Exhibit A_PPI Response Notice 3.pdf

PPI: N40192-25-R9006

Amendment 0004

9/12/2025

RFP / SF 1442 SECTION SECTION TOPIC/TITLE PARAGRAPH PAGE

ITEM

DESCRIPTION/TO

PIC

1 08/27/25 Completed N4019225R9006_JOC_S olicitation

Section 00 21

Factor 2 - Experience

1. Facilities Maintenance / Construction Experience AND 2. Design Experience

13 & 14 Project submission

The Government states "If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for facilities maintenance / construction and design." Can the Government confirm that we are able to submit the same project for both 1.

Facilities Maintenance / Construction Design and 2. Design Experience.

Refer to submittal requirements as described in Factor 2 - Experience, paragraphs Facilities Maintenance/Construction Recency and Design Project Recency of the RFP.

0002 1

2 08/27/25 Completed N4019225R9006_JOC_S olicitation

Section 00 21

Factor 2 - Experience

13 & 14 The Government states that the "completion date was reached within the five (5) years immediately preceding the proposal due date." Can we reference on-going projects?

Refer to submittal requirements as described in Factor 2 - Experience, paragraphs 1. Facilities Maintenance/Construction Experience, Facilities Maintenance/Construction Recency, 2. Design Experience, and Design Project Recency of the RFP.

0002 1

3 08/27/25 Completed General Question The Government expects to implement CMMC into the Federal Acquisition Regulations as early as Oct 2025, given that CMMC has already been made a rule and a part of the Federal Register, and with full enforcement beginning between 2026 and 2028 for given certification levels. Advise if and when CMMC requirements will become part of the contract (if awarded), and advise which certification levels will be required for the Blue JOC and which certification levels will be required for the Gold JOC?

Via solicitation Amendment 0002, DFARS 252.204-7021, Contractor Compliance With the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirement is removed as per Class Deviation 2025-O0006 signed 25 August 2025.

0002 1

4 08/29/25 Completed RFP - Attachment D, Sample ELIN Price Schedule

Attachment D Price Schedule N/A N/A Non-pre-priced items (A0002,A0005,A0 009)

Referring to the sample ELIN Price Schedule provided in the RFP, the Non-Pre-Priced items are not filled in under the Calculated Amount column, Please confirm if this is the format we should follow, or if we are required to fill in the calculated amount as (EVW c Coef) + EVW.

REVISED RESPONSE AS OF AMD 0004:

Refer to Amendment 0004 of the solicitation:

1. Price Factor, section iii, indicating in red font:

-The Offeror shall provide each ELIN $ amount as $ = (EVW x Coef)

2. Attachment D: Table 1. Sample ELIN Price Schedule - Blue

3. Attachment E: Table 2. Sample ELIN Price Schedule - Gold

0004 3

5 08/29/25 Completed RFP - Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

00 21 00 Instructions 2.3 07 of 72 Proposal Submission

We respectfully request a one (1) week extension of the bid submission deadline. The additional time will allow us to properly consolidate all technical and pricing inputs, complete internal reviews, and ensure our proposal complies with the requirements of the solicitation. Granting this extension will help us submit a more thorough and competitive proposal.

Refer to Amendment 0002 for proposal deadline extension to 30 September 2025, 2:00 pm, Chst. 0003 2

6 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 Price 12 What percentage of job orders will require a Designer of Record to stamp and record drawings?

Approximately 5% of job orders will require a Designer of Record to stamp design drawings and calculations.

0003 2

7 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 Price 12

In what ELIN are Design costs to be factored and/or paid for?

Refer to Section 01 00 00 General Requirements, 3.4. The contractor's proposal for design and engineering costs shall be based on the negotiated rates and fees negotiated after award.

0003 2

8 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 experience 14

Will QCM and SSHO be required to be on-site for each JOC?

Yes. Refer to Attachment J: JOC Construction and Design Specifications:

01 45 00, 1.4 - QCM General Requirements 01 35 26, 1.8.2 - Roles and Responsibilities of Prime Contractor and SSHO

0003 2

9 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 Price 12 Is it the GOV’s intention that all pricing will include escalations in the Base and Option years beyond the RS Means Version 2025 Q1?

Refer to Section 01 00 00 General Requirements, 3.2. Use the current RSMeans version and include escalation costs for Task Order durations beyond the current RSMeans version.

0003 2

10 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 PRice 12 If pricing for ELIN 0001, 0005, and 0009 is subject to pricing in the most current RS Means (Section 5, a., iii), what is the relevance of RS Means Version 2025 – Q1?

Refer to solicitation Amendment 0001. Language is updated to indicate the most current edition of the R.S. Means at the time of Request for Proposal issuance shall be used.

0003 2

QUESTION/COMMENT

RFP AMEND

PPI # PER

NOTICE

RECEIVED AS OF:

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SOLICITATION N40192-25-R-9006

JOB ORDER CONTRACT (JOC) at various locations to support Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas’s (NAVFACMAR) area of responsibility (AOR)

RFI #

DATE

SUBMITTED

STATUS

(Completed/P ending)

REFERENCE

EXHIBIT A - PPI Response Notice #3

11 09/02/25 Completed RFP Part A 00 21 00 instruction to offeror

We kindly request a 4-week extension due to the upcoming fiscal year-end, as this period brings additional administrative and financial constraints. An extension will allow us to complete the required work with the necessary attention to detail and ensure that all deliverables are submitted in full compliance without disruption.

Refer to Amendment 0002 for proposal deadline extension to 30 September 2025, 2:00 pm, Chst. 0003 2

12 09/04/25 Completed RFP- N4019225R9006- JOC-Solicitation

Section 00 21

Instructions 12. Bonding Requirements

10 1.On the SolicitaƟon LeƩer paragraph 11. Bonding Requirements stated that the Offerors shall demonstrate adequate bonding capabilities of at least $ 10,000,000.00 per project and aggregate value of at least $ 25,000,000.00. and to be considered eligible for award for both Blue and Gold JOC’s, Offerors MUST submit surety certifying aggregate bonding capability of at least $ 50,000,000.00.

Just for clarification? If our bonding surety company has approved only $ 25,000,000.00, we can only Bid / Offer for (1) One JOC which we select (it’s either Blue JOC or Gold JOC) or The Government JOC assign to the Offeror.

It is the Offerors discretion to submit only one (1) price proposal (i.e. for one location). If such, the offeror shall clearly mark to which location the proposal is for. However, this does not preclude offerors with bonding capabilities of at least $10M per project and at least $25M aggregate from submitting proposals for both the Blue and Gold JOCs as the Government will make two (2) separate best value determinations based on the proposals received for Blue JOC locations and Gold JOC locations. The awards shall be made to the offeror(s) representing the best value to the Government as a result of the independent best value determinations of each JOC.

To be considered eligible for one (1) JOC contract, offerors MUST provide as part of their submission, a letter from surety certifying bonding capabilities of at least $10,000,000 per project and an aggregate value of at least $25,000,000.

To be considered eligible for award for both Blue and Gold JOCs, the offeror MUST submit a letter from their surety certifying aggregate bonding capability of at least $50,000,000. Inability to meet this requirement will render them ineligible for award for at least one location and the Government can proceed selecting the next best value proposal.

0003 2

13 09/04/25 Completed RFP- N4019225R9006- JOC-Solicitation

Section 00 21

Instructions 12. Bonding Requirements

10 For the submission of the Offer like ELIN, attachment C, Attachment D, attachment E, attachment F, do we need to fill up both BLUE JOC and GOLD JOC, or only one if our approved surety bond was $25,000,000.00 only.

It is the Offerors discretion to submit only one (1) price proposal (i.e. for one location). If such, the offeror shall clearly mark to which location the proposal is for. However, this does not preclude offerors with bonding capabilities of at least $10M per project and at least $25M aggregate from submitting proposals for both the Blue and Gold JOCs as the Government will make two (2) separate best value determinations based on the proposals received for Blue JOC locations and Gold JOC locations. The awards shall be made to the offeror(s) representing the best value to the Government as a result of the independent best value determinations of each JOC.

To be considered eligible for one (1) JOC contract, offerors MUST provide as part of their submission, a letter from surety certifying bonding capabilities of at least $10,000,000 per project and an aggregate value of at least $25,000,000.

To be considered eligible for award for both Blue and Gold JOCs, the offeror MUST submit a letter from their surety certifying aggregate bonding capability of at least $50,000,000. Inability to meet this requirement will render them ineligible for award for at least one location and the Government can proceed selecting the next best value proposal.

0003 2

14 09/04/25 Completed RFP - Section 01 00 00 - General Requirements

01 00 00 Coefficients 3.1.1 04 of 12 Coefficient for Pre-Priced line items

Please clarify if our proposal should includes GRT. If so, please confirm if we should add it on-top of our derived coefficients.

Per paragraph 3.1.1 (last part), The Pre-Priced line items price is calculated by combining the R.S.

MEANS bare cost (No O&P), applicable material taxes, and then multiplying that result by the appropriate Coefficient factor. No other R.S. MEANS Coefficients shall be used in addition to the contractor proposed Coefficient.

0003 2

15 09/04/25 Completed RFP - Attachment C, Price Proposal Schedule

Attachment C Price Schedule N/A N/A Estimated volume of Work

(EVW)

Can we request a detailed breakdown of the provided EVW Amount to itemized costs per materials, labor and equipment?

The EVW does not have a detailed breakdown because it is not an individual project task order, rather it is only a historical estimated amount of the total cumulative work of task orders of the previous year. The provided EVW is only used as a basis so all contractors will consistently use the same numbers. The only real application that needs to be provided is each contractor's coefficient.

0003 2

16 09/09/25 Completed RFP - JOC_Solicitation 00 21 00 Instructions 13 13 of 73 Item iii.

Coefficients for each ELINS

There is a conflict between the given formula in Excel Sheet of the Attachment C - Price proposal Schedule and the statement provided at item iii - Coefficients for each ELINS. As stated, "the Offeror shall provided each ELIN $ amount as $ = ((EVW x Coef) + EVW)" , whereas on the Excel sheet, the formula is "Calculated Amount = EVW x Coefficient". Please clarify and confirm what formula should be applied.

Refer to Amendment 0004 of the solicitation:

1. Price Factor, section iii, indicating in red font:

-The Offeror shall provide each ELIN $ amount as $ = (EVW x Coef)

2. Attachment D: Table 1. Sample ELIN Price Schedule - Blue

3. Attachment E: Table 2. Sample ELIN Price Schedule - Gold

0004 3

17 09/10/25 Completed RFP - JOC_Solicitation 00 21 00 Instructions Factor 2 - 2. 15 of 73 Design Experience

Referring to the Design Experience Requirement, please clarify if the Government intend for "Design Experience" mean:

1. Design service only (preparation of plans/ specifications under Design-Bid-Build or Design-Build projects), or

2. Experience specifically as part of a Design-Build package, where Designer participated in both and construction delivery.

This clarification will help us ensure that we submit Designer qualifications in line with the Government's intent.

Relevant Design Experience means:

1. Design-Bid-Build experience for Design means design service only in preparation of plans/ specifications for DBB project where the AE served as Designer of Record (DOR).

2. Design-Build experience for Design Experience means design experience as part of a Design-Build Construction project, where AE served as the DOR sub-consultant for a Prime Construction Contractor.

0004 3

18 09/11/25 Completed RFP Instructions 00 21 00 Proposal Submission

2.2 7 of 72 Proposal Submission Requirements paragraph states electronic and hard copy proposals are required (and was also mentioned a couple of times during the preproposal conference). Please confirm that offerors must submit proposals in both electronic form (via PIEE) and in hard copy form (either hand delivery or mail), and NOT one or the other.

Electronic and hard copy proposals are required for this RFP and both shall be received by the due date of the proposals. Electronic proposal(s) shall be submitted via PIEE and hardcopy proposal(s) shall be hand delivered or mailed.

Refer to Amendment 0004, Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, revising section 2. PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION.

0004 3

19 09/11/25 Completed RFP Instructions 00 21 00 Bonding Requirements

11 9 of 72 Bond Letter placement/inclusi on paragraph states offeror must submit a bonding capability letter from surety; however does not appear to identify where it should be included in the proposal. Should the bond letter be included in the Price Proposal(s), or the Non-Price Proposal?

Refer to Amendment 0004, Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, revising section 2. PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION.

0004 3

20 09/11/25 Completed RFP Instructions 00 21 00 Past Performance

Factor 4-Past Performance, paragraph 1

17 of 72 PPQs Can offerors submit previously completed PPQs in lieu of requesting new/additonal assessments from GPOCs?

Refer to Factor 4 - Past Performance, para (1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements of the RFP. As stated in the RFP, Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations.

0004 3

21 09/11/25 Completed 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee Bid Guarantee. The Offerors MUST provide as part of their submission a letter from their surety certifying bonding capabilities of at least $ 10,000, 000.00 per project and an aggregate value of at least $ 25,000,000 per JOC addressed to the Contract Specialist

Question: Please confirm that a BID BOND is not required under this Solicitaion.

Bid Guarantee will be determined upon issuance of task orders. See 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee incorporated into the solicitation and Attachment K - Section 01 00 00, para 8.9 of the RFP.

0004 3

22 09/11/25 Completed

Instruction to Offerrors Section 00 21

Instruction to Offerrors

2.2.b 4 Proposal Submission Hard copy

Hardcopy proposals shall be hand delivered or mailed. Hand-delivered or mailed proposals shall arrive, and be accepted, at the address provided below, prior to the time set for proposal closing date stated in this RFP

Question: Please comfirm how many hard copies will be provided and if CD copy is required also?

Refer to Amendment 0004, Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, revising section 2. PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION.

0004 3

23 09/09/25 Completed N4019225R9006_JOC_S olicitation

Section 00 21

Factor 2 - Experience

1. Facilities Maintenance / Construction Experience AND 2. Design Experience

13 & 14 Project submission

If one company owns two specialty contractors (sister companies) who both worked on the same project with separate sub-contracts, can we submit this as one project reference?

See Amendment 0004 revising Factor 2 - Construction Experience section:

FROM: The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate facilities maintenance / construction experience under this evaluation factor unless specialized subcontractor experience is stated as acceptable.

TO: The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate facilities maintenance / construction experience under this evaluation factor.

0004 3