N4008523R2562 SB MACC HR GEN CONSTR.pdf

INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION

PRIMARILY IN THE HAMPTON ROADS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR), VIRGINIA

This procurement is being solicited as a small business set-aside.

All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be directed via email to Jonathan Durham at jonathan.m.durham.civ@us.navy.mil

JONATHAN M. DURHAM 757-341-0216

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

04-May-2023

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________20 Jun 2023 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008523R2562 60

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008523R2562

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 575,000,000 Hampton Roads AOR Small Business MACC

FFP

Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Construction Contract for General Construction projects primarily in the Hampton Roads Are of NAVFAC

MIDLANT

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements MAR 2022

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

5.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIS)

5.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

6. ATTACHMENTS:

ATTACHMENT A – PPI LOG TEMPLATE

ATTACHMENT B – PIEE VENDOR ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS

ATTACHMENT C – CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT D – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT E – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM SEED PROJECT

ATTACHMENT F – P702 SITE VISIT MAP

ATTACHMENT G – P702 SPECIFICATIONS

ATTACHMENT H – P702 DRAWINGS

ATTACHMENT I – APPROVED IDENTITY PROOFING DOCUMENTS

ATTACHMENT J – CRITERIA FOR DENYING ACCESS TO NAVY INSTALLATIONS

ATTACHMENT K – SECNAV 5512

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.1.1 THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ISSUED AS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE. THE

NAICS CODE FOR THIS PROCUREMENT IS 236220 AND THE SIZE STANDARD IS $45M.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2.1 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with the requirements designated by sections of the FAR 15.203. This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source(s) whose performance provides the best value to the Government. This acquisition will be solicited as a competitively negotiated procurement as an 8(a) set-aside.

1.2.2 The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time prior to award; to negotiate with any or all offerors; to award the contracts to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; to award to other than the offeror submitting the highest technically rated proposal; and to award to the offeror submitting the proposal determined by the Government to be the most advantageous (best value) to the Government. OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AWARD MAY BE MADE

WITHOUT DISCUSSION OR ANY CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED.

Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms.

Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal.

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

1.3.1 This acquisition will result in the award of a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Design-Build/Design-Bid- Build (DB/DBB) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for General Construction primarily in the Hampton Roads Area of Responsibility (HR AOR).

The Hampton Roads AOR includes the following locations: Naval Air Station Oceana and Dam Neck Annex, Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story, NASA Wallops Island, Naval Station Norfolk, Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Naval Weapons Station Yorktown and Cheatham Annex, and Naval Support Group Activity Sugar Grove. Work may be required in other areas in the area of responsibility of NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic if deemed necessary. The Government intends to award up to eight (8) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the best values after evaluation in accordance with the factors and their relative importance unless the Source Selection Authority determines that award to more than five

(5) Offerors is appropriate.

1.3.2 Construction projects to be performed under this MACC will require the ability to manage multiple task orders concurrently across the Hampton Roads AO. This MACC will encompass a wide range of design-build and design-bid-build projects that include, but are not limited to, new construction, demolition, repair, alteration, and renovation of buildings and infrastructure and repair or replacement of single or multiple building systems that may include site, civil, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, cyber security and communication systems. Types of facilities may include, but are not limited to, administrative, industrial, warehouses, maintenance, communications, schools/training/education, personnel support, recreational, food services, lodging, medical, training areas/ranges, roads, airfields, et cetera. Incidental work with specialty trades includes removal and disposal of asbestos or lead contaminated materials. The Contractor shall provide all labor, supervision, engineering, design, materials, equipment, tools, parts, supplies, and transportation, to perform all of the services described in the plans and specifications for each task order.

1.3.3 The duration of the contract(s) will be for twelve (12) months from the date of contract award with four (4) 12-month option periods, not to exceed 60 months. The total five-year (base and four 12-month options) estimated construction cost for all contracts will not exceed $575,000,000 for the life of the contract. Projects awarded on this MACC will have an estimated construction cost of approximately $5,000,000.00 to $15,000,000.00. The Government guarantees an award amount of $5,000.00 to each successful Offeror over the full term of the contract, including option years.

1.3.4 After award of the initial contracts and “seed” project, the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders based on best value, using the tradeoff process or lowest price technically acceptable (to include lowest price). Only the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders.

1.3.5 The intent of this contract is that all MACC Contractors participate in pre-proposal conferences and site-visits and submit proposals on each task order. Contract awardees will be expected to submit a proposal for all Task Order Requests for Proposal (RFP) received from the Government. However, in the event a MACC awardee is unable to submit a proposal on a particular RFP, the contractor is required to notify, in writing, the Contracting Officer who issued the RFP and the ACO for the basic contract within five (5) working days from receipt of the RFP. A MACC awardee can only elect to withdraw from submitting a proposal on three (3) task order RFPs during the course of each year of the contract (base plus four options). Additional withdrawal requests, in excess of three (3) per year, may result in the Government choosing not to exercise remaining option terms.

1.3.6 Each task order will contain project specific evaluation factors that will vary depending on the unique requirements for each task order. Additionally, each task order will cite a specific completion date and associated liquidated damages.

1.3.7 Contractor Performance Information: Contractor’s performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and email address of the “Contractor’s Representative” that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriate system. It is the contractor’s responsibility to keep this contact information current.

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

2.1 The initial project (seed project) to be awarded as the first task order along with the basic contract will be P702 Submarine Logistics and Support Facilities, Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia. The work includes a design-bid-build construction of the Pre-Engineered Building (PEB) frame on reinforced concrete foundation with structurally supported slab. Features include cavity masonry walls with insulated wall panels above and standing seam roof. Facility systems will include fire protection, HVAC, supplemental dehumidification, compressed air, electrical power, lighting, telecom and security access. Built-in equipment includes a five-ton overhead bridge crane. The facility will have maintenance, storage and operations spaces for weapons cradles and other peculiar support equipment for the Virginia Class Submarine. The project also includes demolition of a 10,489 sf unconditioned single story storage building that currently occupies the P-702 project site. This is a steel framed building with metal panel siding and has an overhead 1ton crane.

* Solicitation Section 01 00 00 will include the General Requirements for the seed project.

Pursuant to FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, the Government's obligation under this solicitation, or any task order or contract that might result from the solicitation is entirely subject to, and contingent upon, the availability of appropriated funds. Should the Government be unable to award the seed project, the Government guarantees an award in the amount of $5,000.00 to each successful offeror upon award of the Multiple Award Construction Contracts. This minimum guarantee is over the full term of the contract, including option years. No legal liability on the part of the Government shall arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer and a task order or contract is awarded by the Contracting Officer.

Any offeror proposing on this solicitation does so at its own cost and with the full knowledge that a task order for the seed project, might not result from this solicitation.

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the Offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

4. The relative order of importance between the non-price evaluation factors is that the technical factors (1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are of approximately equal importance to price. The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Management Approach Factor 4 - Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors Factors 1, 2, 3 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Price

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. The Price and Non-cost/price Factors shall be submitted in separate files and submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF). Price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non- price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

All submissions shall include the following:

(1) Executed SF1442: Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide a cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address, with its proposal.

(2) Price Proposal for Seed Project: The Offeror is required to submit a completed Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442.

(3) Bid Bond (SF-24): Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the seed project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the Offeror identified on the SF1442. In addition, the Offeror shall provide a letter from its bonding company confirming that it has a single project award bonding capacity of at least $15,000,000 and an aggregate bonding capacity of at least $100,000,000.

(4) SAM registration: Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00 45 00 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.

(5) FAPIIS Certification: Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(6) VETS-4212 registration: Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS-4212) for the 2021/2022 filing cycle. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report.

Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

(7) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable): If the offeror is a JV, clearly submit the name of each entity that comprises the JV (offeror). For each entity, provide the complete name of the firm, address of the entity, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address. Provide a copy of the signed JV agreement.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information is utilized by the Contracting Officer in the responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.

(8) Bank Reference: The offeor shall submit a signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

(9) Financial Statements: The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

(10) Facilities and Equipment: Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment to perform work under this contract.

(11) Other Work: Description or listing of the offeror’s other work presently under contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items for the seed project. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

The Price and Non-cost/price Factors shall be submitted in separate files and submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF). Price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non- price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

All submissions shall include the following:

Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Construction Experience

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrates its experience on relevant projects (similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC). Offeror must have performed as prime contractor on all submitted projects. Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as follows:

Size: A final construction cost of at least $5,000,000. At least (1) one relevant project shall have a final construction cost of at least $10,000,000.

Scope/Complexity: Individual projects shall demonstrate experience with at least one of the following:

• New/Addition: New construction of commercial or institutional building or construction of new addition to a commercial or institutional building. New construction or addition work must be conditioned for occupancy and with finished interior.

• Renovation: Interior renovation of a commercial or institutional building that includes repairs/alterations to multiple building systems and infrastructures (e.g. mechanical, electrical, architectural, fire protection).

In addition to meeting the above Size and Scope/Complexity, submitted relevant projects shall, cumulatively, demonstrate the following characteristics:

(1) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with new construction or building addition.

(2) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with interior building renovation that includes repairs/alterations to multiple building systems.

(3) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with design-build.

Notes:

• The Offeror must clearly identify the building systems repaired or altered in each renovation project within their narrative. The project may be determined Not Relevant, if the Government is unable to determine which building systems were repaired. Additionally, work that is strictly ancillary to a main system will not be considered as multiple systems (e.g. electrical work ancillary to mechanical installation).

• Projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will not be considered relevant.

• If a submitted project contains both new construction/addition and renovation work, the offeror shall clearly delineate the dollar value for the portion of the final construction cost associated with the new construction/addition work and the renovation work in the project description. In order for a project to be considered relevant as new construction/addition work, the value of the new construction/addition work must independently meet project size and scope/complexity requirements. Likewise, in order for a project to be considered relevant as renovation work, the value of the renovation work must independently meet project size and scope/complexity requirements. A project may be determined not to satisfy relevancy requirements for new construction/addition or renovation, if the Government is unable to determine whether the project meets the respective requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly identifies whether or not the project is new construction or renovation, the final construction cost (delineated for new and renovation, if applicable), and addresses how the project meets the scope/complexity requirements. The absence of any such information may result in the project being considered Not Relevant, which could result in a rating of UNACCEPTABLE for this Factor.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project and will not be considered.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate Construction and Design Experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages). Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. Offerors may submit experience where a member of the JV performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above. Likewise, Offerors that are not submitting as a JV may submit a project where it performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

For a JV, the Offeror shall submit a signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Joint Venture, the Offeror shall submit the signed SBA Mentor-Protégé Approval Letter and signed JV agreement.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement and clearly describe the role that firm will have in the performance of the contract. If meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will not be considered.

Design Experience:

While the seed project is not design-build, design-build projects may be contemplated under this MACC. Therefore, the offeror is required to address the design firm to be utilized on future projects.

Offerors shall clearly identify the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this MACC. Provide the full name of the firm, address, UEI number, and CAGE code. The designated firm will be required to be utilized as the DOR on future design-build task orders under the resulting MACC, unless a substitution is approved by the Contracting Officer for the proposed task order. To evidence this, Offerors must submit a letter of commitment from the design firm proposed.

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects performed by the designer of record (DOR) that best demonstrates the DOR’s experience on relevant projects (similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC). The design firm must have been the DOR on all submitted projects.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as follows:

Size: A final construction cost of at least $5,000,000. At least (1) one relevant project shall have a final construction cost of at least $10,000,000.

Scope/Complexity: Individual projects shall demonstrate experience with at least one of the following:

• New/Addition: New construction of commercial or institutional building or construction of new addition to a commercial or institutional building. New construction or addition work must be conditioned for occupancy and with finished interior.

• Renovation: Interior renovation of a commercial or institutional building that includes repairs/alterations to multiple building systems and infrastructures (e.g. mechanical, electrical, architectural, fire protection).

In addition to meeting the above Size and Scope/Complexity, submitted relevant projects shall, cumulatively, demonstrate the following characteristics:

(1) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with new construction or building addition.

(2) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with interior building renovation that includes repairs/alterations to multiple building systems.

(3) At least one (1) project must demonstrate experience with design-build.

Notes:

• The Offeror must clearly identify the building systems repaired or altered in each renovation project within their narrative. The project may be determined Not Relevant, if the Government is unable to determine which building systems were repaired. Additionally, work that is strictly ancillary to a main system will not be considered as multiple systems (e.g. electrical work ancillary to mechanical installation).

• Projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will not be considered relevant.

• If a submitted project contains both new construction/addition and renovation work, the offeror shall clearly delineate the dollar value for the portion of the final construction cost associated with the new construction/addition work and the renovation work in the project description. In order for a project to be considered relevant as new construction/addition work, the value of the new construction/addition work must independently meet project size and scope/complexity requirements. Likewise, in order for a project to be considered relevant as renovation work, the value of the renovation work must independently meet project size and scope/complexity requirements. A project may be determined not to satisfy relevancy requirements for new construction/addition or renovation, if the Government is unable to determine whether the project meets the respective requirements.

Projects submitted for the DOR shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Submitted projects that were not completed within this timeframe will be considered Not Relevant. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C). The project will be considered Not Relevant if the design completion date is not clearly provided.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly identifies whether or not the project is new construction or renovation, the final construction cost (delineated for new and renovation, if applicable), and addresses how the project meets the scope/complexity requirements. The absence of any such information may result in the project being considered Not Relevant, which could result in a rating of UNACCEPTABLE for this Factor.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project and will not be considered.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate Construction and Design Experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. Offerors may submit experience where a member of the JV performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above. Likewise, Offerors that are not submitting as a JV may submit a project where it performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. If meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will not be considered, and will be deemed “Not Relevant”.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor as the Designer of Record in order to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. If the agreement/letter is not provided or meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the proposed designer will not be considered.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered. Offerors that do not submit a minimum of three (3) relevant Construction Experience Projects and a minimum of three (3) relevant Design Experience Projects will be rated

UNACCEPTABLE.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together as a design-build team may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Offerors who submit multiple relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those who only meet the minimum requirement for design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate the ability to perform multiple projects simultaneously may be considered more favorably than those who do not have experience performing multiple simultaneous projects.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with local environmental and permitting requirements in Hampton Roads areas may be considered more favorably.

Factor 2, Safety

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information.

These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99

Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information.

These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

Factor 3, Management Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit a detailed Management Approach narrative describing how the offeror intends to successfully complete work awarded under this MACC. The narrative plan shall not exceed six (6) singled-sided pages or three

(3) double-sided pages (with the exception of the organizational chart). Information on pages beyond this limit will not be considered. The narrative, at a minimum, must address the following:

• Offeror’s strategy for successful execution of work awarded under resulting contract, managing multiple concurrent projects, and managing the geographic coverage of the contract requirements.

• Offeror’s plan for accomplishing the varied scope of work (Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build (fully designed)) for general construction.

• The offeror shall provide the roles, responsibilities, and contractual relationships…