J-5_SAMPLE_PROJECT_1_PWS.pdf

US FUNDED CR-AAA FY25 MILCON

DATE: 15 April 2025

1 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) for US FUNDED CONTRACT CR-AAA MILCON

CULTURAL RESOURCE TECHNICAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES

DEVELOPMENT, ISLAND OF GUAM

NOTE: Sample Project scope and cultural resources described within are fictitious.

SECTION 1.0 - GENERAL

This performance work statement solicits cultural resources services for the development of defense facilities on the island of Guam and shall be performed as outlined below. The Navy proposes to construct facilities across two military installations under the Make Skies Safe Initiative (MSSI). The three parcels for development include both developed and undeveloped areas at Naval Base Guam (NBG) and Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB). See Enclosures 1-3 for project locations. Project design efforts will involve soil investigations, including geotechnical borings of varying depths, mechanized excavation, placement of survey markers, and other ground disturbing activities. Project construction efforts will require grading and temporary erosion and soil control, mechanical excavation, road paving, parking, driveways, site, and curbs and gutters; landscaping, fencing, concrete for sidewalks and ramps; electrical power, water (fire protection and potable), sewer, and storm water drainage systems; and possible munitions of explosive concern (MEC) removal.

Cultural resources services shall include archaeological monitoring, data recovery, and interpretive components in accordance with the Navy’s Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act. Additionally, pre-negotiated options for additional emergency data recovery and recovery of human skeletal remains are required.

The duration of construction work requiring archaeological monitoring under this contract task order (CTO) is expected to require approximately the equivalent of eighteen (18) months of field time. The field time may not necessarily occur consecutively. Design efforts will occur over approximately 90 consecutive days while construction is not set to begin until 6 months following design work. This project will involve ground disturbing work up to three areas across the bases simultaneously, which would require an archaeological monitor in each location. The project also includes data recovery of Site 66-02-9976 at NBG, a Latte Period site with surface structures associated artifact scatter. The data collected shall be used to develop and produce a ArcGIS StoryMap and a three-dimensional (3D) landscape model that the Navy will install within the Visitor Control Center.

The Contractor is also to provide documentation of Building 206 at AAFB in accordance with the HABS standards and guidelines; and development of a historic structures report (HSR) for the

2 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 former Palm Tree Clubhouse, a 1964 post Typhoon Karen rebuild, as this project will adapt the building for re-use as a MSSI headquarters facility.

Pre-negotiated tasks shall include follow-on efforts should monitoring identify cultural deposits that represent a historic property, or human skeletal remains.

This effort will be performed in accordance with all applicable federal laws and regulations, including the Antiquities Act of 1906, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of 1906, and ARPA implementing regulation (32 CFR Part 229). Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific will administer this task order. All work must be performed following applicable and appropriate Department of Defense (DOD) guidance and policy for the Department of the Navy Cultural Resources Program and consider all site documentation and reports to date. Under this PWS, the Contractor shall provide all materials, supplies, supervision, coordination, and management necessary to complete the work as required.

1.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this project is to provide cultural resources support for design and construction of MSSI facilities at NBG and AAFB. Before construction activities can begin, data recovery at Site 9976, HABS documentation and preparation of an HSR for Buildings 206 must be completed. During construction and demolition, archaeologists shall monitor ground-disturbing activities, focusing on identifying in-situ cultural deposits and features.

Archaeological monitoring efforts shall be consistent with the monitoring requirements outlined in the base contract. Monitoring will examine sediments for cultural materials, including human remains and assessing the finds for recommendations of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Any deposits identified during archaeological monitoring that represent a site and that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP shall be included as part of pre-negotiated emergency data recovery efforts.

Data recovery efforts will focus on sufficiently characterizing the site and determining vertical and horizontal extents of surface features and subsurface cultural deposit at Site 9976. Data recovery should address the research design and include topics such as regional subsistence and settlement patterns.

Documentation of Building 206 shall be in accordance with the HABS standards and guidelines and accepted by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Programs. Development of an HSR shall provide documentation of facility conditions and recommendations for adaptive reuse.

The contractor shall obtain final approval of the work required by Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), Pacific upon completion of these performance objectives as specified in Section 7.0 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SUMMARY AND OFFER

SCHEDULE.

1.2 BACKGROUND

3 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

The MSSI facilities will be built in three areas: one 14 hectare (ha)/34 acre (ac) parcel containing Site 9976 (.13 ha/.33 ac) on NBG, and two on Andersen Air Force Base, including the former Palm Clubhouse location measuring 35,996 ft2, and an undeveloped 86 ha/211 ac parcel.

Previous archaeological survey identified Site 9976, a Latte set with an associated artifact scatter, at NBG. Although WWII-era activities have disturbed portions of the site area, previous study has confirmed that subsurface cultural deposit is intact.

Post WWII development saw an interest in long-term forward basing military forces on Guam.

Morale, Welfare and Recreational facilities included Building 206, the Palm Clubhouse, built in 1964 as part of massive rebuilding efforts following Typhoon Karen. The original construction was 15,600 ft2. The clubhouse was later expanded to the current footprint.

SECTION 2.0 – WORK ELEMENTS

The Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, supplies, services, equipment, and project management. The contractor shall conduct all work in accordance with all federal regulations and approved work plans.

The contractor’s work areas and activities at the site shall be subject to inspection without announcement by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

The Contractor’s proposal should be presented in standard proposal format.

The estimate should include the following work elements:

WORK ELEMENT 1: Project Management WORK ELEMENT 2: Historic Structures Report (HSR) WORK ELEMENT 3: Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) WORK ELEMENT 4: Data Recovery WORK ELEMENT 5: Archaeological Monitoring WORK ELEMENT 6: Laboratory Analyses WORK ELEMENT 7: Results Reports WORK ELEMENT 8: Interpretive Components WORK ELEMENT 9: Emergency Data Recovery

WORK ELEMENT 10: Emergency Recovery of Human Skeletal Remains

2.1 WORK ELEMENT 1 – Project Management

2.1.1 The Contractor shall attend a kick-off meeting prior to beginning fieldwork, within 14 days after award of contract. The date and time will be mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the Navy COR. The purpose of this meeting is to make an introduction of key personnel, discuss schedule, and arrange access to facilities and Installation areas.

4 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

2.1.2 Prior to the start of fieldwork, the Contractor shall submit a Site Safety and Health Plan. DELIVERABLES section details the timeline for submission of a Draft Site Safety and Health Plan and of a Final Site Safety and Health Plan.

2.1.3 A written weekly status update will be sent to the Navy COR each Monday. The status update would include the progress of ongoing efforts and noteworthy findings.

2.2 WORK ELEMENT 2 – Historic Structures Report (HSR)

2.2.1 The Contractor shall produce a one (1) HSR for Building 206, the Cold War era building eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The HSR is a compilation of facility history, significance, and existing conditions known and/or observed at the time of the fieldwork. It is intended to be a primary reference used in decision-making about treatments and reuse. The HSR shall follow the report content and organization prescribed by the National Park Service in Preservation Brief 43, Reference (a).

2.2.2 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft, Preliminary Final, and Final HSR:

2.2.3 The Contractor shall develop Draft Treatment Recommendations following the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, Reference (b), to then be incorporated into the Draft, Preliminary Final and Final HSRs.

2.2.4 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft HSR that takes into account initial Government and other party discussion about the Draft Treatment Recommendations at the Post-Fieldwork Debrief. The Draft Treatment Recommendations shall be incorporated into the Draft HSRs.

2.2.5 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Final HSR for submittal to the Navy for comment. The Pre-Final HSRs shall incorporate comments received on the Draft HSR.

A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report.

2.2.6 The Contractor shall prepare a Final HSR that incorporates comments received on the Pre-Final HSR. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report.

2.2.7 Specific deliverables for this Work Element are described in Section 6.0 Schedule of Deliverables.

2.3 WORK ELEMENT 3 – Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS)

2.3.1 The Contractor shall prepare HABS Level II documentation for Building 701. The documentation shall conform to the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation

5 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

Programs Standards and Guidelines (Reference (c)) and, upon completion, shall be accepted by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Program.

The Contractor shall assume twelve (12) large-format, black and white photographs will be required to adequately document the facility.

2.3.2 Photography and site visits shall be completed within sixty (60) calendar days of the award of contract.

2.3.3 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Draft, Draft, and Final Report.

2.3.4 The Contractor shall prepare a Preliminary Draft report for internal Navy review.

The Preliminary Draft should incorporate both archival research and fieldwork completed up to this point. It should be a complete draft for review.

2.3.5 The Contractor shall prepare a Draft report for submittal to the Navy and the National Park Service for comment. The Draft report shall incorporate comments received on the Preliminary Draft report. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report. The Draft report shall undergo additional security review and be approved for public release prior to submittal to outside Government agencies (e.g. the National Park Service).

2.3.6 The Contractor shall prepare a Final Report that incorporates comments from the Navy and the National Park Service. A comment matrix indicating the action taken to resolve each comment shall accompany the report. The Final report shall undergo additional security review and be approved for public release prior to submittal to outside Government agencies (e.g. the National Park Service) or the public.

2.3.7 The Contractor shall submit one archival submittal package, including all required hard copy HABS documentation and photographic negatives and prints in the correct format and meeting all transmittal requirements for acceptance by the National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Program for transmittal to the Library of Congress. The Contractor shall transmit these deliverables to the National Park Service on behalf of the Navy.

2.3.7 Specific deliverables for this Work Element are described in Section 6.0. Schedule of Deliverables.

2.4 WORK ELEMENT 4 – Data Recovery

2.4.1 The Contractor shall conduct data recovery at Site 9976 located in the NBG parcel for this project. This effort is to mitigate adverse effects of construction in because avoidance is not possible. The effort will seek to characterize and interpret the site.

6 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

2.4.2 The Contractor shall prepare an Archaeological Work Plan combining the data recovery of Site 9976, archaeological monitoring, and procedures for emergency data recovery and recovery of human skeletal remains. It will include the research design and methodologies to be employed that are tailored to the specific site and formulated to gain optimum information. Development of research topics should guide the research design. Field and laboratory methods should discuss a data recovery excavation plan, including size and number of test units. A discussion of laboratory methods should include the types of analysis to be used and how it is to be conducted.

2.4.3 If human skeletal remains are encountered, the Contractor shall stop all work in the area and secure the remains. The Navy COR shall be contacted within 24 hours.

2.4.4 The Contractor shall record project locations, excavations, archaeological features or deposits, and soil profile locations with a global positioning system (GPS) with sub-meter accuracy and provide Geographic Information System (GIS) data. A geodatabase shall be provided with the draft and final deliverables. Such data shall comply with the Navy’s Geospatial Data Standards.

2.4.5 The Contractor shall prepare a draft and final archaeological report of the findings that will be combined with the archaeological monitoring report. See Section WORK ELEMENT 7 Results Reports.

2.4.6 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in

DELIVERABLES.

2.5 WORK ELEMENT 5 – Archaeological Monitoring

2.5.1 The Contractor shall conduct archaeological monitoring during construction in accordance with the basic contract and the accepted work plan. Archaeological monitoring is expected to require approximately the equivalent of eighteen (18) months of field time, which will require three archaeological monitors in the field: one monitor per excavation equipment. The field time may not necessarily occur consecutively.

2.5.2 Any deposits identified during archaeological monitoring that represent a site and that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP shall be included in emergency data recovery efforts.

2.5.3 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in Section

6.0. Schedule of Deliverables.

7 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

2.6 WORK ELEMENT 6 – Laboratory Analysis

2.6.1 The Contractor shall carry out general laboratory analyses, which shall include sorting items by material (e.g., basalt, ceramic, metal) and type (e.g., flake, rim sherd, nail), and shall be counted and weighed. Laboratory results shall be presented in tabular and text form to be incorporated into the Draft and Final Archaeological Reports.

2.6.2 Diagnostic materials recovered shall be described and classified based on diagnostic attributes, materials shall be weighed and counted, and diagnostic (metric) measurements shall be taken as appropriate.

2.6.3 Vertebrate and invertebrate faunal remains shall be sorted to the lowest taxonomic category possible by an experienced faunal analyst. Vertebrate remains shall be compared with reference skeletons. Invertebrate material shall be compared with a shell reference collection and standard mollusk reference manuals.

2.6.4 Analyses shall also include macro botanical identifications, radiocarbon dating, and nondestructive geochemical characterization a sample of lithic artifacts.

2.7 WORK ELEMENT 7 – Results Reports

2.7.1 Requirements for post-fieldwork deliverables are described below. Quantities and distribution of deliverables are presented in DELIVERABLES.

2.7.2 The end of data recovery fieldwork letter report will be submitted to the Government within 14 days from the completion of data recovery fieldwork.

2.7.3 The end of monitoring fieldwork letter report will be submitted to the Government within 14 days from the completion of monitoring fieldwork.

2.7.4 Ninety (90) calendar days after completion of archaeological fieldwork (data recovery and monitoring), the Contractor shall submit the Draft Report and Draft GIS data to the Government. Site and Feature forms shall be included as an appendix.

2.7.5 The Final combined archaeological Report and Final GIS data shall be submitted within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of Government review comments. The Contractor shall submit a geodatabase with polygons for the project area, and points for the subsurface survey locations and any finds that are encountered. Data shall be collected using GPS coordinates such that the data complies with NAVFAC’s geospatial data standards. Please coordinate with the COR for questions regarding format. The data should be sent on a CD/DVD and submitted with the draft monitoring report to ensure that it is in proper format and can be input into the Navy’s GeoReadiness database. The geodatabase shall be provided with the draft and final reports.

8 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

2.8 WORK ELEMENT 8 – Interpretive Components

2.8.1 As part of mitigation that the Navy agreed to during Section 106 consultation, the Contractor shall develop and produce an ArcGIS StoryMap for Site 9976. The StoryMap theme shall be accepted by the Navy COR. A schematic draft will be provided concurrent with the Draft Report. Final StoryMap shall be delivered within 90 days from the receipt of Government review comments.

2.8.2. The Contractor shall collect geo-spatial data of Site 9976 to produce a 3D landscape model for digital display in the Visitor Control Center. The aspect ratio shall be 3840 x 2160. The model may also be used in the StoryMap presentation, but is a separate deliverable to be provided in DWG file format. The draft shall be provided concurrent with the Draft Report. Final shall be delivered within 90 days from the receipt of Government review comments.

2.8.3 Deliverables associated with this Work Element are described separately in Section 6.0 Schedule of Deliverables.

2.9 WORK ELEMENT 9 – Emergency Data Recovery (PRE-NEGOTIATED; MAY BE EXERCISED UP

TO 3X)

2.9.1 In the case that monitoring identifies cultural deposit representing a historic property, the Contractor shall perform data recovery discovery consistent with the approved work plan. Procedures include discretionary mechanical excavation and controlled units. Sampling for radiocarbon dating, environmental analysis and wood identification is required as part of the data recovery task. The Government provides two weeks of effort for a crew of four each instance.

2.9.2 Deliverables associated with this Work Element shall be included in Work Element 7.

2.10 WORK ELEMENT 10 – Emergency Recovery of Human Skeletal Remains (PRE-

NEGOTIATED; MAY BE EXERCISED UP TO 3X)

2.10.1 The Contractor shall perform recovery work resulting from the discovery of human remains in the project area. To mitigate finds of human remains identified in disturbed contexts, the Contractor shall investigate a 10-meter (m) radius around the discovery using 1 m grids. In-situ remains shall be preserved in place but fully recorded in plan view. The Government provides two weeks of effort for a crew of four each instance.

2.10.2 Recording must include photographs of the discovery location, the number and size of the remains, context of the discovery and mitigation approach, general measurements of push piles and backdirt if part of the investigations, and size of the buffer. Information included in the report will minimally include a description of the investigation and mitigation efforts, analysis of the HSR (including fragmentary HSR), 9 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 radiocarbon dating of associated charcoal, midden, or artifacts, and photographs (to include a scale).

2.10.3 The Contractor shall record the project locations, excavations, archaeological features or deposits, and soil profile locations using global positioning system instrumentation with sub-meter accuracy and provide GIS data. Shape files shall be provided with the draft and final deliverables consisting only of data produced during this project. Such data shall comply with Navy geospatial data standards.

2.10.4 The Collection, analysis and reporting of HSR and associated material will follow the requirements of the base contract. A qualified Biological Anthropologist/Osteologist shall confirm the inventory and assess the remains to determine the individual’s estimated sex, age, stature, and probable ethnicity (if possible). Information on the health of the individual (both oral and skeletal) as well as any indication of trauma will be documented using applicable standards and references.

Where possible these data will be applied to determine a probable cause of death as part of a complete biological profile of the skeleton. This profile should be expanded into an osteo-biography of the individual in cases where the biological profile and archaeological and historical contexts combine to make this possible. The remains and any artifacts collected will be turned over to the Navy upon project completion. A copy of the inventoried remains and artifacts should also be included.

2.10.5 Deliverables associated with this Work Element shall be included in Work Element 7.

SECTION 3.0 – SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS

3.1 Methodology

3.1.1 All persons working on this task order shall be familiar with this PWS. A copy the Site Safety and Health Plan shall be available for consultation in the field at all times while the project is in process. The archaeologists working on the data recovery and archaeological monitoring portions of the project shall be familiar with archaeological work plan, which will be available for consultation in the field during archaeological work.

3.1.2 The Contractor’s Quality Control efforts shall ensure that the Draft, Pre-Final and Final Reports are complete documents, which have been reviewed for academic excellence, professional and copy quality, and technical accuracy. Reports not displaying such efforts will not be accepted.

3.1.3 All archaeological materials and associated records shall be provided to the Navy at the completion of the project. The Contractor shall prepare such materials in archival quality packaging appropriate for long-term curation per 36 CFR § 79.

10 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

3.2 Installation Access

3.2.1 This Task Order requires the Contractor to visit military areas. Personnel assigned to the project must be able to qualify for access to military areas after appropriate security checks are made. All personnel shall abide by prevailing security requirements during visits to such military property and shall obtain the required permits and passes in a timely manner.

3.2.2 Effective 1 September 2018, Navy contractor/subcontractor/service provider access will be allowed almost exclusively using the government owned access control system called Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS). Enrollment into this program will permit unescorted access onto the installation- not necessarily within all installation areas.

3.2.3 All contractor questions regarding base access, including sponsorship for DBIDS shall be referred to the Navy Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist.

3.2.4 There is no cost for enrollment in DBIDS and enrollment and administration labor should not be included as costs within this contract task order. It is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor to enroll in the program, register all employees of consideration for this project, enroll or enable the enrollment of their subcontractors, and to do so in time to allow for processing of any required background checks (this could take several weeks).

3.3 MEC Support Requirements

3.3.1 The contractor shall perform MEC Avoidance Support to ensure MEC is not present during subsurface testing, data recovery, and HSR recovery activities. After the MEC contractor ensures that MEC is not present in the area proposed for ground disturbance, the Archaeological contractor shall follow fieldwork methods. Because the detection depth is generally limited to 6-8 inches in depth, this may be an iterative process

3.3.2 Anomaly Avoidance Plan

The contractor shall prepare an Anomaly Avoidance Plan (AAP) for Government acceptance. The AAP shall be written, job-specific, and address any unusual or unique aspects of the project or activity for which it is written. The AAP shall interface with the contractor’s overall safety, health, and quality control programs. The Government considers the Prime contractor to be the “controlling authority” for all work site safety, health, and quality control implementation of the subcontractors. Contractors are responsible for informing their subcontractors of the safety and quality provisions under the terms of the contract and the penalties for noncompliance, coordinating the work to prevent one craft from interfering with or creating hazardous working conditions for other crafts, and inspecting subcontractor operations to ensure that accident prevention and quality control responsibilities are being carried out. The contractor shall

11 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 implement the three phases of quality control. The AAP shall be signed by the Project Manager, the project Quality Control (QC) Manager, the project Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), the Unexploded Ordnance Safety Officer (UXOSO), and UXO Tech II.

Only when the AAP is accepted shall the contractor be permitted to begin ground disturbing or subsurface survey activities.

Once work begins, changes to the accepted AAP shall be made with the knowledge and concurrence of the Contracting Officer (KO), Project Manager, QC Manager, SSHO, and UXO Tec II. Should imminent danger become evident, stop work in the area, secure the area, remove the exposure and control the hazard. Notify the Contracting Officer and the OICC within four (4) hours of discovery. In the interim, take all necessary action to restore and maintain safe working conditions in order to safeguard onsite personnel, visitors, the public, and the environment. Written notification and initial spot report shall be provided within 24 hours (one business day). Copies of the accepted AAP shall be maintained at the job site.

3.3.3 MEC/MPPEH Spot Report

MEC/MPPEH Spot Reports are needed in any situation where MEC/MPPEH is encountered. In the event MEC/MPPEH is encountered when it was not expected/found, the contractor shall make every effort to contact the government representative via telephone within four (4) hours of discovering the MEC/MPPEH item.

An intermediate written report is due to the KO and the OICC by the next business day.

A closeout report is due to the KO and the OICC 30 calendar days from the day when the MEC/MPPEH was encountered. The initial voice MEC/MMPPEH Spot report shall include a brief description of the positively identified MEC/MPPEH and its disposition. The written report shall include, but is not limited to, the description of the positively identified MEC/MPPEH item(s), photograph of item(s) (if possible next to a measuring device for reference), map indicating location of found MEC/MPPEH item, method used to isolate the hazard, description of work being performed when MEC/MPPEH item was encountered, and names of personnel who found the item. The close-out report shall have all the same information as in the intermediate report and shall include a root cause analysis on why a MEC/MPPEH item was encountered when it was not expected if the area had been previously cleared.

3.3.4 MEC Clearance

If MEC clearance is performed, because the depth of MEC clearance is generally limited to 6 inches in depth, MEC clearance may be an iterative process. The Quality Control Requirements (Section 7.0) of the Munitions Response Explosives Safety Submission Guam Construction Support (MRESS) apply to Full Clearance Ahead of Construction activities. Refer to Section 6.2.4 of the MRESS for Exclusion Zone (EZ) Access Protocols.

12 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

The exclusion zone is based on the Hazardous Fragmentation Distance (HFD) of the Primary munition with the greatest fragmentation distance (MGFD) listed in the MRESS so the contractor shall closely coordinate the activities of their archaeological and explosives safety personnel. Full MEC clearance requirements are described in Section

6.1.4 of the MRESS.

3.3.5 The Contractor shall prepare a MEC Clearance work plan for Government acceptance. If the Contractor plans to use MEC Anomaly Avoidance techniques only, an Anomaly Avoidance work plan shall be prepared for Government acceptance. The work plan shall be written, job-specific, and address any unusual or unique aspects of the project or activity for which it is written. The work plan shall interface with the Contractor's overall safety, health, and quality control programs. The Government considers the Prime Contractor to be the "controlling authority" for all work site safety, health, and quality control implementation of the subcontractors. Contractors are responsible for informing their subcontractors of the safety and quality provisions under the terms of the contract and the penalties for noncompliance, coordinating the work to prevent one craft from interfering with or creating hazardous working conditions for other crafts, and inspecting subcontractor operations to ensure that accident prevention and quality control responsibilities are being carried out. The contractor shall implement the three phases of quality control. The work plan shall be signed by the appropriate project personnel. Once accepted by the Government, the work plan and attachments will be enforced as part of the contract. Only when the work plan is accepted shall the contractor be permitted to begin remediation activities. Should imminent danger become evident, stop work in the area, secure the area, remove the exposure and control the hazard. Notify the appropriate Government contacts within 4 hours of discovery. In the interim, take all necessary action to restore and maintain safe working conditions in order to safeguard onsite personnel, visitors, the public, and the environment. Written notification and initial Spot report need to be completed within 24 hours (one business day). Copies of the accepted work plan will be maintained at the job site.

3.3.6 Installation Commanding Officer Notification.

MEC remediation work which impacts an installations operations (residents and tenant commands), traffic patterns or quality of life will require approval from the Installation Commanding Officer (ICO) prior to the start of remediation work. At a minimum, the ICO will require 45 calendar days to review and approve the proposed plan that will cause disruptions to normal operations. Contractors will submit ICO notifications to the assigned point of contact for each contract. The submission will contain, at a minimum, the following information: location and details of the EZ(s), traffic control plan, and impacted buildings. Additionally, include; an aerial picture, identify the dates, times, and duration of anomaly investigation and identify the lead Government and Contractor

13 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 point of contact for the on-site work. ICO Notification is not typically required for MEC Anomaly Avoidance work as EZs are not generated during MEC Anomaly Avoidance.

3.3.7 Daily Quality Control Reports

The QC report shall include the WG84 UTM 55 North coordinate system used, elevation, description of grids/area included in the report, depth of clearance, number of anomalies investigated, weight of debris recovered, number of MEC found, number of materials potentially presenting an explosives hazard (MPPEH) found, number of blind seeds placed and number of blind seeds recovered. The report must indicate if the QC inspection passed/failed, schedule of requested Government QA inspections and must be signed by the UXOQCS and the Prime Contractor QC Officer (if different). In map format, identify the area included in the QC report relative to the entire project footprint, grids, anomalies Left in Place, MEC/MPPEH, and blind seeds. If MEC/MPPEH are found, include a tabular list of the grid, quantity, depth below surface, weight, type (MEC/MPPEH), disposition, mark/model, northing and easting, and any other applicable information. For blind seeds recovered, include a tabular list of the grid, northing and easting, quantity, depth, size (S, M, L), description, and any other relevant information.

For items Left in Place, include a tabular list of the grid, northing and easting, and elevation. Each complete QC report shall be submitted to the Government for review and acceptance. After UXOQCS determination that the excavation has removed MEC/MPPEH to activity limits, or bedrock, and has delineated the area as low likelihood for encountering same, construction activities may precede after notification to the Government in that area. It is anticipated that multiple QC reports will be required and the number will vary based on project and site conditions. The contractor is responsible for maintaining oversight of intrusive activities to ensure that activities that disturb the earth stay within designated areas that have passed QC and QA inspections.

3.3.8 After Action Report

The After Action reports shall be signed by the project superintendent, QC manager, SSHO, UXOSO, UXOQCS, SUXOS, and geophysicist (DGM AAR only). All After Action reports shall follow, at a minimum, the guidance as depicted in reference NAVSEA OP 5 Volume I Chapter 14-13 with the exception of paragraphs 14-13.3.b and 14.13.3.c.

Additionally, a separate appendix will be provided containing the following: a.

Certification documentation, transfer documentation, and disposal certificates regarding MD/MDAS as detailed in NAVSEA OP 5 Volume 1 Ch13. b. Summary of areas (horizontal and vertical dimensions) cleared/converted to low probability ("made green") within the project site. c. Additional supporting documents as appropriate to include but not limited to field logs, weekly SITREPs, compiled GIS files, MEC/MPPEH spot reports, daily activity reports, QC/QA reports, NOSSA audits, photographs, QA documentation. UXO/MEC clearance procedures shall be discussed in the Work Plan

14 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025 and not included in the After Action Report. An After Action Report is normally not required for MEC Anomaly Avoidance work.

3.4 Disclosure of Information

3.4.1 Work under the task order is UNCLASSIFIED. The contractor shall comply with all applicable security regulations and procedures during the performance of this task order. The Contractor shall not disclose and must safeguard procurement sensitive information, computer systems and data, privacy act data, and Government personnel work products that are obtained or generated in the performance of the task order.

3.4.2 The distribution of any material, data, or reports collected or prepared in the execution of this task order is limited to U.S. Government agencies and U.S.

Government contractors. Navy authorization is required for use or distribution.

3.4.3 The Contractor shall not release to anyone outside the Contractor's organization any unclassified information, regardless of medium (e.g., film, tape, document), pertaining to any part of this contract or any program related to this contract, unless—

(1) The Contracting Officer has given prior written approval;

(2) The information is otherwise in the public domain before the date of release;

or

(3) The information results from or arises during the performance of a project that involves no covered defense information (as defined in the clause at DFARS 252.204-7012) and has been scoped and negotiated by the contracting activity with the contractor and research performer and determined in writing by the contracting officer to be fundamental research (which by definition cannot involve any covered defense information), in accordance with National Security Decision Directive 189, National Policy on the Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information, in effect on the date of contract award and the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) memoranda on Fundamental Research, dated May 24, 2010, and on Contracted Fundamental Research, dated June 26, 2008 (available at DFARS PGI

204.4 (DFARS/PGI view)).

3.4.4 Requests for approval under paragraph 3.3.1(1) shall identify the specific information to be released, the medium to be used, and the purpose for the release.

The Contractor shall submit its request to the Contracting Officer at least 10 business days before the proposed date for release.

3.4.5 The Contractor agrees to include a similar requirement, including this paragraph (3.3.5), in each subcontract under this contract. Subcontractors shall submit requests for authorization to release through the prime contractor to the Contracting Officer.

15 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

SECTION 4.0 – GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT/DATA

Pertinent data in possession of or readily available to the Government, but not to the Contractor, which are needed and requested by the Contractor in order to perform this project, will be made available to the Contractor subject to security requirements.

SECTION 5.0 – POINTS OF CONTACTS

Adam Lauer, Ph.D., NAVFAC Archaeologist and Task Order Contracting Officer’s Representative:

(808) 472-1437; adam.j.lauer.civ@us.navy.mil

Rachel Isara-Phan, NAVFAC Pacific Contract Specialist: (808) 602-7017; rachel.m.isara-phan.civ@us.navy.mil

SECTION 6.0 – SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES

Item Number

Deliverable PWS Reference

Paragraph(s) NAVFAC Pacific COR

(deliverables inclusive) Due Date

1 Draft Site Safety and Health Plan

Section 2.1.2 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 14 calendar days following kick-off meeting

2 Final Site Safety and Health Plan

Section 2.1.2 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) NLT 7 days after receipt of Gov. comments on Draft SS&H Plan

3 Draft Treatment

Recommendations

Section 2.2.2 –

2.2.6

1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 60 calendar days following completion of fieldwork

4 Draft HSR Section 2.2.2 –

2.2.6

4 electronic copies (via File Transfer Protocol (FTP)), + 3 printed/hard copies

90 calendar days following completion of fieldwork

5 Preliminary Final HSR Section 2.2.2 –

2.2.6

4 electronic copies (via FTP), + 3 printed/hard copies

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Draft HSR

6 Final HSR Section 2.2.6 4 printed/hard copies, + 4 electronic copies (via FTP with PDF and source files)

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Preliminary Final HSR

7 Preliminary Draft HABS Section 2.3.3 -

2.3.7

3 printed/hard copies, + 4 electronic copies (via FTP)

120 days following completion of fieldwork

8 Draft HABS Section 2.3.3 -

2.3.7

6 printed/hard copies, + 6 electronic copies (via FTP)

30 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Preliminary Draft HABS

9 Final HABS Section 2.3.6 + 4 hard photocopies of HABS transmittal package, + 5 electronic copies (via FTP with PDF and source files)

45 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments on Draft HABS

10 Final HABS Archival

Transmittal Package

Section 2.3.7 1 hard copy, + 1 set hard copy photographic prints, + 1 set photographic negatives, + 1

45 calendar days following receipt of Govt. comments

16 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

Item Number

Deliverable PWS Reference

Paragraph(s) NAVFAC Pacific COR

(deliverables inclusive) Due Date archival CD meeting transmittal requirements (all required documentation for NPS acceptance) on Draft HABS (with Final HABS deliverable)

11 Draft Archaeological

Work Plan (for data recovery, monitoring, emergency procedures)

Section 2.4.2 1 printed/hard copy, + 1 electronic copy via FTP

Within 21 days of contract award

12 Final Archaeological

Work Plan (for data recovery, monitoring, emergency procedures)

Section 2.4.2 1 printed/hard copy, + 1 electronic copy via FTP

NLT 7 days after receipt of Gov. comments on Draft Archaeological Work Plan

13 Weekly status update Section 2.1.3 1 electronic copy (PDF via email)

- COR to distribute

Each Monday following fieldwork

14 End of Data Recovery

Fieldwork Letter

Section 2.7.2 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 14 days following completion of data recovery fieldwork

15 End of Monitoring

Fieldwork Letter

Section 2.7.3 1 electronic copy (PDF via email) 14 days following completion of monitoring fieldwork

16 Draft Archaeological

Report (for data recovery, monitoring, emergency procedures), draft GIS Data2, draft interpretive components

Section 2.7.4 One (1) electronic copy via FTP + one (1) printed/hard copy

90 calendar days following completion of archaeological fieldwork

17 Final Archaeological

Report (for data recovery, monitoring, emergency procedures) and draft GIS Data

Section 2.7.5 One (1) electronic copy via FTP + one (1) printed/hard copy

14 calendar days from receipt of Govt. review comments

18 Final Interpretive

Components

Sections 2.8.1;

2.8.2

One electronic copy transmitted via FTP

90 calendar days from receipt of Govt. review comments

The project completion date is 31 December 2027.

6.1 This PWS schedule of deliverables assumes Government review periods of 30 calendar days for all report documents.

6.2 Deliverables will be submitted to the Navy COR for acceptance and distribution.

17 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

SECTION 7.0 – PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SUMMARY AND OFFER

SCHEDULE

7.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for achieving the performance objectives in this PWS and successfully performing all the tasks required for successful performance.

7.2 Payments shall be made to the contractor upon completion of the following:

1) Verification that the corresponding event or performance criterion for which payment is requested has been successfully accomplished in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Contracting Officer may, at any time, require the Contractor to substantiate the successful performance of any event or performance criterion which has been or is represented as being payable

2) Submission of a properly prepared invoice. The Contractor may submit requests for payment of performance-based payments in a form and manner acceptable to the Contracting Officer. Unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer, all performance-based payments in any period for which payment is being requested shall be included in a single request, appropriately itemized and totaled. Invoices that fail to meet the requirements of this paragraph and/or the invoicing or prompt payment clauses of the contract may be rejected in their entirety.

7.2.1 If a task associated with a work element is eliminated or not necessary for accomplishing project completion, the contract/task order shall be modified and the payment amount associated with that task shall not be paid to contractor.

7.2.2 Failure to demonstrate that the performance objectives are achieved and the work elements are complete may result in non-payment of the final work element and/or a negative evaluation.

7.3 Performance measurements provided in the basic contract also apply to this

PWS.

Work Element / Task[RI1]

Performance Standard Assessment Method

Work Element 1:

Project Management

Accurate and timely cost and schedule management and administrative support to keep the project on scope, schedule and budget.

Attendance and technical support at kick-off.

Submittal of draft and final Site Safety and Health Plan.

Navy acceptance by Contracting Officer or task order COR.

Attendance of meetings and acceptance of meeting minutes by task order COR.

Work Element 2:

Historic Structures Report (HSR)

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Complete historical background research using existing source materials, as well as conducting new archival research.

Navy acceptance of report deliverables by task order COR.

18 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

Work Element / Task[RI1]

Performance Standard Assessment Method

Work Element 3:

Historic American Buildings Survey

(HABS)

Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Complete historical background research using existing source materials, as well as conducting new archival research.

Preparation of photos and final deliverables to standard accepted by NPS Heritage Documentation Program.

Navy acceptance of report deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 4:

Data Recovery

Successful coordination and execution of the data recovery. Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Personnel assigned consistent with the requirements of the PWS.

This task includes a weekly progress report each Monday following the start of the data recovery.

Navy acceptance of work plan and report deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 5:

Archaeological Monitoring

Successful coordination and execution of the monitoring. Complete fieldwork as specified and other requirements of this PWS with no health and safety incidents.

Personnel assigned is consistent with the requirements of the PWS.

This task includes a weekly progress report each Monday following the start of archaeological monitoring.

Navy acceptance of work plan and report deliverables by task order COR.

Work Element 6:

Laboratory Analysis

Appropriate level of analyses completed for fieldwork conducted.

Lab results presented in report and in appendices.

Navy satisfaction of level of analyses and acceptance of analyses documentation presented in deliverables- acceptance by task order COR.

Work Element 7:

Post-Fieldwork Reports

Submittal of draft, pre-final and final report deliverables.

Documents organized, well written, and adheres to historic preservation standards and guidelines.

Deliverables reviewed by an editor and includes persuasive discussions.

Review of deliverables for content, quality and adherence to laws, guidelines and standards.

Factually accurate and complete with no more than 2 major deficiencies (e.g. missing information) and 5 minor deficiencies (e.g. spelling, format, wrong date).

Navy acceptance of deliverables by task order COR.

SECTION 8.0 - REFERENCES

(a) National Park Service Preservation Brief 43, “The Preparation and Use of Historic Structure Reports”

(b) The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings

(c) The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation

Enclosures:

19 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

1) MSSI Project Area and Site 9976 at NBG

2) MMSI Project Area Parcel at AAFB

3) MMSI Building 206 Project Area at AAFB

20 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

ENCLOSURE 1: MSSI Project Area and Site 9976 at NBG.

21 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

ENCLOSURE 2: MMSI Project Area Parcel at AAFB.

22 Version 1.0 – 15 APR 2025

ENCLOSURE 3: MMSI Building 206 Project Area at AAFB.