Amendment 0013.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION

PRIMARILY IN THE HAMPTON ROADS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR), VIRGINIA

This procurement is being solicited as a small business set-aside.

All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be directed via email to Jonathan Durham at jonathan.m.durham.civ@us.navy.mil

See Continuation Page

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Jul-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008523R2562

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-May-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Jul-2023

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008523R2562

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0013

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Confirm proposal due date from Amendment 0012

2. Incorporate previously omitted revised Civil drawings (attached separately)

3. Incorporate PPI responses

1. Per Amendment 0012: Proposal due date is 20 July 2023 at 2:00PM EDT

2. Revised drawings of CM102 and CU502 are attached separately

3. Incorporate the following PPI responses:

Number Reference

Question Government Response Page

Section Par a

279 PPI Answers

The new Price Sheet has an amount for CLINS 0001I, 0001J, 0001K,0001L, and 0001M set by the Government. Does this amount include all expenses that are required by the KTR and all associated subcontractors for items like KTR Supervision, General Requirements, bonds, etc?

What if this amount does not cover the actual costs incurred by the KTR?

Bid per RFP

280 PPI Answers

Question 166 refers to a P6 schedule. Please confirm a schedule is not required at the time of proposal submission.

The schedule submitted for the seed project under Factor 3 does not need to be P6.

281 PPI Answers

Question 237 refers to Helical Piers, which are not required. It can be assumed that the question is regarding the Ground Improvement Auger Piles as shown on page B-201. This page states that the Ground Improvement Piles are to be designed. With this project being a Bid/Build Seed Project that will be used as a cost comparison, to be fair to all KTR's submitting bids, everyone should use the exact same quantities. Can the Government provide an assumed depth and diameter as well as a quantity for the piles as a base for bidding?

Bid per RFP

282 PPI Answers

Given the depth of information provided with Amendment #9, KTR requests an additional 10 work days from the issuance of Amendment #9 to assimilate and distribute this Amendment to the subcontracting community. Will the Governemnt extend the proposal due date?

Due date will not be extended at this time

N4008523R2562

283 PPI Answers

The answer to PPI # 168, confirms the withholding of 10% of the contract value for commissioning. This solicitation is for Small Business. The 10% for commissioning requirement will likely have a value $1M to $1.5M, This will create a hardship for a Small Business. The requirement does not appear to be fair and reasonable since the Government is responsible for commissioning costs. A 1% of the contract value requirement would be fair and reasonable. Will the government reconsider its position on this issue?

No

284 Page 17 factor 4(i) The evaluation criteria states to get a PPQ from the client, but does not define who is acceptable as a "client". Must the client be an owner, like a NAVFAC contracting officer's representative, or is a prime contractor also acceptable? If the prime contractor is not acceptable, it is very difficult for a DOR to get a CPARS or PPQ on a previous DB construction contract since the government generally will not provide a CPARS nor PPQ to the GC's subs including the designer of record.

The client is whoever received the construction effort.

(End of Summary of Changes)