N6274226R1802 AMD0001.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274226R1802
About this file
This is a solicitation (RFP No. N62742-26-R-1802) for a Multiple Award Contract (MAC) for Cultural Resource Technical Services in Hawaii, Guam, and Japan, issued by Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) Pacific. The contract will be competed as an unrestricted procurement with a partial small business set-aside, with a minimum 18% small business participation requirement. The scope includes archaeological surveys, monitoring, data recovery, historic building documentation, and related cultural resource management services for defense facility development projects.
The solicitation requires offerors to submit technical and price proposals for two sample projects, with evaluation based on experience, sample project approach, safety performance, small business utilization, and past performance. Key personnel include Principal Investigators and Project Directors for archaeology and historical architecture. The contract will support projects like archaeological monitoring during construction at Naval Base Guam and Andersen Air Force Base, including potential data recovery at a Latte Period archaeological site and documentation of a 1964 post-Typhoon Karen rebuilding project. The project completion date is 31 December 2027, with individual task orders to be issued under the MAC.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
R
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
16C. DATE SIGNED
Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
CODE FACILITY CODE
Created On:
10 Dec 2025, 22:24 PM Greenwich Mean Time
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification): AMENDMENT NO. 0001, SOLICITATION NO. N62742-26-R-1802, CULTURAL RESOURCE TECHNICAL SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN HAWAII, WESTERN PACIFIC AND ASIA FOR THE NAVAL
FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC
PLEASE REVIEW THE AMENDMENT, COMPLETE BLOCKS 8 AND 15A THROUGH 15C TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND SUBMIT
WITH YOUR PROPOSAL.
The following items are applicable to this amendment:
A. Provide Government responses to questions/clarifications received in response to the solicitation. See attached questions and answers for Amendment 0001.
B. The following sections of the solicitation has been revised and replaced with the document attached. Changes are annotated with a vertical line on the left hand border of the page and are indicated in track changes. Existing sections shall be removed and replaced.
(1) Replace Section G in its entirety with the revised Section G.
(2) Replace Section L in its entirety with the revised Section L.
(3) Replace Section M in its entirety with the revised Section M.
(4) Replace Section J, Attachment J-5 in its entirety with the revised J-5.
C. The proposal due date remains unchanged.
D. All other sections/attachments remain unchanged.
N6274226R1802
AMD 0001
G.1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
The Contracting Officer for this contract is:
Ms. Danika Kamikawa NAVFAC Pacific (CON75) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100
JBPHH, HI 96860-3134
The Contract will be administered by:
NAVFAC Pacific (CON75) Environmental Contracts Branch 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100
JBPHH, HI 96860-3134
NOTE: Other NAVFAC Contracting Officers are authorized to issue contract task orders, modifications, letters or verbal direction to the Contractor. The point of contact for this Contract will be a Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer within the NAVFAC Pacific Environmental Contracts Branch.
The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is:
To be determined at the time of contract award.
Payment will be made by:
To be determined on individual task order.
G.2 TASK ORDERS ISSUANCE PROCEDURES
1. GENERAL
a. When the Government requires work under the contract, a Request for Proposal Letter (RFPL) will be issued as appropriate. RFPLs will be accompanied by a Performance Work Statement (PWS) and will normally be issued via electronic mail but may be placed via mail, telephone, facsimile or other means.
b. Contractors are responsible for submitting proposals, and any modifications or revisions, so as to reach the Government office designated in the RFPL by the time specified in the RFPL. Any proposal modification or revision, received at the Government office after the exact time specified for receipt of proposals will be late and will not be considered unless it meets the requirements of FAR 52.215-1.
c. Task orders will be awarded on a DD Form 1155 (Order for Supplies or Services).
d. The Government will not be obligated to reimburse the contractor for work performed, items delivered, or any costs incurred, nor shall the contractor be obligated to perform, deliver, or otherwise incur costs except as authorized by duly executed task orders.
e. Each task order shall include as a minimum:
(1) Date of order.
(2) Contract number and order number.
(3) Contract item number and description, quantity, and unit price or estimated cost.
(4) Delivery or performance schedule.
(5) Place of performance.
(6) Any packaging, packing, and shipping instructions.
(7) Accounting and appropriation data.
(8) Method of payment and payment office.
f. Modifications to task orders will be issued on Standard Form (SF) 30.
g. Contractors may elect not to submit on all task order requirements; however, the contractor must notify the Contracting/Ordering Officer in writing within three (3) business days of RFPL issuance when a contractor elects not to submit on a particular task order requirement and state the reasons why. Failure to provide this notification may impact future consideration for task orders and exercise of an option.
h. In accordance with FAR 16.505(a)(10), no protest under Subpart 33.1 is authorized in connection with the issuance or proposed issuance of an order under a task order contract except for a protest on the grounds that the order increases the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract or a protest of an order valued in excess of $25 million. Protests on orders over $25 million may only be filed with the Government Accountability Office, in accordance with the procedures at FAR 33.104.
2. COMPETITION
a. Competition for issuance of task orders is limited to those MAC Holders selected to execute requirements in either the Unrestricted Division (GOJ funded projects) or Small Business Set-Aside (SBSA) Division (US funded projects). Small businesses are eligible to compete for all task orders in either Division. US funded projects shall only be competed in the Unrestricted Division when there is no reasonable expectation of receiving at least two (2) proposals from the SBSA Division. The Contracting/Ordering Officer will identify those MAC Holders eligible to compete for any RFPLs issued.
b. Each awardee will be given a fair opportunity to be considered for each task order exceeding $3,000 issued under multiple award contracts consistent with paragraph 2.a. above unless the Contracting Officer applies one of the exceptions noted below. Upon receipt of a RFPL, all awardees will be considered equally against the criteria set forth in the RFPL.
c. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to make award of a task order without competition based upon one of the circumstances described below:
(1) The agency need for the services are so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;
(2) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized;
(3) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order; or
(4) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.
3. REQUIREMENT FOR PROPOSALS
a. Task orders will be firm fixed price with a specific completion date or performance period and clearly define the specific services to be performed or the performance desired. When options are included in the Schedule, the task order will specify the number of days after award for exercising the options. Each task order incorporates applicable provisions and clauses in the basic contract. All task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a task order and this contract, the contract will control, except as otherwise noted in the contract documents. The Government reserves the right to incorporate additional clauses, as appropriate, into individual task order RFPLs and awards.
b. Unless otherwise specified in the RFPL, task order proposals must remain valid for 90 calendar days after the last stated date for which proposals may be received.
c. Projects will vary in size and complexity. Information required for technical evaluation will be identified in the individual RFPL and may include the following:
(1) Proposed schedule for completing the work shall be addressed in each contractor’s proposal.
(2) Narrative description of how work is intended to be accomplished as stated in the RFP.
(3) Upon receipt of the Contractor’s proposal, the Contracting Officer and the Technical
Representatives will conduct a comprehensive review and will, either, (1) arrange a time and place to conduct negotiations or (2) issue a CTO based on the statement of work and cost proposal as submitted.
(4) A task order will be issued on a DD1155. The DD1155 will be forwarded to the Contractor for signature by a duly authorized representative of the Contractor. The Contracting Officer will then sign the DD1155 at which time, the Contractor may commence work.
(5) The Contractor shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of any unforeseen conditions.
(6) The Contracting/Ordering Officer may at any time, prior to award of the task order, determine that it is not in the best interest of the Government to issue said order to the Contractor. No liability for costs will accrue to the Government as a result of the Contracting Officer’s decision not to issue the task order, e.g. no proposal preparation costs will be paid by the Government.
4. SELECTION CRITERIA
a. Task orders may be awarded on the basis of price only; low price technically acceptable (LPTA), or using the tradeoff process (as described in FAR Part 15). The basis for award will be stated in the RFPL. Whenever possible, award will be made without discussions. If discussions are determined necessary, the Contracting Officer may establish a competitive range if the number of proposals exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted.
b. Task order price proposals: The RFPL will inform MAC Holders on the level of detail required in their price proposal. The Contracting/Ordering officer may simply require submission of a lump sum amount, a few cost items (similar to the amount of detail requested for the Sample Projects), or on occasion detailed cost and pricing data. Detailed cost and pricing data will not be requested often and will be limited to the more complicated or very large task order projects.
G.3 TASK ORDER MODIFICATION PROPOSALS
The following may apply when changes to a task order issued under this contract are required.
(a) The Contractor shall furnish a price breakdown, itemized as required and within the time specified by the Contracting Officer, with any proposal for a task order modification.
(b) The price breakdown will be tailored to each task order modification.
(c) The Contractor may be asked to provide similar price breakdown details to support any amounts to be performed by subcontracts.
(d) The Contractor's proposal shall include a justification for any time extension proposed.
G.4 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER (ACO)
Each CTO will designate the appropriate ACO.
G.5 CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The Contractor shall, after award of the basic contract, notify the Government in writing, of the person or persons authorized to contractually and legally bind the Contractor. The Contractor shall include the title of the person or persons and any limitations that apply to the signatory authority.
G.6 CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)
The Contracting Officer will appoint the COR for this contract in writing at time of award.
A Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is NOT a Contracting or Ordering Officer and DOES NOT have authority to take any action, either directly or indirectly, that would change the pricing, quantity, quality, place of performance, delivery schedule, or any other terms and conditions of the contract (or task order), or to direct the accomplishment of effort which goes beyond the scope of the Statement of Work in the contract (or task order).
The COR is technically responsible for monitoring of contractor performance and is the sole technical point of contact and will be identified on individual task orders.
The Contracting Officer may also appoint, in writing, an alternate COR (ACOR) to perform the responsibilities and functions when the COR is absent.
G.7 TECHNICAL DIRECTION
(a) As provided by the contract provision, "CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)", performance of work under this contract is subject to the written technical direction of the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), who shall be specifically appointed by the Contracting Officer in writing. "Technical Direction" means a directive to the Contractor that approves approaches, solutions, designs, or refinements; fills in details or otherwise completes the general description of the work or documentation items; shifts emphasis among work areas or tasks; or furnishes similar instructions to the Contractor. Technical direction includes requiring studies and pursuit of certain lines of inquiry regarding matters within the general tasks and requirements in the Statement of Work of the task order.
(b) The COR does not have the authority to, and shall not, issue any instruction purporting to be technical direction which:
(1) Constitutes an assignment of additional work outside the Statement of Work;
(2) Constitutes a change as defined in the Changes Clause;
(3) In any manner causes an increase or decrease in the total estimated cost, Award Fee, or the time required for task order performance;
(4) Changes any of the expressed terms, conditions, or specifications of the task order;
(5) Interferes with the Contractor's rights to perform the terms and conditions of the order, or;
(6) Authorizes the Contractor to incur costs in excess of the estimated cost or other limitations on costs or funds set forth in this contract.
(c) All technical direction shall be issued in writing by the COR.
(d) When, in the opinion of the contractor, the COR or any other Government official other than the Contracting Officer, requests effort outside the existing scope of the contract (or task order), the contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing. No action shall be taken by the contractor under such direction until the Contracting Officer has issued a modification to the contract (or task order) or has otherwise resolved the issue.
G.8 TRAVEL COSTS
(a) Travel Policy. Generally the Government will negotiate all allowable, allocable and reasonable travel costs to be incurred by the contractor in performance of the contract/CTO in accordance with FAR Subpart 31.2 and the rules and definitions set forth for temporary duty and local travel in the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) but not to exceed the amounts authorized in the JTR.
(b) Official Travel.
(1) Temporary Duty (Overnight Stay Required) Beyond 50 Mile Radius. If a temporary duty station to which an employee is required to travel in the performance of this contract is beyond the circular boundary created by a 50 mile radius of the employee’s official point of departure, and the period of official travel is greater than two hours more than the employee’s regular work day, the cost of transportation and per diem will be negotiated or allowed.
Official travel begins at the time an employee leaves his/her home, office, or other authorized point of departure and ends when the traveler returns to his/her home, office, or other authorized point at the conclusion of the trip.
(2) One Day Travel Beyond 50 Miles Radius. When the period of official travel is 24 hours or less, but greater than two hours more than the employee’s regular work day, transportation and per diem costs will be negotiated or allowed consistent with company policy but not to exceed the amounts authorized in the JTR. If lodging is not required, the maximum allowable rate will be the meals and incidental expenses (M&IE) rate, prorated as provided in the JTR. If lodging is required, the rules for travel of more than 24 hours apply.
(3) Local Travel (within 50 Miles Radius of Official Point of Departure) or at Temporary Duty Station. Cost of commercial transportation and Privately Owned Vehicles (POV mileage) used in the performance of this contract for local travel or at a temporary duty station will be negotiated or allowed, if approved by appropriate Contractor supervisory personnel as advantageous to the Government. For local travel required in the performance of this contract, transportation costs will be negotiated or allowed for the distance that exceeds the employee’s regular commuting distance.
G.9 PRE-PERFORMANCE CONFERENCE – CONTRACT TASK ORDER
Prior to commencing work, the contractor may be required to meet with the Contracting Officer and/or designated technical personnel at a mutually agreeable time to discuss and develop mutual understandings concerning scheduling and administering work.
G.10 PAYMENT
Payment will be made at the individual contract task order level in accordance with DFARS 252.232-7006, Wide Area WorkFlow Payment Instructions (JAN 2023). DFARS 252.232-7006 will be populated at the contract task order level.
Link to payment instructions:
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/pgi_htm/current/PGI204_71.htm#payment_instructions
G.11 SUBCONTRACTING PROGRAM FOR SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED
BUSINESS CONCERNS
In accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Alt II, Section I, Large Business Contractorother than small business concerns shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The following guidelines are provided regarding small business targets, which the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command has established:
FY 2026 STRATEGIC FOCUS NAVFAC Subcontracting Small Business 40%
Small Disadvantaged Business 5%
Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business 3%
Women-Owned Small Business 9%
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 5%
G.12 SUBCONTRACTING REPORTS
In accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Alt II, Section I(l), a Large Business Contractorother than small business concerns shall submit subcontracting reporting using the web-based eSRS at http://www.esrs.gov.
US FUNDED CR-AAA FY25 MILCON
DATE: 15 April 2025
1 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) for US FUNDED CONTRACT CR-AAA MILCON
CULTURAL RESOURCE TECHNICAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES
DEVELOPMENT, ISLAND OF GUAM
NOTE: Sample Project scope and cultural resources described within are fictitious.
SECTION 1.0 - GENERAL
This performance work statement solicits cultural resources services for the development of defense facilities on the island of Guam and shall be performed as outlined below. The Navy proposes to construct facilities across two military installations under the Make Skies Safe Initiative (MSSI). The three parcels for development include both developed and undeveloped areas at Naval Base Guam (NBG) and Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB). See Enclosures 1-3 for project locations. Project design efforts will involve soil investigations, including geotechnical borings of varying depths, mechanized excavation, placement of survey markers, and other ground disturbing activities. Project construction efforts will require grading and temporary erosion and soil control, mechanical excavation, road paving, parking, driveways, site, and curbs and gutters; landscaping, fencing, concrete for sidewalks and ramps; electrical power, water (fire protection and potable), sewer, and storm water drainage systems; and possible munitions of explosive concern (MEC) removal.
Cultural resources services shall include archaeological monitoring, data recovery, and interpretive components in accordance with the Navy’s Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act. Additionally, pre-negotiated options for additional emergency data recovery and recovery of human skeletal remains are required.
The duration of construction work requiring archaeological monitoring under this contract task order (CTO) is expected to require approximately the equivalent of eighteen (18) months of field time. The field time may not necessarily occur consecutively. Design efforts will occur over approximately 90 consecutive days while construction is not set to begin until 6 months following design work. This project will involve ground disturbing work up to three areas across the bases simultaneously, which would require an archaeological monitor in each location. The project also includes data recovery of Site 66-02-9976 at NBG, a Latte Period site with surface structures associated artifact scatter. The data collected shall be used to develop and produce a ArcGIS StoryMap and a three-dimensional (3D) landscape model that the Navy will install within the Visitor Control Center.
The Contractor is also to provide documentation of Building 206 at AAFB in accordance with the HABS standards and guidelines; and development of a historic structures report (HSR) for the
2 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 former Palm Tree Clubhouse, a 1964 post Typhoon Karen rebuild, as this project will adapt the building for re-use as a MSSI headquarters facility.
Pre-negotiated tasks shall include follow-on efforts should monitoring identify cultural deposits that represent a historic property, or human skeletal remains.
This effort will be performed in accordance with all applicable federal laws and regulations, including the Antiquities Act of 1906, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of 1906, and ARPA implementing regulation (32 CFR Part 229). Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific will administer this task order. All work must be performed following applicable and appropriate Department of Defense (DOD) guidance and policy for the Department of the Navy Cultural Resources Program and consider all site documentation and reports to date. Under this PWS, the Contractor shall provide all materials, supplies, supervision, coordination, and management necessary to complete the work as required.
1.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this project is to provide cultural resources support for design and construction of MSSI facilities at NBG and AAFB. Before construction activities can begin, data recovery at Site 9976, HABS documentation and preparation of an HSR for Buildings 206 must be completed. During construction and demolition, archaeologists shall monitor ground-disturbing activities, focusing on identifying in-situ cultural deposits and features.
Archaeological monitoring efforts shall be consistent with the monitoring requirements outlined in the base contract. Monitoring will examine sediments for cultural materials, including human remains and assessing the finds for recommendations of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Any deposits identified during archaeological monitoring that represent a site and that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP shall be included as part of pre-negotiated emergency data recovery efforts.
Data recovery efforts will focus on sufficiently characterizing the site and determining vertical and horizontal extents of surface features and subsurface cultural deposit at Site 9976. Data recovery should address the research design and include topics such as regional subsistence and settlement patterns.
Documentation of Building 206 shall be in accordance with the HABS standards and guidelines and accepted by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Programs. Development of an HSR shall provide documentation of facility conditions and recommendations for adaptive reuse.
The contractor shall obtain final approval of the work required by Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), Pacific upon completion of these performance objectives as specified in Section 7.0 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SUMMARY AND OFFER
SCHEDULE.
1.2 BACKGROUND
3 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
The MSSI facilities will be built in three areas: one 14 hectare (ha)/34 acre (ac) parcel containing Site 9976 (.13 ha/.33 ac) on NBG, and two on Andersen Air Force Base, including the former Palm Clubhouse location measuring 35,996 ft2, and an undeveloped 86 ha/211 ac parcel.
Previous archaeological survey identified Site 9976, a Latte set with an associated artifact scatter, at NBG. Although WWII-era activities have disturbed portions of the site area, previous study has confirmed that subsurface cultural deposit is intact.
Post WWII development saw an interest in long-term forward basing military forces on Guam.
Morale, Welfare and Recreational facilities included Building 206, the Palm Clubhouse, built in 1964 as part of massive rebuilding efforts following Typhoon Karen. The original construction was 15,600 ft2. The clubhouse was later expanded to the current footprint.
SECTION 2.0 – WORK ELEMENTS
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, supplies, services, equipment, and project management. The contractor shall conduct all work in accordance with all federal regulations and approved work plans.
The contractor’s work areas and activities at the site shall be subject to inspection without announcement by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).
The Contractor’s proposal should be presented in standard proposal format.
The estimate should include the following work elements:
WORK ELEMENT 1: Project Management
WORK ELEMENT 2: Historic Structures Report (HSR)
WORK ELEMENT 3: Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS)
WORK ELEMENT 4: Data Recovery
WORK ELEMENT 5: Archaeological Monitoring WORK ELEMENT 6: Laboratory Analyses
WORK ELEMENT 7: Results Reports
WORK ELEMENT 8: Interpretive Components
WORK ELEMENT 9: Emergency Data Recovery
WORK ELEMENT 10: Emergency Recovery of Human Skeletal Remains
2.1 WORK ELEMENT 1 – Project Management
2.1.1 The Contractor shall attend a kick-off meeting prior to beginning fieldwork, within 14 days after award of contract. The date and time will be mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the Navy COR. The purpose of this meeting is to make an introduction of key personnel, discuss schedule, and arrange access to facilities and
Installation areas.
4 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
2.1.2 Prior to the start of fieldwork, the Contractor shall submit a Site Safety and
Health Plan. DELIVERABLES section details the timeline for submission of a Draft Site
Safety and Health Plan and of a Final Site Safety and Health Plan.
2.1.3 A written weekly status update will be sent to the Navy COR each Monday. The status update would include the progress of ongoing efforts and noteworthy findings.
2.2 WORK ELEMENT 2 – Historic Structures Report (HSR)
2.2.1 The Contractor shall produce a one (1) HSR for Building 206, the Cold War era building eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The HSR is a compilation of facility history, significance, and existing conditions known and/or observed at the time of the fieldwork. It is intended to be a primary reference used in decision-making about treatments and reuse. The HSR shall follow the report content and organization prescribed by the National Park Service in Preservation Brief 43, Reference (a).
2.2.2 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft, Preliminary Final, and Final HSR:
2.2.3 The Contractor shall develop Draft Treatment Recommendations following the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, Reference (b), to then be incorporated into the Draft, Preliminary Final and Final HSRs.
2.2.4 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft HSR that takes into account initial Government and other party discussion about the Draft Treatment Recommendations at the Post-Fieldwork Debrief. The Draft Treatment Recommendations shall be incorporated into the Draft HSRs.
2.2.5 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Final HSR for submittal to the Navy for comment. The Pre-Final HSRs shall incorporate comments received on the Draft HSR.
A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report.
2.2.6 The Contractor shall prepare a Final HSR that incorporates comments received on the Pre-Final HSR. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report.
2.2.7 Specific deliverables for this Work Element are described in Section 6.0 Schedule of Deliverables.
2.3 WORK ELEMENT 3 – Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS)
2.3.1 The Contractor shall prepare HABS Level II documentation for Building 701 206.
The documentation shall conform to the National Park Service’s Heritage
5 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
Documentation Programs Standards and Guidelines (Reference (c)) and, upon completion, shall be accepted by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Program.
The Contractor shall assume twelve (12) large-format, black and white photographs will be required to adequately document the facility.
2.3.2 Photography and site visits shall be completed within sixty (60) calendar days of the award of contract.
2.3.3 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Draft, Draft, and Final Report.
2.3.4 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Draft report for internal Navy review.
The Preliminary Draft should incorporate both archival research and fieldwork completed up to this point. It should be a complete draft for review.
2.3.5 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft report for submittal to the Navy and the National Park Service for comment. The Draft report shall incorporate comments received on the Preliminary Draft report. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report. The Draft report shall undergo additional security review and be approved for public release prior to submittal to outside Government agencies (e.g. the National Park Service).
2.3.6 The Contractor shall prepare a Final Report that incorporates comments from the Navy and the National Park Service. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report. The Final report shall undergo additional security review and be approved for public release prior to submittal to outside Government agencies (e.g. the National Park Service) or the public.
2.3.7 The Contractor shall submit one archival submittal package, including all required hard copy HABS documentation and photographic negatives and prints in the correct format and meeting all transmittal requirements for acceptance by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Program for transmittal to the Library of Congress. The Contractor shall transmit these deliverables to the National Park Service on behalf of the Navy.
2.3.7 Specific deliverables for this Work Element are described in Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables.
2.4 WORK ELEMENT 4 – Data Recovery
2.4.1 The Contractor shall conduct data recovery at Site 9976 located in the NBG parcel for this project. This effort is to mitigate adverse effects of construction in because avoidance is not possible. The effort will seek to characterize and interpret
6 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 the site.
2.4.2 The Contractor shall prepare an Archaeological Work Plan combining the data recovery of Site 9976, archaeological monitoring, and procedures for emergency data recovery and recovery of human skeletal remains. It will include the research design and methodologies to be employed that are tailored to the specific site and formulated to gain optimum information. Development of research topics should guide the research design. Field and laboratory methods should discuss a data recovery excavation plan, including size and number of test units. A discussion of laboratory methods should include the types of analysis to be used and how it is to be conducted.
2.4.3 If human skeletal remains are encountered, the Contractor shall stop all work in the area and secure the remains. The Navy COR shall be contacted within 24 hours.
2.4.4 The Contractor shall record project locations, excavations, archaeological features or deposits, and soil profile locations with a global positioning system (GPS) with sub-meter accuracy and provide Geographic Information System (GIS) data. A geodatabase shall be provided with the draft and final deliverables. Such data shall comply with the Navy’s Geospatial Data Standards.
2.4.5 The Contractor shall prepare a draft and final archaeological report of the findings that will be combined with the archaeological monitoring report. See Section WORK ELEMENT 7 Results Reports.
2.4.6 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in
DELIVERABLES.
2.5 WORK ELEMENT 5 – Archaeological Monitoring
2.5.1 The Contractor shall conduct archaeological monitoring during construction in accordance with the basic contract and the accepted work plan. Archaeological monitoring is expected to require approximately the equivalent of eighteen (18) months of field time, which will require three archaeological monitors in the field: one monitor per excavation equipment. The field time may not necessarily occur consecutively.
2.5.2 Any deposits identified during archaeological monitoring that represent a site and that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP shall be included in emergency data recovery efforts.
2.5.3 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in Section
6.0. Schedule of Deliverables.
7 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
2.6 WORK ELEMENT 6 – Laboratory Analysis
2.6.1 The Contractor shall carry out general laboratory analyses, which shall include sorting items by material (e.g., basalt, ceramic, metal) and type (e.g., flake, rim sherd, nail), and shall be counted and weighed. Laboratory results shall be presented in tabular and text form to be incorporated into the Draft and Final Archaeological Reports.
2.6.2 Diagnostic materials recovered shall be described and classified based on diagnostic attributes, materials shall be weighed and counted, and diagnostic (metric) measurements shall be taken as appropriate.
2.6.3 Vertebrate and invertebrate faunal remains shall be sorted to the lowest taxonomic category possible by an experienced faunal analyst. Vertebrate remains shall be compared with reference skeletons. Invertebrate material shall be compared with a shell reference collection and standard mollusk reference manuals.
2.6.4 Analyses shall also include macro botanical identifications, radiocarbon dating, and nondestructive geochemical characterization a sample of lithic artifacts.
2.7 WORK ELEMENT 7 – Results Reports
2.7.1 Requirements for post-fieldwork deliverables are described below. Quantities and distribution of deliverables are presented in DELIVERABLES.
2.7.2 The end of data recovery fieldwork letter report will be submitted to the Government within 14 days from the completion of data recovery fieldwork.
2.7.3 The end of monitoring fieldwork letter report will be submitted to the Government within 14 days from the completion of monitoring fieldwork.
2.7.4 Ninety (90) calendar days after completion of archaeological fieldwork (data recovery and monitoring), the Contractor shall submit the Draft Report and Draft GIS data to the Government. Site and Feature forms shall be included as an appendix.
2.7.5 The Final combined archaeological Report and Final GIS data shall be submitted within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of Government review comments. The Contractor shall submit a geodatabase with polygons for the project area, and points for the subsurface survey locations and any finds that are encountered. Data shall be collected using GPS coordinates such that the data complies with NAVFAC’s geospatial data standards. Please coordinate with the COR for questions regarding format. The data should be sent on a CD/DVD and submitted with the draft monitoring report to ensure that it is in proper format and can be input into the Navy’s GeoReadiness database. The geodatabase shall be provided with the draft and final reports.
8 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
2.8 WORK ELEMENT 8 – Interpretive Components
2.8.1 As part of mitigation that the Navy agreed to during Section 106 consultation, the Contractor shall develop and produce an ArcGIS StoryMap for Site 9976. The StoryMap theme shall be accepted by the Navy COR. A schematic draft will be provided concurrent with the Draft Report. Final StoryMap shall be delivered within 90 days from the receipt of Government review comments.
2.8.2. The Contractor shall collect geo-spatial data of Site 9976 to produce a 3D landscape model for digital display in the Visitor Control Center. The aspect ratio shall be 3840 x 2160. The model may also be used in the StoryMap presentation, but is a separate deliverable to be provided in DWG file format. The draft shall be provided concurrent with the Draft Report. Final shall be delivered within 90 days from the receipt of Government review comments.
2.8.3 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in Section 6.0 Schedule of Deliverables.
2.9 WORK ELEMENT 9 – Emergency Data Recovery (PRE-NEGOTIATED; MAY BE EXERCISED UP
TO 3X)
2.9.1 In the case that monitoring identifies cultural deposit representing a historic property, the Contractor shall perform data recovery discovery consistent with the approved work plan. Procedures include discretionary mechanical excavation and controlled units. Sampling for radiocarbon dating, environmental analysis and wood identification is required as part of the data recovery task. The Government provides two weeks of effort for a crew of four each instance.
2.9.2 Deliverables associated with this Work Element shall be included in Work Element 7.
2.10 WORK ELEMENT 10 – Emergency Recovery of Human Skeletal Remains (PRE-
NEGOTIATED; MAY BE EXERCISED UP TO 3X)
2.10.1 The Contractor shall perform recovery work resulting from the discovery of human remains in the project area. To mitigate finds of human remains identified in disturbed contexts, the Contractor shall investigate a 10-meter (m) radius around the discovery using 1 m grids. In-situ remains shall be preserved in place but fully recorded in plan view. The Government provides two weeks of effort for a crew of four each instance.
2.10.2 Recording must include photographs of the discovery location, the number and size of the remains, context of the discovery and mitigation approach, general measurements of push piles and backdirt if part of the investigations, and size of the buffer. Information included in the report will minimally include a description of the investigation and mitigation efforts, analysis of the HSR (including fragmentary HSR), 9 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 radiocarbon dating of associated charcoal, midden, or artifacts, and photographs (to include a scale).
2.10.3 The Contractor shall record the project locations, excavations, archaeological features or deposits, and soil profile locations using global positioning system instrumentation with sub-meter accuracy and provide GIS data. Shape files shall be provided with the draft and final deliverables consisting only of data produced during this project. Such data shall comply with Navy geospatial data standards.
2.10.4 The Collection, analysis and reporting of HSR and associated material will follow the requirements of the base contract. A qualified Biological Anthropologist/Osteologist shall confirm the inventory and assess the remains to determine the individual’s estimated sex, age, stature, and probable ethnicity (if possible). Information on the health of the individual (both oral and skeletal) as well as any indication of trauma will be documented using applicable standards and references.
Where possible these data will be applied to determine a probable cause of death as part of a complete biological profile of the skeleton. This profile should be expanded into an osteo-biography of the individual in cases where the biological profile and archaeological and historical contexts combine to make this possible. The remains and any artifacts collected will be turned over to the Navy upon project completion. A copy of the inventoried remains and artifacts should also be included.
2.10.5 Deliverables associated with this Work Element shall be included in Work Element 7.
SECTION 3.0 – SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS
3.1 Methodology
3.1.1 All persons working on this task order shall be familiar with this PWS. A copy the Site Safety and Health Plan shall be available for consultation in the field at all times while the project is in process. The archaeologists working on the data recovery and archaeological monitoring portions of the project shall be familiar with archaeological work plan, which will be available for consultation in the field during archaeological work.
3.1.2 The Contractor’s Quality Control efforts shall ensure that the Draft, Pre-Final and Final Reports are complete documents, which have been reviewed for academic excellence, professional and copy quality, and technical accuracy. Reports not displaying such efforts will not be accepted.
3.1.3 All archaeological materials and associated records shall be provided to the Navy at the completion of the project. The Contractor shall prepare such materials in archival quality packaging appropriate for long-term curation per 36 CFR § 79.
10 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
3.2 Installation Access
3.2.1 This Task Order requires the Contractor to visit military areas. Personnel assigned to the project must be able to qualify for access to military areas after appropriate security checks are made. All personnel shall abide by prevailing security requirements during visits to such military property and shall obtain the required permits and passes in a timely manner.
3.2.2 Effective 1 September 2018, Navy contractor/subcontractor/service provider access will be allowed almost exclusively using the government owned access control system called Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS). Enrollment into this program will permit unescorted access onto the installation- not necessarily within all installation areas.
3.2.3 All contractor questions regarding base access, including sponsorship for DBIDS shall be referred to the Navy Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist.
3.2.4 There is no cost for enrollment in DBIDS and enrollment and administration labor should not be included as costs within this contract task order. It is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor to enroll in the program, register all employees of consideration for this project, enroll or enable the enrollment of their subcontractors, and to do so in time to allow for processing of any required background checks (this could take several weeks).
3.3 MEC Support Requirements
3.3.1 The contractor shall perform MEC Avoidance Support to ensure MEC is not present during subsurface testing, data recovery, and HSR recovery activities. After the MEC contractor ensures that MEC is not present in the area proposed for ground disturbance, the Archaeological contractor shall follow fieldwork methods. Because the detection depth is generally limited to 6-8 inches in depth, this may be an iterative process
3.3.2 Anomaly Avoidance Plan
The contractor shall prepare an Anomaly Avoidance Plan (AAP) for Government acceptance. The AAP shall be written, job-specific, and address any unusual or unique aspects of the project or activity for which it is written. The AAP shall interface with the contractor’s overall safety, health, and quality control programs. The Government considers the Prime contractor to be the “controlling authority” for all work site safety, health, and quality control implementation of the subcontractors. Contractors are responsible for informing their subcontractors of the safety and quality provisions under the terms of the contract and the penalties for noncompliance, coordinating the work to prevent one craft from interfering with or creating hazardous working conditions for other crafts, and inspecting subcontractor operations to ensure that accident prevention and quality control responsibilities are being carried out. The contractor shall
11 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 implement the three phases of quality control. The AAP shall be signed by the Project Manager, the project Quality Control (QC) Manager, the project Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), the Unexploded Ordnance Safety Officer (UXOSO), and UXO Tech II.
Only when the AAP is accepted shall the contractor be permitted to begin ground disturbing or subsurface survey activities.
Once work begins, changes to the accepted AAP shall be made with the knowledge and concurrence of the Contracting Officer (KO), Project Manager, QC Manager, SSHO, and UXO Tec II. Should imminent danger become evident, stop work in the area, secure the area, remove the exposure and control the hazard. Notify the Contracting Officer and the OICC within four (4) hours of discovery. In the interim, take all necessary action to restore and maintain safe working conditions in order to safeguard onsite personnel, visitors, the public, and the environment. Written notification and initial spot report shall be provided within 24 hours (one business day). Copies of the accepted AAP shall be maintained at the job site.
3.3.3 MEC/MPPEH Spot Report
MEC/MPPEH Spot Reports are needed in any situation where MEC/MPPEH is encountered. In the event MEC/MPPEH is encountered when it was not expected/found, the contractor shall make every effort to contact the government representative via telephone within four (4) hours of discovering the MEC/MPPEH item.
An intermediate written report is due to the KO and the OICC by the next business day.
A closeout report is due to the KO and the OICC 30 calendar days from the day when the MEC/MPPEH was encountered. The initial voice MEC/MMPPEH Spot report shall include a brief description of the positively identified MEC/MPPEH and its disposition. The written report shall include, but is not limited to, the description of the positively identified MEC/MPPEH item(s), photograph of item(s) (if possible next to a measuring device for reference), map indicating location of found MEC/MPPEH item, method used to isolate the hazard, description of work being performed when MEC/MPPEH item was encountered, and names of personnel who found the item. The close-out report shall have all the same information as in the intermediate report and shall include a root cause analysis on why a MEC/MPPEH item was encountered when it was not expected if the area had been previously cleared.
3.3.4 MEC Clearance
If MEC clearance is performed, because the depth of MEC clearance is generally limited to 6 inches in depth, MEC clearance may be an iterative process. The Quality Control Requirements (Section 7.0) of the Munitions Response Explosives Safety Submission Guam Construction Support (MRESS) apply to Full Clearance Ahead of Construction activities. Refer to Section 6.2.4 of the MRESS for Exclusion Zone (EZ) Access Protocols.
12 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025
The exclusion zone is based on the Hazardous Fragmentation Distance (HFD) of the Primary munition with the greatest fragmentation distance (MGFD) listed in the MRESS so the contractor shall closely coordinate the activities of their archaeological and explosives safety personnel. Full MEC clearance requirements are described in Section
6.1.4 of the MRESS.
3.3.5 The Contractor shall prepare a MEC Clearance work plan for Government acceptance. If the Contractor plans to use MEC Anomaly Avoidance techniques only, an Anomaly Avoidance work plan shall be prepared for Government acceptance. The work plan shall be written, job-specific, and address any unusual or unique aspects of the project or activity for which it is written. The work plan shall interface with the Contractor's overall safety, health, and quality control programs.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .