Solicitation Amendment W50S8W25RA0030002 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Accept Within Days 30 120 Response Due Date 28 Jan 2025 18 Feb 2025

Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurements

The following clauses were added:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction). (Alternate I) (Feb 1995)Alternate I(Feb 1995)

Alternate I . If an organized site visit will be conducted, substitute a paragraph substantially (Feb 1995) the same as the following for paragraph (b) of the basic provision:

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-

0900 on 14 January 2024

(c) Participants will meet at-

Bldg 31 Classroom153d Airlift Wing, Cheyenne, WY, 82009

**PLEASE NOTE THAT AN ENTRY AUTHORIZATION LIST (EAL) DOCUMENT WILL NEED

TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ACCESS TO BASE ENTRY. IF YOU PLAN ON ATTENDING

THE SITE VISIT PLEASE CONTACT THE POC'S LISTED 1-2 WEEKS PRIOR TO SITE VISIT TO

REQUEST A BLANK EAL DOCUMENT FOR SUBMISSION.**

W50S8W25RA0030002

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

The following clauses were added:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

52.204-7 System for Award Management. Oct 2018 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal. Jan 2017

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements-Secondary Site of the Work.

May 2014

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.233-2 Service of Protest. (Sep 2006)

As prescribed in , insert the following provision:33.106

Service of Protest (Sept 2006)

Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly (a) with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from Christopher Davalos,Contracting Office, 217 Dell Range Blvd., Cheyenne, WY, 82009Protests to NG Protest Decision Authority shall be filed at: National Guard Bureau Office of the Director of Acquisitions ATTN: NGB-AQ-O 111 S. George Mason Dr. Arlington, VA

. [Contracting Officer 22204 Email: ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-order-ombudsman@army.mil designate the official or location where a protest may be served on the Contracting Officer.]

The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within oneday of filing a (b) protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference. (Feb 1998)

As prescribed in , insert the following provision:52.107(a)

Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

www.acquisition.gov [ ]____ ____ Insert one or more Internet addresses

(End of provision)

52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions. (Nov 2020)

As prescribed in , insert the following provision in solicitations that include any FAR or 52.107(e) supplemental provision with an authorized deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental provision is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the provision when it is used without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental provision, except that the contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Nov 2020)

The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with (a) an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

The use in this solicitation of any [insert regulation name](48 CFR (b) Federal Acquisition Regulation Chapter ) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of Chapter 2 "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

(End of provision)

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements.

Nov 2023

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

sam.gov. OFFERORS ARESTRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS EARLY IN

THIS PROCESS.

3.4. Any interpretations made will be in the form of an amendment of the solicitation, drawings, specifications.etc., and will be furnished to all prospective offerors via posting to https://sam.gov.

3.4.1. Receipt by the offeror must be acknowledged in the space provided on the SF 1442 or by returning a signed copy of the amendment by the time set for receipt of proposals. Explanations or instructions given in a form other than an amendment to the solicitation shall not be binding. Questions (on a non-attribution basis) and answers shall be furnished to all prospective offerors via the web site.

3.4.2. For security reasons, all technical and engineering data related to this solicitation will be distributed using the https://sam.gov. Sam.gov is a web-based dissemination tool designed to safeguard acquisition-related information for all Federal agencies. Plans and specifications are uploaded and require Contractors to request explicit access from the Contracting Officer OR export controlled access through

DLA.

3.4.2.2. Interested offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM). To register go to: www.sam.gov. You will need your DUNS number to register. Instructions for registering are on the web page. (Please note the registration for access to the secure site takes approximately 15 business days, so plan accordingly.)

4. AMENDMENTS PRIOR TO DATE SET FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

4.1. The right is reserved, as the interest of the Government may require, to revise or amend, the specifications or drawings or both prior to and/or after the date set for receipt of proposals as necessary.

Such amendments, if any, will be announced by an amendment or amendments to this Request for Proposal. All information relating to this RFP, including pertinent changes/amendments and information prior to the date set for receipt of proposals will be posted at https://sam.gov.

4.2. Offerors are strongly cautioned to check this site frequently and to "refresh" their web page to ensure they have the lasted information.

5. HAND CARRIED PROPOSALS

5.1. A bid repository is provided for hand carried proposals and is located at: Wyoming Air National Guard 217Dell Range Blvd, Cheyenne, WY 82009.

5.2. Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the Contracting Office located at 217 Dell Range Blvd and must be sealed prior to the time established for receipt of proposals.

5.3. Offerors are cautioned that approval to enter the base must be obtained prior to the closing date for receipt of proposals. Follow the procedures outlined above in paragraph 2.1.2.for entry. Delays are probable at the entry point and should be accounted for. Late receipt of proposals due to base entry delays may not be deemed excusable and the Contracting Officer may declare the proposal late and remove it from consideration.

6. WAGE DETERMINATION

6.1. The Construction Wage Rate Requirements formerly known as Davis Bacon Wage Rates are applicable to this project. Current prevailing wage determination(s) at time of issuance of solicitation are General Decision Number WY20240023 dated 01/12/2024 for Laramie County in Wyoming. In the event the current prevailing Wage Determination is changed by the Department of Labor prior to the closing date of the solicitation, the most current wage determination is in effect. Should the wage rate change after closing, but prior to award, the updated Wage Determination will be incorporated by amendment and issued to all offerors that have not been eliminated from the competition. If applicable, these offerors /contractors will be given a reasonable opportunity to provide revised proposals solely to amend proposals due to Wage Determination changes. If the wage determination modification does not change any affected wage rates, then the provisions of FAR 22.404-5(c)(4) will apply.

6.2. Applicable wage rates can be found at https://sam.gov/search?index=wd.

7. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This RFP does not commit the Government to pay costs incurred in preparation and submission of initial and subsequent proposals or for other costs incurred prior to award of a formal contract.

8. REMOVAL OF SECTIONS AT TIME OF AWARD

Sections 00100, 00110, 00120,00600 and all exhibits will be physically removed as a result of an award, but will be deemed to be incorporated by reference in that award.

9. DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

In compliance with FAR Subpart4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals.

The Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals. No destruction certificate will be provided.

10. INFORMATION REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF UTILITY SERVICES

It has been determined that all temporary utilities shall be the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor will pay all charges (hook up fees, metering, monthly usage, etc.)resulting from temporary utilities. The offerors shall take this into consideration when computing their offers. (FAR Clause 52.236- 14, Availability and Use of Utility Services.) OR It has been determined that all reasonable amounts of (insert), where/if physically available, used in connection with this project will be furnished to contractor without cost. The offerors will take this into consideration when computing its offer. (FAR Clause 52.236-14, Availability and Use of Utility Services)

11. BIDBONDS

A Bid bond is required with submission of the proposal. The bid bond is due on the date as stated on the SF1442 block 13. The bid bond must be on a SF24 form. Rejection of a bid bond shall be in accordance with FAR 28.101-4 Noncompliance with bid guarantee requirements.

12. EXCEPTIONS

If the offeror takes exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify each such exception and include a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and what benefit accrues to the Government. All exceptions to the solicitation requirements (Sections 00010 through 00800) and supporting rationale shall be included in an addendum to the proposal and clearly labeled "Exceptions". An addendum is only required if the offeror takes exception to any requirement in the solicitation. (The Addendum does not have a page limitation, but shall only include information relevant to exceptions taken to the solicitation requirements.) The Government will assume an offeror takes no exceptions to any solicitation requirement if the offeror does not submit an Addendum identifying exceptions. Offerors are advised that solicitation requirements are not necessarily negotiable and such exceptions may render an offeror's proposal unacceptable and ineligible for award.

13. CLAUSES

12.1. Clauses and provisions from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and supplements thereto are incorporated in this document by reference and in full text. Those incorporated by reference have the same force and effect as if they were given in full text.

12.2. Clauses and provisions in this document may not appear in consecutive order.

14. NEW CONTROL SYSTEMS

New DDC control systems must be able to communicate with existing Distech systems.

PROPOSAL PREP INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposal data. They are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals. Carefully review this section prior to commencing proposal preparation. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with Section 00100, FAR Provision 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors- Competitive Acquisition.

1.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal, at the time of proposal submission, may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and eliminated from consideration for award.

2. PROPOSAL CONTENT

2.1. Prospective offerors shall submit the following volumes in two separate packages:

2.1.1. Submit Volume 1, Price proposal, pro forma documents, in original and (3) three hard copies, in accordance with instructions contained herein.

Volume 2, Part 1 - Technical Capability Proposal, in original, (3) hard copies and one CD.

Subfactor 1 - Site Superintendent Qualifications (limit resumes to 2 pages each)

Subfactor 2- Team Project Experience (limit to 3 pages)

Subfactor 3 - Key Subcontractor Experience (limit to 3 pages)

Subfactor 4 - Quality Control(limit to 5 pages)

Subfactor 5 - Progress Schedule(limit to 3 pages)

Volume 2, Part 2 - Past/Present Performance Information

Attachment 5 - Performance Performance Questionnaire should provide questionnaire responses to the Contracting Officer not later than the closing date.

2.3. After compiling all required information, submit original and specified number of copies to the following office: Wyoming Air National Guard Contracting Office. Mark the front of the envelope/box with the following:

"PROPOSAL No. W50S8W-25-R-A003, DONOT OPEN--- Competitive Acquisition".

2.4. PROPOSAL FORMAT

2.4.1. Purpose: These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposed data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation.

2.4.2. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

2.4.3. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each offeror's capability to perform all of the requirements contemplated by this solicitation. All commitments made in the proposal may become a part of the resultant contract. The data submitted with each proposal should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged.

2.4.4. Written proposals shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper (charts may be landscaped but must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper) and shall be in a legible font size (10 min.). All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered, and identified with the RFP number. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering with tabs is required. Type size for graphics, charts, diagrams and tables shall be of an appropriate font and size for the application, and must be clearly readable without magnification assistance to the normal eye. Text lines will be no less than single-space. To the maximum extent practicable, proposal submission shall be double sided. Where page limits exist a page is defined as one single side of a page. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Unless otherwise stated, tabs, indexes and dividers do not count in the page count.

2.4.5. Binding: Elaborate format and binding are neither necessary nor desirable. All binders will be capable of lying flat when opened. Three ring binders are preferred. The cover and spine of each binder will clearly identify the offeror's name, Project number, RFP number, RFP title and copy number, (e.g.

copy 2 of 3). The original for each volume will be clearly identified on the cover and the spine. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages.

2.4.6. Indexing: Each binder will contain a "Table of Contents" for that volume. The "Table of Contents" will identify major areas, paragraphs and subparagraphs by number and title, as well as by page number and volume locations. Tab indexing will be used to identify Sections as appropriate.

2.4.7. Electronic Copy: Provide one (1) electronic copy of all of the Volume 2 proposal information.

Electronic copies shall be submitted on CD/DVD saved in Microsoft Word format or Adobe Acrobat.

("Read Only" files are acceptable).

2.4.10. The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in his/her proposal, including that provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected.

2.5. PROPOSAL VOLUME CONTENTS: Each offeror's proposal shall be submitted as set forth below and all information shall be confined to the appropriate part to facilitate independent evaluation.

Proposals, which do not include the requested minimum information, may be eliminated from further consideration for award.

2.5.1. VOLUME 1, PRICE/COSTINFORMATION AND PRO FORMA DOCUMENTS

2.5.1.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and evaluation of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation. The Government is not, and does not intend on, requesting certified cost or pricing data. See bid schedule table for details.

2.5.1.2. Provide an introductory page to include Cage Code, DUNS Number, Tax Identification Number (TIN), points of contact, authorized negotiators, contact phone, and email addresses. Also, include your business socioeconomic status, e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, HUBZone small business, etc.

2.5.1.3. Offer and Section 00010 -Complete in its entirety the "Offeror" portion of the Standard Form (SF) 1442.An official having the authority to contractually bind your company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with FAR 4.102. One copy of the SF 1442 is required to have an original signature.

2.5.1.4. Section 00010 - Insert the price/cost associated with the project in the line items. All line items (CLINs) must be priced to be considered.

2.5.1.5. Representations and Certifications- Section 00600- insert the required certifications and representations and return only those shown in section 00600. Return the entire Section 00600 with your proposal. All other required representations and certifications are to be completed on line in the System for Award Management (SAM)www.sam.gov.

2.5.1.6. All potential offerors are required to register in the System for Award Management. See FAR Provision52.204-7 System for Award Management.

2.5.1.8. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity.

Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. Applicable to set-aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1). Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party isnot a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration ( IAWFAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer.

2.5.2. VOLUME 2, PART 1, OFFERORTECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROPOSAL

2.5.2.1. Volume 2 Part 1 is comprised of five (5) subfactors. Subfactor 1 Site Superintendent Experience;

Subfactor 2 Team Project Experience; Subfactor 3 Key Subcontractor Experience; Subfactor 4 Quality Control; and Subfactor 5 Progress Schedule.

2.5.2.1.1. Government acknowledges that the technical proposal will involve discussion of some of the same projects/contracts discussed in the Past Performance volume. While Past Performance examines how an offeror performed in the past, so as to determine the probability of success on future projects, this subfactor examines the offeror's experience with complex multidiscipline project management and execution and how the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the contract's requirements taking this experience into consideration. Offeror should reference this information by providing a short summation of their relevant experience to meet the submission requirements of this subfactor.

2.5.2.2. The Experience and Capability Proposal is Subfactor 1: Site Superintendent Experience.

limited to 2 single pages, excluding tabs, indexes and resumes as noted below. Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated.

2.5.2.2.1 Demonstrate offeror's site superintendent qualifications to perform a project of this magnitude and complexity. Discuss and provide key experience on previous projects in terms of scope, size and complexity. Refer to Specification Section 01 30 00 Paragraph1.6.2. If no experience, state so and indicate in detail how you plan to overcome this lack of experience. The onus is solely on the offeror to indicate in detail how the offeror plans to overcome this lack of experience. (Resumes or experience cut sheets are limited to 2 pages each and not part of the page count.) In the event the intended person is not part of the offeror's organization at the time the proposal is submitted, then a completed Exhibits Band D, "Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form," is also required, or the information will not be considered.

2.5.2.3. The Team Project Experience is limited to 3 single Subfactor 2: Team Project Experience.

pages. Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated.

2.5.2.3.1. Demonstrate offeror's team experience to perform a project of this magnitude and complexity.

Discuss and provide experience of key personnel including, but not limited to, Project Manager, Quality Assurance Manager (on site), and Safety Manager. (Resumes or experience cut sheets are limited to 2 pages each and not part of the page count.) If no team experience, state so and indicate in detail how you plan to overcome this lack of experience.

2.5.2.4 The Key Subcontractor Experience is limited to 3 Subfactor 3: Key Subcontractor Experience.

single pages (does not include resumes). Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated.

2.5.2.4.1. Demonstrate offeror's respective subcontractor experience to perform a project of this magnitude and complexity. Discuss and provide key subcontractors experience on projects in terms of scope, size and complexity.

2.5.2.5. The Quality Control is limited to 5pages. Pages in excess of the Subfactor 4: Quality Control:

limit will not be evaluated.

2.5.2.5.1. The proposal narrative demonstrates that the quality control staff, with lines of authority, is adequate to meet the contract's requirements. The proposed Quality Control answers should provide a detailed explanation of how quality issues are dealt with on various types of construction projects and as a minimum, meetings, inspections, submittal reviews, correction of non-compliant work and how you intend to ensure non-reoccurrence and reporting of quality problems to Government officials. (Note a Quality Control Plan is not required with this proposal).

2.5.2.6 The Progress Schedule is limited to3 pages (does not include Subfactor 5: Progress Schedule:

the actual schedule in the Critical Path Method provided in a PDF). Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated.

2.5.2.6.1. Provide construction schedule in a Critical Path Method that shows the complete project schedule from Notice to Proceed date of 1February 2025 (estimated) to include all construction activities as well as concurrent activities, and outline the critical path activities that will show successful execution of the construction project within the period of performance requirements per FAR 52.211-10. Also, include a narrative discussing the scheduling processes and resource allocation that ensure completion and control of schedule progress from beginning to the end of the project.

2.5.3. VOLUME 2, PART 2 OFFERORPAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

2.5.3.1. Volume 2 Part 2 is obtained for the purpose of evaluating Past/Present Performance. Past/Present Performance includes current/on-going performance that is complete to 70% or greater. Volume 2 includes the offeror's Performance Performance Questionnaire, Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire; and any discussion and or additional information, awards, letters, etc. concerning past /present performance the offeror includes. Offerors are cautioned to complete all the questions on the Past Performance Questionnaire.

2.5.3.2. Offerors shall use the Reference Package, Exhibit C, to obtain references from past and present clients.

2.5.3.3. Past/Present Performance, which includes current on-going (present) performance that is complete to 70%or greater will be evaluated using the evaluation criteria set forth in Section00120 of the solicitation. If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies, joint venture or formal teaming agreement. The Government may contact these references and may consider this information as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the offeror's past/present performance.

2.5.3.4. Offerors shall discuss their performance using the Attachment 5 - Performance Performance Questionnaire format. Prepare not more than (3-5) of these documents. Contractors should select their projects carefully because the quality of the contractor's relevant performance is more important than the quantity of projects submitted.

2.5.3.5. Use the Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire format to provide information that demonstrates a history of performance on contracts that are similar in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude to this project's plans and specifications. Explain what aspects of the contract you find relevant to the proposed effort and identify how each contract ranks, in terms of relevancy, with respect to the other contracts addressed in proposal.

2.5.3.6. Offerors should consider the currency and relevancy of the past/present performance information to be considered, the performance must have been completed during the past five (5)years. The period begins five (5) years prior to the solicitation release date and includes current performance. Performance that is more current may have greater impact than older performance.

2.5.3.7. In determining relevancy to the solicitation requirement, offerors should consider the similarity of construction methods employed, size, scope, cost magnitude, location, client type (e.g. federal government) and complexity of work performed to those required for the proposed effort. Location should also be considered.

2.5.3.8. Offerors are encouraged to include with their proposal information any problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror's correction actions.

2.5.3.9. Offerors lacking relevant present/past performance experience may submit information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement if such information is relevant to this acquisition. Such information shall, as a minimum, include:

-Name(s) of Predecessor Company/Subcontractor and/or Key Personnel

-Complete Address Telephone, Fax Number and email address

- Brief synopsis of the experience- A resume may be submitted for "Key Personnel" Describe relevancy to this project

2.5.3.10 Provide three (3)references, for each Predecessor Company, Subcontractor or Key Personnel.

Clearly identify the contractor/individual for whom the reference information concerns.

2.5.3.11. Past Performance References - - A "Final "Performance Evaluation REQUIRED (Construction) (also referred to as CCASS Evaluation)issued for a project may be included in lieu of sending out reference package for the project. Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior client(s) of OR all the projects listed on your Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire submission. (Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit C Package). This includes correspondence explaining the requirement to obtain an independent evaluation of prior contract performance, and the Past Performance Questionnaire for use in evaluating Past Performance. Inform references that completed Performance Questionnaire should be returned to the Contracting Officer via email at: christopher.davalos.1@us.af.

to arrive prior to or on mil, kristopher.kahle@us.af.mil and robert.rodriguezsantiago.civ@army.mil the closing date for receipt of proposals. Offeror must not review the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They are to be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Officer.

Offeror's should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner.

2.5.3.12. In assessing past performance, the Government may also consider the past/present performance of the offeror's key personnel, Project Manager, Quality Control Manager and Site Superintendent, as it relates to previous projects. In the event the intended key personnel for this solicitation's project do not have demonstrated past performance in the project(s) submitted in the Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire, the Government reserves to obtain reference information additional information is required.

2.5.3.12.1. Each key person without prior past performance history demonstrated on the submitted Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire shall provide a summary of experience or a n the event the intended person is not part of the offeror's organization at the time the proposal resume. I is submitted then a completed Exhibit B," Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form (Exhibit D)" or Letter of Intent, is also required or the information will not be considered. The Government may seek additional references and reserves the right to use the information provided to obtain additional references.

2.5.3.13. Offerors are advised that the Government may use all data provided by the offeror in this volume and data obtained from any other sources, to include, but not limited to, data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror. The Government reserves the rights to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current accurate and complete past/present performance information rests with the offeror.

The following clauses were added:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting. Aug 2020

Section 00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

PROPOSALEVALUATION AND BASIS FOR AWARD

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. This solicitation is for a Firm Fixed Price Contract. The Government intends to award a single contract to a qualified Small Business Offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposal conforms to all the RFP's requirements and is judged to represent the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation scheme set out in this solicitation. The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e. best value) proposal that is determined to be the most be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Technical, Price, and Past Performance. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. In terms is relative importance of the factors, the Technical factor is more important than the Present/ Past Performance and when combined, the non cost factors are approximately equal to the Price Factor. The firm that represents the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.

1.2. To arrive at a Best Value decision this acquisition will utilize the FAR Part 15.101-1 tradeoff process unless the lowest priced offeror (with a price deemed reasonable and realistic)is also deemed to be the highest rated in terms of non-price evaluation criteria. If the lowest priced offeror is also the highest rated in terms of non-Price Factors, no tradeoff is necessary. Further, there is no tradeoff necessary between any offer that is lower priced and higher rated in terms of non-Price Factors with respect to any other offers that are higher priced and lower rated for the non-Price Factors. While the Government and the Source Selection Authority will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

1.3. The source selection process will be conducted in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.3, Source Selection procedures. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria listed in "Evaluation Factors for Award."

Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may raise serious questions regarding an offeror's technical ability, past performance and/or pricing and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

1.4. The Contracting Officer will begin the evaluation process by conducting a proposal compliance review for all timely-received proposals for determination of basic proposal adequacy prior to providing the proposals to the evaluators. Failure to provide a complete proposal may result in the proposal being removed from further consideration for award. Failure to address any factor Technical, Past Performance and Price or any technical subfactor shall be grounds for elimination from evaluation and consideration for award.

1.5. Offerors must ensure that no pricing information is displayed in Volume 2, Technical and Past Performance Proposal.

1.6. Although the assessment of Past Performance as a specific evaluation factor is separate and distinct from the Determination of Responsibility required by FAR Part 9, Past Performance information obtained herein will be used during the Government's responsibility determination. The Government also reserves the right to obtain additional information solely for the purpose of making a responsibility determination from all offerors after receipt of proposals. Requests for responsibility information do not constitute discussions.

1.7. ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (if applicable e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

2. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

2.1. The evaluation factors are(1) Technical, (2) Past/Present Performance and (3) Price. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. The firm that represents the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.

2.1.1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror's methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed task and technical requirements within the required schedule.

2.2. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: TECHNICALEVALUATION FACTOR RATINGS:

2.2.1. The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal. This is a combined rating that includes risk associated with the technical approach in a single rating. Ratings will be assigned at the subfactor level as well as an overall factor level rating. Based on evaluation results, the Government will assign a technical rating for each of the five (5) subfactors as well as the overall technical proposal. An offer which fails to provide information in any of the specified areas may be deemed incomplete, and eliminated from the competition and ineligible for further consideration for award.

Below sub-factors are listed in descending order of importance

Color Rating

Adjectiva l Rating

Description

Blue Outstandi ng

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements, contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength.

Purple Good Proposal demonstrates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength.

Green Acceptab le

Proposal demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Yello w

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Red Unaccept able

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable.

2.2.3. Subfactor 1: Site Superintendent Qualifications:

2.2.3.1. The offeror shall submit a quality site superintendent identified for this project. Have at least one qualified superintendent, or competent alternate, capable of reading, writing, and conversing fluently in the English language, on the job-site at all times during the performance of the contract work. The Site Superintendent will also be skilled in computer communications and applications.

2.2.3.2. The project superintendent must have a minimum of 10 years' experience in construction with at least 5 of those years as a superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity to this project. The individual shall be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance. The individual shall be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings. The qualification requirements for the alternate superintendent are the same as for the project superintendent.

2.2.4. .Subfactor 2: Team Project Experience

2.2.4.1. Submit a narrative, which demonstrates successful project execution with the same or similar team. Contractor shall provide information that effectively represents their ability to work together as a team demonstrated through previous construction projects of similar size, scope, duration, mission and cost factors. Furthermore demonstrate the team's success with other federal, state, and or public sector projects. Demonstrate how the team successfully completed projects together.

2.2.5. Subfactor 3: Key Subcontractor Experience.

2.2.5.1. Submit a narrative, which describes subcontractor experience that will enable a successful project. Contractor shall provide information that effectively represents the success and potential for success of each of their respective subcontractors. In addition, identify the on-site lead crew foreman for each discipline. The list of foreman and key personnel with accompanying resumes will be evaluated for completeness to determine if all foremen and key personnel identified have the technical and educational background, relevant job experience and qualifications to perform the work requirements of this project.

Documentation indicating that the lead crew foreman assigned to this project has a minimum of five years of experience. This foreman must be able to speak English and will be required to be present at the job site at all times when work is in progress. In addition the offeror shall identify the total number of crews and size of each crew.

2.2.6. Subfactor 4: Quality Control.

2.2.6.1. Submit a narrative, which describes the offeror's quality control plan. Contractor shall provide information that effectively represents their quality control program and methodology. The offeror's quality control plan and methodology shall meet or exceed commercial standards routinely used by the construction industry for same or similar projects. Any innovative procedures or methods shall be explained in detail. The Quality Control plan submittal shall clearly demonstrate the Contractor's abilities to effectively plan and manage the quality control aspects relating to the project.

2.2.7. Subfactor 5: Progress Schedule.

2.2.7.1. The progress schedule shall be in Critical Path Method for the project. The project schedule will be evaluated for completeness to determine if it demonstrates and describes how required work will be performed within the time allotted. A progress schedule for all major construction elements of this project based upon the offeror's proposed performance period. Offerors shall use the attached AF Form 3064 or equivalent. All milestones shall be annotated with actual dates and a line graph. The offeror's proposed performance period shall not exceed the performance period outlined in SF 1442, block 11. The progress schedule shall demonstrate the offeror's technical capabilities and expertise. The schedule shall clearly demonstrate the offeror's ability to manage and complete all requirements within the proposed performance period. Please ensure to include a list of items that may negatively impact the schedule and how the offeror intends to mitigate the risk.

2.3. PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCEEVALUATION

2.3.1. The Government will evaluate the offeror's record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the Plans and Specifications. The Past /Present Performance evaluation will consist of a "relevancy" rating and a "confidence" rating. Although there are subfactors listed below, the "confidence" ratings will be at the factor level only. Stated differently, the subfactors will be considered, but they will not receive individual confidence ratings. The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consider such things as an offeror's business practices, customer relationship, ability to successfully perform as proposed, and other considerations as described in Past/Present Performance Sub-factors, elements and other considerations. Past/Present Performance includes current/on-going (present)performance complete to 70% percent. Projects currently in progress for the National Guard will also be considered regardless of percentage complete. In assessing performance confidence, the evaluator may: (1) evaluate present and past performance information through the use of questionnaires completed by the offeror's references; (2) use data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System(FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases;(3) interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror; (4) the information provided in the Offeror's Past Performance Relevancy Questionnaire; and (5) consider any information the offeror submits which explains any problems encountered on the identified contract and the offeror's corrective actions. The Government reserves the rights to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate.

2.3.2. The evaluation may take into account Past/Present Performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. The evaluation will also consider information provided relative to corrective actions taken to resolve problems on past or existing, contracts.

2.3..3. An offeror with no relevant Past/Present Performance may receive a rating based on the evaluation of its predecessor companies, key personnel, and/or subcontractors provided the offeror…