J-6_SAMPLE_PROJECT_2_PWS.pdf

US FUNDED CR-AAA FY25 MILCON

DATE: 01 OCTOBER 2025

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) for US FUNDED CONTRACT CR-AAA MILCON

CULTURAL RESOURCE TECHNICAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF

MISSILE DEFENSE EXPANSION, KAUAI, HAWAII

NOTE: Sample Project scope and cultural resources described within are fictitious.

SECTION 1.0 - GENERAL

This performance work statement solicits proposals for a variety of cultural resources technical services in support of missile defense expansion at Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) on the island of Kauai and shall be performed as outlined below. The Navy proposes to construct a new missile launch complex at the northern end of the Barking Sands installation at PMRF as shown on [Enclosures 1-2]. The project will require demolition of one National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible, Cold War-era missile launch facility (Facility 583). In addition, the project requires an alteration to another NRHP-eligible, Cold War-era building, a missile assembly and blockhouse facility (Building 573), as well as the relocation of two NRHP-eligible, Cold War-era launch pad pump buildings (Facilities 566 and 586). Required services include: documentation of Building 583 consistent with Level II Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) and documentation of Building 573 consistent with Level II Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) standards and guidelines; Historic Structures Reports (HSR) on Buildings 566 and 586 to assess their suitability for adaptive reuse; an update to the Barking Sands Historic District NRHP Nomination reflecting the Navy’s proposed changes to facilities in support of missile expansion; and the development of an interpretive plan focusing on the history of PMRF. These services shall be performed in compliance with the Secretary of Interior’s (SOI) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR Part 68 1995).

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific (NAVFAC PAC) will manage this contract task order (CTO). The Contractor shall perform all work in compliance with the base contract, all applicable cultural resources laws, implementing regulations, policies, and this Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

Under this PWS, the Contractor shall provide all materials, supplies, supervision, coordination, and management necessary to complete the work as required. All work must be performed following applicable and appropriate Department of Defense (DOD) guidance and policy for the Department of the Navy Cultural Resources Program and consider all site documentation and reports to date.

1.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this project is to provide cultural resources technical services in support of missile defense expansion at PMRF, Barking Sands. The contractor shall perform the following tasks:

produce HSRs for Buildings 566 and 568 to include recommendations for relocation and reuse; complete HAER Level II documentation of Facility 583 and HABS Level II documentation of Building 573; develop an interpretive plan for PMRF, Barking Sands; and update the NRHP Nomination for the Barking Sands Historic District, reflecting changes to the built environment as a result of the missile expansion effort.

The nomination update shall document the historic district as it appears following building demolitions and alterations. The project scope shall include all necessary labor associated with meeting the objectives and ensure that documentation conforms to the SOI’s NRHP Bulletins (NRB) and guidance documents.

The contractor shall obtain final approval of the work required by NAVFAC PAC upon completion of these performance objectives as specified in Section 7.0 Performance Measurement.

1.2 BACKGROUND

Missile defense expansion at Barking Sands, PMRF involves construction of a new missile launch complex, demolition of one NRHP-eligible Cold War missile launch facility, a new addition amended to a NRHP-eligible Cold War missile assembly and blockhouse facility, and the relocation of two NRHP-eligible Cold War launch pad pump buildings. The proposed actions shall occur in the northernmost portion of the Barking Sands installation, which has served as a missile-launching area since opening as an Army Air Corps Station in the early 1940s.

PMRF encompasses 2,453 acres in four discrete areas on the western shore of the island of Kauai.

Barking Sands, the largest of the four areas, is located entirely on the coastal fringe of the Mana Plain extending from Kokole Point in the south to Polihale State Park in the north. The project area sits approximately a half mile southwest of the Barking Sands northern boundary, just west of Nohili Road [Enclosure 2]. Nineteen existing Cold War-era buildings occupy the project area. The project area is within the NRHP-eligible Barking Sands Historic District; the four facilities to be directly impacted by the missile defense expansion are NRHP-eligible as contributing resources to the district.

The United States Army Air Corps activated Barking Sands in 1940 after taking ownership of a Hawaii territorial airfield. The primary mission at Barking Sands during the early era was flight training. During World War II Barking Sands became a Combat Crew Replacement Center where aircraft flying between the mainland and the Pacific theater stopped for inspection. After the war, the focus at Barking Sands shifted to the Cold War mission of atmospheric and communications research, weapons testing, and NASA’s Man in Space Program. The Air Force assumed control of Barking Sands in the late 1940s and the installation was renamed Bonham Air Force Base in 1958. At this time, the Regulus guided missile program was a major Navy tenant mission established in the old cantonment zone of Barking Sands, the current project area. Regulus testing resulted in the construction of the regulus launcher (Facility 583), a launch pad (Building 566) with a booster rocket storage structure (Building 568) built within a World War II parking apron off the north runway. The official transfer of Barking Sands back to the Navy took place in 1964, and the base was renamed PMRF, Barking Sands in 1966. Training, launching, tracking, and data collection remain ongoing activities at the installation.

The Navy’s proposed demolition, alteration, and relocation of resources listed in or eligible for the NRHP constitute adverse effects to historic properties. Under the provisions of Sections 106 and 110b of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, amended, federal agencies must produce documentation to Heritage Documentation Programs standards for buildings that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the NRHP, to mitigate the adverse effects of federal undertakings. Additionally, Sections 106 and 110 of the amended NHPA require federal agencies to encourage preservation of NRHP-listed or -eligible properties. Furthermore, the Navy’s activities in Hawaii are required under 54 U.S.C. § 306101(a)(2) of the NHPA of 1966, as amended, to reuse available historic property in favor of new leases or construction.

SECTION 2.0 – WORK ELEMENTS

The contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, supplies, services, equipment, and project management. The contractor shall conduct all work in accordance with all federal regulations and approved work plans.

The contractor’s work areas and activities at the site shall be subject to inspection without announcement by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

The Contractor’s proposal should be presented in standard proposal format.

The estimate should include the following work elements:

WORK ELEMENT 1: Project Management

WORK ELEMENT 2: Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan

WORK ELEMENT 3: Fieldwork

WORK ELEMENT 4: HSRs

WORK ELEMENT 5: HAER/HABS Documentation

WORK ELEMENT 6: Interpretive Plan

WORK ELEMENT 7: NRHP Nomination Update

2.1 WORK ELEMENT 1 – Project Management

2.1.1 The Contractor shall attend a kick-off meeting within fourteen (14) calendar days after award of contract. The date and time will be mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the

Navy COR. The purpose of this meeting is to make an introduction of key personnel, discuss schedule, and arrange access to facilities and Installation areas.

2.1.2 The Contractor shall attend one (1) Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan Review

Meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to review the Government comments on the Draft

Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan Review deliverable, discuss schedules and identify problem areas, if any, prior to fieldwork and remaining deliverables.

2.1.3 The Contractor shall attend deliverable review meetings (not to exceed eight [8] total) following Government/Consulting Party review of the Draft and Pre-Final versions of report deliverables. The dates and times will be mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the Navy

COR. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss comments on deliverables and provide updates on the status of the work.

2.1.4 The Contractor shall submit draft meeting notes via email to the COR for review within two (2) days after each meeting. The Contractor shall incorporate comments or changes requested and submit final meeting notes for approval by the COR within two (2) days after receiving Government comments on the draft meeting notes.

2.2 WORK ELEMENT 2 – Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan

2.2.1 The Contractor shall prepare and develop a Work Plan, which shall include, but not be limited to general site history and significance, an outline of report formats, and an overall project schedule. The Work Plan shall also include a Site Safety and Health Plan, in conformance with the basic contract. The schedule shall include milestones and dates for completion of services requested for each project task and associated deliverables.

2.2.2 The Contractor shall draw upon sources including, but not limited to, existing studies and documents in Section 8.0 References a-b. The Contractor shall also conduct historical background and archival research as needed to locate necessary research materials including, but not limited to: primary and secondary sources, manuals, guidelines, photographs, blueprints, drawings, etc. All government furnished and local sources should be exhausted prior to pursuing additional research.

2.2.3 The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the Draft Work Plan and Site

Health and Safety Plan to the COR via email or DoDSAFE file transfer within fourteen (14) calendar days after approval of the final kick-off meeting notes.

2.2.4 The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic Final Work Plan and Site Health and

Safety Plan to the COR via email or DoDSAFE file transfer within seven (7) calendar days after receiving comments on the Draft Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan. The submittal shall include a compilation of all comments received on the draft version and response from the

Contractor to identify how all Government comments have been addressed.

See Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

2.3 WORK ELEMENT 3 – Fieldwork

2.3.1 Fieldwork will begin within thirty calendar (30) days following submittal of the Final

Work Plan and Site Health and Safety Plan.

2.3.2 All fieldwork and access to the project site shall be coordinated through the COR.

2.3.3 All fieldwork for the documentation of the interior, exterior, and surrounding area of the facilities and buildings required to produce the HSRs, HABS/HAER reports, interpretive plan, and NRHP nomination update shall take place during Work Element 3.

2.3.4 The Contractor shall submit a letter report (PDF format via email), within seven (7) days of the end of fieldwork to summarize the process as well as indicate the fieldwork start and end dates.

See Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

2.4 WORK ELEMENT 4 – HSRs

2.4.1 The Contractor shall produce one (1) HSR for each NRHP-eligible, Cold War-era building identified for relocation for the missile defense expansion project, Building 566 and Building

586. A HSR is a compilation of facility history, significance, and existing conditions known and/or observed at the time of the fieldwork. It is intended to be a primary reference used in decision-making about treatments and reuse. The HSR shall follow the report content and organization prescribed by the National Park Service (NPS) in Preservation Brief 43, Reference (c). The

Contractor shall prepare a Draft, Pre-Final, and Final HSR for each building.

2.4.2 Draft HSRs. The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy (in text searchable PDF format) of the Draft HSR for each building to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within one hundred-twenty (120) calendar days of completion of fieldwork. The Draft HSRs shall be finished documents that have been copy-edited for consistency, organization, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It is stressed that the Draft HSRs must be complete, of professional quality, and thoroughly edited for internal review by Navy COR, PMRF, and DoD Security.

2.4.3 Pre-Final HSRs. The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy (in text searchable

PDF format) of the Pre-Final HSR for each building to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of Government comments on the Draft HSRs. One (1) electronic copy of the comment matrices with the responses or actions taken shall accompany the reports. The Pre-Final HSRs shall reflect comments from the Draft HSRs review.

2.4.4 Final HSRs. The Contractor shall submit six (6) bound hard copies of each Final HSR, accompanying photo index, and photocopies of the prints and four (4) digital copies (in text-searchable PDF on CD-R) of each Final HSR, photo index, and photographs within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving Government comments on the Pre-Final HSRs. In addition, two (2) electronic copies of each HSR (in text-searchable PDF format and native files on CD-R) and two

(2) electronic copies of each HSR documentation photographs (in PDF and TIFF format on CD-R) shall be submitted. One (1) hard copy comment matrix (including all comments on each Pre-

Final HSR) with responses or actions taken shall accompany the reports.

See Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

2.5 WORK ELEMENT 5 – HAER/HABS Documentation

2.5.1 The Contractor shall prepare HAER Level II documentation for Facility 583 and HABS

Level II documentation for Building 573. The documentation shall conform to the NPS’s Heritage

Documentation Programs Standards and Guidelines [Reference (e)] and, upon completion, shall be accepted by the NPS’s Heritage Documentation Program. The Contractor shall prepare a

Draft, Pre-Final, and Final HAER/HABS report for each building.

HAER recordation of Facility 583 and HABS recordation of Building 573 shall follow the Outline

Format for HAER/HABS reports and all required sections including those documenting (1) significance, (2) historical information, (3) historical context, (4) architectural information, and

(5) bibliographic sources of information.

The report submittals of each Historic Documentation Package shall incorporate reproductions of existing drawings, historic maps, and historic photographs in accordance with the above references to include but not be limited to elevations, plans, sections and significant building details, and compilation of all Government comments from previous versions and response to comments from the Contractor, to identify how all Government, NPS, and Hawaii SHPD comments have been addressed.

2.5.2 Photographs. The Contractor shall prepare large-format, perspective-corrected black and white photographs of overall views and details of important interior and exterior features of each building. Photography and archival prints shall conform to Reference (e). The Contractor shall also provide these photographs in an electronic format conforming to the Heritage

Documentation Programs standards.

2.5.3 Draft Reports. Each Draft Report submittal shall consist of one (1) electronic copy (in text searchable PDF format) of the documentation package for each building to the COR via

DoDSAFE file transfer. The Draft HAER/HABS Reports shall include the written report and copies of the photographic prints and be submitted within ninety (90) calendar days of submittal of the

Final HSRs. Negatives shall not be included. Each draft report shall be a finished document that has been copy-edited for consistency, organization, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It is stressed that each Draft Report must be complete, of professional quality, thoroughly edited and for internal review by Navy COR, PMRF, and DoD Security.

2.5.4 Pre-Final Reports. Each Pre-Final Report submittal shall consist of one (1) electronic copy

(in text searchable PDF format) of the documentation package for each building to the COR via

DoDSAFE file transfer. The Pre-Final HAER/HABS Reports shall include the same components as the Draft Reports and be submitted within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of Government comments on the Draft HAER/HABS reports. One (1) electronic copy of the comment matrices with the responses or actions taken shall accompany the Pre-Final Reports submittal.

2.5.5 Final Report. Each Final Report shall consist of one (1) set of each complete HAER/HABS documentation package for transmittal to the Library of Congress and include the written report, negatives and the mounted contact prints, and three (3) sets of the written report with prints in sleeves. All paper, folders, sleeves, other materials and techniques used shall be of archival quality and comply with the Standards and Guidelines in Reference (e).

For each of two (2) building HAER/HABS documentation packages, the Contractor shall produce six (6) hard copies to include reports and photocopies of photographs, six (6) electronic copies to include reports and all source files, and six (6) electronic (on CD/DVD) sets of all images in uncompressed tif format. The final reports shall incorporate comments on the draft reports and shall be submitted within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving the review comments on the Pre-

Final versions. Response to comments is to be provided under separate cover.

2.5.6 Transmittal. The Contractor shall transmit the final submittals to the NPS and SHPD on behalf of PMRF, including a signed distribution letter to be provided.

See Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

2.6 WORK ELEMENT 6 – Interpretive Plan

2.6.1 The Contractor shall develop an overarching interpretive plan to serve as a framework for phased research, documentation, and interpretation of PMRF’s history and significance. The plan’s scope will include traditional Native Hawaiian uses prior to the establishment of military operations at PMRF and the subsequent full range of military activity.

2.6.2 The Contractor shall facilitate a planning session to gather the input of the Navy and external stakeholders, including but not limited to consulting parties, for consideration in development of the interpretive plan. This in-person or hybrid meeting will last approximately two (2) hours (not including preparation and follow-up effort) and shall be led by the Contractor.

The Contractor shall schedule the planning session within thirty (30) calendar days of submittal of the final HAER/HABS documentation packages.

The Contractor shall facilitate up to three (3) additional virtual or hybrid planning meetings with Navy internal and/or external stakeholders, including, but not limited to consulting parties, to discuss the interpretive plan, as needed. These meetings shall serve to provide updates, work collaboratively, or discuss issues.

The Contractor shall prepare meeting notes for the planning meetings, as well as a consolidated matrix of comments received. The Contractor shall submit draft meeting notes via email to the COR for review within seven (7) calendar days after each meeting. The Contractor shall incorporate comments or changes requested and submit final meeting notes within two (2) calendar days after receiving comments on the draft meeting notes.

2.6.3 The Contractor shall conduct background research online, on base, and in archives to gather necessary information for the interpretive plan. The Navy will help the Contractor identify known resources that will support project research. The Contractor shall incorporate research into plan deliverables and recommendations.

2.6.4 The Contractor shall prepare a comprehensive plan for future interpretation resources at PMRF. The Contractor shall prepare a Draft, Pre-Final and Final Interpretive Plan.

In the interpretive plan, the Contractor shall:

Document the type, location, description, usage and current condition of existing historical/cultural interpretation resources at PMRF.

Identify gaps in the historical research and interpretive “story” of the installation.

Prepare a framework for future research, including identification of repositories and research sources.

Identify specific opportunities for augmentation, upgrades or improvements to existing interpretation and make specific recommendations for future interpretive projects.

Make specific recommendations for the development of educational materials, including moving images and web content, and opportunities for educational partnering.

Identify potential interpretive or storytelling opportunities for partnership with the local community organizations.

2.6.5 Draft Interpretive Plan. The Draft Interpretive Plan shall include draft text with maps, photographs, graphics, future recommendations and an inventory of existing interpretive resources at PMRF. Placeholders for less than 25% of graphics is acceptable for the Draft Interpretive Plan. The Draft Plan must be complete, of professional quality, and thoroughly edited.

The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the report to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within ninety (90) calendar days of submitting the final planning session notes.

2.6.6 Pre-Final Interpretive Plan. The Pre-Final Interpretive Plan shall incorporate all Government comments on the Draft Plan and shall be formatted as a final report for Government review and comment. The Government will also provide a copy of the Pre-Final Interpretive Plan to external stakeholders for review and comment. Response to comments is to be provided under separate cover, with separate comment matrices prepared for Government comments and external stakeholder comments.

The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the report to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of Government comments on the Draft Interpretive Plan.

2.6.7 Final Interpretive Plan. The Final Interpretive Plan shall incorporate all comments made by the Government and external stakeholders and be submitted to the Government as a finished product. This Final Plan shall be complete, incorporating final photos and maps as well as appendices containing the inventory of existing interpretive resources.

The Final Interpretive Plan submittal shall include a compilation of all comments received on previous versions and response to comments from the Contractor, to identify how all Government and external stakeholder comments have been addressed. Response to comments is to be provided under separate cover, with separate comment matrices prepared for Government comments and external stakeholder comments.

The Contractor shall produce six (6) hard copies and two (2) electronic (on CD/DVD) copies of the Final Interpretive Plan, as well as two (2) electronic copies of all source files. The Contractor shall also provide the Final Interpretive Plan to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer. The Final Report shall incorporate comments on Pre-Final Interpretive Plan and shall be submitted within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of Government comments on the Pre-Final Interpretive Plan.

2.6.8 Any historical photographs used must have copyright permissions secured prior to submittal of the final report, where applicable.

See Section 6.0 Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

2.7 WORK ELEMENT 7 – NRHP Nomination Update

2.7.1 The Contractor shall update the Barking Sands Historic District Nomination, reflecting changes to the built environment as a result of the missile expansion effort. The Contractor shall prepare a Draft, Pre-Final and Final Updated NRHP Nomination.

The updated nomination shall:

Adhere to the SOI’s NRBs and guidance documents, per Section 8.0 Reference (f).

Be completed entirely, including the incorporation of photos, a photo log, geographical information, verbal boundary descriptions, boundary justifications, maps, etc.

2.7.2 Draft Updated Nomination. The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy (in text searchable PDF format) of the Draft Updated NRHP Nomination to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within ninety (90) calendar days of submitting the Final Interpretive Plan. The Draft Updated Nomination shall be a finished product that has been copy-edited for consistency, organization, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It is stressed the Draft Updated Nomination be complete, of professional quality, and thoroughly edited for internal review by Navy COR, PMRF, and DoD Security.

2.7.3 Pre-Final Updated Nomination. The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy (in text searchable PDF format) of the Pre-Final Updated NRHP Nomination to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of Government and external stakeholder comments. The Pre-Final Updated Nomination shall incorporate all Government comments on the Draft Updated Nomination and shall be formatted as a final report for Government review and comment. The Government will also provide a copy of the Pre-Final Updated Nomination to external stakeholders for review and comment. Response to comments is to be provided under separate cover, with separate comment matrices prepared for Government comments and external stakeholder comments.

The Contractor shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the report to the COR via DoDSAFE file transfer within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of Government comments on the Draft Updated Nomination.

2.7.4 Final Updated Nomination. The Contractor shall submit two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (on CD/DVD) of the Final Updated NRHP Nomination to the COR within thirty

(30) calendar days of receipt of Government and external stakeholder comments on the Pre- Final Updated Nomination. The Final Updated Nomination shall incorporate all Government comments on the Pre-Final Updated Nomination. Response to comments is to be provided under separate cover, with separate comment matrices prepared for Government comments and external stakeholder comments.

See Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables for details on the timeline for submissions.

SECTION 3.0 – SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS

3.1 Methodology

3.1.1 The Contractor shall follow and abide by professional conventions accepted in the field of historic preservation. The Contractor shall ensure the project be carried out by a qualified preservation professional who meets the SOI Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Appendix A to Part 61) for History, Architectural History, or Historic Architect and has at least two (2) years of experience identifying, documenting, and preserving Cold War-era military architecture.

3.1.2 All persons working on this task order shall be familiar with this PWS. A copy the Site Safety and Health Plan shall be available for consultation in the field at all times while the project is in process.

3.1.3 The Contractor’s Quality Control efforts shall ensure that the Draft, Pre-Final and Final Reports are complete documents, which have been reviewed for academic excellence, professional and copy quality, and technical accuracy. Reports not displaying such efforts will not be accepted.

3.1.4 Work shall be approached and reported in an objective and dispassionate manner.

Writing shall clearly distinguish between fact and opinion. Interpretations and inferences from data, as well as assumptions, premises, and reasoning used, shall be clearly and explicitly stated.

Technical terms shall be used in a way that is consistent with current usage in the professional literature or shall be explicitly defined when introduced.

3.1.5 To minimize duplication of effort and needless expense to the Government, the Contractor shall make use of all applicable historical data and materials collected under other studies for the Government.

3.2 Installation Access

3.2.1 This Task Order requires the Contractor to visit military areas. Personnel assigned to the project must be able to qualify for access to military areas after appropriate security checks are made. All personnel shall abide by prevailing security requirements during visits to such military property and shall obtain the required permits and passes in a timely manner.

3.2.2 Effective 1 September 2018, Navy contractor/subcontractor/service provider access will be allowed almost exclusively using the government owned access control system called Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS). Enrollment into this program will permit unescorted access onto the installation, not necessarily within all installation areas.

3.2.3 All contractor questions regarding base access, including sponsorship for DBIDS shall be referred to the Navy Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist.

3.2.4 There is no cost for enrollment in DBIDS and enrollment and administration labor should not be included as costs within this contract task order. It is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor to enroll in the program, register all employees of consideration for this project, enroll or enable the enrollment of their subcontractors, and to do so in time to allow for processing of any required background checks (this could take several weeks).

3.3 Disclosure of Information

3.3.1 Work under the task order is UNCLASSIFIED. The contractor shall comply with all applicable security regulations and procedures during the performance of this task order. The Contractor shall not disclose and must safeguard procurement sensitive information, computer systems and data, privacy act data, and Government personnel work products that are obtained or generated in the performance of the task order.

3.3.2 The distribution of any material, data, or reports collected or prepared in the execution of this task order is limited to U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government contractors.

Navy authorization is required for use or distribution.

3.3.3 The Contractor shall not release to anyone outside the Contractor's organization any unclassified information, regardless of medium (e.g., film, tape, document), pertaining to any part of this contract or any program related to this contract, unless—

(1) The Contracting Officer has given prior written approval;

(2) The information is otherwise in the public domain before the date of release; or

(3) The information results from or arises during the performance of a project that involves no covered defense information (as defined in the clause at DFARS 252.204-7012) and has been scoped and negotiated by the contracting activity with the contractor and research performer and determined in writing by the contracting officer to be fundamental research (which by definition cannot involve any covered defense information), in accordance with National Security Decision Directive 189, National Policy on the Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information, in effect on the date of contract award and the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) memoranda on Fundamental Research, dated May 24, 2010, and on Contracted Fundamental Research, dated June 26, 2008 (available at DFARS PGI 204.4 (DFARS/PGI view)).

3.3.4 Requests for approval under paragraph 3.3.1 shall identify the specific information to be released, the medium to be used, and the purpose for the release. The Contractor shall submit its request to the Contracting Officer at least 10 business days before the proposed date for release.

3.3.5 The Contractor agrees to include a similar requirement, including this paragraph (3.3.5), in each subcontract under this contract. Subcontractors shall submit requests for authorization to release through the prime contractor to the Contracting Officer.

SECTION 4.0 – GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT/DATA

Pertinent data in possession of or readily available to the Government, but not to the Contractor, which are needed and requested by the Contractor in order to perform this project, will be made available to the Contractor subject to security requirements.

SECTION 5.0 – POINTS OF CONTACTS

Erin Tyson, NAVFAC Pacific Architectural Historian and Task Order Contracting Officer’s Representative:

(808) 472-1071; erin.r.tyson.civ@us.navy.mil.

Rachel Isara-Phan, NAVFAC Pacific Contract Specialist: (808) 602-7017;

rachel.m.isara-phan.civ@us.navy.mil

SECTION 6.0 – SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES

Item Number

Deliverable PWS Reference Paragraph(s)

NAVFAC Pacific COR (deliverables inclusive)

Due Date

1 Kick-off Meeting Notes Section 2.1.4 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 2 calendar days following kick-off meeting

Draft Work Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan

Section 2.2.3 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 14 calendar days following approval of kick-off meeting notes

Final Work Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan

Section 2.2.4 1 electronic copy (PDF via email)

7 days after receipt of Gov.

comments on Draft Work Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan

Item Number

Deliverable PWS Reference Paragraph(s)

NAVFAC Pacific COR (deliverables inclusive)

Due Date

End-of-Fieldwork Letter

Report Section 2.3.4 1 electronic copy (PDF via email)

7 calendar days following completion of fieldwork

5 Draft HSRs Section 2.4.2 1 electronic copy of each (in text searchable PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

120 calendar days following completion of fieldwork

6 Pre-Final HSRs Section 2.4.3 1 electronic copy of each (in text searchable PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Draft HSRs

7 Final HSRs Section 2.4.4 6 printed/hard copies of each, + 4 electronic copies (on CD/DVD with PDF and source files)

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Pre-Final HSRs

Draft HAER/HABS

Reports Section 2.5.3

1 electronic copy of each (in text searchable PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

90 days following submittal of Final HSRs

Pre-Final HAER/HABS

Reports Section 2.5.4

1 electronic copy of each (in text searchable PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

60 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Draft HAER/HABS

10 Final HAER/HABS Reports Section 2.5.5

6 hard photocopies of each transmittal package, + 6 electronic copies (on CD/DVD with PDF and source files)

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Pre-Final HAER/HABS

Final HAER/HABS

Archival Transmittal

Package

Section 2.5.6

1 hard copy, + 1 set hard copy photographic prints, + 1 set photographic negatives, + 1 archival CD meeting transmittal requirements (all required documentation for NPS acceptance) for each

45 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Pre-Final HAER/HABS

Draft Interpretive

Planning Meeting Notes Section 2.6.2 1 electronic copy (PDF via email)

7 calendar days following planning meeting

Final Interpretive

Planning Meeting Notes Section 2.6.2 1 electronic copy (PDF via email)

2 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on draft meeting notes

14 Draft Interpretive Plan Section 2.6.5 1 electronic copy (PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

90 calendar days following submittal of final meeting notes

Pre-Final Interpretive

Plan Section 2.6.6

1 electronic copy (PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

60 calendar days following submittal of Draft Interpretive Plan

16 Final Interpretive Plan Section 2.6.7 6 printed/hard copies of each, + 2 electronic copies (on CD/DVD with PDF and source files)

30 calendar days following submittal of Pre-Final Interpretive Plan

Draft Updated

Nomination Section 2.7.2

1 electronic copy (PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

90 calendar days following submittal of Final Interpretive Plan

Pre-Final Updated

Nomination Section 2.7.3

1 electronic copy (PDF format via DoDSAFE file transfer)

60 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Draft Updated Nomination

Item Number

Deliverable PWS Reference Paragraph(s)

NAVFAC Pacific COR (deliverables inclusive)

Due Date

Final Updated

Nomination Section 2.7.4

6 printed/hard copies of each, + 2 electronic copies (on CD/DVD with PDF and source files)

30 calendar days following submittal of Pre-Final Updated Nomination

The project completion date is 30 September 2027.

6.1 This PWS schedule of deliverables assumes Government review periods of 30 calendar days for all report documents.

6.2 Deliverables will be submitted to the Navy COR for acceptance and distribution.

SECTION 7.0 – PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SUMMARY AND OFFER SCHEDULE

7.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for achieving the performance objectives in this PWS and successfully performing all the tasks required for successful performance.

7.2 Payments shall be made to the contractor upon completion of the following:

1) Verification that the corresponding event or performance criterion for which payment is requested has been successfully accomplished in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Contracting Officer may, at any time, require the Contractor to substantiate the successful performance of any event or performance criterion which has been or is represented as being payable.

2) Submission of a properly prepared invoice. The Contractor may submit requests for payment of performance-based payments in a form and manner acceptable to the Contracting Officer. Unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer, all performance-based payments in any period for which payment is being requested shall be included in a single request, appropriately itemized and totaled. Invoices that fail to meet the requirements of this paragraph and/or the invoicing or prompt payment clauses of the contract may be rejected in their entirety.

7.2.1 If a task associated with a work element is eliminated or not necessary for accomplishing project completion, the contract/task order shall be modified and the payment amount associated with that task shall not be paid to contractor.

7.2.2 Failure to demonstrate that the performance objectives are achieved and the work elements are complete may result in non-payment of the final work element and/or a negative evaluation.

7.3 Performance measurements provided in the basic contract also apply to this PWS.

Work Element / Task

Performance Standard Assessment Method

Work Element 1:

Project Management

Accurate and timely cost and schedule management and administrative support to keep the project on scope, schedule and budget.

Attendance and technical support at kick-off.

Submittal of meeting minutes.

Attendance of meetings and acceptance of meeting minutes by task order COR.

Navy acceptance by Contracting Officer or task order COR.

Work Element / Task

Performance Standard Assessment Method

Work Element 2:

Work Plan and Site and Safety Health Plan

Submittal of Draft and Final Work Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan.

Attendance and technical support at Work Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan review meeting.

Submittal of meeting minutes.

Navy acceptance of Draft and Final Work Plan and Site and Safety Health Plan by task order

COR.

Attendance of meetings and acceptance of meeting minutes by task order COR.

Work Element 3:

Fieldwork

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Submittal of End of Letter Field Report.

Navy acceptance of End-of- Fieldwork Letter Report by task order COR.

Work Element 4:

HSRs

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Submittal of draft, pre-final and final report deliverables.

Complete historical background research using existing source materials, as well as conducting new archival research, as needed.

Review of deliverables for content, quality and adherence to laws, guidelines and standards.

Factually accurate and complete with no more than 2 major deficiencies (e.g. missing information) and 5 minor deficiencies (e.g. spelling, format, wrong date).

Navy acceptance of deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 5:

HAER/HABS

Documentation

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Complete historical background research using existing source materials, as well as conducting new archival research, as needed.

Submittal of draft, pre-final and final report deliverables.

Preparation of photos and final deliverables to standard accepted by NPS Heritage Documentation Program.

Review of deliverables for content, quality and adherence to laws, guidelines and standards.

Factually accurate and complete with no more than 2 major deficiencies (e.g. missing information) and 5 minor deficiencies (e.g. spelling, format, wrong date).

Navy acceptance of deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 6:

Interpretive Plan

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Submittal of draft, pre-final and final report deliverables.

Documents organized, well written, and adheres to historic preservation standards and guidelines.

Deliverables reviewed by an editor and include persuasive discussions.

Review of deliverables for content, quality and adherence to laws, guidelines and standards.

Factually accurate and complete with no more than 2 major deficiencies (e.g. missing information) and 5 minor deficiencies (e.g. spelling, format, wrong date).

Navy acceptance of deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 7:

NRHP Nomination Update

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Complete historical background research using existing source materials, as well as conducting new archival research.

Review of deliverables for content, quality and adherence to laws, guidelines and standards.

Factually accurate and complete with no more than 2 major

Work Element / Task

Performance Standard Assessment Method

Submittal of draft, pre-final and final report deliverables.

Preparation of photos and final deliverables to standard accepted by NPS Heritage Documentation Program.

deficiencies (e.g. missing information) and 5 minor deficiencies (e.g. spelling, format, wrong date).

Navy acceptance of deliverables by task order COR.

SECTION 8.0 - REFERENCES

(a) Commander Navy Region Hawaii, Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai Island, State of Hawaii, FY 2012-2017, Final Report, prepared by Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH)

(b) Commander Navy Region Hawaii, Pacific Missile Range Facility Cultural Landscape Report, Final, August 2011, prepared by TEC Inc

(c) National Park Service Preservation Brief 43, “The Preparation and Use of Historic Structure Reports.” National Park Service (1998)

(d) U.S. Department of the Interior, “The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings,” National Park Service Technical Preservation Services (2017)

(e) The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation

(f) National Register of Historic Places Bulletin 16A, “How to Complete the National Register Registration Form,” National Park Service (1997)

Enclosures:

1) Aerial view of PMRF installations on the island of Kauai, Hawaii

2) Project area within PMRF, Barking Sands on the island of Kauai, Hawaii

Enclosure 1

Aerial view of PMRF installations on the island of Kauai, Hawaii.

Enclosure 2

Project area within PMRF, Barking Sands on the island of Kauai, Hawaii.