N6247020R4011 0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Design-Build (DB) Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract for Projects, Primarily Located at Rota, Spain and Worldw ide

PLEASE SEE SF-30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Feb-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247020R4011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Dec-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Feb-2021

CODE

COMNAVFACSYSCOM ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247020R4011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

Design-Build (DB) Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract for Projects, Primarily Located at Rota, Spain and Worldwide The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s)

2. Solicitation Revisions

3. Specification Revisions

4. Additional Attachments

The proposal due date is unchanged and remains 12 February 2021 at 2:30 PM (Eastern U.S. Time). Pre- Proposal Inquiries shall be accepted until 29 January 2021.

1. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s)

16 I am contacting you to inform you that in order to guarantee that our documentation arrives on time to the USA on January 26th, we need to send it from Spain on January 18th, due to possible delays in customs.

Therefore, I would need to confirm the resolution of the doubts raised above and that you can inform me if a visit to the facilities is going to be made, since you have not yet been informed about it.

It is very important for us to send the documentation sufficiently in advance so that you can receive it before the 26th, so if a visit is going to be scheduled, to postpone the delivery of the documentation or to attach more information before the 18th (8 days before the deadline), we need to know in advance these changes to take them into consideration.

See previous amendments extending due date

17 15- Jan-21 of ( page of sectio n 08 13)

SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

S e a l a n ts

"2.1.1.2 Sealants Provide either ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) elastomeric extrusions or thermoplastic elastomer glazing gaskets. Structural silicone sealant is required".

The Paragraph 2.1.1.2 mentions that structural sealant is required , but does not clarify which standard or Specification shall be required to the for the Structural Silicone Sealants, and also does not clarify in which glass pane shall be applied.

Please confirm if Standard ASTM F2248 − 12, applies. This ASTM F2248-12 mentions, Historical records show that fragments from glazing that has failed as the result of intentional or accidental explosions present a serious threat of personal injury. Glazing failure also allows blast pressure to enter the interior of buildings thus resulting in additional threat of personal injury and facility damage. This standard practice provides a means for designers to determine equivalent 3-second duration design loadings with which they can size blast resistant glazing comprised of laminated glass or insulating glass fabricated with laminated glass, or both. Blast resistant glazing systems of this genere can reduce the number and size of glass fragments in an explosion as well as reducing greatly or eliminating blast pressure that enters buildings when an explosion occurs. The standard assumes that the structural silicone bead or glazing tape is applied.

Please confirm and include in paragraph 2.1.1.2 all applicable codes and standard that apply to the structural silicone selant,

ie. ASTM C1184 "Standard Specification for Structural Silicone Sealants" and requirements to be applied in storefronts to resist the required blast pressure. This information is mandatory for the QC program to provide a correct quality assurance of the design, certification, assembly and installation and also is useful for the offerors in order to provide a correct price for storefront systems.

See revised Specification Sections 08 41

ALUMINUM

FRAMED

ENTRANCES

AND

STOREFRONT

S and 08 56 53

BLAST

RESISTANT

TEMPERED

GLASS

WINDOWS.

18 15-

SECTIO

N 08 56

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

RED

GLASS

WINDO

WS

2.3.1.

Elasto meric Sealant

2.3.1 Elastomeric Sealant

ASTM C920, Type S or M, Grade NS, Class 12.5, Use NT. Use for channel or stop glazing and metal sash.

Sealant shall be chemically compatible with setting blocks, edge blocks, and sealing tapes.

This paragraph does not mention the structural silicone sealant to be used for glass sealing along the perimeter for Blast resistant tempered windows, in order to redude an mitigate harzard of flying debris, causes by an unexpected blast event.

Please confirm that structural sealant shall be applied in blast tempered glass windows same as in sections

SECTION 08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED

ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS, in case affirmative a suitable standard shall be applied in example ASTM C1184 "Standard Specification for Structural Silicone Sealants" instead of ASTM C920.

In addition, as a key element to avoid flying debris and best practise of a blast resistant tempered glass windows system design, please clarify and confirm that the structural silicone shall be applied at the perimeter of the insulated glass pane as assumed in Standard ASTM F2248 − 12

See revised Specification Sections 08 41

ALUMINUM

FRAMED

ENTRANCES

AND

STOREFRONT

S and 08 56 53

BLAST

RESISTANT

TEMPERED

GLASS

WINDOWS.

19 15- Jan-21

SECTIO

N 08 56

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

RED

GLASS

WINDO

WS

Section 08 56 53 BLAST RESISTANT TEMPERED GLASS WINDOWS does not provide Blast Pressures and impulses required to design the windows system.

Please define Design Blast loads, which are tipically defined by 2 parameters: peak ovepressure (bar,Pa or psi) and impulse (barxsec, Paxsec, or psxmsec) or alternatively, instead of impulse, they may also provide the blast load duration (milliseconds). This information is required to design properly the Blast Resistant Window system.

Refer to Drawing S-003 for requirements.

20 15-

SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

SECTIO

N 08 56 53

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

RED

GLASS

WINDO

WS

Attending the locations area for both new facilities, of this contract, please confirm the applicable code, i.e. code UFC 4- 010-01 DoD MINIMUM ANTITERRORISM STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS,12 December 2018 Change 1, 19 August 2020 for storefronts and aluminum windows sections. Please also confirm the applicable level of protection (low,medium or high LOP ) used for the design of both buildings.

The Table B-1 Levels of Protection – New and Existing Buildings of code UFC 4-010-01 DoD MINIMUM

ANTITERRORISM STANDARDS FOR

BUILDINGS,12 December 2018 Change 1, 19 August 2020, adefines different Levels of protections Defines a VERY LOW LEVEL of protection and this level implies that "Glazing will fracture, come out of the frame, and is likely to be propelled into the building, with potential to cause serious injuries. (Low hazard rating)", this table also detail a Potential Injury with “Majority of personnel in damaged area suffer serious injuries with a potential for fatalities. Personnel in areas outside damaged area will experience minor to moderate injuries”. Meanwhile a MEDIUM LEVEL of protection implies "Glazing will fracture, remain in the frame and results in a minimal hazard consisting of glass dust and slivers. (Minimal hazard and No Hazard ratings)".

Please confirm if the intended level of protection for window and Storefront level of Protection was LOW, MEDIUM, or HIGH taking into account the port area arc, the minimum stand-off distances and distnaces to the base fence, wich is the current controlled perimeter on the Naval Station, in order to have an effective hazard mitigation and to minimize hazards from flying debris from aluminum windows, storefronts and doors.

Refer to Drawing S-003 for requirements.

21 SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

SECTIO

N 08 56

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

Please confirm if each type of Blast Resistant Tempered Glass Window assembly and Storefronts (including glazing) shall be designed using a dynamic analysis performed by a third party registered professional engineer to prove that the performance equivalent to or better than a specific category of window damage level in accordance with ASTM F 1642 for a concret and required peak positive pressure (pounds per square inch (psi) and a specific peak positive phase impulse - pounds per square inch-millisecond (psi-ms).

Refer to Drawing S-003 for loading

RED

WINDO

WS

22 15- Jan-21

SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

SECTIO

N 08 56

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

RED

GLASS

WINDO

WS

Please confirm if a design analysis with calculations shall be provided for blast resistant tempred glass windows and Storefronts showing that the design of each different size and type of window unit and its anchorage to the structure meets the performance requirements.

Please confirm if calculations verifying the structural performance of each window proposed for use, under the given loads, must be prepared and signed by a experienced and US blast registered professional engineer as required in the applicable UFC.

Refer to Drawing S-003 for loading requirements.

23 15- Jan-21

NON

PRICE

VOLUM

E Factor 1, Technica l Approac h:

"If the experience of a design subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2, the firm must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart. The organizational chart can be on one single sided 11 x 17 size paper and will count as one (1) page."

Please confirm that the measurements A3 are also valid.

Yes, A3 is acceptable.

24 Januar y 15, 22 of

Docume nt N624702 0R4011.

pdf

5.3

PRE-

PROP

OSAL

INQUI

RIES

(PPIs)

Paragraph 5.3 mention that "All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry." .

Attending new amendement 0001, to notify a change of proposal due date, please confirm if PPi's submission due date has changed too. being the new ppi's sumission date the next 27 of january 2021.

See Amendment 0002.

25 15-

Should the effect of the table water and sea tides be considered in the excavations for buildings foundations?

This would have a significant cost impact in the performance of the works

Refer to Specification Section 31 23

00.00 20, paragraph 3.1.2 regarding drainage and dewatering.

26 15- Jan-21

Regarding Items 12 and 13 (Electronic Security System for both buildings), is US contractor with security clearance required for the performance of these works?

In case, would the Government accept the work to be performed by Spanish companies under the supervision of US contractor with security clearanced personnel?

See revised Specification Section 28 08 10 Electronic Security System Acceptance Testing and Specification Section 28 10 05 Electronic Security Systems (ESS).

27 15- Jan-21

Please specify if the demolition of Building 189 should wait to be performed after the conclusion of PORT OPS/FDRMC, or if they can be performed simultaneously, depending on if Building 189 is currently occupied (and all personnel would be directly transfered to new building).

See Amendment 0002 for details.

28 15- Jan-21

In order to ensure the success of the bid delivery in the USA, given the current constrains due to the COVID-19 pandemic, could it be possible to enable an electronic way of delivery instead of postal delivery?

No change will be made to the RFP in this regard. Bid per

RFP

requirements.

29 15- Jan-21

The demolition of different buildings included in the project will take place inside the harbor area, which is subject to special security measures and access control.

Could you please specify the periods and requirements to be considered for the management of access badges to mobilize inside this area?

Refer to Specification Section 01 14

00 – WORK

RESTRICTION

S

30 Januar y 15, 08 41 13

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS/

08 56 53

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

Attending to the location of both new port operation facilities of seed project, Please conifrm if the new construction project in the port nearby would be affected by the ESQD ARC .

Please confirm if the new buildings within the SOW of the seed project, are affected by the ESQD arc of the PORT ESQD MAP, Rota Naval Station. In case affirmative, please confirm if all exterior windows and doors shall be designed, certified, manufactured, assembled and/or installed complying with specifications required to resist Blast and/or Explosive Safety Quarantity Distances (ESQD) specifications. This information shall be indicated in the drawing schedules, so offeror can provide competitive and correct price for this systems, attendinng the minumum blast resistant requirement to be accomplished.

Refer to Drawing S-003

RED

WINDO

WS

Please clarify blast resistant requirements that will define and shall by applied to design exterior windows systems, doors and storefront

31 Januar y 15, SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

2.1.1 Design Requir ements for Alumi num (Entra nces and Compo nents)

Subparagraph "g." of paragraph "2.1.1 Design Requirements for Aluminum (Entrances and Components)", mentions the following: "g. Blast Pressures: Provide window systems capable of withstanding the pressures and impulses indicated."

But specifications does nor shows the pressure and the impulses.

Please define Design Blast loads, which are tipically defined by 2 parameters: peak ovepressure (bar,Pa or psi) and impulse (barxsec, Paxsec, or psxmsec) or alternatively, instead of impulse, they may also provide the blast load duration (milliseconds). This information is required to properly design and certify the Aluminum framed Storefront and entrance, in order to resist an unexpected blast event in the port area.

Refer to Drawing S-003 for requirements.

32 Januar y 15, SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

2.1.1 Design Requir ements for Alumi num (Entra nces and Compo nents)

Paragraph 2.1.1.1 Material Standard, mentions that aluminum alloy shall be 6063-T5 alloy and section SECTION 08 56 53 BLAST RESISTANT TEMPERED GLASS WINDOWS, does not mention type of aluminum alloy for blast resistant windows.

Applicable regulations for Blast Resistant windows, doors and storefronts remark that the suitable aluminum alloy to achieve blast resistant requirements, and should be certified by means of the approved methods, i.e. the dynamic analysis performed by experienced and U.S.

Registered Structural Engineer is the aluminum alloy 6063-T6 for design of aluminum windows, storefronts and doors.

Please confirm the three aluminum systems type and/or their mechanical properties, that confers the Aluminum Alloy to achieve blast resistant contract requirements.

Refer to Drawings S- 003.

33 Januar y 15, SECTIO

N 08 41

ALUMI

NUM-

FRAME

D

ENTRA

NCES

AND

STOREF

RONTS

2.1.1 Design Requir ements for Alumi num (Entra nces and Compo nents)

Paragraph 2.1.1.2 structural sealant: Confirm the standard required.

See revised Specification Sections 08 41

ALUMINUM

FRAMED

ENTRANCES

AND

STOREFRONT

S and 08 56 53

BLAST

RESISTANT

WINDOWS

34 Januar y 15, SECTIO

N 08 56

BLAST

RESIST

ANT

TEMPE

RED

GLASS

WINDO

WS

Sectio n 08 56 53

BLAS

T

RESIS

TANT

TEMP

ERED

GLAS

S

WIND

OWS

Please confirm Blast Pressures and impulses applicable for the design and manufacture of the blast windows system.

Refer to Drawing S-003 for requirements.

35 15- Jan-21 of ( page 7 of sectio n 08 13)

SECTIO

N 01 45

SPECIA

L

INSPEC

TIONS

3.1.2 Qualit y Contro l Manag er and 3.1.1 Special Inspect or of Record

Paragraph 3.1.2 mentions that the QC Mannager Supervise all Special Inspectors required by the contract documents and the IBC, in addition Paragraph 3.1.1 Special Inspector of Record, mention the same sentence a. Supervise all Special Inspectors required by the contract documents.

Please confirm if the QC Manager can also serve as the SIOR and therefore, assumen the SIOR role and responsibilities.

Refer to Section 01 45 00.00 20 paragraph

1.5.1.1 states “The only duties of the QC Manager are to manage and implement the QC program on this Contract” and paragraph 1.3.8 “The SIOR must be independent third party hired directly by the Prime Contractor”

36 Januar y 16, SECTIO

N 01 45

SPECIA

L

INSPEC

TIONS

1.5

SPECI

AL

INSPE

CTOR

QUAL

IFICA

TIONS

Please confirm if the QC Manager and the QC Specialist can serve as the required Special Inspectors and assume their roles and responsibilities. Please confirm parahraph

1.5 wich requires up to thirteen (13) Special Inspectors for this Contract:

1.3.14 Designated Seismic SystemDesignated seismic

system Inspector

1.5.1 Steel Construction and High Strength Bolting

1.5.2 Welding Structural Steel

1.5.3 Nondestructive Testing of Welds

1.5.4 Cold Formed Steel Framing

1.5.4.1 Special Inspector

1.5.5 Concrete Construction

1.5.6 Masonry Construction

1.5.7 Verification of Site Soil Condition, Fill Placement

and Load-

1.5.8 Sprayed Fire Resistant Material

1.5.9 Mastic and Intumescent Fire Resistant Coatings

1.5.10 Fire-Resistant Penetrations and Joints

1.5.11 Smoke Control

1.5.11.1 Special Inspector

1.5.12 Special Inspector of Record (SIOR).

Please confirm if Goverment would accept that QC Manager and/or the QC Specialist can assume special inspectors roles and responsibilities or shall be separate individual with their own experience and certifications.

Refer to Section 01 45 00.00 20, paragraph

1.5.1.1 states “The only duties of the QC Manager are to manage and implement the QC program on this Contract” and paragraph 1.3.8 “The SIOR must be independent third party hired directly by the Prime Contractor”.

37 Januar y 16, SECTIO

N 01 45

SPECIA

L

INSPEC

TIONS

1.5

SPECI

AL

INSPE

CTOR

QUAL

IFICA

TIONS

Paragraph 1.5 show a table that lists the Certifying Associations for Special Inspectors:

AABC Associated Air Balance Council ACI American Concrete Institute AWCI Association of the Wall and Ceiling Industry AWS American Welding Society FM Factory Mutual ICC International Code Council NDT Nondestructive Testing NICET National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies PCI Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute PTI Post-Tensioning Institute UL Underwriters Laboratories Currents and potentially travelling restriction imposed by US. or Host Nation Government due to the COVID-19 health crisis, can prevent that foreing inspectors can get access to Spain.

Please confirm if Goverment would accept and homologous Spanish/European accreditation for all required Special inspectors. The required Cerification are hard (almost imposible) to find in Europe to temporaly serve construction projects, specailly under COVID-19 restrictions.

See revised Specification Section 01 45 35 Special Inspections

38 18-

7 3.6 An ongoing COVID-19 spike in Spain is causing delays in our ability to establish a new UTE for this MACC, and because it is an RFP requirement for firms/JVs to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), a process which usually takes up to 30 days, we respectfully request a 1 month extension to the due date to allow for this to happen.

See previous amendments extending the due date.

39 19- Jan-21

DRAWINGS.- Drawings numbers 14069889 to 14069900 are included in DRAWINGS INDEX (drawing nº14069870) but we can´t find them in the docs attached.

Please confirm if those drawings will be submitted in future amendments. Thanks

Missing drawings were issued as part of Amendment 0002.

40 20- Jan-21

2 SF30

Amend

1 Will the Government consider a modest 2-week extension to the due date to allow sufficient time for takeoffs and pricing for the seed project? This extension will allow time to secure more competitive pricing for the seed project, a clear benefit to the Navy.

See previous amendments extending the due date.

41 20- Jan-21

Factor 4, Technical Solution identifies the requirements for the project schedule in Gantt / Bar Chart form. This section goes on to state that the Gantt chart is to be 1-page and not counted against the page limitations of the narrative. With the Seed Project having a POP of 903 cds (shorter POP also desired by Government) and ROM in excess of $18M, is it acceptable for bidding contractors to provide a Gantt chart that is longer in page-count than 1 page in order to capture the Seed project elements as completely as possible?

Bid per RFP requirements.

42 20- Jan-21

11 RFP 4.2 2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor, Solicitation Submittal Requirements, calls for hard copy proposal submittal. Please consider changing the hard copy requirement to an electronic submittal via DoD SAFE.

Bid per RFP requirements.

43 20- Jan-21

11 RFP 4.2 Solicitation Submittal Requirements specify use of a 12-pt font. Between the tight page restritions for Factor 1 (2 pages), Factor 2 (3 pages), etc., and the 12-point TNR font requirement, there is little room to provide the level of detail required. In lieu of a page increase for these factors, would the Government consider reducing the 12-point TNR font requirement to 11-point TNR font?

Bid per RFP requirements.

44 20- Jan-21

11 RFP 4.2 Solicitation Submittal Requirements specify use of a 12-pt font. Will the Government permit the use of a minimum 10-point TNR font for use in tables, forms, charts and graphics?

Bid per RFP

45 20-

11 RFP 4 The 3rd paragraph of the instructions for Factor 1 Technical Approach state, "If the experience of a design subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2, the firm must be named in the above narative and organizational chart.

Do you mean to refer to Factor 3 Design Experience?

See Amendment below.

46 20- Jan-21

20 5.2 19 Proposal Delivery: The instructions for proposal delivery state, "Proposals may not be hand delivered." Further, it states proposals must be mailed via the post office or commercial carriers such as FedEx, DHL or UPS. With the onset of COVID-19, delivery by any of these carriers is wholly UNRELIABLE, at best. We request the Government allow for electronic proposals to be submitted via the DoD SAFE site or via email. This has been the common practice for proposal submittal to the DoD since March of 2020.

Bid per RFP requirements.

47 20- Jan-21

CD10

Note 1 on Drawing CD101 - Pier Demolition Plan indicates to remove existing building and slab. Please confirm building foundations may remain and be abandoned in place.

Bid per RFP requirements.

Complete removal of building slab including tickened portions is required to facilitate construction of new pavement.

48 20- Jan-21

Att H Specs We find no reference to cathodic protection requirements for underground piping. Please confirm whether soil conditions/types of pipe dictate need for cathodic protection and if so, please provide a specification section.

Bid per RFP requirements.

No cathodic protection system required for utility piping.

49 20- Jan-21

1 Att G Statutory Cost Limitation: Will any proposed price over the cost limitation be considered for award of an IDIQ?

The statutory cost limitation for the task order applies to the award of the task order per the terms of

FAR 36.205.

That said, it also forms the basis of the Government’s overall pricing evaluation, and the Government must be able to find pricing to be fair and reasonable for all proposed

MACC

awardees, per the Basis of Evaluation.

50 20- Jan-21

1 Att G Statutory Cost limitation: Will any proposed price over the cost limitation be cause for an offeror's entire proposal to be considered non-responsive?

Bid per RFP requirements.

51 20- Jan-21

59 RFP 252.229-7001 TAX RELIEF (APR 2020) (a): It this project exempt from all local sales and use taxes and all value added taxes (VAT)?

Refer to

DFARS

252.229-7001 and consider enlisting the help of consultants to the extent you need assistance determining applicability.

52 20- Jan-21

Att H

00 01 15 9 List of Drawings (Page 9 of 1,146): Sheet Nos. 21 through 32 under "Geotechnical" appear to be missing.

Can the Government please provide?

Missing drawings were issued as part of Amendment 0002.

53 20- Jan-21

6 2 2 Paragraph 2 General Overview of the Seed Project states the seed project is Design -Build; however, full specs and drawings have been provided. Please confirm the seed project is D-B-B.

Seed project is Design Bid Build. See Amendment 0002.

54 20- Jan-21

1 (Attachm ent H) 1561956 spc1of2 Docume nt 00 01 15 List of Drawing s 02/11

1.

Missin g inform ation - Geotec hnical Drawi ngs

We are not able to find the geotechnical drawings included in the list indicated (See Section 00 01 15) We kindly ask you to confirm if these documents will be available before the proposal due date.

Missing drawings were issued as part of Amendment 0002.

55 20- Jan-21

2.

Missin g inform ation - Geotec hnical Report

We cannot find the geotechnical report (prepared by Labson, April,2018) among project's documents.

We kindly ask you to confirm if this document will be available before the proposal due date.

Geotechnical report will not be issued as part of this solicitation.

56 20-

11 of

N624702 0R4011 Section 00 21 00 Instructio ns

3.

Design er of Record

- "The offeror shall submit the followi ng inform ation:

(1) (...)

Offero rs shall clearly state the Archit ect- Engine er firm that is propos ed to be utilize d as the Design er of Record

(DOR)

for future task orders under this

MACC

To most effectively accomplish this contract, considering that various publications, codes and industry standards (U.S., European or Spanish) are applicable or referenced in the specifications to establish requirements for the work and assuming the same for future task orders, we kindly ask you to confirm if the Designer of Record shall be an American or a Spanish registered or licensed firm (or both?).

In case of required a PE license, please clarify which State(s) would be acceptable, (Virginia?).

Bid per RFP

57 1/22/2

8 / 66 N624702 0R4011 Section 00 21 00 Instructio ns

1.

Perfor mace and Payme nt Bond 3.8

PERF

ORM

ANCE

GUAR

ANTE

E:

Ten- Percen t (10%)

PERF

ORM

ANCE

GUAR

ANTE

E Option al Perfor mance and Payme nt Bonds:

In lieu of a perfor mance guaran tee, the offeror may submit Perfor mance and Payme nt Bonds in which the offeror and the surety obligat

We kindly ask you to confirm if the Optional Performace and Payment Bond shall be in a penal sum equal to 100% of the contract price (instead of 10%).

Refer to RFP requirements under section

3.8. The

reference to 10% applies only to the Performance Guarantee scenario, rather than Optional Performance and Payment Bonds e themse lves in the amoun t of one hundre d percent (100% ) of the task order price, 58 1/22/2

1 (Attachm ent H) 1561956 spc1of2

SECTIO

N 08 56

2.

BLAS

T

RESIS

TANT

WIND

OWS/

GLAZ

ING

REQU

IREM

ENTS

SECTI

ON 08

56 53

BLAS

T

RESIS

TANT

TEMP

ERED

GLAS

S

WIND

OWS

The title of the SECTION 08 56 53 BLAST RESISTANT TEMPERED GLASS WINDOWS and the references to various standards, seem to indicate that the glass in the building must meet some type of "Blast resistant" classification, for example ER 1 or similar, however there is no reference to this issue in the section and the classification required for the glass is only the following Glass, Grade B (tempered), Style I (uncoated), Type 2, Class 1 (transparent). Can you confirm if it is necessary to meet any Blast resistant condition and, if any, indicate the blast loads and/or blast-resistance classification?

Refer to Drawing S-003

2. Solicitation Revisions:

CURRENT:

ROTA SPAIN MACC

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with no preestablished fixed contract prices.

The actual amount of work of be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the

Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representatives, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposal to MACC awardees. Award of task orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The effective period of the resultant contract will be a Base Period plus seven (7) possible one-year option periods, or a total aggregate MACC value not to exceed $500,000,000 whichever occrus first.

FOB: Destination

REVISED TO:

ROTA SPAIN MACC

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with no preestablished fixed contract prices.

The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representatives, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposal to MACC awardees. Award of task orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The effective period of the resultant contract will be a Base Period plus seven (7) possible one-year option periods, or a total aggregate MACC value not to exceed $500,000,000 whichever occurs first.

FOB: Destination

CURRENT:

Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor. Both design-build and design-bid-build projects are contemplated under this MACC.

Therefore, the offeror is required to address the design firm to be proposed on the MACC and anticipated future projects.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) and primary design firm(s) for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. Offerors shall clearly state the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this MACC. Provide the full name of the firm, address, DUNS number, and CAGE code. The designated firm will be required to be utilized as the DOR on future design-build task orders under the resulting MACC, unless a substitution is approved by the Contracting Officer for the proposed task order. The Offeror must provide a supporting signed joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment with the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the DOR.

If the experience of a design subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2, the firm must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart. The organizational chart can be on one single sided 11 x 17 size paper and will count as one (1) page.

The technical approach narrative, separate from the organizational chart, shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page 8 ½ x 11 (or two (2) single-sided pages, A4 is also acceptable). The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative and organizational chart, the offeror shall submit a copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified in the narrative or on the organizational chart (e.g., joint venture partner, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.)

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. A failure of the offeror to provide either (a) a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement, providing the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms, (b) an organizational chart, or (c) a joint venture agreement (if applicable) will be rated Unacceptable. Offerors that are rated Unacceptable will be found ineligible for award.

REVISED TO:

Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor. Both design-build and design-bid-build projects are contemplated under this MACC.

Therefore, the offeror is required to address the design firm to be proposed on the MACC and anticipated future projects.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) and primary design firm(s) for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. Offerors shall clearly state the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this MACC. Provide the full name of the firm, address, DUNS number, and CAGE code. The designated firm will be required to be utilized as the DOR on future design-build task orders under the resulting MACC, unless a substitution is approved by the Contracting Officer for the proposed task order. The Offeror must provide a supporting signed joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment with the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the DOR.

If the experience of a design subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 3, the firm must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart. The organizational chart can be on one single sided 11 x 17 size paper and will count as one (1) page.

The technical approach narrative, separate from the organizational chart, shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page 8 ½ x 11 (or two (2) single-sided pages, A4 is also acceptable). The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative and organizational chart, the offeror shall submit a copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified in the narrative or on the organizational chart (e.g., joint venture partner, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.)

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. A failure of the offeror to provide either (a) a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement, providing the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms, (b) an organizational chart, or (c) a joint venture agreement (if applicable) will be rated Unacceptable. Offerors that are rated Unacceptable will be found ineligible for award.

3. Specification Revisions

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

Delete sections 01 45 35, 08 41 13, 08 56 53, 28 08 10, and 28 10 05 in their entirety and replace with Section “01 45 35, SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, dated January 22, 2021”, Section “08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS, dated January 28, 2021, Section “08 56 53 BLAST RESISTANT TEMPERED GLASS WINDOWS, dated January 28, 2021, Section “28 08 10 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TESTING, dated January 22, 2021”, and Section “28 10 05 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS (ESS), dated January 22, 2021”.

4. Additional Attachments

01 45 35 08 41 13 08 56 53 28 08 10 28 10 05

(End of Summary of Changes)