Asbestos Survey.pdf

ASBESTOS‐CONTAINING MATERIALS

and HAZMAT SURVEY

Conducted on

Buildings 2977 and 2978

Naval Air Station Whiting Field Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida

UES Project No. 1740.1900083.0000

Prepared for:

Prime AE Group 2510 W. Cervantes Street Pensacola, Florida 32505

Attention: Mr. Giles Yokel, Project Manager

Prepared by:

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc.

1985 Cope Lane

Pensacola, Florida 32526

(850) 944‐5555 www.UniversalEngineering.com

Survey Date: December 9, 2019 Report Date: December 27, 2019

Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Offices in: Orlando • Daytona Beach • Fort Myers • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Ocala • Palm Coast • Rockledge • Sarasota • Miami

Pensacola • Panama City • Fort Pierce • St. Petersburg • Tampa • West Palm Beach • Atlanta, GA • Tifton, GA

UNIVERSAL

ENGINEERING SCIENCES

December 27, 2019

Mr. Mr. Giles Yokel Project Manager Prime AE Group 2510 W. Cervantes Street Pensacola, Florida 32505

Reference: ASBESTOS‐CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

Buildings 2977 and 2978 Naval Air Station Whiting Field Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida UES Project No. 1740.1900083.0000

Dear Mr. Yokel:

On behalf of Prime AE Group (the “client”), Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) has completed this Asbestos‐Containing Materials (ACM) and Hazardous Materials (HazMat) Survey for the above‐ referenced property (the “subject property). UES performed this ACM survey on Monday, December 09, 2019, to categorize and assess readily available suspect homogeneous material within the subject building(s). UES collected 33 bulk samples from nine homogeneous materials. The bulk samples were transported to a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory and analyzed for the presence of asbestos fibers using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Based on review of the Bulk Sample Analysis Report, asbestos fibers in excess of one percent were detected in one of the homogeneous materials sampled during the course of this ACM survey.

Hazardous materials, with the exception of a fire‐proof can for oily rags that was located in building 2978, were not identified. Additional details regarding the asbestos and hazardous materials survey are presented in the attached report.

UES appreciates this opportunity to provide environmental services to you and we look forward to future endeavors. If you have any comments or questions regarding the information contained within this report or if we can be of further service, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc.

D. Paul Cheney, P.G. Adelmarie Bones MSPH, CIH, CSP EPA Accredited Asbestos Inspector Senior Industrial Hygienist Certificate No. 200031‐7886 Air Analytics, LLC Licensed Asbestos Project Designer No. AA011819PDR02 Florida License Asbestos Consultant No. AX103

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK

2.0 BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS AND INFORMATION

2.1 GENERAL

2.2 AVAILABLE BUILDING INFORMATION

2.3 CURRENT BUILDING USE

3.0 BUILDING INSPECTION

3.1 INSPECTION PROCEDURES

3.2 SUSPECTED ASBESTOS‐CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

4.1 POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

4.2 POINT COUNT ANALYSIS

5.0 FINDINGS

6.0 SUMMARY

7.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION

8.0 CONTROLLING AGENCY

9.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

9.1 BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

9.2 POTENTIAL PCB CONTAINING MATERIALS

9.3 POTENTIAL CFC‐CONTAINING EQUIPMENT

9.4 TRITIUM EXIT SIGNAGE

9.5 RADON

10.0 CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS SURVEY

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

Bulk Sample Location Map ............................................................................................................... A

APPENDIX B

Bulk Sample Analysis Report ............................................................................................................ B

APPENDIX C

Inspector Certification(s) ................................................................................................................. C

APPENDIX D

Florida Radon Information .............................................................................................................. D

Asbestos‐Containing Materials and Hazardous Materials Survey UES Project No. 1740.1900083.0000

Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida December 27, 2019

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

The purpose of this Asbestos‐Containing Materials (ACM) Survey was to identify accessible ACM and their general locations within the subject buildings (building 2977 and 2978) located at Naval Air Station Whiting Field in Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida. This service was conducted based on the written authorization of Prime AE Group, dated December 3, 2019.

1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work

The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the above‐referenced facility for the presence of ACMs, specifically those building materials which may be present or impacted during potential demolition or renovation activities. The activities and procedures used to accomplish this task were as follows:

1) A review of available building documents to identify potential locations of suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs);

2) Visual building inspection of accessible areas by an United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accredited asbestos inspector to identify suspect ACMs;

3) Once identified, homogeneous materials (materials which are uniform in color, texture, construction/application date, and general appearance) will be determined;

4) Determine whether the suspect ACM is friable (a material that when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure) or non‐friable;

5) Collection of bulk samples of each homogeneous suspect ACM. Record sample information on Asbestos Bulk Sample Forms (chain‐of‐custody sheets), which were signed, dated, and sent with the samples to the laboratory;

6) Analysis of the collected bulk samples at a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for the presence of asbestos fibers;

7) Approximate locations of the bulk samples were defined. In addition, approximate quantities of identified ACM were also determined. The indicated material quantities are estimates based on the field observations and should be considered preliminary in nature. These estimates should not be used for bidding purposes without verification by an abatement contractor; and,

8) Prepare and submit a report.

Complete destructive observation and sampling procedures were not generally used during our evaluation of the facility. Inaccessible areas within the building, such as crawl spaces, inside partitions, inside other sealed areas, behind architectural details and under mirrors are beyond the scope of this study. The scope of our investigation did not include an evaluation of fixtures, equipment, or stored materials. Additionally, the roof of the building consisted of single ply rubber or vinyl type membrane material. This membrane material itself is not considered to be a suspect asbestos containing roofing

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 2 material (SACRM); however, buildings that are more than fifteen to twenty years old could have a SACRM under the membrane material, such as but not limited to, built‐up gravel roofs, rolled roof shingles or mastics. There are many manufactures of the membrane materials that are used on roofs and parapet walls. UES understands that any penetration to this membrane material requires a licensed roofing contractor that is certified in patching a specific manufacturer. UES is not a certified roofing contractor. UES did not penetrate this membrane material on this structure as part of this asbestos evaluation. Finally, samples of the concrete slab were not collected. If the concrete is to be recycled, Florida regulations require that the concrete be sampled to verify that it is free of asbestos.

2.0 BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS AND INFORMATION

2.1 General

A summary of the subject building(s) characteristics is outlined in the table below

General Facility Type U.S. Navy Training Center (Building 2977). Aircraft Maintenance (Building 2978)

Construction Date Not reported

Building Size 27,000 (Building 2977). 2,700 (Building 2978)

Number of Stories One

Structural

Foundation Slab‐on‐Grade

Wall Support Concrete Block

Wall Finish Mixture of ceramic tile, drywall and painted concrete block

Roof Support Concrete

Roof System Type Single ply rubber or vinyl type membrane material

Mechanical/ Plumbing

HVAC Type Pad‐Mounted Chiller System

Duct Type Metal above drop ceiling

Pipe Insulation Mixture of fiberglass and foam glass

Interior

Wall Substrates Concrete block

Wall Finishes Ceramic tile and paint

Floor Substrates Concrete

Floor Finishes Terrazzo and vinyl

Ceiling Systems Suspended

Ceiling Finishes 2’ x 4’ acoustic tile

Other None

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 3

2.2 Available Building Information

Floor plans for each structure were provided to UES. No other building plans and no other material information were provided in reference to the structures located within the subject property.

2.3 Current Building Use

At the time of UES’ evaluation, Building 2977 was occupied by the U.S. Navy and used as a command headquarters, briefing rooms, and administration offices for a flight training squadron. Building 2978 was used by maintenance crews as a operations headquarters and break room.

3.0 BUILDING INSPECTION

Three forms of asbestos containing materials are typically found in buildings:

Surfacing Material – material that is sprayed, troweled‐on, or otherwise applied to interior and exterior structural and architectural surfaces. Surfacing material includes acoustical plaster on ceilings, fireproofing on structural members, textured paint and exterior stucco, and other materials applied to surfaces for acoustical, decorative, fireproofing, and other purposes.

Thermal System Insulation — material which is applied to interior and exterior mechanical components to reduce heat gain or loss. Thermal system insulation includes insulation on pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, and other mechanical components.

Miscellaneous Materials — material, other than surfacing material and thermal system insulation, on interior and exterior structural, mechanical, electrical, or architectural components, and surfaces. Miscellaneous material includes but is not limited to ceiling tiles, gaskets, floor coverings and mastics, wallboard joint compound, roofing materials, and cementitious products.

An inspection of Buildings 2977 and 2978 was conducted to identify these and other materials present within the buildings which are typically suspected of containing asbestos

3.1 Inspection Procedures

UES’ field inspection was performed on December 9, 2019 by Paul Cheney, an inspector accredited according to Federal Regulation 40 CFR, Part 763 (AHERA) and licensed in the State of Florida. After a preliminary walk‐through of the building, an inspection was conducted to evaluate the location and extent of the suspected asbestos containing building materials. Once identified, these materials were categorized into homogeneous areas containing materials of the same type, age, visual appearance, texture, composition, etc. The present condition of the ACM was evaluated by UES and classified as one of three categories: Good, Fair or Poor. The “fair” and “poor” categories correspond to the AHERA definitions of “damaged” and “significantly damaged,” respectively.

Each sample was documented by labeling the container with a unique sample number, entering the sample material on a bulk sample log or chain‐of‐custody form, and noting the location of each sample on a floor plan. Throughout the sampling process, care was taken to prevent cross‐contamination of the collected bulk samples. Sampling equipment was cleaned following the collection of each sample.

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 4

Since the subject building was operational and occupied, the survey did not include a significantly destructive search behind walls or below existing floors. Some materials may be hidden or masked by overlying materials such as flooring, carpeting or concealed walls. While a reasonable effort was made by UES to collect and analyze samples of suspect materials, some may remain unobserved by the inspector(s).

Random, and in some cases judgmental, samples of each homogeneous area of material were then collected. The physical condition of each material was assessed. In addition, a tactile inspection of the material was performed to evaluate friability. If the material, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, it is considered friable.

3.2 Suspected Asbestos‐Containing Building Materials

Based on UES’ review of the available building system information and visual survey of the subject building, eight homogeneous materials commonly suspected of containing asbestos were identified at building 2977 and two materials were identified at Building 2978. A map illustrating the sample locations is included in Appendix A of this report.

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

4.1 Polarized Light Microscopy

The samples of the suspected ACMs collected during the field inspection were transported with chain‐ of‐custody documentation to EMSL, Inc. located in Orlando, Florida. EMSL is an accredited laboratory for bulk sample analysis according to the NVLAP (Accreditation No. 600206‐0).

Bulk samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos fibers using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

The analyses were performed according to EPA Method 600/R‐93/116 July 1993 “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.” This analytical method can be used for qualitative identification of six morphologically different types of asbestos fibers: chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite and anthophylite.

The method specifies that the asbestos content in a bulk sample shall be estimated and reported as a finite percentage within the range of 0 to 100. Minute quantities of asbestos in bulk samples may be reported as “trace” or less than one percent (<1%). The analytical method determines the asbestos percentage by means of visual estimation technique. If analysis of the sample of a suspect ACM reveals a negative result, UES considers the material to be non asbestos‐containing. If at any time during the analytical process a sample tests positive, that material must be treated as asbestos‐containing.

4.2 Point Count Analysis

Samples of the suspect ACMs collected during the field inspection were not point counted as part of this survey.

5.0 FINDINGS

A total of 10 suspect homogeneous materials were identified at Buildings 2977 and 2978. At least two bulk samples were collected from each homogeneous material and submitted for laboratory analysis.

The laboratory analyses indicated that asbestos fibers excess of one percent were detected in one of the

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 5 homogeneous materials analyzed from the structure. The table below outlines general information regarding the suspect ACM.

SUMMARY OF SUSPECT ACMS

HSA

Sample

No.

Material Description Location Cond.

%/Type

Asbestos

NESHAPS

Category

Building 2977

2977‐1

1 to 2 Dark Grey/Brown Cove Base Finished office areas of

Building 2977

G ND NR

1 to 2 Mastic Finished office areas of

Building 2977

G ND NR

2977‐2 1 to 2 Brown wood pattern vinyl flooring Selected office areas G ND NR

2777‐3 1 to 2 Mastic ‐ brown wood pattern vinyl flooring Selected office areas G ND NR

2977‐4 1 to 2 Ceiling tile Hallways and offices G ND NR

2977‐5 1 to 4 HVAC Duct System Joints HVAC air ducts G 8%

Chrysotile

Category I

Non‐Friable

2977‐6 1 to 3 Foam Glass Pipe Insulation Piping in Mechanical Room G ND NR

1 to 3 Mastic Piping in Mechanical Room G ND NR

2977‐7 1 to 3 White HVAC System Duct

Mastic

HVAC Air Ducts –

Mechanical Room

G ND NR

2977‐8 1 to 3 Wallboard System Finished office areas G ND NR

Building 2978

2978‐1 1 to 3 HVAC Duct System Joints HVAC air ducts G 8%

Chrysotile

Category I

Non‐Friable

2978‐2 1 to 2 Ceiling tile Hallways and offices G ND NR

Notes:

Condition: G – Good (Undamaged), F – Fair (Damaged), P – Poor (Severely Damaged)

The type of asbestos detected is Chrysotile, unless otherwise noted.

ND – Not Detected

Categories: NR – Not Regulated, Cat 1 – Category 1 Non‐Friable, Cat. II – Category II Non‐Friable, F ‐ Friable

6.0 SUMMARY

Inspection of Buildings 2977 and 2978 located at Naval Air Station Whiting Field in Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida, identified a total of 10 materials suspected of containing asbestos fibers. At least two bulk samples of each material were collected and submitted to an NVLAP accredited laboratory for analysis. The results indicated that one of the suspect materials contained asbestos fibers in excess] one percent asbestos follows:

Black mastic on the seams and joints of the HVAC system air ducts in each building. This material would be considered a Category I Non‐Friable asbestos containing material.

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 6

7.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION

There are numerous federal and state statutes, regulations, and rules which govern the abatement and disposal of ACMs. In particular, the renovation of buildings containing asbestos building materials is regulated under the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Airborne Pollutants (NESHAP) statute.

The NESHAP regulations require notification to the controlling agency and removal of all regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) prior to renovation. RACM is defined as: (1) friable asbestos material; (2) Category I non‐friable asbestos containing material that has become friable; (3) Category I non‐friable asbestos containing material that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; or (4) Category II non‐friable asbestos containing material that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by NESHAP. It is important to note that even though an activity may be exempt from the EPA NESHAP regulations, such exemption does not extend to OSHA standards or other state and federal statutes.

Renovation or demolition activities in buildings that contain ACM or PACM (Presumed Asbestos Containing Material) are also regulated under the OSHA Asbestos Construction Standard (CFR 1926.1101). The OSHA standard requires the building owner to inform their employees who will work in or adjacent to areas containing ACM or PACM, perspective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees reasonable cay be expected to work in or adjacent to areas containing ACM or PACM, all employers of employees on multi‐employer work sites who will be performing work with or adjacent to areas containing asbestos, and tenants who will occupy areas containing ACM or PACM, of the presence location, and quantity of ACM or PACM at the work sites in their buildings and facilities.

Further, the OSHA standard (1926.1101) requires employers who discover ACM or PACM to convey information concerning the presence, location and quantity of such newly discovered ACM or PACM to other employers of employees working at the work site within 24 hours of discovery. While OSHA says the notification can be in written or personal communication, there are many advantages to written communication.

The OSHA construction standard (CFR 1926.1101) also contains specific training, work practices, procedures, engineering controls, notifications, permissible exposure limits, personal protection, record keeping, and a multitude of other requirements for the demolition, renovation, construction, alterations, repair, maintenance of structures, substrates or portions there of that contain asbestos.

Future demolition or renovation of Buildings 2977 and 2978 should be conducted in strict compliance with the aforementioned federal statutes and other applicable regulations, and good health and safety practices. All procedures, methods, and documentation should be accomplished by and be the responsibility of appropriately licensed professionals (asbestos consultants and contractors).

Any material identified as non‐friable ACM must be treated as friable ACM when the material is about to become friable as a result of activities performed within the buildings. Prior to renovation or demolition, Universal strongly recommends you meet with the controlling agencies and discuss the specific requirements for disposition of the asbestos containing materials identified in this report. State licensing and OSHA‐related requirements would be applicable and should be strictly complied with during the demolition process.

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 7

8.0 CONTROLLING AGENCY

The Controlling Agency for the coordination of projects involving asbestos removal projects or demolition for Santa Rosa County is the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), 160 Governmental Center, Pensacola, Florida 32502. Inquiries should be addressed to Ms. Carol Melton. Ms.

Melton can be reached at (850) 595‐8300.

9.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

9.1 BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

Based on our site visit observations and the nature of the adjacent and nearby facilities, UES did not identify the potential presence of biological agents on or near the subject property.

9.2 POTENTIAL PCB CONTAINING MATERIALS

Older transformers and other electrical equipment can contain PCBs at a level that subjects them to regulation by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). PCBs in electrical equipment are controlled by U.S. EPA regulations 40 CFR, Part 761. The ASTM Standard requires identification of electrical or hydraulic equipment, not including light ballasts, that are known to contain PCBs or likely to contain PCBs. One electrical transformer was observed at Building 2977. No “Non‐PCB” stickers were observed.

9.3 POTENTIAL CFC‐CONTAINING EQUIPMENT

The HVAC system for the facility consists of pad‐mounted chiller units located adjacent to the north side of Building 2977. There were no coolers or chillers noted in the interior areas of the structures.

9.4 TRITIUM EXIT SIGNAGE

Exit signage at building 2977 was observed to be hardwired. Exit signage at Building 2978 consisted of unlighted placards.

9.5 RADON

According to the Map of Florida Radon Zones (Figure 3, Appendix A) Santa Rosa County is located in an area designated as having a low potential for radon exposure (i.e., counties that have a predicted average indoor radon screening level less than 2 picocuries per liter (pCi/L)). According to the Florida Department of Health, the average indoor radon levels of Santa Rosa County, as determined by radon test results is 0.4 pCi/L

10.0 CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS SURVEY

A representative of UES obtained samples of building materials which were observed during an inspection of the building at the subject site that are typically suspected of containing asbestos as a constituent. The bulk samples were submitted to an NVLAP approved laboratory for analysis using EPA approved methods for industry‐accepted standards. No other warranty is expressed or implied.

In general, non‐destructive inspection and sampling procedures were incorporated which allowed assessment of reasonably accessible building materials. This survey did not include a significantly destructive search behind walls or below existing floors. Some materials may be hidden or masked by

Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Page 8 overlying materials such as flooring, carpeting or concealed walls. While a reasonable effort was made by UES to collect and analyze samples of suspect materials, some may remain unobserved by the inspector(s).

Suspect building materials not addressed in this report which are encountered during demolition or renovation should be analyzed for asbestos content prior to being damaged and/or removed. Please note that UES did not collect samples of concrete slabs and walls.

Analysis of resinously bound materials by EPA Method 600/R‐93/116 July 1993, may yield false‐negative results because of method limitations in separating closely bound fibers and in detecting fibers of small length and diameter. Should you desire, other analytical methods including Transmission Electron Microscopy can be used to further evaluate these types of materials.

A P

P E

N D

IX

Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2A – Building 2977 Sample Location Map Figure 2B – Building 2978 Sample Location Map

Figure 1 – Property Location Map - Buildings 2977 and 2978 NAS Whiting Field

PROJECT NUMBER

1740.1900083.0000

PROJECT LOCATION

Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. 1985 Cope Lane PENSACOLA, FL 32526 Phone: (850) 944-5555 Fax: (850) 944-5885

Building 2977

Building 2978 N

U ni ve rs al E ng in ee rin g S ci en ce s

C op e

La ne

, P en sa co la , F

L, ho ne

0)

-5

Fa x (8

) 9

-5

Fi gu re

A

B ui ld in g

S am pl e Lo ca tio n Pl an N

A S

W hi tin g

Fi el d, M ilt on

, S an ta R os a

C ou nt y, F lo rid a

U

ES

P ro je ct

N o.

0.

3.

-1 -1

-1 -2

-2 -1

-3 -1

-2 -2

-3 -2

-4 -1

-5 -1

-4 -2

-5 -2

-5 -3

-5 -4

-6 -1

, 2

7- 6-

2, -6

-3 (M ec ha ni ca l R oo m

-7 -1

, 2

7- 7-

-8 -1

-8 -2

-8 -3

N

Figure 2B – Building 2978 Sample Location Map NAS Whiting Field

PROJECT NUMBER

1740.1900083.0000

PROJECT LOCATION

Milton, Santa Rosa County, Florida

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. 1985 Cope Lane PENSACOLA, FL 32526 Phone: (850) 944-5555 Fax: (850) 944-5885

2978-1-1

2978-1-2

2978-2-1

2978-2-2

N

P E

N D

B

Bulk Sample Analysis Report

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT Orlando, FL 32808

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341919816EMSL Order:

Customer ID: UESC62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Paul Cheney (850) 944-5555

Fax:Universal Engineering Sciences (850) 944-5885

Received Date:1985 Cope Lane 12/16/2019 8:40 AM

Analysis Date:Pensacola, FL 32526 12/18/2019

Collected Date:

Project: Buildings 2977 and 2978/1740.1900083.0000

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

2977-1-1-Cove Base

341919816-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Grey/Brown

Cove Base

2977-1-1-Mastic

341919816-0001A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Grey/Brown

Cove Base

2977-1-2-Cove Base

341919816-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Grey/Brown

Cove Base

2977-1-2-Mastic

341919816-0002A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dark Grey/Brown

Cove Base

2977-2-1

341919816-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown/Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Brown Wood Pattern

VCT

2977-2-2

341919816-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Brown Wood Pattern

VCT

2977-3-1

341919816-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Synthetic2%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Mastic - Brown Wood

Pattern VCT

2977-3-2

341919816-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Mastic - Brown Wood

Pattern VCT

2977-4-1

341919816-0007

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Suspended Ceiling

Tile

2977-4-2

341919816-0008

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Suspended Ceiling

Tile

2977-5-1

341919816-0009

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Matic

2977-5-2

341919816-0010

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Matic

2977-5-3

341919816-0011

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Matic

2977-5-4

341919816-0012

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Matic

2977-6-1-Foam Glass

341919816-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

2977-6-1-Mastic

341919816-0013A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

Initial report from: 12/19/2019 16:56:24

Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/19/2019 4:56 PM

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT Orlando, FL 32808

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341919816EMSL Order:

Customer ID: UESC62

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

2977-6-2-Foam Glass

341919816-0014

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

2977-6-2-Mastic

341919816-0014A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

2977-6-3-Foam Glass

341919816-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

2977-6-3-Mastic

341919816-0015A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Foam Glass Pine

Insulation

2977-7-1

341919816-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Synthetic2%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White HVAC Duct

Mastic

2977-7-2

341919816-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White HVAC Duct

Mastic

2977-8-1

341919816-0018

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

10%

Cellulose30%Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Wallboard

2977-8-2

341919816-0019

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

10%

Cellulose30%Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Wallboard

2977-8-3

341919816-0020

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

10%

Cellulose25%White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Wallboard

2978-1-1

341919816-0021

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Mastic

2978-1-2

341919816-0022

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Mastic

2978-1-3

341919816-0023

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black HVAC Duct

Mastic

2978-2-1

341919816-0024

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Ceiling Tile

2978-2-2

341919816-0025

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Ceiling Tile

Analyst(s)

Laura Vera (10)

Nashira McCall (20)

Carlos Rivadeneyra, Laboratory Director or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0

Initial report from: 12/19/2019 16:56:24

Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/19/2019 4:56 PM

PP

EN

D

C

Inspector Certification(s)

P E

N D

D

Florida Radon Information

Zo ne

(7 co un tie s)

Zo ne

(1 co un tie s)

Zo ne

(0 c ou nt ie s)

H ig he st

P ot en tia l:

co un tie s ha ve a pr ed ic te d av er ag e in do or ra do n sc re en in g le ve l g re at er th an p

C i/L

(p ic o cu rie s pe r l ite r)

(r ed z on es

M od er at e Po te nt ia l:

co un tie s ha ve a pr ed ic te d av er ag e in do or ra do n sc re en in g le ve l b et w ee n an d pC i/L

(o ra ng e zo ne s)

Lo w

P ot en tia l:

co un tie s ha ve a p re di ct ed av er ag e in do or ra do n sc re en in g le ve l le ss th an p C i/L (y el lo w z on es

M ap o f R ad on

Z on es in

F lo rid a ba se d on

E nv iro nm en ta l P ro te ct io n

A ge nc y

(E

PA

) d at a

S an ta R os a

C ou nt y

R ad on z on e

: 3

Zi p

C od e C ity C er tif ie d

R es id en tia l D at ab as e

M an da to ry R es id en tia l D at ab as e M an da to ry

N on

-R es id en tia l D at ab as e

B ui ld in gs M ea su re d

A bo ve p C i/L

B ui ld in gs

M ea su re d A bo ve p

C i/L

B ui ld in gs M ea su re d

A bo ve p C i/L

B ag da d

G ul f B re ez e

G ul f B re ez e

Ja y

N av ar re

M ilt on M ilt on

M ilt on