0004.pdf
PDF 207 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOLICTATION - P1800/1801, DESIGN BUILD 2nd Marine Division and 2nd MLG Operations Center, Camp Lejeune, NC
- Solicitation number
- N40085-19-R-9147
About this file
This solicitation requests design-build construction services for two Marine Corps headquarters facilities and a training center at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Offerors must provide design and construction services to design and construct a multi-story administrative and academic facility for II Marine Expeditionary Force headquarters, a multi-story administrative facility for 2nd Marine Logistics Group headquarters, and renovate an existing building and construct an addition for 2nd Marine Division headquarters. The solicitation includes requirements for relevant project experience, past performance questionnaires, and proposals are due by March 10, 2020. The Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ACQR5632652
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
This Amendment is issued to provide responses to PPIs.
In addition, the Description of Work as provided in the Instructions to Offerors is revised as follow s:
DELETE the last sentence: This project w ill demolish the follow ing facilities: H1, H14B, H17, H21, H21A, H22, H34, and H84 and REPLACE WITH This project w ill demolish the follow ing facilities: H1, H17, H21, H21A, H22, H84, S770 and S770A.”
The proposal due date remains 10 March 2020 at 2:00 p.m. (EST) .
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 5
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 27-Feb-2020
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9147
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
07-Feb-2020
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
27-Feb-2020
CODE
NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC
ACQUISITION CORE
9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE
NORFOLK VA 23511-3095
N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N4008519R9147
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)
The following have been added by full text:
PPI RESPONSES
PRE‐PROPOSAL INQUIRY ATTACHMENT (5.3)
Solicitation Number: N40085‐19‐R‐9147 – P1800/1801
Contractor Name:
Contractor POC (Name and email):
Mark Ruffino FederalContracting@mortenson.com
Instructions: DO NOT submit in PDF format. DO submit as a word document
Contractor
PPI#
Section of RFP or Page Number
Paragraph Reference
Drawing Number
Question RESPONSE
1 Section 00 21 16 ‐ Solicitation Submittal Requirements
Factor 2 – Design Experience, First Paragraph, N/A The last paragraph of Factor 2, (2) Design Experience on page 14 of 50 indicates that "The Offeror must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor." Please confirm that the necessary teaming agreement information and any related teaming explanation narrative is to be included in Factor 1 and not in Factor 2.
The supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor should be included in Factor 1.
The intent of the language in Factor 2 (and as you reference) is to re‐ iterate the requirement to submit these agreements and if properly provided in Factor 1 , the requirement will be satisfied.
2 Section 00 21 16 ‐ Solicitation Submittal Requirements
Factor 3 ‐ Past Performance, Design Past Performance, last
N/A In a government design‐ build project where the prime construction contractor holds the design‐build contract, If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation specific to the proposed Designer of Record paragraph, government clients are frequently not willing to fill out PPQs for the contractor’s AE design‐ partner, since there is no direct contractual relationship between that government client and the AE firm. And, of course, there is no ACASS/CPAR provided to the design partner, for the same reason. Please clarify if a PPQ, filled out by the design‐build contractor (offeror), is an acceptable evaluation for the AE partner’s design past performance, since the design‐build contractor is a client of that AE firm.
for design‐build projects, then the Offeror may submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment F) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience.
3 Section 00 21 16 ‐ Solicitation Submittal Requirements
Factor 3 ‐ Past Performance, first paragraph, N/A In a government design‐ build project where the prime construction contractor holds the design‐build contract, government clients are frequently not in a position to fill out PPQs for the contractor’s AE design‐partner, since there is no direct contractual relationship between that government client and the AE firm. Since an ACASS or design firm CPAR is not available for government design‐build contracts, please confirm if it is acceptable for a design‐build prime contractor (as the offeror) to submit the design‐build prime contractor’s CPAR or CCASS evaluation as evidence of past performance of the design partner, if the design partner of the
This is acceptable.
featured project is the same as the proposed design partner.
The following have been modified:
PPI
PRE‐PROPOSAL INQUIRY ATTACHMENT (5.3)
Solicitation Number: N40085‐19‐R‐9147 – P1800/1801
Contractor Name:
Contractor POC (Name and email):
Instructions: DO NOT submit in PDF format. DO submit as a word document
Contractor
PPI#
Section of RFP or Page Number
Paragraph Reference
Drawing Number
Question RESPONSE
1 Amd Page 4 of
6 N/A Amendment 0002 design requirements state “At least one relevant New Construction project meeting the Size/Scope/Complexity requirements shall have a final construction cost of $100,000,000 or greater.” Please confirm only construction projects are required to have a minimum of one new construction project with a final cost of $100,000,0000 or greater.
CORRECT AND CLARIFICATION ‐
THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH
WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION
EXPERIENCE FACTOR
“At least one relevant New Construction project meeting the Size/Scope/Complexity requirements shall have a final construction cost of $100,000,000 or greater. This project may include a single building or multiple buildings, as long as one of the buildings in the project meets the Size/Scope/Complexity requirements. Any submitted Renovation project will not count towards this requirement.”
THIS PARAGRAPH ONLY
APPLIES TO
CONSTRUCTION
EXPERIENCE.
DELETE the above
PARAGRAPH from the “Design Experience” portion of Factor 2.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .