SF30 Amendment #3.pdf
PDF 225 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct Corrosion Control Hangar Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W50S8Z20B0001
About this file
This document provides information on a federal contract opportunity to construct a corrosion control hangar for the Oregon Air National Guard at Kingsley Field in Klamath Falls, Oregon. The solicitation seeks a single firm fixed-price contract to provide all labor, materials, equipment and supervision necessary to construct a pre-engineered metal hangar and support facilities totaling approximately 16,000 square feet. The scope includes construction of a concrete aircraft tow-lane. The solicitation includes five line items, with four listed as options for security fencing, a temporary haul road, demolition and restoration of the temporary road, and lead lining at the hangar. The contract duration is 365 calendar days after notice to proceed. The North American Industry Classification code is 236210 and the size standard is $36.5 million. The estimated value is between $5-10 million. The performance location is Klamath Falls, Oregon and the requirement is set aside 100% for small business. The pre-bid conference is scheduled for December 12, 2019 and bids are due January 6, 2020.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch #3 Revised Specs -Steel Sliding Doors -RFI 047.pdf | ||
| Attch # 2 - Sheet T-011 -RFI 040-41 Response.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment #4.pdf | ||
| Attch #4 - Revised - Door hardware.pdf | ||
| Corrosion Control Pre-Bid Minutes 12 Dec.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment #2.pdf | ||
| Sign-In Sheet.pdf | ||
| SF30.pdf | ||
| JA Brand Name - Automated Logic_Redacted.pdf | ||
| 8 - Technology Systems.pdf | ||
| 7 - Electrical.pdf | ||
| 6 - Mechanical.pdf | ||
| 2 - Structural.pdf | ||
| W50S8Z20B0001.pdf | ||
| JA Brand Name - Advantor (1)_Redacted.pdf | ||
| 3 - Architectural.pdf | ||
| JA Brand Name - Monaco Fire Alarm_Redacted.pdf | ||
| KANGB Corr Control Hgr_Type B3 Revised Bid Spec Vol 1.pdf | ||
| KANGB Corr Control Hgr_Type B3 Revised Bid Spec Vol 2.pdf | ||
| KANGB Corr Control Hgr_Type B3 Revised Bid Spec Vol 3.pdf | ||
| 1 - General and Civil.pdf | ||
| 4 - Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler.pdf | ||
| 5 - Plumbing.pdf |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is ti:
a) Include additional answ ers ro RFI's
b) Include meeting minutes from pre-bid conference
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 9
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 16-Jan-2020
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W50S8Z20B0001
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
06-Dec-2019
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
16-Jan-2020
CODE
173 FW / BASE CONTRACTING OFFICE
211 ARNOLD AVE. SUITE 35
KLAMATH FALLS OR 97603
W912JV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W50S8Z20B0001
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
The following have been modified:
RFI #1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR
SOLICITATION W50S8Z-20-B-0001
Construct Corrosion Control Facility Project No. KJAQ119006
Updated: 15 Jan 2020
Date: 6 Dec 2019
RFI Question 1: Is there a possibility of moving the bid date to late January? The upcoming holidays will greatly impact our ability to get subcontractor pricing in time for a 6 January 2020 bid date.
Answer 1: New bid due date is 23 Jan 2020.
Date: 10 Dec 2019
RFI Question 2: The end of year timing of this highly complex project will reduce participation among subcontractors, many of which are not in the office for the holiday season. As such, it will be difficult to obtain competitive pricing from all of the different trades by 6 January 2020. In order to obtain the most competitive and accurate pricing, we strongly recommend extending the close of the solicitation to 27 January 2020.
Answer 2. SEE Response to RFI 1.
Date: 11 Dec 2019
RFI Question 3: Coiling doors Section 08 33 23. For doors 127A, 125B, 123B, 123D, 123E. The door schedule indicates these to be lead lined, but plans and spec indicates otherwise. Please Confirm that the spec is accurate showing 18 ga. Galvanized steel curtain
Answer 3. See Spec section 13 49 10 – 2.7 refers to Lead-lined doors and frames. These doors (127A, 125B, 123B, 123D, 123E) shall be ATFP rated and insulated, NOT to be lead lined. Curtain and hanging systems are to be in place at doors 123B, D and E.
Date: 13 Dec 2019
RFI Question 4: We are planning to bid section 33 32 16 Package Utility Wastewater Pumping Stations.
There are no flow or discharge pressure requirements listed. Are there any available?
Answer 4. Detail 4 on project plan sheet C-502 identifies the use of 1hp pumps. Both pumps are 1hp, either 120v or 240v. Attached to this RFI response is an example packaged grinder pump station, an approved equal may alternatively be used. The packaged system pumps are per the manufacturer in accordance with section ‘33 32 16 – 2.3 Pump Motor’.
Sewage flow calculations are attached (Attch 1). Explosion proofing requirements identified under 33 32 16 section 2.2. The E/one example contains discharge pressures and associated flows.
Grinder pump working pressure requirements are outlined in 33 32 16.
Date: 19 Dec 2019
RFI Question 5: Will the government please identify the significant changes to specifications that were made in the determination to re-solicit the Corrosion Control Hanger? With over 2000 pages of specs/drawings and to provide full transparency, at minimum, please cite the Divisions and Sections where these changes can be identified and addressed.
Answer 5. The significant changes is adding two options. One option to construct a temporary haul road and another to demolish and restore temp haul road.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 6: Is the project under the Buy America Act?
Answer 6. Yes, the project is subject to the Buy America Act.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 7: Option 4 Lead lining on the hanger, does the lead extend to full height of the hanger walls?
Answer 7. Yes. Lead lining extends to the full height of the hangar walls.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 8: Is there a detail showing how the lead lining is to be attached to the hanger siding and columns?
Answer 8. Detail 03/A-141 shows detail of exterior wall with lead lining. Since the columns are interior to the lead-lined wall panels they will not need to be wrapped in lead. The lead lining can be overlapped as in the detail or butt joined with a 2” strip of lead covering the butt joint. Section 13 49 10, describes the method of attachment.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 9: Per SECTION 13 49 10; Item 3.2 LEAD-LINED PANELS States, “Lead-lined panels shall be butt-jointed and shall be placed over supports with lead linings placed next to supports.”
a. Where does this condition exist and what detail will reflect this?
b. All details in sheets A-501, A-502, A-503 and A-504 only reflect either lead sheet or lead lined GWB.
Answer 9. a. Detail 1/A-142 (At Gypsum Board Joints) show the lead applied to the support and the gyp butt jointed forward of the stud.
b. Is there a question here?
In general, there will need to be an overlap where any joints occur. There can be no avenue for x-rays to penetrate the wall system.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 10: Per SECTION 13 49 10; Item 1.5 WARRANTY; States, “Lead sheet shielding materials shall be warranted against sagging and curling for 10 years.” Many aspects of the shielding are components of assemblies around columns and other obstacles, are integrated into field applied systems, or are applied to premanufactured products. Per 07 42 63 FABRICATED WALL PANEL ASSEMBLIES there is no information or reference to the lead sheets which means this is all field applied and the integrity is in the means of attachment directly to the insulated metal wall panel.
a. Is the warranty a workmanship or performance warranty?
Answer 10. This is a workmanship warranty.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 11: Please provide or verify the exterior insulated wall panel gauge (interior skin & exterior skin) and finish (SMP or Kynar), as well as the liner panel gauge
Answer 11. The drawings call out to meet or exceed AWIP HE40-A:
https://www.awipanels.com/products/adobetexturetm-he40-a-2/
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 12: Section 10 50 13 – Metal Lockers - Our material provider is requesting if ANG will accept slightly different material finishes for the lockers: Part 2 Products
2.2.1 Galvanized steel sheet – will the government accept electrolytic zinc coated galvanized process?
ASTM D6386, Method A is not included.
2.2.2 Finish – Will the government accept a powder coat finish?
2.3.2 Coat Hooks– Will the government accept zinc plated coat hooks in lieu of chromium plating?
2.3.3 Hanger Rods – Will the government accept zinc plated hanger rods in lieu of chromium plating?
2.3.4 Door Handles – Will the government accept stainless steel cup in lieu of chromium coatings?
2.3.11 Base Panels – Will the government accept 6” metal “Z” base in lieu of individual front and end base panels (see diagram below)? Front and end bases are used with 6" legs. These bases fit flush with the locker frame and are easily damaged. The “Z” base is recessed 2" and is recommended.
Answer 12. These are acceptable alternatives.
Date: 20 Dec 2019
RFI Question 13: Specification Section 21 30 00 Fire Pumps
a. Is controller required to be a VFD variable speed drive and if so what type of back up start method is required (IE Solid state soft start, Wye delta, Open or closed, Across the line start)
b. Is a main relief valve and waste cone required for an electric pump?
c. Please confirm that only one electric pump required (Specifications reference both Electric and
Diesel )
d. Design conditions call out 2000GPM at 105 psi, which only requires a 200hp motor. Is this an acceptable option for this facility?
e. Is a grooved derby type test header acceptable?
Answer 13. a. Yes, VFD is required. Soft start backup.
b. Relief valve is required in accordance with NFPA 20. The waste cone is indicated to comply with the requirement that the water discharge from the relief valve shall be readily visible or easily detectable by the pump operator.
c. Only one (1) electric centrifugal fire pump is required.
d. Electrical systems can support up to 375 HP. Fire Protection Contractor to verify that two (2) sets of #350kcmil conductors can be terminated on controller and fire pump, per Sheet E-701.
e. No. Linear manifold test heat is required.
Date: 6 Jan 2019
RFI Question 14: Hanger Doors - We have taken a look at the bid package and note a MAJOR conflict:
The specification is for a bi-swinging plenum door. However, the plans indicate a four-leaf bottom rolling door – bi-parting. These are two completely different door types. Please confirm which door type is required on this project.
Answer: The drawings indicate the proper door for the hangar.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 15: Security Fencing - Products, 2.1 Fence Fabric, 2.1.1 General Is the fabric to be GBW (galvanized before weave) Or GAW (galvanized after weave)? Please advise.
Answer: Either GBW or GAW may be used.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 16: Is the OANG paying the PP&L fees for the new transformer and switch gear?
Answer: No, The contractor will pay for PP&L fees
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 17: Two questions from Division 13, pre-engineered metal building:
1). Is the PEMB manufacturer supposed to account for some additional loading in regard to the lead lining system? 2). Where do we find the loading criteria for the PEMB structure in regard to the fall restraint system?
Answer: 1) The PEMB shall account for the additional loading required for the lead lining. 2) The loading criteria will be based on the fall restraint system selected by the contractor. This will be coordinated for connection points and loads with the PEMB manufacturer. See note 4.146 on A- 121, Re-Bid docs.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 18: Drawing A101, Note on Door 123B, has 4.149 Lead lined curtain hung from structure.
Also, the note above 4.149 which is 4.147, says door 123B curtain shall be hung on a frame that is mobile and can be positioned in front of the door. Is Door 123B curtain hung by structural support on the wall or on a mobile frame?
Answer: Please ignore the note 4.147, it is not used. Refer to Drawings S-112 for plan, S-131 location and S-601 elevation of the frame for the lead curtain at Door 123B.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 19: Have the new transformer details been submitted and reviewed by the County Building Department, or will Offerors need to carry a permit for the transformer? Is the transformer permits to be considered a part of the $40,000 allowance specified in 01 21 00?
Answer: The $40,000 allowance is only covering Electric Utility costs associated with the new transformer installation. It does not take into account any electrical permits that the contractor will have to cover.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 20: Cast in Place Concrete - 2.3.1.1d – Air content at point of delivery: Will the concrete be tested before it goes through the pump or at the end of the hose?
Answer: Collect the sample for the test at the discharge point (end of hose) in accordance with
ASTM C172.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 21: 2.3.1.7 – Will the owner reject all concrete that exceeds the strength requirement by 20%?
Answer: The owner may accept concrete that exceeds the specified design strength by 20% provided there are no adverse effects caused by using a mix that exceeds the specified design strength such as, but not limited to, cracking cased by the concrete gaining strength to quickly.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 22: 2.3.1.5 – Trial batching – Is the owner going to require 3 trial batches using 3 different water cement ratios for all concrete mix designs on this project or will one truck trial batch be sufficient?
Answer: Prepare design mixtures for each type and strength of concrete proportioned on the basis of laboratory trial mixture in accordance with ACI 301. In accordance with the specifications and ACI 301 use at least three different water-cementitious material ratios for each type of mixture. Alternatively, a design mixture proportioned on the basis of field test data in accordance with ACI 301 may be accepted.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 23: 1.6.8a – Mix Proportioning – Will the owner allow Knife River’s Labs and qualified personnel design the concrete mixes and do the necessary trial batches for this project?
Answer: Knife River’s Labs and qualified personnel may design the concrete mixes and do the necessary trial batches for the purposes of developing the mix design provided they meet the qualifications given in the specifications.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 24: Concrete Paving & Cast in Place Concrete - ASR Testing – Our ASR Tests are done under ASTM C1567: Will this be acceptable or will we need to do the ASTM C1260 as well?
Answer: ASTM C1260 testing will not be required if ASTM C1567 testing is done. The requirement to perform ASTM C1260 testing was intended to screen if additional (ASTM C1567) testing was needed.
Date: 7 Jan 2019
RFI Question 25: Paving – 2.3.1.1 ASTM C666 Aggregate Freeze Thaw Test - Will this be a required test or will our past history of concrete paving jobs at Kingsley prove that we do not need to do this test? Over the years we have supplied paving concrete for portions of ramp repair, Building 400, North and South DeArm projects.
Answer: Section 32 13 14.13 part 2.3.1.2: Yes, testing for individual aggregates in accordance with ASTM C1260 is required. 2. Section 32 13 14.13 part 2.3.1.1: Service record could potentially be acceptable in lieu of testing in accordance with ASTM C666. Service record must be performed by an independent third-party professional engineer, petrographer, or concrete materials engineer outlining the information contained within part 2.3.1.1. 3. Section 32 13 14.13 part 2.3.1.1: Number of projects listed meets the minimum of three concrete paving projects required to satisfy the service record option of part 2.3.1.1.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 26: Looking at the drawings for room 124, Drawing A101, Footing plan S101, Framing plan S141, the footing doesn’t match up with the wall and the framing. Does the footing layout on S101 need to change to match the block wall layout on A101?
Answer: At the north wall of Room 124, Drawings A-101 and S-141 are correct. On Drawing S-101, the footing shall be movednorthward to align with the wall as indicated in A-101 and S-141.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 27: The lead lining shown on A-002 Method of Attachment:
Answer: See answer to RFIs 8 & 9. Sheet A-141/A-142 show lead lining attachment.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 28: The questions and answers from previous solicitation W912JV19B7000 dated June 6, 2019 – Are the response to RFIs #1 to 67 still valid?
Answer: These RFIs where incorporated/captured into the revised plans and specs dated 4 Oct 2019.
Date: 8 Jan 2019
RFI Question 29: Clarification for the product required for the entry floor mats, cannot find in specifications or finish schedule.
Answer: Provide a 3’ x 4’ vinyl and polypropylene floor mat. Equal or superior to American Floor Mat, Ribbed Entrance Mats, in Charcoal. https://www.americanfloormats.com/ribbed-entrance-mats/ Date: 14 Jan 2019
RFI Question 30: Section 01 45 35: Special Inspections : So, besides having a fulltime QC person and a Superintendent this section requires the prime contractor to hire independent 3rd party inspector(s) to fulfill this QC oversight position? Is the SIOR (Special Inspector of Record) a fulltime position also?
Answer: Special Inspections are not a full time position, they are third party, and only required as the task requires per plans and specification.
Date: 14 Jan 2019
RFI Question 31: Are there any special permits required? Building? Etc..
Answer: Comply with permitting in specifications.
Date: 14 Jan 2019
RFI Question 32: Masonry Note M-9 on Sheet S-001 States:
“MASONRY DESIGN IS BASED ON INSPECTED WORKMANSHIP.”
Please provide clarification as to the meaning of this statement.
Answer: The note indicates that the masonry design is based on the masonry being inspected in accordance with the specifications and the special inspection and testing notes on sheet S-003.
Date: 10 Jan 2019
RFI Question 33: Drawing A602 - Room 122 shows ACP1 for ceiling finish, however drawing A121 shows an exposed ceiling and note 4.116 says no ceiling. Which detail is correct?
Answer: The ceiling in Room 122 is exposed, there is to be no ACP in this room.
Date: 15 Jan 2019
RFI Question 34: We show the lead lining in the aircraft maintenance bay as an option bid item. We are trying to determine how this lead shielding is attached. What is the finish material over the lead lining. We can’t seem to locate the detail. Please advise.
Answer: The finish schedule calls out for the exposed lead lining to be painted. Finish schedule A-
602. The building sections and elevations show Metal Liner Panel to 7’-2” on the walls that are not Gyp. Spec section 13 49 10, 3.2 indicates the spacing of 8” OC
Date: 15 Jan 2019
RFI Question 35: Spec Section 01 50 00 Section 3.2.5 Temporary Electrical Work “The General Contractor shall pay for all electrical energy consumed for construction purposes for all trades including temporary offices, for operation of ventilating equipment, for heating of building, and for testing and operating of all equipment. The General Prime Contractor shall continue to pay for energy used until substantial completion even though equipment has been connected to the permanent wiring.”
1) It is our understanding that the Contractor will pay for the installation of all temporary service to utility point of termination shown on drawings, and upon completion of project, pay for removal of temporary service.
2) It is our understanding that the Contractor will pay for all electrical energy consumed for construction purposes.
3) According to the referenced paragraph above, it is also our understanding that the Contractor will pay for all permanent electrical energy consumed that is connected to permanent wiring(i.e., the new facility) until substantial completion is achieved.
Answer: 1) Yes the contractor will pay for temp service. 2) no, the government will pay 3) no, government will pay.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .