Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire (Rev-1).pdf

PDF 211 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation, Cyber Center of Excellence. Instructor Training Support Services
Solicitation number
W911SF-20-R-0031
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation seeks proposals for Cyber Center of Excellence Instructor Training Support Services at Fort Gordon, Georgia. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis will award multiple indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts with firm fixed price task orders for a base period of twelve months plus four one-year option periods. Services will equip the Cyber Center of Excellence to develop and execute training in career fields related to signals, cyber, and electronic warfare for military service members and officers. The applicable NAICS code is 611430 for professional development training with a $12 million small business size standard. This requirement is set aside solely for small businesses. The solicitation is available on beta.sam.gov and closes on October 26, 2020. All questions must be submitted by October 7 to the identified contracting contacts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0009.pdf PDF
Revised Proposal Preparation Instructions_5 Jan 2020.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0009 Conformed.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0008.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0008 Conformed.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0007 Conformed.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0007.pdf PDF
Revised Proposal Preparation Instructions_29 Dec 2020.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0006 Conformed.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0006.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Wage Determination 2015-24466 Rev-13.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 - Letter For Implementation of the Section 889(a)(1)(B) Prohibition Rev-1.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - Pricing Worksheet (Rev-1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Technical Exhibit 5 Rev-1.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit 6 Rev-2.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet (Rev-1).docx DOCX document
Technical Exhibit 1 Rev-1.pdf PDF
Revised PWS W911SF-20-R-0031_16 Dec 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - DD FORM 254 SCI ADDENDUM (Rev-1).pdf PDF
Revised 52.212-2 Evaluation_21 Dec 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Consent Letter.docx DOCX document
Revised Proposal Preparation Instructions_16 Dec 2020.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0005.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0004.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0003.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031 A0002.pdf PDF
W911S0-20-R-0031 0001.pdf PDF
W911SF-20-R-0031.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Employee Total Compensation Plan Pricing Sheet.docx DOCX document
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 -Letter For Implementation of the Section 889(a)(1)(B) Prohibition.docx DOCX document
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 3.docx DOCX document
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 6.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 - Wage Determination 2015-24466 Rev-12.pdf PDF
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 5.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 - DD 254 .pdf PDF
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 2a CDRL.pdf PDF
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 4.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 - DD FORM 254 SCI ADDENDUM.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

MICC-FORT EUSTIS

705 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 126

FORT EUSTIS, VA 23604-5292

December 23, 2020

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) (W911SF-20-R-0031)

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army, Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) – Fort Eustis is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 611430. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 2:00 PM EST January 7, 2021, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Ms. Rhoda C. Harrison-Spence at rhoda.c.harrisonspence.civ@mail.mil, Ms. Melinda Paynter at melinda.c.paynter.civ@mail.mil, and Ms. Mai-Ly Pham at anna.m.pham2.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at Ms. Rhoda C. Harrison-Spence at rhoda.c.harrisonspence.civ@mail.mil.

Sincerely, Ms. Rhoda C. Harrison-Spence Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .