W56HZV18R0001-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2017DEC21

W56HZV

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

MATTHEW KUNKEL

EMAIL: MATTHEW.D.KUNKEL2.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-18-R-0001

2017NOV21

X

X

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 128

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: MATTHEW KUNKEL

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-AHL-C/(586)282-6563

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Type of Contract 2: Fixed Price Incentive (Cost Based)

Kind of Contract: Research and Development Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Mobile Protected Firepower

Executive Summary

1) MPF Program Overview:_________________________

a. The Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) vehicle is a new combat vehicle required to address the capability gap identified within the Armys Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs). This vehicle will be incorporated in the IBCT structure as a weapon system solution to provide a protected, long range, cyber resilient, precision, direct fire capability for early/forcible entry operations. The MPF vehicle will be a new system within the IBCT designed to support the full range of military actions, and will operate in concert with the Ground

Mobility Vehicle (GMV) and Light Reconnaissance Vehicle (LRV) within the IBCT. The total MPF quantity is 504 vehicles at the brigade level and below.

b. Since its inception, the MPF program has represented an innovative approach to Army acquisition by focusing on delivering an essential new capability to the IBCTs while under a significantly reduced timeline, as compared to traditional acquisition efforts.

This was achieved by leveraging existing material solutions with proven capabilities coupled with new technologies to meet the requirements. This approach allows the program to enter at Milestone B, and alleviate a 2-3 year Technical Development phase.

2) Solicitation________________

a. This solicitation covers both the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD) Phase and Low Rate Initial Production

(LRIP). This solicitation includes two primary contract types: Firm Fixed Price for EMD and Fixed Price Incentive (Firm) for the LRIP vehicle options.

b. Offerors shall submit proposals in six separate volumes by 01 March 2018 in accordance with L.2.1. The Offerors may submit optional Armor Coupons and an optional Bid Sample to support the proposals in accordance with L.2.8 by 02 April 2018. The Bid Sample and/or Armor Coupons will be evaluated, if submitted, as substantiating data to the proposals in accordance with Attachment 43.

3) EMD Proposal Evaluation___________________________

a. The Government will conduct a full and open competition using Best Value Source Selection procedures for the award of up to two contracts for the EMD phase.

b. The Government will evaluate Offerors proposals based on the below evaluation criteria and in accordance with Section M.4 of the RFP:

i. Schedule - The Government will assess the probability/risk that the Offerors design will successfully meet the program requirements within the delivery schedule in accordance with Section F. The Schedule Factor is composed of two Sub-Factors: 1) Design

Maturity and 2) Integrated Master Schedule/Integrated Master Plan. Both Sub-Factors are equal in importance.

ii. Performance - The Performance Factor contains two Sub-Factors: 1) Primary Technical and 2) Objective Technical. Primary

Technical is more important than Objective Technical. The Primary and Objective Technical Sub-factors will assess the probability/risk that the Offerors MPF will achieve the Governments defined threshold performance levels for the requirements identified in Table 1 of

Attachment 45 (Mandatory Compliance Requirements List) and the Government's defined objective performance levels in Attachment 46

(Objective Technical Requirements), respectively.

iii. Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) - The VATEP Factor will be used in the trade-off evaluation to determine best value. The Performance Specification (P-Spec) includes a tiering structure. Compliance to the Tier 1 requirements in the P-Spec are mandatory. Tiers 2 and 3 are tradeable requirements with Tier 2 weighted higher than Tier 3, and individually are not mandatory, 2 128

W56HZV-18-R-0001 0001

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

however a minimum quantity (approximately half) must be met to be eligible for award. These tradeable requirements will be evaluated in the form of a VATEP adjustment (i.e. Technical and Objective adjustments). These adjustments will be calculated based on the Offerors proposed compliance to the requirements. In order to be eligible for award the Offerors must propose a minimum of roughly half of any combination of Tiers 2 and 3 of the tradeable requirements. Tier 4 requirements are objective only and also receive an adjustment if proposed. For Tier 4 requirements, no credit will be assigned for partial compliance. Offerors proposed compliance to Tiers 2 through 4 will be incorporated into the resulting contract, if selected.

iv. Small Business Participation - The Government will evaluate the extent of the Offerors approach to achieving the

Government's objective of providing maximum practicable opportunities in meeting the small business participation goals identified in this solicitation.

c. Relative of Importance of Factors: The Schedule Factor is slightly more important than Performance. Performance and VATEP are equal in importance to each other. Performance and VATEP are each, on an individual basis, significantly more important than Small

Business Participation. As required to be defined by FAR 15.304(e), the non- VATEP factors, when combined, are significantly more important than the VATEP Factor.

4) EMD Phase: __________

Up to two EMD contracts are targeted for award during the first quarter of FY19. Each contractor is required to deliver 12 pre-production vehicles in accordance with the Scope of Work and P-Spec. In addition, the contractor(s) shall deliver two Ballistic Hull and Turrets (BH&T), System Support Packages (SSP) and Special Tools and Test Equipment (STTE), Armor Coupons, and a Cyber Bench, if proposed with its design, during EMD. During the EMD phase, the vehicle shall be developed, designed, and tested within the affordability constraints described in Section M.3.2, and the vehicles will be used to support Pre-Production Testing, and a Soldier

Vehicle Assessment (SVA) used to measure prototype effectiveness and provide feedback. Pre-production vehicles shall be transferred to the Government through use of a DD Form 1149, Requisition and Invoice/Shipping Document. The MPF program includes a comprehensive provisioning program to allow for crew and field-level organic Army support by First Unit Equipped in 2025.

5) Funding and Affordability:_____________________________

The Government will provide funds for EMD on an incremental basis. Any proposal received in response to this RFP that proposes a total price in excess of the cumulative available funding by fiscal year for in EMD or the LRIP option(s) available funding will be considered unaffordable in accordance with M.3.2.

EMD Available Funding by FY (for each offeror) Cumulative Available______________________________________________ ____________________

FY2019 $176M

FY2020 $311M

FY2021 $360M

FY2022 $376M

LRIP Affordability__________________

Sum of CLINs 1001 (Ceiling Price) and 1003 $378M

CLIN 1002 $16M

CLIN 2001 (Ceiling Price) $311M

6) Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Option(s) ____________________________________________

a. The Government intends to award the option(s) on only one of the two EMD contracts. The contractors awarded EMD contracts will deliver prototype vehicles that will be evaluated in a subsequent competitive evaluation for their ability to meet MPF System requirements. The contractor whose system best meets the evaluation criteria will be awarded the LRIP option(s). Only one EMD contractor will be selected for LRIP. The LRIP options include a total of 54 vehicles (26 vehicles for Option 1 and 28 for Option 2)

LRIP also includes the retrofit of 8 EMD vehicles, SSP, STTE, Logistics Products, and Government Test Support.

b. The Government will convene an Evaluation Board to determine which contractor offers the best value to the Government for LRIP.

LRIP options will be exercised for one of the two EMD contracts. The Government will evaluate contractor proposals based on the below evaluation criteria and in accordance with Section H.10.

i. Performance - The Performance Factor contains two Sub-Factors: 1) Technical and 2) Force Structure. The technical Sub-Factor will assess the probability/risk that the contractors MPF will achieve the contractors proposed performance levels for the requirements identified in Attachment 34 (LRIP Down-Select Requirements List). The Force Structure Sub-Factor will assess the probability/risk that a contractor can meet the tasks identified in Attachment 54 (Force Structure Worksheet).

ii. VATEP - The VATEP Factor will be used in the trade-off evaluation to determine best value. The VATEP Factor includes the

Evaluated Options Price, a LRIP Technical Adjustment, GFP Use and Charges Adjustment, and an Operations and Sustainment Adjustment.

iii. Data and Background Patent Rights - The Government will assess and evaluate the extent the additional proposed Data and

Patent Rights allows the Government to (1) organically perform or to compete the depot maintenance and gun barrel production; (2)

3 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

compete spare parts procurement; (3) secure additional sources for the MPF system and equipment; and (4) use submitted technical data or computer software and background patent rights for any other Government programs.

iv. Small Business Participation - The Government will evaluate the extent of the Offerors approach to achieving the

Government's objective of providing maximum practicable opportunities in meeting the small business participation goals identified in this solicitation.

Relative Order of Importance of Factors: Performance is more important than VATEP and VATEP is slightly more important than Data and

Background Patent Rights. Data and Background Patent Rights is significantly more important than Small Business Participation. As required to be defined by FAR 15.304(e), the non-VATEP factors, when combined, are significantly more important than the VATEP

Factor.The Performance Factor is more important than VATEP.

c. LRIP includes a performance incentive for reliability. Cost will be incentivized by use of an FPIF contract. The terms and conditions for the reliability incentive is set forth in Section H.5.

7) Administrative: _______________

a. Eligibility requirements for award and Rejection Criteria are included in the RFP. Offerors should carefully review the RFP to insure all requirements for award are met.

b. Access to Classified, FOUO, and Export Controlled Documents: All Offerors must have a valid facility clearance of SECRET or higher in order to respond to this RFP. See the DD Form 254 (Attachment 01) for security requirements. For Export Controlled information, it is the responsibility of the Offeror, not the Government, to obtain the appropriate export licenses, or process the appropriate export license exemption, necessary for authorization to share information with foreign subcontractors. Offerors who previously received FOUO attachments for solicitation W56HZV-16-R-0244 will be provided all FOUO attachments for this solicitation.

Offerors who have not had prior access to FOUO attachments shall send their request to the Contract Specialists identified below. Your request shall include the following:

-Your Company's name and address

-Your Name, Title, Office phone number and email address

-Copy of the approved DD2345

c. Assertion of Restrictions: The offeror shall include in its EMD proposal submission, each of the following: Non-Commercial

Technical Data, Non-Commercial Computer Software and Software Documentation, Commercial Technical Data, and Commercial Computer Software and Software Documentation on its Assertion of Restrictions listing required under DFARS 252.227-7017.

d. Waivers: Prohibited Material: If the contractor desires to use a prohibited material, it shall submit a waiver request using the Request for Use of Prohibited Materials form (Attachment 19). The contractor shall not use or deliver any prohibited materials without prior Government waiver acceptance.

Note: This Executive Summary is provided as a convenience to highlight the program requirements contained within the RFP. In the event of any inconsistencies, the RFP requirements take precedence.

Points of Contact:__________________

Shannon Zemke Procuring Contracting Officer 586-282-6040 mailto:shannon.b.zemke.civ@mail.mil

Jamie Barnett Contract Specialist 586-282-5130 mailto:jamie.l.barnett8.civ@mail.mil

Matt Kunkel Contract Specialist 586-282-6563 mailto:matthew.d.kunkel2.civ@mail.mil

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

Solicitation: W56HZV18R0001

Amendment: 0001

1. The purpose of Amendment 0001 to solicitation W56HZV-18-R-0001 is to add detailed LRIP down-select criteria and incorporate other minor revisions as follows:

2. Section A Supplemental Information ___________________________________

a. Revise Narrative A0001 Mobile "Protected Firepower Executive Summary" to add Section 6) b. for the Low Rate Initial

4 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Production down-select evaluation summary and add excerpt "EMD" within paragraph 7) c.

3. Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs ________________________________________________

a. Revise CLIN 2001 narrative B001 in part

From:

"This CLIN funds all of Section C.2."

To:

"This CLIN funds work performed in accordance with Section C.2, except the paragraphs noted in separate CLINS 1002-1004."

4. Section C Description/Specifications/Work Statement ____________________________________________________

a. Revise Section C.1.1.1.4 in part to add "The contractor shall flow down the DAL requirements to its subcontractors."

b. Revise Section C.1.2.6 in part

From:

"The contractor shall develop and deliver an E3 Control Plan and an E3 Verification Plan in accordance with CDRL A028."

To:

"The contractor shall develop an E3 Control Plan. The contractor shall develop and deliver the E3 Verification Plan in accordance with CDRL A028."

c. Revise Section C.1.2.8.3 in part

From:

"The contractor shall obtain a Government Gun Safety Certification for the primary weapon system prior to delivery of the

PPT vehicles."

To:

"The contractor shall obtain a Government Gun Safety Release for the primary weapon system prior to delivery of the PPT vehicles." This is an administrative change for clarity.

d. Revise Section C.1.2.10.3 to delete excerpt "and identification of the Government rights in each computer software component."

e. Revise Section C.1.2.10.4 to add excerpt "and open source software".

f. Revise Sections C.1.5.1.2 and C.2.6.1.1 to add excerpt "Government R&M testing will be conducted in both day and night shifts."

g. Revise Section C.1.5.1.3.10 to delete excerpt "CDRL A006" and replace with "CDRL A066".

h. Revise Section C.1.5.1.4.9 to delete excerpt "CDRL A006" and replace with "CDRL A066".

i. Revise Section C.1.6.3 to add excerpt "identification of opportunities to utilize Army Industrial facilities for potential Government Furnished Material (GFM) or Contractor Furnished Material (CFM)"

j. Add Sections C.1.7.6.5 and C.2.8.5.5 to incorporate the following paragraph:

"The contractor shall acquire and deliver the copyright releases for any use of manuals or materials in the Operator Manual

(CDRL A065), Field Maintenance Manual with RPSTL (CDRL A091), and BDAR Manual (CDRL A092). The contractor shall deliver the copyright releases as part of each delivery of CDRL A065, CDRL A091, and CDRL A092. The copyright release shall be written for the Government's use and shall not prohibit duplications, release, or website publication. The contractor shall ensure that Government has the right to use, copy, and distribute the manuals, and electronic data files delivered under this contract."

5. Section H Special Contract Requirements ________________________________________

a. Section H.4.5 has been added in its entirety.

b. Revise Section H.5.1

5 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

From:

"The Government will conduct Test Incident Report (TIR) Scoring Conferences during and immediately after Government test in accordance with Section C.2.6.1.1.8.2. The Government will make its determination regarding the MPF vehicle MMBSA as part of this scoring/assessment conference process. The contractor will be notified of MMBSA results within 20 calendar days after completion of the final Scoring and Assessment Conference. If the contractor earns an incentive fee in conjunction with this reliability performance incentive, the Government will issue a unilateral contract modification to fund the incentive fee under CLIN 1004 within 90 calendar days after completion of the Scoring Conference. The contractor shall not submit an invoice for payment under CLIN 1004 until the unilateral contract modification has been executed by the

Government funding the final Incentive Fee. The USG reserves the unilateral right to reduce the amount of funding obligated on CLIN 1004 to the amount of the incentive fee earned. The criteria for scoring of the Reliability incentive are provided in H.5.1.1 below."

To:

The Government will conduct Test Incident Report (TIR) Scoring Conferences during and immediately after Government test in accordance with Section C.2.6.1.1.8.2. To prove that the MMBSA incentive has been demonstrated, the Program Management

Office with the support of ATEC and TRADOC will evaluate the scored System Aborts from all completed PQT testing to date.

The contractor will be notified of the MMBSA results within 20 calendar days after completion of the final Scoring

Conference. If the contractor earns an incentive fee in conjunction with this reliability performance incentive, the

Government will issue a unilateral contract modification to fund the incentive fee under CLIN 1004 within 90 calendar days after completion of the Scoring Conference. The contractor shall not submit an invoice for payment under CLIN 1004 until the unilateral contract modification has been executed by the Government funding the final Incentive Fee. The USG reserves the unilateral right to reduce the amount of funding obligated on CLIN 1004 to the amount of the incentive fee earned.

c. Delete Section H.5.1.1 in its entirety.

d. Revise Section H.8 from "Reserved" to incorporate requirements for "Identification and Assertion of Restrictions on

Technical Data and Computer Software"

e. Revise Section H.9 to "LRIP- Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Contractors" and Section H.10 has been added for

"LRIP- Evaluation Factors for Award" to incorporate the LRIP down-select evaluation criteria. They represent Sections L and M respectively for the LRIP down-select.

6. Section I Contract Clauses ___________________________

a. Add clause 52.227-9 "Refund of Royalties"

7. Section J List Of Attachments ______________________________

a. Revise Exhibit A "Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLS)"

(i) Revise CDRL A006 Block 5 Contract Reference to delete "C.1.5.2.3.10" and "C.1.5.1.4.9"

(ii) Revise CDRL A044 Block 16 Remarks in part

Add:

"Block 4: DI-PSSS-82046 (T) is tailored as follows:

Replace "aircraft" with "vehicle" within Table 1: Field Definitions and Instructions

(iii) Revise CDRL A053 Block 16 Remarks in part

From:

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 45 calendar days prior to each TRR, the Supportability

Assessment, and the Log Demo."

To:

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 45 calendar days prior to each TRR (except Armor Coupon TRR), the

Supportability Assessment, and the Log Demo."

(iv) Revise CDRL A055 Block 16 Remarks in part

From:

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 45 calendar days prior to each TRR, the Supportability Analysis, and the Log Demo."

To:

6 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 45 calendar days prior to each TRR (except Armor Coupon TRR), the

Supportability Analysis, and the Log Demo."

(v) Revise CDRL A129 Block 16 Remarks in part

From:

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 60 calendar days after contract award."

To:

"Blocks 10, 11, 12, and 13: The data item is due 30 calendar days after contract award."

b. Revise Attachment 1 - MPF DD FORM 254 for administrative clarity and incorporation of the current form.

c. Revise Attachment 7 - Mobile Protected Firepower Performance Specification.

d. Revise Attachment 9 - MPF Government Furnished Property Listing to add Serially Managed Items List line items 93-418 and

Non-Serially Managed Items List line items 44-87 for LRIP option quantities.

e. Revise Attachment 16 - MPF System Security Plan to incorporate formatted appendices for administrative purposes.

f. Revise Attachment 20 - Production Government Format TDP Requirements to add additional information within the appendices.

g. Revise Attachment 21 - Government Test Schedule.

h. Revise Attachment 23 - Reliability Growth Plan.

i. Revise Attachment 28 - Equipment Publications Defects List.

j. Revise Attachment 35 - to rename it from Pricing Spreadsheet to EMD Pricing Spreadsheet for administrative clarity.

k. Revise Attachment 40 - to rename it from VATEP Adjustment Spreadsheet to EMD VATEP Adjustment Spreadsheet for administrative clarity. The distribution statement for this attachment has also been revised.

l. Revise Attachment 43 - Bid Sample Evaluation Plan.

m. Revise Attachment 51 - Technical Data and Computer Software Assertion of Restrictions for administrative clarity.

n. The following LRIP Down-Select Attachments have been added as follows:

(i) Attachment 34 - LRIP Down-Select Requirements List

(ii) Attachment 36 - LRIP Pricing Spreadsheet

(iii) Attachment 48 - LRIP VATEP Adjustment

(iv) Attachment 54 - Force Structure Worksheet

(v) Attachment 55 - Technical Data, Computer Software and Patent License Identification and Assertions

(vi) Attachment 56 - Specially Negotiated Rights Template

8. Section K Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors ____________________________________________________________________________

a. Add clause 52.227-6 "Royalty Information"

9. Section L Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors ____________________________________________________________

a. Revise all Section L paragraphs that reference excerpt "cost/price" to "price".

b. Revise all Section L paragraphs that reference excerpt "(Pricing Spreadsheet)" to "(EMD Pricing Spreadsheet)"

c. Revise Section L.4.2 in part

From:

"The Contract Performance Specification shall not be tiered and shall contain the values proposed under Attachment 45 and

Attachment 46 as thresholds. Non-proposed Tier 2, Tier 3, and Tier 4 requirements shall be removed, to include non-proposed objective requirements. No other language in these Performance Specification Paragraphs may be modified."

To:

7 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

"The Contract Performance Specification shall not be tiered and shall contain the performance proposed under Attachment 45 and Attachment 46 as thresholds. Objective performance for proposed Performance Specifications shall be retained. Non-proposed Tier 2, Tier 3, and Tier 4 requirements shall be removed. No other language in these Performance Specification

Paragraphs may be modified."

d. Revise Section L.4.2.1 in part to add "The Offeror shall provide a single worksheet (Attachment 33) for each requirement in Table 1 of Attachment 45 (Mandatory Compliance Requirements List)."

e. Revise Section L.4.2.1.1 excerpt from "If the Offeror uses third party test data to substantiate requirements" to "If the Offeror uses third party or Offeror test data to substantiate requirements"

f. Revise Section L.4.3 to delete excerpt "and contract deliverable"

g. Revise Section L.4.3.1.3 excerpt from "shall not proposed an alternative share ratios" to "shall not propose alternative share ratios"

h. Revise Section L.4.5.2 excerpt from "shall be included in the solicitation, or any exception. Offeror's proposal, along with or any exceptions" to "shall be included in the Offeror's proposal, along with any exceptions"

i. Revise Section L.5 to delete the entire paragraph and mark reserved.

10. Section M Evaluation Factors For Award _______________________________________

a. Revise all Section M paragraphs that reference excerpt "cost/price" to "price".

b. Revise all Section M paragraphs that reference excerpt "(Pricing Spreadsheet)" to "(EMD Pricing Spreadsheet)"

c. Revise Section M.2 in part to add "(k) In accordance with the authority granted to the Government by FAR 52.204-22, Offers that do not comply with the line items specified in this solicitation will be determined nonresponsive or unacceptable."

d. Revise Section M.4.2.1 excerpt from "achieve the Governments defined threshold performance levels" to "achieve the proposed performance levels"

e. Revise Section M.4.2.1.1 to add excerpts "proportional" and "Offerors proposing performance at Government defined threshold performance levels identified in Table 1 of Attachment 45 (Mandatory Compliance Requirements List) that is supported by credible substantiating data and assessed at a reduced risk of achieving the threshold performance level may be assessed an additional strength."

f. Revise Section M.4.2.1.3

Delete excerpt:

"may be assessed at a reduced risk of achieving the threshold performance level and"

Add excerpt:

"The proposed performance level for the requirements levels identified in Table 1 of Attachment 45 (Mandatory Compliance

Requirements List) will be incorporated as a Threshold Performance requirement in the resulting contract."

g. Revise Section M.4.2.2.2 excerpt from "proposed Cost/Price" to "Evaluated Contract Price"

h. Revise Section M.4.3.1.1 in part

From:

"The Evaluated Contract Cost/Price will consist of the sum of the following:"

To:

"The Evaluated Contract Price is calculated in the "Summary" tab of Attachment 35 - EMD Pricing Spreadsheet, and consists of the sum of the following:"

8 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

9 128

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

2001 LRIP VEHICLE (OPTION 2) 28 EA $ $ _______________________ ______________ __________________

COMMODITY NAME: LRIP VEHICLE OPTION 2

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Fixed Price Incentive (Cost Based)

This CLIN funds work performed in accordance with

Section C.2, except the paragraphs noted in seperate

CLINs 1002-1004.

Quantity: 28 EA MPF vehicles

Target Cost: $___________

Target Profit: $___________

Target Price: $___________

Ceiling Price: $___________

The following incentive structure shall be adhered to in the CLIN pricing:

-Ceiling Price shall be 110% of the Target Price.

-Share Ratios (Gov/Ktr)

Underrun: 30/70

Overrun: 70/30

All deliverables under this CLIN shall be in accordance with the requirements detailed in Section

F and inspection shall be in accordance with the requirements detailed in Section E.

These options may be exercised by the Government in accordance with Section H.4.1.

OPTION QUANTITY________________

The quantity stated for the option CLIN DOES NOT form a part of the basic contractual quantity and is not being exercised at time of contract award.

(End of narrative B001)

Packaging and Marking _____________________

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Origin ACCEPTANCE: Origin

10 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

C.1 Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD)

The Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) program aims to procure a vehicle that provides Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs) a protected, long range, cyber resilient, precision direct fire capability for early/forcible entry operations. IBCTs require this capability to be employed in austere and unpredictable locations allowing them to avoid the enemys strengths and rapidly transition to offensive operations and exploit the initiative.

C.1.1 Program Management

C.1.1.1 Data Deliveries

C.1.1.1.1 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) Data Deliveries

The contractor shall deliver data in accordance with the Department of Defense (DD) Form 1423, CDRLs, as set forth in Section J and as called out in the scope of work. The days specified in the CDRL are calculated as calendar days unless otherwise specified in a specific

CDRL. If a CDRL delivery date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal Government holiday, the contractor shall deliver the CDRL on the next business day. All data specified in this contract shall be provided using the Governments CDRL Delivery Tool, accessible at https://gcscdrl.tacom.army.mil, unless otherwise specified in the DD Form 1423. Within 10 calendar days after contract award, the contractor shall provide the Government with a list of personnel requiring access to the CDRL Delivery Tool. Personnel will be required to have either a Government-issued Common Access Card (CAC), Government-approved External Certificate Authority (ECA), or an Army

Knowledge Online (AKO) account in order to be provided access to the CDRL Delivery Tool. CDRL Delivery Tool user instructions and training will be provided at the Start of Work Meeting (SOWM).

The contractor shall deliver CDRLs without encryption, locks, passwords, or other security protection features which would prevent the

Government from editing, sorting, merging, or otherwise manipulating the data for Government purposes.

C.1.1.1.2 Information Exchanges

The contractor shall utilize industry best practices in data management throughout performance of this contract. In conjunction with its data management system, the contractor shall utilize the Governments MPF SharePoint folder for secure Government exchanges that can be used to facilitate information transmission between the Government and contractor for controlled, distributed access to project information, both released and in-work. Within 10 calendar days after contract award, the contractor shall provide the Government with a list of personnel requiring access to the MPF SharePoint folder. Personnel will be required to have either a Government-issued CAC, Government-approved ECA, or an AKO account in order to be provided access to the MPF SharePoint Folder. The SharePoint user instructions and training will be provided at the SOWM.

C.1.1.1.3 Classified Data Deliveries

All classified information shall be sent via registered mail to the MPF classified mailing address or other agreeable secure data transfer environment identified by the Government at the SOWM.

#C.1.1.1.4 Data Accession List

The contractor shall provide and update a Data Accession List (DAL) in accordance with CDRL A001. The contractor shall flow down the

DAL requirements to its subcontractors.

C.1.1.2 Support for Meetings, Conferences, and Reviews

The contractor shall conduct and administer meetings, reviews, and events as required by this SOW. Unless otherwise stated, the contractor shall host all meeting at its facilities. The contractor shall submit an agenda in accordance with CDRL A002, a read-ahead package in accordance with CDRL A003, and meeting minutes in accordance with CDRL A004 for all major program reviews, excluding TRRs.

The contractor shall submit only the read-ahead package in accordance with CDRL A003 for TRRs. The contractor shall track the status and resolution of all action items generated in performance of this Statement of Work (SOW) in a single action item database and present the status at each meeting. All reviews, meetings, and events administered by the contractor, except for meetings where classified data is discussed, shall have a virtual-based option using the Defense Collaboration Services (DCS) conferencing tool. The contractor shall schedule face-to-face meetings to occur at mutually agreed time and location, and maximize web conferencing to the highest extent possible to minimize personnel resources and travel expenses. The contractor's administrative duties and responsibilities shall include all functions (e.g., providing facilities, sending invitations, media resources, security, minutes, hard copy materials) related to the preparation and execution of the meetings, reviews, and events.

C.1.1.2.1 Meeting Facilities

The contractor's facilities shall be multi-media capable; to include a conference room speaker phone, a large screen with computer projection capabilities that the planned number of attendees can see. The contractor shall coordinate with the Government to determine

11 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

facility seating requirements for all meetings. Unless otherwise stated below, the contractor shall be able to accommodate no less than

10 Government attendees. The contractor shall ensure appropriate Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) are available to advise and answer questions. The contractor shall coordinate with the Government to determine the most programmatically effective geographic location for meetings.

The contractor shall be capable of hosting classified meetings at the DD Form 254 (Attachment 01) designated classification level which will accommodate not less than 10 Government attendees. The Government will provide larger classified meeting facilities on an as-needed basis for joint Government and contractor classified meetings.

C.1.1.3 Major Program Reviews

Major program reviews identified throughout this EMD SOW are defined as the following: SOWM; Program Management Reviews (PMRs); Design

Maturity Review (DMR); Test Readiness Reviews (TRRs); combined System-Level Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and System Verification

Review (SVR); and Production Readiness Review (PRR).

C.1.1.3.1 Start of Work Meeting (SOWM)

The contractor shall host and conduct a SOWM at its facility within 30 calendar days after contract award. The purpose of the SOWM is to discuss and clarify the Governments expectations for performance during the effort covered by the SOW, meet with the contractor's program team, and align the contractor and Government teams. The contractor shall present key program objectives and risks; provide an overview of its approach; and present key elements of the contract, including the SOW, financial planning, Integrated Master Plan (IMP), Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), and deliverables. The contractor shall present its current and future years accounting calendar at the start of work meeting to convey the as-of and delivery dates for contracts various financial reporting CDRLs. The contractor shall present its starting technical baseline, illustrating the technical solution proposed to meet the contract requirements.

C.1.1.3.2 Program Management Reviews (PMR)

The contractor shall host and conduct PMRs every six months, beginning six months after DMR. The PMRs shall include contractor senior-level program management personnel and shall alternately be held near the Governments location and near the contractor's facility. The contractor shall present its current and projected cost, IMS, and performance metrics, along with the risk status at each PMR. The contractor shall also present a list of non-value added CDRLs and/or processes.

C.1.1.3.3 Design Maturity Review (DMR)

The contractor shall host and conduct a DMR within six months of contract award. The DMR shall demonstrate that the system design will meet suitability, performance, affordability, supportability, manufacturability, and schedule goals.

The contractor shall provide status on the following items at DMR:

* Overall project cost and IMS performance and impacts of the DMR design.

* Unit Manufacturing Cost (UMC) estimates.

* Project risk assessment and mitigation plans.

* The functional, allocated, and initial product baselines.

* The Bill of Material (BOM).

* The set of system elements comprising the detailed system design, including internal and external interfaces.

* Assessment of hardware and computer software hazards associated with the system design.

* The detailed designs for external interfaces.

* The verification requirements demonstrating achievement of all specified allocated performance characteristics.

* Technologies have been demonstrated in a relevant environment and can be integrated into a system with acceptable risk.

* Contractor testing, modeling, and simulation results that support the design.

* Critical manufacturing processes that affect the systems key characteristics have been identified and their capability to meet design tolerances has been demonstrated in a production-representative environment.

* System hardware element physical architectures and detailed designs.

12 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

* Detailed designs for Critical Safety Items (CSI) and Critical Application Items (CAI).

* Computer software architectures and detailed design.

* Cybersecurity approaches.

* Program Protection planning.

* Management of the 12 Integrated Product Support (IPS) elements.

* Provisioning and technical manual conferences.

C.1.1.3.4 Test Readiness Reviews (TRRs)

The contractor shall attend and participate in three Government-led TRRs (one for Armor Coupon Testing, one covering both Ballistic Hull and Turret (BH&T) testing and Pre-Production Prove-out Testing (PPT), and one for the Limited User Test (LUT)). The contractor shall present design maturity of the configuration test articles and provide resolution of discrepancies and actions assigned to the contractor. The contractor shall provide access to all pertinent records and data requested by the Government to adequately prepare for the TRR. Reviews will be held at a Government test location. The Government reserves the right to change the test locations and TRR locations, within the Continental United States (CONUS), at no additional cost to the Government.

C.1.1.3.5 Soldier Vehicle Assessment (SVA) Readiness Review

The contractor shall attend and participate in a Government-led SVA Readiness Review. The contractor shall present its plans and status for Field Service Representatives (FSRs) support, data collection efforts, vehicle shipping, technical manual, training plans, contractor special tools, and System Support Package (SSP). The contractor shall provide resolution of discrepancies and actions assigned to it. The contractor shall provide access to all pertinent records and data requested by the Government for it to adequately prepare for the SVA Readiness Review. The review will be held at a Government test location. The Government reserves the right to change the test location and SVA Readiness Review location, within the CONUS, at no additional cost to the Government.

C.1.1.3.6 System-Level Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and System Verification Review (SVR)

The contractor shall host and conduct a combined System-Level FCA and SVR at its facility. The event shall demonstrate that the system as tested has successfully met the requirements in the MPF System Specification and the FCA and SVR technical review products acceptability criteria as documented in Tables 25 and 29 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 15288.2

Standard for Technical Reviews and Audits on Defense Programs, as tailored by Attachment 02.

C.1.1.3.7 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

The contractor shall host a PRR at its facility and assist in the development of the PRR by completing the PRR Checklist (Attachment 03) and having all artifacts available for Government review at the PRR.

C.1.1.4 Government Furnished Property (GFP)

The contractor shall develop and implement an Inventory Control Plan and process that accounts for GFP in accordance with DFARS 252.211-

7007. The contractor shall maintain a Configuration Managed GFP list. The contractor shall utilize a Property Management System, approved by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Property Administrator for the delivery and storage of GFP. The contractor shall maintain the Property Management System for all GFP.

The plan shall provide for monthly GFP inventory counts at all locations (storage and consumption points) to prevent loss or misplacement of material. The contractor shall report the GFP status in accordance with CDRL A005. The contractor shall identify and report excess GFP to the Government. The Government will have 120 calendar days to provide disposition instructions.

Report of Shipping (Item) and Packaging Discrepancy shall be provided to the Government by the contractor when GFP is received which does not agree with information on the shipping documents and when GFP is found to have transportation damage. The contractor shall inspect all GFP received upon receipt and the inspection data shall be included in the GFP Status Report in accordance with CDRL A005.

Deficient or defective GFP shall be reported in accordance with CDRL A006.

Deficient or defective GFP will be replaced or repaired by the Government. The contractor shall request authorization for the replacement or repair of unserviceable GFP no longer usable for intended use during the execution of current efforts. Shipments of all

GFP shall be made via DD Form 1149. Events requiring reporting shall consist of receipt, turn in, transfer, site relocation, shipment, disposal, and disposition. Upon Government request, signed shipping documentation shall be provided upon receipt or completion of the property shipment. GFP is identified in Attachment 09.

13 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The contractor shall allow the Government to conduct annual inspections of Communications Security (COMSEC) property, at a minimum, and standard GFP every three years or as required.

C.1.1.5 Design-to-Cost

C.1.1.5.1 Unit Manufacturing Cost (UMC)

The contractor shall manage its MPF design to ensure that the vehicles production costs meets the Governments UMC affordability target of $6.4 million per vehicle (expressed in base year 2018 constant dollars). This UMC target does not include any proposed Chemical

Energy (CE) protection solutions for Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs), Anti-Tank Grenades (ATGs), Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs), and

Artillery-Delivered High Precision Munitions (ADHPMs), unless such solutions are integrated into the vehicles base configuration. The first production year begins in fiscal year 2022 for 26 vehicles, followed by 28 vehicles in FY23, and then 50 vehicles per year from

FY24 through FY32 (for a total of 504 vehicles).

UMC is defined as the fully burdened costs of all material, labor, overhead, General and Administrative (G&A) expenses, fee/profit, and other direct and indirect expenses necessary for the production of vehicles. UMC also includes fully burdened costs of subcontractors, purchased parts and equipment, costs to integrate and assemble the various subassemblies into a working system, costs to install special and general equipment, costs to paint and package the system for shipment to its acceptance destination, and all transportation and travel costs needed to assemble the final system. Further, the UMC target does not include the cost to the Government to procure GFP necessary for manufacturing and assembly of vehicles.

C.1.1.5.2 Affordability Assessment

The contractor shall present its affordability management process and its UMC estimate at DMR and PRR. The contractor shall, to the maximum extent practicable, base its UMC estimate on actual historical costs incurred. The contractors DMR and PRR presentations shall include the following Affordability Assessment and UMC information:

* The UMC estimate methodology; basis of estimates and justifications; and identification of hardware, computer software, and requirement cost drivers.

* A description of risks that may impact the ability to meet the UMC target.

* A year-by-year UMC estimate at the fourth Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) level (as defined by the Cost and Software Data

Reporting (CSDR) Plan (Attachment 04)).

* A year-by-year UMC estimate, categorized by the following:

- Direct Material

- Material Overhead

- Direct Labor

- Labor Overhead

- Other Direct Costs

- G&A

- Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM)

- Fee/Profit

* The extent to which actual incurred costs were used in estimating the UMC.

* The learning and rate curves to be achieved during production.

The contractor shall identify cost reduction opportunities that would result in incremental overall UMC reductions of 5%, 10% and 15%.

The contractor shall perform a production rate analysis whereby the relationship between UMC and alternative production rates are defined, specifically assessing production durations from five to fifteen years in length. As part of this analysis, the contractor shall recommend the optimal economic order quantity rate of production and identify facility and tooling costs required to achieve this rate. Separately, the contractor shall develop its manufacturing cost estimate and present the results at DMR and PRR for any proposed

CE protection solutions for RPGs, ATGs, ATGMs, and ADHPMs. The contractor shall assume production of 167 CE protection solutions, 54 within the first 2 Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) options, and 20 per year up to the total requested number of solutions.

14 128

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.1.1.6 Program Planning, Scheduling, and Cost Reporting

C.1.1.6.1 Integrated Master Plan (IMP)

The contractor shall update, implement, and submit the IMP in accordance with CDRL A007. The IMP is an event-based plan consisting of a hierarchy of program events, with each event being supported by specific accomplishments, and each accomplishment associated with specific criteria to be satisfied for its completion. The IMP is part of the contract and all events, accomplishments, and criteria identified in the approved submittal will be contractually binding. Any changes to the IMP after it has been submitted as a CDRL will require written approval by the Government. Definitions of events, accomplishments, and criteria are based on the Department of Defense

(DoD) "Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and Use Guide" and MIL-STD-881C. The contractor shall include events, accomplishments, and criteria in its IMP but may include additional lower levels if desired. The contractor shall identify each

IMP event and accomplishment with a unique identification number and provide a textual description of all criteria. The contractor shall include the IMP events and accomplishments in the IMS on a word-for-word basis.

C.1.1.6.2 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The contractor shall develop, implement, and submit the IMS in accordance with Format 6 of CDRL A008.

C.1.1.6.3 Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) and CWBS Dictionary

The contractor…