Amendment 0009.pdf

ACQR5632652

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is:

1. To CLARIFY a response to PPI #76 and #77 - see continuation sheet.

2. Provide responses to PPIs.

The proposal due date remains

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Aug-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9147

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Feb-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Aug-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9147

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

CLARIFICATION OF 76 77

Clarification to PPI #76 and #77 below:

“Include the price to perform the analysis in the base bid. If the analysis shows repairs/improvements are necessary it may be a consideration under FAR part 43 (Changes).

PPI RESPONSES AMENDMENT 0009

127 Part 6, B.1Part 6, B.1Page 251 of 55F, PDF 2of3

PDFs were provided for the topographic survey. These PDFs do not include layers that can be turned on/off. Can we get CAD files for the survey, or at least new PDFs that have layers that can be manipulated so we can create a better CAD base sheet for our drawings?

Survey instrruments are for bidding purposes only.

Contractor is required to create surveys for design and construction purposes.

128 Part 3.1,

3.2 * 3.3, Chapter 3.1.2.4 Water Supply

Additional Criteria Item #4

The RFP states that “all construction must be at least 200 feet from any existing or proposed drinking water supply wells.”

Can you tell us if there are any drinking water supply wells within 200 feet of the limits of each site?

There are no drinking water supply wells within 200 feet of the site limits at any of the

(3) sites.

129 PART 3.2 -

CHPT 6 –

G2020 - Page 4, Para 5.

The RFP states:

“Provide parking in accordance with UFC 3-201-01, Section 2-

9.6 Parking Areas and

SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-17.”

TBD

PART 3.3 -

CHPT 6 –

G2020 - Page 4, Para 3.

130 Section 1.11.3

Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Submission

For the purposes of compliance with The Life Safety Code, is the MARDIV building listed as a historic building? The Life Safety Code defines a historic building as “a building or facility deemed to have historical, architectural or cultural significance by a local, regional or national jurisdiction” (section 3.3.36.8).

SHPO has determined Building 2 to be a historical building.

131 Page 1053 G403003 The RFP notes the tie-in point for the fiber cable as manhole 1-9.

See revised drawing C.2.1 for locatin of handhole RP582-4

Part 3.2 G403004

ESR G40 The manhole is not identified on the Conceptual Site Plan C.2.1. Please clarify location of the manhole.

132 Page 1053 G403003 The RFP notes to provide 300 pair copper cable to MARDIV through new handhole next to RP582-4. The new handhole or RP582-4 are not identified on the Conceptual Site Plan C.2.1. Please clarify locations.

See revised drawing C.2.1 for locatin of handhole RP582-4

133 Page 1594 Part 4 PTS D50

List UFGS 26 32

13.00 20, Single Operation Generator Sets. The referenced specification section is not current. WBDG has reorganized the system and this section is currently unavailable. Should UFGS 26 36 23.00 be used?

Use the specification section referenced in the RFP.

134 Page 1594 Part 4 PTS D50

List UFGS 26 36

23.00 20, Automatic Transfer Switches.

The referenced specification section is not current. WBDG has reorganized the system and this section is currently unavailable. Should UFGS 26 36 23.00 be used?

Use the specification section referenced in the RFP.

135 Part 3, 5.0 Room Requireme nts, multiple occurrence s

Acoustics What is the required STC rating? Partitions are called out as “STC rated” but does not list a required STC rating anywhere in the RFP.

It notes: “Acoustics:

Comply with UFC 3- 101-01 Architecture, Section 4-8 Interior Acoustics”. This refers to Fig. 4-1 “Interior Acoustic Requirements for

Use UFC 3-101-01, Figure 4-1, Interior Acoustical Requirements (Sound Isolation, Background Noise Level, and Reverberation Time) for Typical Spaces and GSA PBS-P100 Facity Standards for the Public Buildings Service when determining interior acoustical

Typical Figure Spaces”. Which lists NIC requirements for various spaces but not STC. The next table, Fig. 4-2 “Acoustic Requirements for Typical Facilities” refers to the types of spaces we have in this project and directs you to GSA-PBS-P100.

The P100 provides charts for acoustics but lists 4 different STC levels, “Baseline” and Tiers 1-3.

requirements (For purposes of this RFP, add 10 to the Noise Isolation Class (NIC) to determine a Sound Transmission Class (STC). Note: NIC class for Small, Medium and Shared Offices is 35. NIC class for Large and X- Large Offices is 45.

136 G205005 Plantings RFP requires root barrier for all trees within 8 feet of any utility, wall, curb or pavement; this would require almost every landscape island within the parking lot to have root barrier within the entire interior of the parking lot island. Is this a blanket requirement or are there some cases, like parking lot islands, where it would not be needed?

Requirement is for all trees subject to specification. Design of project will determine requirement.

137 B201012 Screen Wall Do the mechanical enclosures require gates? The BEAP and RFP documents do not provide any information.

Mechanical equipment requires periodic maintenance. Provide means to secure unauthorized access to mechanical equipment and/or replace it if necessary.

138 3.1.2.3 New Site Work/Addendum 7

What are the specific requirements for the PA system? Wireless microphones? Does the parade field need to be able to hear the audio or just the stands?

PA System will be provided by the Base G-6. This is a portable system and is currently being used on the Parade Deck on Holcomb Boulevard.

139 Part 3.1, Ch 6, ESR G20

G201003 and G202003 G201003 indicates use of recycled asphalt in bituminios and concrete pavement is not allowed for

G202003 should read Recycled asphalt pavement material may not be used for bituminous concrete roadways, while G202003 indicates it would be allowed as permitted by SHS under parking lots. Is this intentional? Please confirm pavement.

140 3.2.2.3 New Site Work Are knox locks and padlocks required for the service area gates?

Any gate or fire access barrier required to be open for access must have a knox box.

141 G204005 Signage Can the signage criteria be provided per the requirements of the RFP, and as stated in the BEAP section 3.4.6 Signage.

Design guidelines state that all signage shall comply with the Sign Policy for Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (Base Order 11014.3, dated 28 August 2003).

Sign policy for MCB Camp Lejuene issued by addendum.

142 Amendme nt 7

Parade Grounds PPI 100-104 note that the new drawings issued in Amendment 0007 should be used for the viewing stand design at the parade grounds, and to delete the Gazebos. C-1 shows New Metal Bleachers on either side of the Reviewing Stand. Are these required for P-1800?

Is the Reviewing Stand to be a mirror image of the provided drawings (w/ lighting, hose bib, Seats by Gov’t, etc.)?

Bleaches will be provided by the activity and are not part of this RFP.

Sample drawing is for design direction only.

Lighting and hose bib are provided by the contractor. Seating are

GFGI.

143 Factor 4 – Technical Solution: Concept Drawings & Narratives

N/A Please confirm Technical Solution Narrative shall not exceed 4 single sided pages for P1800 II- MEF and an additional Narrative of 4 single sided pages for P1801 (MARDIV and MLG Buildings combined).

Confirmed – See PPI response #20

144 Factor 4 – Technical

Drawings & Narratives

N/A Please confirm Technical Solution Concept Drawings shall not exceed 6 conceptual drawings for P1800 MEF and an additional 6 conceptual drawings for P1801 (MARDIV and MLG Buildings combined).

Refer to PPI response 019.

145 RFP+Final Factor 4 – Technical

Drawings & Narratives

N/A The submission requirements indicate Concept Drawings shall include a Site Plan and Floor Plan.

Please define additional drawing requirements for P1800 & P1801.

No additional drawing requirements

Page 16 of

146 RFP 01 of

Part 3 Project Description, Par. 2.5.2 Staffing/Occup ancy

Typically, the RFP provides a ratio/percentage of Male/Female occupants for design of restrooms to best meet your anticipated staffing mix. Please confirm a 50 male/ 50 female ratio is correct or provide additional information for P1800 & P1801

Male/Female toilet fixtures ration is 50/50. Shower ratio is 80/20.

MEF, MARDIV and

MLG

147 RFP 01 of

Part 3 Project Program & Room Requirements

II MEF

Auditorium Seating

Project program on Part 3.1, Chapter 4 – Page 2 indicates Auditorium shall be sized for 450 seats.

Part 3 5.0 Room Requirements Page 23 indicated fixed seating for 400. Please confirm total seat count. Please confirm seat count above includes Wheelchair/companio n seating.

Auditorium seat count is 450

148 RFP 01 of

Part 3 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF Page 55 and 58

Male Head and Female Head

The number of showers for the II MEF Building are defined as a total of 34 showers for the Male Head and 17 for the Female Head. Please

087.

confirm we shall meet RFP requirements versus calculated UFC shower requirements.

149 RFP 01 of

Part 3 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF Page 55 and 58

Male and Female Head

Are showers and lockers to be distributed between all the Heads in the building, or are they to be grouped into a single location in the building?

Showers and lockers are to be centrally located by floor.

Single occupant heads do not require a shower / locker unless located in the Command Suite or department titled "Task Force".

150 RFP 01 of

Part 3. 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF

Single Head The requirement for the single head in the MEF calls for 3 shower receptors.

Please verify the requirement for 3 shower receptors in a single head.

II MEF requires 3 private heads (with showers) within the Command Suite, 2 private heads (with showers) within the department titled "Task Force", 2 private heads (without showers within the G- 2 Suite, and 3 private heads within the G-6 Comsec Classroom space.

151 RFP 01 of

Part 3.2 5.0 Room Requirements – 2nd MARDIV Page 35 and

Male and Female Head

The number of showers for the 2nd MARDIV Building are defined as a total of 16 showers for the Male Head and 6 for the Female Head.

Please confirm we shall meet RFP requirements versus calculated UFC shower requirements.

087 and 146.

152 RFP 01 of

Part 3.3 5.0 Room Requirements – 2nd MLG Page 30 and page

Male and Female Head

The number of showers for the 2nd MLG Building are defined as a total of 10 showers for the Male Head and 4 for the Female Head. Please confirm we shall meet RFP requirements versus calculated UFC shower requirements.

087 and 146.

153 RFP 01 of

Part 3.3 5.0 Room Requirements – 2nd MLG Page 30 and page

Male and Female Head

Please confirm shower distribution requirements for male/female restrooms

Auditorium heads do not require showers.

Provide two showers in each of the male for Auditorium and LWTC heads.

and female heads on each level of the LWTC. (8 showers).

154 RFP 01 of

Part 3. 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF

Single Head The requirement for the single head in the MLG calls for 2 shower receptors.

Please verify the requirement for 3 shower receptors in a single head.

The Command Suite requires 2 single heads with showers.

155 RFP 01 of

Part 3. 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF Page 61, Part 3,2 5.0 MARDIV page 41, Part

3.3 5.0 page 36 MLG

Single Head Confirm that a bench is required in single head rooms.

A bench is not required within a single head.

156 RFP 01 of

Part 3. 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF Page 61, Part 3,2 5.0 MARDIV page 41, Part

3.3 5.0 page 36 MLG

Single Head Confirm that a no lockers are required in single head rooms

A locker is not required within a single head.

157 RFP 01 of

Part 3 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF

Male Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

34 showers are specified which implies 64 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

2 lockers per shower is correct. Refer to PPI response 084.

158 RFP 01 of

Part 3 5.0 Room Requirements – II MEF

Female Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

17 showers are specified which implies 34 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

156 and 157.

159 RFP 01 of

Part 3 6.0– II MEF Page

C103005 Lockers

This paragraph states “where required provide lockers at a ratio of 1:20 per building occupant.

Total occupants are defined as 1,536 for MEF. which adds up to 76 lockers. See above questions and clarify which locker quantities we are to follow.

160 RFP 01 of

Part 3.2 5.0 Room Requirements – 2nd MARDIV Page 34

Male Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

16 showers are specified which implies 32 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

161 RFP 01 of

Part 3.2 5.0 Room Requirements – 2nd MARDIV Page 37

Female Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

6 showers are specified which implies 12 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

162 RFP 01 of

Part 3.2 chapter 2 -2nd MARDIV page 12

C103005 Lockers

This paragraph states “where required provide lockers at a ratio of 1:20 per building occupant.

Total occupants are defined as 406 for MARDIV. which adds up to 20 lockers. See above questions and clarify which locker quantities we are to follow.

163 RFP 01 of

Part 3.3 5.0 Room Requirements – MLG

Male Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

10 showers are specified which implies 20 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

164 RFP 01 of

Part 3.3 5.0 Room Requirements – MLG

Female Head Requirements call for 2 lockers per shower.

4 showers are specified which implies 8 lockers-however the same line specifies 10 lockers.

Please clarify the quantities of lockers required.

165 RFP 01 of

Part 3.3 6.0– MLG Page

C103005 Lockers

This paragraph states “where required provide lockers at a ratio of 1:20 per building occupant.

Total occupants are defined as 228 for MLG which adds up to 11 lockers. See above questions and clarify which locker quantities we are to follow.

166 RFP 02 Part 6, Chapter C C1 We believe the MEF site has been logged and/or cleared. Please confirm if this was done, its limits, and confirm if it has been done to agree with the LOD limits shown in the RFP drawing. For permitting, please note that the “existing conditions” of the site will be the conditions of the site once the contract is awarded, so this could significantly impact the costs for the stormwater management system versus what was anticipated during the RFP preparation.

II MEF site is partially cleared due to past site use. Further clearing / logging is predicated on the Contractor's site layout.

167 RFP 01 of

Part 3.1/3.2/3.3, Chapter 3, 3.1.1

This section of the RFP states ”There a 50’ undisturbed buffer associated with wetlands at Camp Lejeune. Site layout must not encroach within the wetland buffer.

The 50' buffer is a Camp Lejeune requirement.

MARDIV 3.1.2.3

states "Portions of the two existing parking areas are located inside 50’ wetland buffers; to allow the contractor more flexibility to meet the parking requirements, Camp Lejeune has advised the buffer may be reduced to 25’ in the vicinity of the

Please confirm this requirement for both the 25’ and 50’ buffers shown on the drawings. Please also confirm this is a Camp

Lejeune requirement since NC DEQ has no limits to working in the wetland’s buffers.

north parking area. "

168 RFP 02 of

Part 6, Chapter C Please confirm the buffer for working adjacent to the New River for the MARDIV and MLG sites.

Limits of Construction as shown. 50' wetland buffer would apply.

169 RFP 02 of

Part 6, Chapter C The new addition to the MARDIV building shows no connection to the existing amphitheater. What is intended in this location?

There is no planned connection between the building addition and the amphitheater.

170 Part 3.2, Chapter 1, Section 1.0 and Chapter 2, Section 2.1

The SOW references 279 and 295 parking spaces for the MARDIV building.

Please confirm which is correct.

069.

171 Part 3 – Project Program

N/A Is the domestic water meter for each building required to be inside the mechanical room or can it be located on the exterior of the buildings?

Bid per RFP.

Domestic water is an indoor potable water use and requires indoor water meter being installed in Mechanical Room (which is domestic water point of service entrance)

Part 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3

Chapter 6 – Engineering Systems Requirements

(ESR)

Section D20 Plumbing

General System Requirements

172 Part 3 – Project Program ; Part 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3; Chapter 6 – Engineering Systems Requirements (ESR);

Section D40 Fire Protection; Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment

N/A Is RPZ Assembly specified for the sprinkler line required to be located inside the mechanical room or can it be on the exterior of the buildings?

Locate within the Mechanical Room.

Section D40 Fire Protection

Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment

173 Part 6 – Attachments Drawing C.3.1

– Affinity Site Diagram

The MEF HQ Conceptual Site Plan shows 2 looped waterlines around the building with the domestic service line connecting to one and the fire service (sprinkler) line connecting to the other. Can this be a single line loop with connections for both services?

Yes.

Chapter C – Affinity Diagrams

Section C.1 – II MEF Affinity Diagrams

174 Part 3 – Project

N/A Section 3-230-01 of the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) regarding projects with a fire demand states the following:

Minimum residual during daily demand - 40 psi. Minimum residual during daily demand and design flow to building or structure - 30 psi.

Minimum residual during daily demand, design flow and hose stream - 20 psi.

Systems Requirements

(ESR)

5-3.2.2 – “Design the water distribution system to maintain a minimum residual pressure of 40 psi (276 kPa) at fire hydrants for the average day demand and 30 psi (207 kPa) during the design flow.

Minimum residual pressures at fire hydrants must be at least 20 psi (138 kPa) while supplying fire flow and hose stream demand.”

Section D40 Fire Protection

UFC Section 3-230- 03; 3-3 defines the “Design Flow” as the Maximum Daily Demand plus the required Fire Flow. Is the proposed system required to maintain 20 psi or 30 psi during the Maximum Daily Demand plus Fire Flow scenario?

Section D4020 Fire

175 Part 6 – Attachments N/A In Part 6, Chapter E of the Statement of Work (SOW), the Sewer and Water Load Estimates table lists a Sewage Load in gallons per day for each building.

This load is based on the occupancy count of the building and a designated flow factor based on occupants per shift. Is the number of occupants given per shift? How many shifts per day?

What is the duration of each shift?

Calculation is based on one shift from 8 AM to 5 PM

Chapter E – Mechanical and Fire Protection

Section E.7 – Estimated Gas and Plumbing (Sewer and Water) Loads

176 Part 3 – Project

N/A Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment shows the hydrant flow test summary but states that hydraulic calculations must be based upon a water flow test performed no more than 6 months prior to submission of the calculations. The hydrant flow test information provided is from July of 2019.

Will this information be acceptable to use for the Basis of Design and Proposal?

Hydrant flow test information was provided for bidding purposes only.

Successful bidder must conduct their own flow test after award and use that information in the Basis of Design

Systems Requirements

(ESR)

Section D40 Fire Protection

Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment

177 Part 3, 3.1.3.1 N/A This section for the MEF and MARDIV sites says that Excavated onsite soils may not be reused as structural fill/backfill.

When the successful bidder performs their own geotechnical investigation, would NAVFAC entertain the possibility to re-use the excavated

Bid per RFP requirements. At the completion of a comprehensive subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation, the government may consider reducing the RFP requirements through the value engineering process onsite soils if their investigation results show this is possible?

outlined in FAR 52.248-1.

178 Part 3, 3.1.3.1 N/A This section for the MEF site says to anticipate an 18-inch (12-inch at MARDIV, 18-inch at MLG) subbase layer of imported Select Material (minimum CBR = 20) in planned pavement areas where the subgrade elevation is below the existing ground surface elevation. When the successful bidder performs their own geotechnical investigation, would NAVFAC entertain the possibility of eliminating the 18-inch import if their investigation results show this is possible?

Bid per RFP requirements. At the completion of a comprehensive subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation, the government may consider reducing the RFP requirements through the value engineering process outlined in FAR 52.248-1.

179 Part 3.1, Chapter 6, ENGINEERING

SYSTEMS

REQUIREMENTS,

Section G20 SITE

IMPROVEMENTS

N/A This section states “The existing dirt road located west of the project site is planned to be relocated.

Reference the draft Traffic Study, prepared by Kimley Horn, dated March 2019, in Part 6, Chapter A of this RFP.

Contractor to obtain the final approved Traffic Study and design the site around the relocated road and proposed traffic circle, by others. It is anticipated that an entrance to the MEF site will be located off the proposed traffic circle.”

Refer to PPI responses 044 and 045.

Successful NS roadway bidder is not been identified.

Proposed location of NS roadway project west of Wallace Creek site is illustrated in Part 6 and Chapter

C.3.1. II MEF

roadway improvements will begin at the edge of roadway pavement illustrated on drawing C.3.1.

The SOW says the contractor shall design the site around the relocated road and proposed traffic circle. Has the final road design been completed and/or can the successful bidder relocate the traffic circle to be better utilized with the MEF layout? Please also provide a description on exactly where the proposed road improvements will end so the bidders know where the MEF site improvement will start.

180 Part 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 Chapter 6, G40

N/A G40 states “All road crossings for new utilities must be by directional boring to avoid road closure and repair. Overhead

Directional boring applies to all utilities.

spans across roads are not allowed.”

Please confirm this is just for new Electrical lines and no other utilities.

181 Part 6 C.2.1 Please confirm if the Standoff/Unobstructed /Clear Zones for the MARDIV Building Addition must also be offset from the Existing Building?

Standoff/Unobstructed /Clear Zone requirements must comply with NFPA 101 and UFC 4-010- 01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buldings.

182 RFP 01 of

Part 3 – Project Program

N/A Is RPZ Assembly specified for the sprinkler line required to be located inside the mechanical room or can it be on the exterior of the buildings?

Locate within the Mechanical Room.

Systems Requirements

(ESR)

Section D40 Fire Protection

Section D4020 Fire

183 Part 6 – Attachments Drawing C.3.1

– Affinity Site Diagram

The MEF HQ Conceptual Site Plan shows 2 looped waterlines around the building with the domestic service line connecting to one and the fire service (sprinkler) line connecting to the other. Can this be a single line loop with connections for both services?

173.

Chapter C – Affinity Diagrams

Section C.1 – II MEF Affinity Diagrams

184 Part 3 – Project

N/A Section 3-230-01 of the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) regarding projects with a fire demand states the following: 5-3.2.2

– “Design the water distribution system to maintain a minimum residual pressure of 40 psi (276 kPa) at fire hydrants for the average day demand and 30 psi (207 kPa) during the design flow. Minimum residual pressures at fire hydrants must be at least 20 psi (138 kPa) while supplying fire flow and hose stream demand. UFC Section 3-230-03; 3-3 defines the “Design Flow” as the Maximum Daily Demand plus the required Fire Flow. Is the proposed system required to maintain 20 psi or 30 psi during the Maximum Daily Demand plus Fire Flow scenario?

Minimum residual during daily demand - 40 psi. Minimum residual during daily demand and design flow to building or structure - 30 psi.

Minimum residual during daily demand, design flow and hose stream - 20 psi.

185 Part 6 – Attachments N/A In Part 6, Chapter E of the Statement of Work (SOW), the Sewer and Water Load Estimates table lists a Sewage Load in gallons per day for each building.

This load is based on the occupancy count of the building and a designated flow factor based on occupants per shift. Is the number of occupants given per shift? How many shifts per day?

What is the duration of each shift?

186 Part 3 – Project Program ; Part 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3; Chapter 6 – Engineering Systems Requirements (ESR);

Section D40 Fire Protection; Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment

N/A Section D4020 Fire Suppression Water Supply and Equipment shows the hydrant flow test summary but states that hydraulic calculations must be based upon a water flow test performed no more than 6 months prior to submission of the calculations. The hydrant flow test information provided is from July of 2019.

Will this information be acceptable to use for the Basis of Design and Proposal?

The flow test information provided within D4020 by AE1 is for bidding purposes. The statement within D4020 requires the successful DB contractor to perform additional flow tests within 6 months of their required shop drawing calculations & design submittals.

187 Part 6, P1800 – II MEF

HQ SITE PLAN

C1? Is the contractor responsible for clearing and grubbing the entire footprint of the II MEF site and within the limits of construction marking and thus, in return sodding areas outside of the footprint of where roads, parking lots and the parade deck are located? Or are only the limits of the project site necessary to accommodate the Site Key Note Features

The contractor is responsible for clearing and grubbing the entire footprint of the II MEF site, within the limits of construction, and sodding areas outside of the footprint of buildings, roadways, and parking areas. The parade ground is to receive ground cover.

required to be grubbed and vegetated?

188 Amendment 7 RFI response

In reference to Amendment 7, PPI 66;

please provided an estimated tonnage or number of containers of FFE and other interior haul-off waste to be removed from the Hospital Point Buildings. With over 400,000 SF of building area there is too much uncertainty in terms of waste to be removed. Further without a site walk we are unable to even gauge the amount of demo to be removed from these buildings.

Thus, to get everyone on a level playing field as response such as assume (20) 40-yard dumpsters for interior waste for Building #...

would be very helpful.

Link to Truview Cloud provided with username and password required.

Buildings are scheduled for demolition / renovation per this

RFP.

https://aecomims.truvi ew-cloud.com/welcome UserName: iddviewer Password:

Review123!

189 Page 305, ESR G20 (Pg. 7)

N/A Is there a grand sign reminiscent of Building 1 or 2 made of Masonry (or similar) with Metal Numbering and lighting required for this building?

Brick signs similar to the sign at Building 2 will be required at the II MEF and 2D MLG headquarters

190 Page 587, ESR G20 (Pg. 7)

C.2.1 Is the existing MLG entry sign to be repurposed or rebuilt under this projects scope?

Existing sign will not be repurposed or rebuilt under this project scope.

191 General C.2.1 C.2.1 lists keynote 13 as Electrical Connection Point, however, is any other work to take place at Building 353 as it is shown within the LODs of this project.

No.

192 MARDIV,

General C.2.1 Are the basketball courts or other physical fitness features at the Building 2 site to be repurposed or rebuilt elsewhere? These features currently reside inside of the Building 2 LODs which will need to be demolished for new parking and stormwater measures.

If required to replace, please detail what is to be rebuilt, the components of these and where?

Basketball courts and other physical fitness features adjacent to Building 2 are to be demolished and not reconstructed, 193 Part 3, G204005, 2nd MLG, Page 854-855, ESR G20 (Pg. 6-7)

Is there a grand sign reminiscent of Building 1 or 2 made of Masonry (or similar) with Metal Numbering and lighting required for this building?

Brick signs similar to the sign at Building 2 will be required at the II MEF and 2D MLG headquarters.

194 Part 6, P1800 – II MEF

HQ SITE PLAN

C1? Amendment 7 stated that no work is to take place within the wetlands. However, the proposed site plan shows a fence line contained within the wetland delineation and the storage area pad hugging that boundary. Please confirm these items are allowable as shown.

Fence line would and not the exact location.

CONFIRM WITH

CAMP LEJEUNE.

Confirmed with EMD that the data provided by Camp Lejeune. The fenceline cannot be within the wetlands deleation. Camp Lejeune must maintain a 20' clear zone outside the fence.

195 P896 Intended Use of “Bunk Room”

For the purposes of compliance with The Life Safety Code, is the intended use of the bunk room to provide a full night’s sleep, or to provide a space for a person to take a nap?

The intent of the bunk room is to allow on duty personnel to nap which may include a full night’s sleep

196 Page 990 Part 3.2

ESR D50

Part 3.3

ESR D50

INTERCOMMUNICA

TIONS SYSTEMS

Stand alone systems are required from the “managers office and the warehouse shop space” and between the “headquarters

Delete Stand alone systems requirement from “managers office and the warehouse shop space” and between the offices and administration offices”. These spaces do not appear to be reflected in the room sheets. Please clarify based on the room sheets.

“headquarters offices and administration offices”.

(End of Summary of Changes)