N6247020R4011 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Design-Build (DB) Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract for Projects, Primarily Located at Rota, Spain and Worldw ide

PLEASE SEE SF-30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jan-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247020R4011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Dec-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jan-2021

CODE

COMNAVFACSYSCOM ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247020R4011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

Design-Build (DB) Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract for Projects, Primarily Located at Rota, Spain and Worldwide

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. Extend proposal due date

2. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s)

3. Solicitation Revisions

4. Drawing Revisions

5. Additional Attachments

6. Clause Revisions

1. The proposal due date is extended from 5 February 2021 at 2:30 PM (Eastern U.S. Time) to 12 February 2021 at 2:30 PM (Eastern U.S. Time). Pre-Proposal Inquiries shall be accepted until 29 January 2021.

2. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s):

PPI # REFERENCE QUESTION

GOVERNMENT

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

Drawing H-001 note 8

According to drawing H-001 note 8, there are 5ea ballasts containing PCB's and 200ea fluorescent light tubes contain mercury vapor, however in CLIN 0012AA - Option nº 11 the number of mercury containing lamps units are only 20, they do not match.

Please clarify.

See Amendment detail below.

SECTION 01 91

00.15 TOTAL

BUILDING

COMMISSIONING

According to SECTION 01 91 00.15

TOTAL BUILDING

COMMISSIONING specifications in SUMMARY, it says: "The Government will employ the services of an independent Commissioning Firm", does this mean that the commissioning services will be hired by the Government and the contractor should only provide support necessary? Please clarify.

Bid per solicitation - See Spec Section 01

91 00.15 TOTAL

BUILDING

COMMISSIONING

for details.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

3 Drawing C-003

According to the project, Drawing C- 003, the work is divided into three zones PIER 1 (building demolitions), FDRMC (new building execution) and PORT (new building execution). Are there any restrictions regarding planning and / or transfer of personnel? That is, the PIER 1 demolition zones, can they be domolished at any time? Should one building be built before the other?

Please clarify.

See Amendment detail below.

Factor 3, Corporate

Experience:

In the RFP it is explicitly stated as follows.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442) (“Affiliates”), the proposal must, in a separate narrative or letter of commitment, clearly demonstrate the manner in which the Affiliate will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract for the experience information of the Affiliate to be considered..."

Please confirm that two sister companies, both belonging to the same holding of companies, are considered affiliated between them.

Whether a company is considered an “Affiliate” depends upon that company’s relationship to the Offeror entity identified on the SF1442. Companies that have a shared corporate structure with the Offeror, such as a shared parent company, would be considered affiliates of the Offeror.

We would like to be able to properly study the project and the contract, and in order to be able to send a correctly studied offer, we would like to know if we could have the plans in editable form and the measurements of the work to be studied.

I would appreciate it if you could send us at least the measurements.

Editable files will not be provided. Refer to RFP requirements.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

Is it necessary to provide the DUNS and NCAGE Code number of the design firms?

Refer to RFP requirements. Factor 1 Solicitation Submittal Requirements states in part, “…Offerors shall clearly state the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this MACC. Provide the full name of the firm, address, DUNS number, and CAGE code. …”

Can you confirm the number of paper and CD copies to be delivered?

on page 1, they indicate 1 original and 4 copies, however, on page 11 (A) NON-PRICE FACTORS, they indicate one original and three copies with two CDs.

On page 17, 1 original and 1 copy with one CD are indicated.

I apologize in advance but I would like to present the documentation correctly and as far as I understand, a single PDF document must be presented with the information in (A)NON-PRICE FACTORS and the PRICE information.

If I have misunderstood, I would appreciate it if you could tell me exactly how to submit the information Thank you very much in advance.

Refer to RFP requirements. Page 11 applies to the non-price proposal, while page 17 applies to the price proposal. These are the more specific provisions that should be followed, as the box on page 1 (SF1442) does not permit the Agency to clarify the distinction between non-price proposals and price proposals.

TIME EXTENSION.- Due to the unexpected difficulties caused by current Covid situation and snowfall in Spain we would like to ask for a time extension. Proposed new limit date is 15 Feb 2021.

See item above extending the Proposal Due date.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

9 Drawing ES101A

According to note 16 of drawing ES101A and note 3 of drawing ES104A, the works under those notes will be reflected in the CLIN0005.

CLIN # 0005 refers to the Furnish and install 20-ton bridge crane. The notes and CLIN have no relationship. Please clarify.

In Note 16 of drawing ES101A and Note 3 of drawing ES104A change words "CLIN #0005" to "CLIN 0008".

10 DRAWG

GI002 INDEX

OF

DRAWINGS

Geotechnical drawings BB001 through BB609 (NAVFAC Dwg No.

14069889 through 14069900) listed in the drawing index GI002 are not provided with the solicitation package.

See Amendment detail below.

11 1 SF 1442 13.A

We request the Government consider a 30-day extension to the current bid due date. There are a number of issues we would like the Government to consider in extending this proposal. First, for those firms that have been tracking (or “following”) this opportunity since it was issued as a presolicitation, recognize that the presolicitation notice was archived when the solicitation was posted. This broke any links or tracking mechanisms we had in place in beta.sam.gov to alert us when the solicitation was posted.

Second, this solicitation was issued on 23 Dec 2020, days before two major holidays. The Christmas and New Years holidays aside, a 30-day turnaround for a proposal of this size and detail would be very difficult.

Please also consider that after New Year Day, Spain celebrates Three Kings Day on 6 Jan 2021. Many company personnel go on holiday either the last week of the year or the first week of the year; therefore, companies generally are not fully staffed until the second full week of January, which this year would start on 11 Jan 2021. This leaves really only two full weeks to put together a major proposal. The remaining timeframe, as is stands, is a deterrent to companies

See item above extending the Proposal Due date.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

wishing to submit a proposal. This, in turn, severely limits competition for the Government. We request your timely response to this inquiry as soon as possible, so bidders have time to re-evaluate our ability to prepare and submit a proposal within the prescribed timeframe.

12 00 21 00

Para.1.3

GENERAL

OVERVIEW

OF

CONTRACT,

and Para.4

EVALUATION

FACTORS

FOR AWARD

Factor 3 - Corporate

Experience

Paragraph 1.3.3 specifies that “projects for the MACC have an estimated construction costs between $8,000,000 and $64,000,000; however, smaller and larger dollar value projects may be considered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.”

In this direction, paragraph 4 Evaluation Factors for Award, (2) (A) Factor 3 (a) (1) Construction Experience states that offerors shall submit experience on relevant construction projects “similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC.”

However, that same paragraph 4 (2)

(A) Factor 3 (1) in subparagraph (b) Size, defines a volume parameter in square feet for building size, between 20K and +50K sq. ft.

We would appreciate a clarification on the volume determination of size vs.

value relevancy.

Refer to RFP requirements. The criteria established in Evaluation Factor 3 will be used for determining the relevance of projects under that factor.

13 00 21 00

Para. 4

EVALUATION

FACTORS

FOR AWARD

Factor 3 - Corporate

Experience

In paragraph 4 Evaluation Factors for Award, Factor 3 (1) Construction Experience, (a) Recency it is stated that “ongoing projects will not be considered.”

As you are aware, COVID19 conditions have delayed all projects beyond their scheduled completion.

Because of this fact most relevant projects are not yet completed, although they stand at 90% to project completion.

This fact may be taken into consideration to maybe increase

The RFP requirements will remain unchanged in this regard.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

participation and competition for this solicitation.

14 00 21 00

Para.1.3

GENERAL

OVERVIEW

OF

CONTRACT,

and Para.4

EVALUATION

FACTORS

FOR AWARD

Factor 3 - Corporate

Experience

Description of projects proposed for this MACC is found in paragraph

1.3.2 which states that “construction projects to be performed under this MACC will primarily consist of general building type projects (new construction, renovations, alterations, demolition, repair work, and any necessary design) including, but not limited to: airfield, industrial, infrastructure, administrative, training, retail, food service, ammunition storage, community support facilities and both vertical and horizontal construction in the Rota, Spain region or other areas managed by NAVFAC-

EURAFCENT.”

In this direction, paragraph #4 Evaluation Factors for Award, (2) (A) Factor 3 (a) (1) Construction Experience states that offerors shall submit experience on relevant construction projects “similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC.”

However, that same paragraph #4 (2)

(A) Factor 3 (a) (1) under subparagraph (c) Scope / Complexity, requires that projects submitted for experience meet “new building construction and/or interior/exterior alteration or renovation of existing facilities that include repairs to multiple building systems and infrastructures. Projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will not be considered relevant.”

Almost all MILCON projects for general horizontal construction in Rota

Refer to RFP requirements. The criteria established in Evaluation Factor 3 will be used for determining the relevance of projects under that factor.

RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

Spain region include minor vertical construction. However, paragraph 4.

Factor 3 (a) (1) (c) removes all relevancy from general horizontal construction projects. Therefore, we believe that relevancy of horizontal construction projects as described in paragraph 1.3.2 may supersede requirement stated in paragraph 4.

Factor 3 (a) (1) (c). We think this may be noted to avoid confusion or misunderstanding in the experience projects submitted.

We are contacting FEDEX, DHL and UPS in Spain (we are a Spanish construction company), and they do not know if they have the relevant authorizations or permits (CAC or Rapidgate logo).

Since this is the first tender we are applying for and we have to send the documentation to the USA, we do not want to make any mistakes and be proactive about the deadline.

Therefore, I would like to ask you which company recommends us to hire for the shipment that you know has the pertinent accesses to deliver the documentation that we have to present.

In case you do not have it, I understand that we must send the SECNAV 5512/1 1 form to NAVFAC LANT Security a minimum of 17 days before (we are still on time) the proposed date of the visit so that the security personnel have enough time to process and send applications. If we are given this situation, my doubt is whether we should contact the delegation of the transport company in the USA to fill out the form or with the Spanish company, since here in Spain they are telling us that they do not know if their delegation in the USA has the permits.

The Government cannot recommend couriers. Refer to RFP requirements.

3. Solicitation Revisions:

CURRENT:

2.1 The initial project expected to be awarded as the first task order “seed project” is identified as Design-Build P811 Port Operations Facilities, Naval Station Rota, Spain. The statutory cost limitation for this project is $18,300,000. This project will construct a new Port Operations Facility to service as a consolidated compound for intermodal management and port operations at Naval Station Rota, Spain. The building will accommodate a small craft maintenance high bay area, workshops, storage areas, oil spill response area, hazardous supply and hazardous waste storage area, and locker and shower rooms on the first floor. Upper floors will provide administrative space for intermodal management and port operations, a multipurpose conference room and bunk rooms. An administrative suite at the third floor level will accommodate Spanish Port Operations personnel and functions. The harbor control tower will house equipment and work areas which will be shared by Spanish and US Port Operations for surveillance of the harbor.

REVISED TO:

2.1 The initial project expected to be awarded as the first task order “seed project” is identified as Design-Bid-Build P811 Port Operations Facilities, Naval Station Rota, Spain. The statutory cost limitation for this project is $18,300,000. This project will construct a new Port Operations Facility to service as a consolidated compound for intermodal management and port operations at Naval Station Rota, Spain. The building will accommodate a small craft maintenance high bay area, workshops, storage areas, oil spill response area, hazardous supply and hazardous waste storage area, and locker and shower rooms on the first floor. Upper floors will provide administrative space for intermodal management and port operations, a multipurpose conference room and bunk rooms. An administrative suite at the third floor level will accommodate Spanish Port Operations personnel and functions. The harbor control tower will house equipment and work areas which will be shared by Spanish and US Port Operations for surveillance of the harbor.

4. Drawing Revisions:

NAVFAC Dwg. Nos. 14069889, 14069890, 14069891, 14069892, 14069893, 14069894, 14069895, 14069896, 14069897, 14069898, 14069899, 14069900 have been added.

DOCUMENT 00 01 15 LIST OF DRAWINGS

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

On NAVFAC Dwg No. 14069885 (H-001)

Hazardous Materials Notes. In note number 8, delete “200” Fluorescent Light Tubes and replace with “20”.

On NAVFAC Dwg No. 14069901 (C-001)

Demolition Notes. Add “Note 3. New FDRMC and Port Ops Buildings must be complete and personnel relocated before any Pier demolition work can occur.”

On NAVFAC Dwg No. (ES101A)

Notes. In note number 16, delete “CLIN #0005” and replace with “CLIN 0008”.

On NAVFAC Dwg No. (ES104A)

Notes. In note number 16, delete “CLIN #0005” and replace with “CLIN 0008”.

5. Additional Attachments (Attached Separately):

1. (J) 1561956dwg02Aof19

SECTION 00 45 00 - REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

The following have been added by reference:

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020

SECTION 01 00 00 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by reference:

252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020

(End of Summary of Changes)