the estimated savings exceeds the guaranteed savings.
| Total project |
| $ |
| % |
Total estimated savings
Total guaranteed savings
Amount total estimated savings exceeds total guaranteed savings
Savings in subject to verification by ongoing measurements category
Estimated savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements
Guaranteed savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements
Amount estimated savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements exceeds guaranteed savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements
7. Payments for Post-Acceptance Performance Period Services Note: Specify level of payment for post-acceptance performance period services and the date in which payments are expected to commence
| Year One Annual Amount ($) |
| Anticipated payment start date |
Total post-acceptance performance period services payment
8. Savings Shortfall Required Before Exceeding Payment for ESCO Post-Acceptance Performance Period Services Note: Section 8 presents a savings risk analysis to the financiers. For Years 1, 2 and 3, in the spaces provided, list the level of “guaranteed savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements” and the total payment for post-acceptance performance period services. Calculate the percent difference between the two values and show that percentage in space for “Percent shortfall in savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements.” Since the financier is in a position superior to the ESCO, the Trustee has the ability to redirect the post-acceptance performance period payments to the financier should a shortfall exist. This percentage reflects the upper shortfall limit in guaranteed savings that could be “covered” through the redirection of post-acceptance performance period payments.
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Year 3 |
Guaranteed savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements ($)
Post-acceptance performance period services payment ($)
Percent shortfall in savings subject to verification by ongoing measurements before post-acceptance performance period services payment is exceeded
9. Events Required to Trigger Agency Withholding of Payments and Likelihood of Occurrence Note: Brief narrative describing post-acceptance events required to trigger agency withholding of payments and likelihood of occurrence of those events.
10. Applicable Financial Index (i.e., U.S. Treasury, Swap Rate, etc) Note: Specify the financial index that the financier shall based their offers upon. The intent is for all offerors to base their proposed project interest rates upon the same financial index to better enable the ESCO to perform a selection.
11. Risk Assignment Summary: Refer to Completed Risk, Responsibility and Performance Matrix Note: Attach completed Risk, Responsibility and Performance Matrix.
12. Frequency of Government Payments Note: Specify the frequency (monthly, quarterly, or annually).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .