13. Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Joint Base Lewis-McChord PAVEMENT IDIQ
Solicitation number
W911S8-17-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF1442_W911S8-17-R-0001_0002.pdf PDF
4. Technical Exbhibit C Statement of Work 19 Dec 2016.pdf PDF
JBLM Paving W911S8-17-R-0001 Contractor QUESTIONS 22 Dec16.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference Contractor Attendees.pdf PDF
33 71 02UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
SF30 W911S8-17-R-0001 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1- Sample Project 19 December 2016.pdf PDF
32 12 21-BITUMINOUS ROAD-MIX SURFACE COURSE.pdf PDF
01_45_00_10_Quality_Control_19_Dec.pdf PDF
33 71 02 JBLM DESIGN STANDARDS-UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
Site Visit Briefing W911S8-17-R-0001 JBLM Paving -29 Nov 2016.pdf PDF
SF30 W911S8-17-R-0001 0001.pdf PDF
W911S8-17-R-0001_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
01 57 19-TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS.pdf PDF
01 42 00-SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS.pdf PDF
32_84_24_(Irrigation_Sprinkles).pdf PDF
26_56_13.00_40_Lighting_Poles_and_Standards.pdf PDF
14. Attachment 6 Insurance Certificate of Compliance.docx DOCX document
01 78 23-OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA.pdf PDF
32_17_24.00_10_(Pavement_Markings).pdf PDF
1. RFP W911S8-17-R-0001 Paving IDC.pdf PDF
01 50 00-TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS.pdf PDF
01 32 01 00 10 Project Schedule.pdf PDF
7. TE F General Decision Number WA160001 Dtd 19 Aug 16.pdf PDF
31_11_00_Clearing_ _Grubbing.pdf PDF
5. TE D-Table of Contents.pdf PDF
3. TE B Proposal Item Descriptions(09-27-16).pdf PDF
10. Attachment 2-Experience Document.docx DOCX document
6. TE E Standards Plans Drawings 25Aug16.pdf PDF
31_23_00.00_20_Excavation_ _Fill.pdf PDF
01 35 29.13 Contaminated Site.pdf PDF
32_11_24_CSBC_for_Flexible_Pavement.pdf PDF
32_31_26_(Wire_Fence_ _Gate).pdf PDF
32_31_13.53_(High_Security_Fence).pdf PDF
26_56_19.00_40_Roadway_Lighting.pdf PDF
32_93_00_(Exterior_Plants).pdf PDF
31_00_00_Earthwork.pdf PDF
2. TE A ELIN Proposal Schedule 11 Oct 16.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
33_11_00-WATER_DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
01 45 00 10 Quality Control.pdf PDF
01 30 00 Administrative Requirements.pdf PDF
33_30_00-SANITARY_SEWERS.pdf PDF
01 78 00- CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS.pdf PDF
32_01_13_BITUMINOUS_SEAL_AND_FOG_COATS.pdf PDF
16. Attachment 8-JBLM Installation Access Information.docx DOCX document
32_92_19_(Seeding).pdf PDF
32_12_10_(Tack_Coat).pdf PDF
12. Attachment 4 - Relevant Contract Reference Sheet.docx DOCX document
00 10 01 - Supplementary Requirements.pdf PDF
32_12_15.13_HMA_for_Airfields.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 74 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5 W911S8-17-R-0001 8/27/2016 Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation W911S8-17-R-0001 Paving Indefinite Delivery Contract Joint Base Lewis-McChord

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

The Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC)-Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) is in the process of selecting a contractor for a paving indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ). The contract requires the contractor to provide all materials, labor, supervision, equipment, tools, transportation, and ancillary items necessary to manage and accomplish a broad range of maintenance, repair and minor construction work on vehicle roadways and airfield paving projects at JBLM including removal, replacement and repair of existing subgrade, utilities, shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other real property common to roadway and airfield pavements.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. MICC-JBLM depends on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. CONTRACTOR:

1. CAGE CODE:

1. CONTRACT NUMBER:

1. CONTRACT TYPE:

1. WAS THIS A COMPETITIVE CONTRACT?
YES NO
1. CONTRACTOR PERFORMED AS THE
|_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-Contractor |_| Key Personnel.

1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

1. INITIAL CONTRACT COST:

1. CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT COST:

1. REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INITIAL CONTRACT COST AND FINAL CONTRACT COSTS:

1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY NAME:

B. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY DESCRIPTION:

C. GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES UNDER THIS CONTRACT, I.E. LOCAL, NATIONWIDE, WORLDWIDE, OTHER COMMANDS:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. EVALUATOR'S NAME:

B. EVALUATOR'S TITLE:

C. EVALUATOR'S PHONE/FAX NUMBER:

D. NUMBER OF YEARS EVALUATOR WORKED ON SUBJECT CONTRACT:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

PLEASE INDICATE YOUR SATISFACTION WITH THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE BY PLACING AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BLOCK USING THE SCALE PROVIDED TO THE RIGHT OF EACH QUESTION. THIS SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE CONTAINED SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR APPEAR OR WERE SATISFACTORY.

M MARGINAL – PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MEET SOME CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE REFLECTS A SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR WHICH THE CONTRACTOR HAS NOT YET IDENTIFIED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OR THE CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSED ACTIONS APPEAR ONLY MARGINALLY EFFECTIVE OR WERE NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED.

U UNSATISFACTORY – PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MEET MOST CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. THE CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEM(S) FOR WHICH THE CONTRACTOR’S CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR OR WERE INEFFECTIVE.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - UNABLE TO PROVIDE A SCORE.

S
M
U
NA

DEMONSTRATED THE ABILITY TO SUBMIT ALL REQUIRED SUBMITTALS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.

DEMONSTRATED FLEXIBILITY AND COOPERATIVENESS WITH PHASING WORK TO MEET USER NEEDS AND COORDINATION WITH ALL PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS.

PROVIDED EXPERIENCED MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS WITH THE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITIES NEEDED TO MEET CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.

DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO HIRE, MAINTAIN, AND REPLACE, IF NECESSARY, QUALIFIED PERSONNEL DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD.

DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO PROJECT MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS COMMENSURATE WITH CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.

HOME OFFICE PARTICIPATED IN SOLVING SIGNIFICANT LOCAL PROBLEMS.

FOLLOWED APPROVED QUALITY CONTROL PLAN.

PROVIDED EFFECTIVE QUALITY CONTROL AND/OR INSPECTION PROCEDURES TO MEET CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.

CORRECTED DEFICIENCIES IN TIMELY MANNER AND PURSUANT TO THEIR QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES.

PROVIDED TIMELY RESOLUTION OF CONTRACT DISCREPANCIES.

IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS AS THEY OCCURRED.

SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PROBLEMS.

DISPLAYED INITIATIVE TO SOLVE PROBLEMS.

DEVELOPED REALISTIC PROGRESS SCHEDULES.

MET ESTABLISHED PROJECT SCHEDULES.

PROVIDED TIMELY RESOLUTION OF WARRANTY DEFECTS.

WAS RESPONSIVE TO CONTRACT CHANGES.

PROVIDED ADEQUATE PROJECT SUPERVISION.

OBTAINED CONSENT OF SURETY FOR INCREASES IN BONDING AS WORK-IN-PROGRESS INCREASED.

PAID SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS IN A TIMELY MANNER.

PROVIDED ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LINE ITEM COST PROPOSALS INCLUDING ALL ASPECTS OF WORK REQUIRED FOR EACH TASK.

COOPERATED WITH GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL AFTER AWARD.

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S OVERALL PERFORMANCE?

WAS THE CONTRACTOR EVER ISSUED A CURE OR SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER THE REFERENCED CONTRACT? IF YES, EXPLAIN OUTCOME IN “REMARKS.”
YES
NO
WOULD YOU AWARD ANOTHER CONTRACT TO THIS CONTRACTOR? IF NOT, EXPLAIN IN “REMARKS.”
YES
NO
IS THE CONTRACTOR RATED IN CPARS?
YES
NO

PLEASE DISCUSS EACH AND EVERY RESPONSE FOR WHICH YOU INDICATED M (MARGINAL) OR US (UNSATISFACTORY) IN RESPONSE TO THE QUESTIONS ABOVE (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY).

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: HAS/WAS THIS CONTRACT BEEN PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY TERMINATED FOR DEFAULT OR CONVENIENCE OR ARE THERE ANY PENDING TERMINATIONS?

YES____NO ____
DEFAULT____CONVENIENCE____PENDING TERMINATIONS____

IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN (E.G., INABILITY TO MEET COST, PERFORMANCE, OR DELIVERY SCHEDULES, ETC).

WOULD YOU HAVE ANY RESERVATIONS ABOUT SOLICITING THIS CONTRACTOR IN THE FUTURE OR HAVING THE CONTRACTOR M PERFORM ONE OF YOUR CRITICAL AND DEMANDING PROGRAMS?

EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE:
DATE:

PLEASE COMPLETE THIS SURVEY AND RETURN DIRECTLY TO CONTRACT SPECIALIST, IANTHE STEVENS-FORD, VIA EMAIL TO USARMY.JBLM.ACCMICC.LIST.PROPOSALS@MAIL.MIL AND IANTHE.M.STEVENS-FORD.CIV@MAIL.MIL, BY TO BE DETERMINED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:

Remarks:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .