RSQ_10-22_Final_Civil_Evaluation_Committee_Results.pdf

PDF 98 KB Posted

Attached to
RSQ 09-25 Continuing Professional Services
Solicitation number
RSQ 09-25
Issued by
Volusia County, Orlando City, Florida

About this file

The document is an evaluation scoresheet for the Utilities Commission of the City of New Smyrna Beach, Florida, related to RSQ 10-22 Continuing Services Civil contract opportunity. The scoresheet contains evaluation results from three different evaluators for 12 engineering and consulting firms, scoring their qualifications for ongoing professional services. The document indicates a competitive selection process where firms are ranked based on multiple evaluation criteria, with scores ranging from the low 40s to mid-90s.

CPH, Inc. received the highest total score of 93.50, followed closely by Tetra Tech at 93.00, while Yuro & Assoc received the lowest total score of 42.50. The evaluation appears to be part of a process to select qualified firms for continuing civil engineering and professional services, with the potential for a one-year contract that can be extended up to three times. The scoring suggests a comprehensive review of each firm's capabilities, experience, and potential to meet the city's utilities commission ongoing service needs.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RSQ_09-25_Shortlist_Posting.pdf PDF
RSQ09-25_PROPOSAL_RECEIPT_LOG.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RSQ_09-25_Addendum_No_3_PR_Response.pdf PDF
RSQ_09-25_Addendum_No_2.pdf PDF
2022-4-15_Utilities_New_Smyrna_Beach-_Mangan_Qualifications_DP_V1.0.pdf PDF
POPP_20220310_0839-City_of_New_Smyrna_Beach_RSQ_-AST-Final.pdf PDF
Atwell_City_of_New_Smyrna_RSOQ.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_NSB_Continuing_Professional_Services_Civil_Engineering_Burns_&_McDonnell.pdf PDF
Hazen_and_Sawyer_UCNSB_Continuing_Professional_Services.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Final_Tab_Survey.pdf PDF
CPH_Response_RSQ_10-22_General_Survey_and_Mapping.pdf PDF
CPH_Response_RSQ10-22_Civil_Engineering.pdf PDF
ETM_Survey_Utiltiies_Commission_Survey_Proposal.pdf PDF
UCNSB_RFQ_10-22.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Civil_Eng_Proposal.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Continuing_Professional_Services_Burgess&Niple_Inc..pdf PDF
RSQ-10-22_Continuing_Professional_Services-Electrical_Engineering.pdf PDF
RSQ_09-25_Addendum_No_1_PR_Response.pdf PDF
RSQ-10-22_Continuing_Professional_Services-Survey_and_Mapping.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Tetra_Tech.pdf PDF
lazen_new_smyrna_red_r0.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Final_Tab_Electrical.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_NSB_Continuing_Professional_Services_Electrical_Engineering_Burns_McDonnell.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Rummel_Klepper_Kahl_Submittal.pdf PDF
New_Smyrna_RSQ_10-22_Continuing_Professional_Services.pdf PDF
RSQ_10-22_Electrical_Eng_Proposal.pdf PDF
1_Yuro_&_Associates__Submitted_RFQ.pdf PDF
Stantec_UCNSB_RSQ10-22_04.19.22.pdf PDF
SOQ_P&D_Engineers_New_Smyrna_Beach.pdf PDF
DRMP_Inc._SOQ_for_RSQ_10-22.pdf PDF
Stantec__UCNSB_RSQ10-22__Electrical_Engineering.pdf PDF
New_Smyrna_Beach_RSQ_10-22_-_SurvTech_Solutions_Response_20220419.pdf PDF
RSQ_09-25_Continuing_Professional_Services.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATOR EVALUATOR 1 EVALUATOR 2 EVALUATOR 3 EVALUATOR 3 TOTALS

COMPANY

Burgess & Niple 92 82 88 78 85.00 Burns &

McDonnell 76 86 62 62 71.50 Chen Moore 84 72 68 68 73.00 CPH, Inc. 92 96 94 92 93.50

Dyer,Riddle,Mills and Precourt 88 78 66 66 74.50 Hazen and Sawyer 88 78 88 88 85.50 Mangan 56 26 32 34 37.00

McKim & Creed 84 82 80 80 81.50 Rummel,Klepper

&Kahl 92 72 82 88 83.50 Stantec 88 92 88 88 89.00

Tetra Tech 96 92 96 88 93.00 Yuro & Assoc 58 30 42 40 42.50

Utilities Commission

RSQ 10‐22 Continuing Services Civil City of New Smyrna Beach

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .