JL-11_N6945022R0032_AwardFeePlan DRAFT.pdf

N69450-22-R-0032

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE - SEE FAR 2.101 & 3.104

AWARD-FEE PLAN

FOR

BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT

SERVICES

U.S. NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA

(NSGB BOS)

18 April 2022

APPROVED:

Fee Determining Official

Chief of Contracts

NAVFAC Southeast

Table of Contents

Section Title Page

1.0 Introduction 1

2.0 Organization 1

3.0 Responsibilities 2

4.0 Award-Fee Processes 2

5.0 Award-Fee Plan Change Procedure 4

6.0 Contract Termination 4

Attachment Title Page

1 Minimum Award Fee Criteria Summary 6

2 Award Fee Rating Table 8

3 Award Fee Conversion Chart 12

4 Award Fee Process 13

AWARD-FEE PLAN

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This award-fee plan is the basis for the evaluation of the contractor's performance under

Solicitation N69450-22-R-0032, Base Operations Support Services, U.S. Naval Station

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for presenting an assessment of that performance to the Fee

Determining Official (FDO). It describes specific criteria and procedures used to assess the contractor’s performance and to determine the amount of award fee earned. Actual award-fee determinations and the methodology for determining award fee are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government.

The contract performance includes a one year base period and seven and one half year option periods. The work to be acquired under this solicitation is for ongoing Base Operations

Support (BOS) services at U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This requirement includes all labor, supervision, management, and materials.

The award fee will be provided to the contractor through contract modifications and is in addition to the fixed-price provisions of the contract. The award fee earned and payable will be determined by the FDO based upon review of the contractor's performance against the criteria set forth in this plan. The FDO may unilaterally change this plan prior to the beginning of an evaluation period. The contractor will be notified of changes to the plan by the Contracting

Officer, in writing, before the start of the affected evaluation period. Changes to this plan that are applicable to a current evaluation period will be incorporated by mutual consent of both parties.

2.0 ORGANIZATION

The award-fee organization consists of: the Fee Determining Official (FDO) who is the Chief of the Contracting Office (HCO) NAVFAC Southeast; an Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) which consists of the Deputy Public Works Officer (DPWO) of NSGB as chairperson*, the

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)*, other functional area participants, and other advisory members as required to include:

- NAVFAC SE Core Contracting Officer

- Facilities Engineering and Acquisition Department (FEAD)

- Requirements Branch Head

- Facilities Maintenance Division (FMD)

- Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)*

- Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast PW2 Project Manager

- Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay Cuba Engineer

- Office of Military Commissions (OMC) North Facility Manager

- Department of Defense Educational Activity (DODEA) Facilities Manager

- Defense Health Agency (DHA) Facilities Manager

- Family Housing (FH) Manager

- Navy Region Southeast (NRSE) Assistant/Deputy Regional Engineer (ARE/DARE)

The asterisks denote mandatory members. A simple majority of voting members is required to achieve a quorum. Non-Voting Technical Support members may include performance assessment representatives and facility management specialists.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

a. Fee Determining Official. The FDO approves the award-fee plan and any significant changes. The FDO reviews the recommendation(s) of the AFEB, considers all pertinent data, and determines the earned award-fee amount for each evaluation period.

b. Award-Fee Evaluation Board. The AFEB will convene as soon as possible after the end of a performance evaluation period but not more than 30 days after the end of the period.

AFEB members review the Contracting Officer’s Representative’s evaluation of the contractor's performance, consider all information from pertinent sources, prepare a report summarizing its findings, and arrive at an earned award-fee recommendation to be presented to the FDO. The

AFEB may also recommend changes to this plan.

c. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). The ACO is the liaison between contractor and Government personnel and coordinates the administrative actions during the award fee process.

d. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR maintains written records of the contractor's performance in their assigned evaluation area(s) and prepares Monthly

Performance Assessment Summaries (MPAS) so that a fair and accurate evaluation is obtained.

CORs will be fully trained and maintain detailed and proper documentation.

4.0 AWARD-FEE PROCESSES

a. Available Award-Fee Amount. The available award fee for each evaluation period is

5% (10% annually) of the awarded Recurring Work portion of the contract. The award fee earned will be paid based on the contractor’s performance during each evaluation period.

b. Evaluation Period. During the first six months of performance, no award fee will be available; however, the Government and the contractor will participate in a mock AFEB. The first award fee evaluation period will occur one year (12 months) after the effective date of the contract and bi-annually thereafter (at the end point of the base year and mid and end points of the option year periods of performance). The first award fee evaluation period will be for the second six months of the base year. The maximum award fee that will be made available is 5% of the contract awarded amount for recurring work for the base year and 10% annually thereafter, with the exception of the 52.217-8 Option, should it be executed, which will be 5% for the six-month period. The award-fee process laid out herein will be carried out for the first six months of performance for informational purposes only.

c. Evaluation Criteria. If the Contracting Officer does not give specific notice in writing to the contractor of any change to the evaluation criteria prior to the start of a new evaluation period, then the same criteria listed for the preceding period will be used in the subsequent award-fee evaluation period. Any changes to evaluation criteria will be made by revising

Attachments 1, 2 and 3, and notifying the contractor.

d. End-of-Period Evaluations. The Contracting Officer’s Representative submits their evaluation reports to the AFEB 14 calendar days after the end of the evaluation period. The

AFEB prepares its evaluation report and recommendation of earned award fee. The AFEB Chair briefs the evaluation report and recommendation to the FDO within 45 days after each evaluation period. At this time, the AFEB may also recommend any significant changes to the award-fee plan for FDO approval. The FDO determines the overall grade and earned award-fee amount for the evaluation period within 60 calendar days after each evaluation period and at that point cognizant comptrollers are informed to recoup un-awarded funds. The FDO letter informs the contractor of the earned award-fee amount. The Contracting Officer issues a contract modification within 15 calendar days after the FDO’s decision is made authorizing payment of the earned-award-fee amount. Attachment 4 summarizes the award fee process graphically.

e. Contractor’s Self-Assessment. When the contractor chooses to submit a self-evaluation, it must be submitted to the Contracting Officer no later than five working days from the end of the evaluation period. This written assessment of the contractor’s performance throughout the evaluation period may also contain any information that may be reasonably expected to assist the AFEB in evaluating the contractor’s performance. It is highly recommended that the contractor follow the Award Fee Plan criteria in conducting and presenting their self-assessment, and include how they rate themselves on their performance for the period. The contractor may choose to present their self-assessment orally to the AFEB if desired. The request to do an oral presentation must accompany the written summary self-assessment. The report shall include a summary of all the evaluation criteria listed in

Attachment 2. The contractor will not be reimbursed for any effort in preparation of a self-assessment.

g. Unearned Award Fee. All unearned award fee will be de-obligated from the contract by modification. Any unearned award fee will be forfeited and not available in subsequent evaluation periods.

5.0 AWARD-FEE PLAN CHANGE PROCEDURE

All significant changes are approved by the FDO; the AFEB Chairperson approves other changes. Examples of significant changes include changing evaluation criteria, adjusting weights to redirect contractor’s emphasis to areas needing improvement, and revising the distribution of the award-fee dollars. The contractor may recommend changes to the Contracting Officer no later than 30 days prior to the beginning of the new evaluation period. After approval, the

Contracting Officer shall notify the contractor in writing of any change(s). Unilateral changes may be made to the award-fee plan if the contractor is provided written notification by the

Contracting Officer before the start of the upcoming evaluation period. Changes effecting the current evaluation period must be by mutual agreement of both parties (contractor and

Government).

6.0 CONTRACT TERMINATION

If the contract is terminated for the convenience of the Government after the start of an award-fee evaluation period, the award fee deemed earned for that period shall be determined by the

FDO using the normal award-fee evaluation process. After termination for convenience, the remaining award-fee amounts allocated to all subsequent award-fee evaluation periods cannot be earned by the contractor and, therefore, shall not be paid.

Attachments

1. Minimum Award Fee Criteria Summary

2. Award Fee Rating Table

3. Award Fee Conversion Chart

4. Award Fee Process

Attachment 1

Minimum Award Fee Criteria Summary

Category of Performance Weighting

Quality of Product or Services for 1602000 Electrical

1. Contractor’s minimization of unscheduled interruptions (outages) for electrical utility demand results in is 4.5 hours of downtime or less.

2. Average Monthly Performance Assessment Summaries (MPAS) for the sub-annex are rated Satisfactory or higher.

10%

Quality of Product or Services for 1606000 Water

1. The average monthly finished water storage capacity is at least 85%.

Quality of Product or Services for 1604000 Wastewater

1. Contractor has no more than one exceedance in wastewater discharges.

5%

Quality of Product or Services for 1502000, Facility Investment service calls, IMP, PMs, inspections and certifications.

1. Average Monthly Performance Assessment Summaries (MPAS) for the sub-annex are

Quality of Product or Services for 1502000(DHA) Facility Investment including service calls, IMP, PMs, inspections and certifications.

1. Average Monthly Performance Assessment Summaries (MPAS) for the sub-annex are rated

Satisfactory or higher.

Quality of Product or Services for 1502000(JTF) Facility Investment including service calls, IMP, PMs, inspections and certifications.

Quality of Product or Services for 1502000(OMC) Facility Investment including service calls, IMP, PMs, inspections and certifications.

Quality of Product or Services for 1401000 Family Housing COM, service calls, IMP, PMs, inspections and certifications.

Quality of Product or Services for remaining annexes: Custodial, Pest Control, Other (Swimming

Pools), Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping, Integrated Solid Waste Management and Landfill

Operations, and Facility Management.

Quality of Product or Services for 1700000 BSVE

1. No more than 16 vehicles, annually (eight per rating period of which two or less are JTF construction equipment), exceed allowable individual unit downtime.

Safety Program

1. Contractor DART Rate is equal to or less than 2.0.

2. Contractor Reports all safety incidents in a proper and timely manner and takes appropriate corrective actions.

3. Contractor staffs qualified Safety personnel at all times.

Business Management/Relations:

1. Interaction between the contractor and the government is satisfactory or higher. This includes contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification to the Contracting Officer of issues in controversy).

2. 85% of Maximo entry for ICAP/UICAP, work orders and equipment installation are made within specified timeframes.

3. Customer Satisfaction is rated Satisfactory or higher for all customers.

4. The Contractor’s Quality Control Plan (QCP) minimizes the number of reworks, customer complaints, and equipment and system failures.

5. Contractor provides on-time or better, complete, fair, and reasonable proposals for contract modifications and non-recurring work task orders. The contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems are adequate.

6. Critical certified tradesmen are onsite to meet contract maintenance, repair and certification requirements including but not limited to: Water Plant Manager, Elevator tech, Fire Alarm tech, Fire Sprinkler tech, Healthcare Facility Manager, and Medical Gas technician.

7. No more than two weeks gap in Key Personnel with a qualified stand-on on island.

Attachment 2

Award Fee Rating Table

Adjectival

Rating/

Percentage of Award

Fee Earned

Description

Outstanding

91% - 100%

– Contractor has met the minimum basic (minimum essential) requirements of the contract, and has met at least 91% of the award fee criteria established in the award plan.

– Contractor’s minimization of unscheduled interruptions (outages) for electrical utility demand is between 0 and 30 minutes of downtime.

– Contractor’s monthly average finished water storage capacity is greater than 97% at all times.

– Contractor has no exceedances in wastewater discharges.

– Under 1700000 BSVE, 0 to 1 vehicles, including JTF construction equipment, exceed the allowable individual unit downtime. The number of vehicles that exceeds the allowable individual unit downtime applies to the total vehicles across all alpha codes. For example, if only one vehicle exceeds the individual unit downtime for the performance period, the contractor will receive an outstanding rating for the BSVE Category of

Performance.

– Contractor completes and documents corrective actions for all life safety inspection and testing within required frequencies, to include annual 3rd party Medical Gas system certification.

– Critical certified tradesmen are onsite to meet contract maintenance, repair and certification requirements including but not limited to: Water Plant Manager, Elevator tech, Fire Alarm tech, Fire Sprinkler tech, Healthcare Facility Manager, and Medical Gas technician.

– All maintenance and repair work on life safety/medical systems is accomplished within required periodicities.

– All (100%) of non-life safety/medical system PM/IMP and associated repair work is accomplished within required periodicities.

– All (100%) corrective maintenance including service work and task orders are accomplished within contractually established timelines inclusive of waiting for parts.

– Contractor DART Rate is 0.0 or less than or equal to 0.5.

– Contractor staffs qualified Safety personnel at all times.

– At least one week face-to-face turnover of qualified Key Personnel.

– No death or serious injury to government or contractor personnel due to contractor’s action or inaction.

– Contractor always reports all safety incidents immediately and quickly and in a proper manner and is proactive in taking appropriate corrective action.

– Cooperation and teamwork demonstrated by the Contractor (including timely identification to the Contracting Officer of issues in controversy) substantially exceed normal expectations.

– Contractor’s number of validated customer complaints with mission impact is zero to one.

– Contractor provides outstanding fair and reasonable proposals for contract modifications and non-recurring work task orders error free and in advance of the due date. The contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems are outstanding.

– Contractor’s Customer Satisfaction received an Exceptional rating or equivalent.

– Contractor’s average MPAS for the sub-annex received an Exceptional rating.

– All (100%) of Maximo entry for ICAP/UICAP, work orders and equipment installation are made within specified timeframes.

Percentage

Excellent

76% - 90%

– Contractor has met the minimum basic (minimum essential) requirements of the contract, and has met at least 76% of the award fee criteria established in the award plan.

– Contractor’s minimization of unscheduled interruptions (outages) for electrical utility demand is greater than 30 minutes and less than or equal to 1.5 hours of downtime.

– Contractor’s monthly average finished water storage capacity is greater than 93% and less than or equal to 97% at all times.

– Contractor has no exceedances in wastewater discharges.

– Under 1700000 BSVE, greater than 1 to less than or equal to 3 vehicles, no more than one of which are JTF construction equipment, exceed the allowable individual unit downtime.

The number of vehicles that exceeds the allowable individual unit downtime applies to the total vehicles across all alpha codes. For example, if two vehicles exceed the individual unit downtime for the performance period, the contractor will receive an excellent rating for the BSVE Category of Performance.

– Contractor completes and documents corrective actions for all life safety inspection and testing within required frequencies, to include annual 3rd party Medical Gas system certification.

– Critical certified tradesmen are onsite to meet contract maintenance, repair and certification requirements including but not limited to: Water Plant Manager, Elevator tech, Fire Alarm tech, Fire Sprinkler tech, Healthcare Facility Manager, and Medical Gas technician.

– All maintenance and repair work on life safety/medical systems is accomplished within required periodicities.

– At least 95% of all non-life safety/medical system PM/IMP and associated repair work is accomplished within required periodicities.

– At least 95% of all corrective maintenance including service work and task orders is accomplished within contractually established timelines inclusive of waiting for parts.

– Contractor DART Rate is greater than 0.5 to less than or equal to 1.0.

– Contractor staffs qualified Safety personnel at all times.

– No gaps in Key Personnel onboard the job site.

– No death or serious injury to government or contractor personnel due to contractor’s action or inaction.

– Contractor always reports all safety incidents in a timely and proper manner and is minimally proactive in taking appropriate corrective action.

– Cooperation and teamwork demonstrated by the Contractor (including timely identification to the Contracting Officer of issues in controversy) exceed normal expectations.

– Contractor’s number of validated customer complaints with mission impact is greater than 1 to less than or equal to 3.

– Contractor provides excellent fair and reasonable proposals for contract modifications and non-recurring work task orders in advance of the due date. The contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems are excellent. Typically no more than 2 minor errors or omissions.

– Contractor’s Customer Satisfaction received a Very Good rating or equivalent.

– Contractor’s average MPAS for the sub-annex received a Very Good rating or higher.

– 95% of Maximo entry for ICAP/UICAP, work orders and equipment installation are made within specified timeframes.

Percentage

Good

51% - 75%

– Contractor has met the minimum basic (minimum essential) requirements of the contract, and has met at least 51% of the award fee criteria established in the award plan.

– Contractor’s minimization of unscheduled interruptions (outages) for electrical utility demand is greater than 1.5 and less than 4.5 hours of downtime.

– Contractor’s monthly average finished water storage capacity is greater than 85% and less than or equal to 93% at all times.

– Contractor has no exceedances in wastewater discharges.

– Under 1700000 BSVE, greater than 3 to less than 8 vehicles, no more than one of which are JTF construction equipment, exceed the allowable individual unit downtime. The number of vehicles that exceeds the allowable individual unit downtime applies to the total vehicles across all alpha codes. For example, if four vehicles exceed the individual unit downtime for the performance period, the contractor will receive a good rating for the BSVE Category of Performance.

– Contractor completes and documents corrective actions for all life safety inspection and testing within required frequencies, to include annual 3rd party Medical Gas system certification.

– Critical certified tradesmen are onsite to meet contract maintenance, repair and certification requirements including but not limited to: Water Plant Manager, Elevator tech, Fire Alarm tech, Fire Sprinkler tech, Healthcare Facility Manager, and Medical Gas technician.

– All maintenance and repair work on life safety/medical systems is accomplished within required periodicities.

– At least 90% of all non-life safety/medical system PM/IMP and associated repair work is accomplished within required periodicities.

– At least 90% of all corrective maintenance including service work and task orders is accomplished within contractually established timelines inclusive of waiting for parts.

– Contractor DART Rate is greater than 1.0 to less than or equal to 2.0.

– Contractor staffs qualified Safety personnel at all times.

– No more than one week gap in Key Personnel with a qualified stand-on on island.

– No death or serious injury to government or contractor personnel due to contractor’s action or inaction.

– Contractor reports all safety incidents, most of which are reported in a timely and proper manner, and takes appropriate corrective action.

– Contractor and employees usually demonstrate cooperation and teamwork (including timely identification to the Contracting Officer of issues in controversy) in accomplishment of the contract.

– Contractor’s number of validated customer complaints with mission impact is greater than 3 to less than 8.

– Contractor provides good fair and reasonable proposals for contract modifications and non-recurring work task orders in advance of the due date. The contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems are good. Typically no more than 2 minor errors or omissions.

– Contractor’s Customer Satisfaction received a Good rating or equivalent.

– Contractor’s average MPAS for the sub-annex received a Very Good rating or higher.

– 90% of Maximo entry for ICAP/UICAP, work orders and equipment installation are made within specified timeframes.

Percentage of

Award Fee

Earned

Satisfactory 10% -

50%

1. Contractor has met the basic (minimum essential) requirements of the contract.

2. Contractor’s minimization of unscheduled interruptions (outages) for electrical utility demand results in 4.5 hours of downtime or less.

3. Contractor’s monthly average finished water storage capacity is 85% at all times.

4. Contractor has no more than one exceedance in wastewater discharges.

5. Under 1700000 BSVE, 8 vehicles, of which two or less are JTF construction equipment, exceed the allowable individual unit downtime. The number of vehicles that exceeds the allowable individual unit downtime applies to the total vehicles across all alpha codes. For example, if eight vehicles exceed the individual unit downtime for the performance period, the contractor will receive a satisfactory rating for the BSVE

Category of Performance.

6. Contractor completes and documents corrective actions for all life safety inspection and testing within required frequencies, to include annual 3rd party Medical Gas system certification.

7. Critical certified tradesmen are onsite to meet contract maintenance, repair and certification requirements including but not limited to: Water Plant Manager, Elevator tech, Fire Alarm tech, Fire Sprinkler tech, Healthcare Facility Manager, and Medical Gas technician.

8. All maintenance and repair work on life safety/medical systems is accomplished within required periodicities.

9. At least 85% of all non-life safety/medical system PM/IMP and associated repair work is accomplished within required periodicities.

10. At least 85% of all corrective maintenance including service work and task orders is accomplished within contractually established timelines inclusive of waiting for parts.

11. Contractor DART Rate is 2.0 or better.

12. Contractor staffs qualified Safety personnel at all times.

13. No death or serious injury to government or contractor personnel due to contractor’s action or inaction.

14. No more than two weeks gap in Key Personnel with a qualified stand-on on island.

15. Contractor reports some safety incidents in a timely and proper manner, and takes appropriate corrective action with little Government direction.

16. Contractor and employees occasionally demonstrate cooperation and teamwork

(including timely identification to the Contracting Officer of issues in controversy) in accomplishment of the contract.

17. Contractor’s number of validated customer complaints with mission impact is no more than 8.

18. Contractor provides satisfactory on-time, fair and reasonable proposals for contract modifications and non-recurring work task orders. The contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems are satisfactory. Typically no more than 3 minor errors or omissions.

19. Contractor’s Customer Satisfaction received a Satisfactory or Marginal rating or equivalent.

20. Contractor’s average MPAS for the sub-annex received a Satisfactory or higher.

21. 85% of Maximo entry for ICAP/UICAP, work orders and equipment installation are made within specified timeframes.

Attachment 3

Award Fee Conversion Chart

Adjectival Rating Evaluation Points (Overall

Weighted Results)

Percent of Award Fee

Earned

OUTSTANDING 91-100 91 to 100 %

EXCELLENT 76-90 76 to 90%

GOOD 51-75 51 to 75%

SATISFACTORY 40-50 10% to 50%*

UNSATISFACTORY 0 0%

Award Fee Calculation Methodology:

1. A rating is assigned (0-100) for each Category of Performance (CP).

2. Multiply weighting percentage to each CP to arrive at weighted result.

3. Add weighted results together to arrive at overall weighted result.

Example:

AFEB Ratings: Quality of Product or Services 1602000 Electrical - 80

Quality of Product or Services 1606000 Water - 85

Quality of Product or Services 1604000 Wastewater - 83

Quality of Product or Services 1502000 Facility Investments - 80

Quality of Product or Services 1502000(DHA) Facility Investments - 85

Quality of Product or Services 1502000(JTF) Facility Investments - 80

Quality of Product or Services 1502000(OMC) Facility Investments - 85

Quality of Product or Services 1401000 Family Housing - 81

Quality of Product or Services Remaining Annexes – 77

Quality of Product or Services 1700000 BSVE – 70

Safety Program – 95

Business Management/Relations – 80

Weighted Result: (80*10%) + (85*10%) + (83*5%) + (80*10%) + (85*10%) + (80*10%) + (85*10%) +

(81*10%) + (77*10%) + (70*5%) + (95*5%) + (80*5%) = 81.7

Overall Weighted Result: 81.7; round up to 82

Adjectival Rating (Award Fee Conversion Chart): EXCELLENT

Potential Percentage of Award Fee Earned (as determined by the FDO): 76% to 90%

FDO Decision:

*All Categories of Performance listed in Attachment 1 must achieve at least a satisfactory award fee adjectival rating in order to be eligible for ANY award fee payment during a rating period.

The earned award-fee amount indicated by the use of a conversion table or graph is a guide to the FDO. Use of the Award Fee Conversion Chart does not remove the element of judgment from the award-fee process.

Attachment 4

Award Fee Process Diagram

COR SUBMITS EVALUATION REPORT/MPAS TO AFEB WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER

THE END OF THE EVALUATION PERIOD

CONTRACTOR PRESENTS THEIR SELF-ASSESSMENT ORALLY TO THE AFEB, IF APPLICABLE

AFEB PREPARES EVALUATION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF EARNED AWARD FEE

AFEB CHAIR BRIEFS THE EVALUATION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO FDO

WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE END OF THE EVALUATION PERIOD

AFEB RECOMMENDS ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO AWARD-FEE PLAN FOR FDO

APPROVAL, IF APPLICABLE

FDO DETERMINES OVERALL GRADE AND EARNED AWARD-FEE AMOUNT WITHIN 60

CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE EVALUATION PERIOD

FDO LETTER INFORMS THE CONTRACTOR OF THE EARNED AWARD-FEE AMOUNT

AND INSTRUCTS COMPTROLLERS TO RECOUP UNAWARDED FUNDS

CONTRACTING OFFICER ISSUES CONTRACT MODIFICATION WITHIN FIFTEEN CALENDAR

DAYS OF FDO'S DECISION

CONTRACTOR SUBMITS SELF ASSESSMENT NO LATER THAN FIVE WORKING DAYS FROM

THE END OF THE EVALUATION PERIOD, IF APPLICABLE