Amendment 0007.pdf

ACQR5632652

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is:

1. To provide responses to PPIs 18 - 116.

2. To provide revisions to specifications and draw ings as indicated herein.

The proposal due date remains 25 August 2020 2:00 p.m. (EST)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 32

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Aug-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9147

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Feb-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Aug-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9147

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

PPI RESPONSES 18 - 116 AM 0007

018 00 70 00 c. Schedule Block 11 on the SF1142 states 2104 calendar days for the period of performance as does FAR 52.211- 10, which includes the 15 calendar days for bonds and insurance.

Attachment F – Price Proposal Form 1.3 f. states the performance period is 2089 and includes the 15 days for submission and approval of Bonds and Insurance. The Phased Construction Schedule in 00 70 00 identifies 2089 calendar days calculated from the Contract Award.

Please revised the Phase Construction Schedule and Price Form to include the 15 Calendar Days for submission and approval of Bonds and Insurance or advise that a Notice to Proceed will be given after the 15 Calendar from Notice of Award upon approval of the Bonds and Insurance.

The contract performance period is for 2104 calendar days (which includes the 15 days).

The award document serves as the notice to proceed.

019 Factor 4 Factor 4 identifies we are to include a site plan and floor plans for both P1800 and P1801 but states only a up to a total of 6 concept drawings can be included.

P1800 is a multi-story building and P1801 has multiple sites with multi-story buildings which would require more than 6 drawings to produce legible conceptual drawings. Please allow up to 11 conceptual drawings.

Pending

020 Factor 4 requires a technical narrative for both projects in this MILCON package. The Section states only 4 single-sided pages are allow for each MILCON project in the Package.

However, P1801 has 2 separate building in the MILCON project with different features.

Addressing all the systems identified in Factor 4 for both the 2nd MARDIV HQ and 2nd MLG HQ on 4 single sided pages will be very difficult.

Please allow up to 4 singled sided pages per Building not MILCON project.

Pending

021 RFP Part 3.2-Chapter 1 – 2nd MARDIV – P1801

Amendment 0006, PPI Question 2 notes that exterior cleaning and minor repointing of masonry is anticipated for Building 2

(MARDIV HQ).

Please provide additional information on cleaning and minor repointing scope of work and quantities or allowances to be included. We would recommend this cost be unit cost allowances for the project until a final inspection report is generated.

Pending

022 Part 3.3-Chapter 6 –

ESR B201002

“Exterior Wall Backup Construction”.

B201002 Part 3.3-Chapter 6

– ESR B201002

“Exterior Wall Backup Construction”.

Please verify non-loadbearing metal stud back up wall to masonry veneer is permitted as long

UFC 4-010-01

requirements are met. The RFP notes exterior bearing walls consisting of metal studs as the primary floor or roof supporting structural element are not permitted, but is silent on non-load bearing.

Non-loadbearing metal stud back up wall with masonry veneer is permitted as long UFC 4-010-01 requirements are met

023 RFP Part 3.1-Chapter 6 – 2nd MEF – P1800

– ESR D30 – Page 2

General System Requirements, 4th paragraph

RFP states “Economizer cycles must not be used”.

Economizers are required by ASHRAE 90.1 and we are required to comply with 90.1 –

Bid per RFP. Per Camp Lejeune Mechanical Design Guidance:

"Avoid use of economizers (dry bulb or enthalpy). High humidity and poor control reliability prohibit success with economizers except in extremely high internal load buildings." Extremely high internal loads are not applicable to how do we do that? this project.

024 RFP Part 3.1-Chapter 6 – 2nd MEF – P1800

– ESR D30 – Page 6

D3020

BOILERS

RFP states to limit boilers to maximum 399,000 Btu/hr. This will require between 10 and 15 boilers.

Boiler room space will be large and maintenance cost will be large.

Could that limit be increased to 2,000,000 Btu/hr?

3 or 4 boilers for this size building will be a better solution both cost and maintenance wise.

Bid per RFP. This is a Camp Lejeune Design Guidance requirement due to different maintenance requirements of heating appliances (boilers up to 399,000 Btu/hr) versus utility boilers (400,000 Btu/hr and bigger).

025 RFP Part 3.1-Chapter 2 – 2nd MEF – P1800

– Page 2

Last Paragraph and Figure 1

RFP paragraph and Figure illustrate a cold mechanical room with an AHU on grade. Given the size of P-1800 it will likely require a multistory building. Please advise how these requirements can be met on the 2nd or 3rd floor? Does this require all cold mechanical rooms to be located at grade level?

Systems design and configuration of space outlined in the RFP is the responsibility of the Contractor.

026 RFP Part 3.1-Chapter 6 – 2nd MEF – P1800

– ESR D30 – Page 1

D30 HVAC –

SYSTEM

DESCRIPTION

RFP requires a total enthalpy fixed plate heat exchanger section as part of each air handling unit.

Would a single energy recovery unit with similar technology be allowed to serve multiple air handling units with

Bid per RFP. Total enthalpy fixed plate heat exchanger must be used to treat outside air being introduced to the system. Having central (single or multiple) energy recovery unit fulfills this requirement and is acceptable.

flow control of the outside air as appropriate for each air handler served?

027 Part 3.2 – Chapter 6 and Part 3.3 Chapter

Section A1010 Part 3.2 – Chapter 6 and Part 3.3 – Chapter 6, Section A1010, states that the geotechnical tolerance for Slab-on-grade post construction total settlement due to permanent loads must be limited to ¼ inch. Previous RFPs for the Camp Lejeune specifically Hurricane Florence Recovery Package 3, 6 & 7 has the same requirement as ½ inch of total settlement for slab-on-grade. Please verify that it is Government’s intent to have the total settlement limited to ¼ inch for the RFP or can it be relaxed to ½ inch?

1/4" settlement limit may be relaxed to 1/2".

028 RFP Part 6, Chapter E, Camp Lejeune Mechanical Design Guidance

Page 2 Page 1 of this document is missing, please provide.

Page 1 is issued by addendum

029 RFP Part 3.1, Chapter 5 – 2nd MEF

– P1800

Page 86 Mechanical Room Data Sheet, Item B203004 Overhead Door calls for 7’ wide x 8’ tall roll up door. This conflicts with Chapter 2, Figure 1 which calls for door width same as air handler plus 2’.

Air handlers will be greater than 5’ wide. Please clarify intent.

Overhead Door will be the width of the air handler plus 2’ but not less than 7' wide.

030 RFP Part 6, Chapter E, Camp Lejeune Mechanical Design Guidance

Page 2 Page 1 of this document is missing, please provide.

Issued by addendum

031 RFP Part 3.1, Chapter 5 – 2nd MEF

– P1800

Page 86 Mechanical Room Data Sheet, Item B203004 Overhead Door calls for 7’ wide x 8’ tall roll up door. This conflicts with Chapter 2, Figure 1 which calls for door width same as air handler plus 2’.

Air handlers will be greater than 5’ wide. Please clarify intent.

Overhead Door will be the width of the air handler plus 2’ but not less than 7' wide.

032 Part 3.1, Ch. 3 3.1.2.4 & 3.1.2.5

Note 1 & 2 states that this project involves a water and/or wastewater line that serves more than one building and that permit is required.

We believe this is incorrect for P1800

– the lines will serve a single building. Please confirm this interpretation and whether a permit is still required for a single line.

Single building services do not require an extension permit from

NCDEQ.

033 Part 3.1, Ch. 6, ESR G20

G204002 The RFP states that DOR must obtain building permits for retaining walls greater than 5’.

What entity would issue building permits?

NAVFAC? PWD?

Permitting is achieved thru the review/comment of construction drawings by NAVFAC, 034 Part 3.1, Ch. 3 3.1.1 RFP states that site layout must not encroach on wetland buffer.

However, the Conceptual Site Plan in Part 6 appears to show the layout encroaching

No.

on the wetland/ buffer. Also, there is discussion of mitigation for wetland impact in Part 3.1 Chapter 1 and Part 3.1 Chapter 3 para

3.1.2.8. Can the

site layout encroach into buffer and/or into the wetlands?

035 Part 5, A.11 RFP includes a FEMA FIRMette which indicates flood level adjacent to MARDIV and MLG sites as Zone AE (Elevation 2).

Also included in that section is a "Preliminary" FIRM map that shows an Elevation of 8.

This is not a question.

036 Page 236 and 237 of 557, PDF 2of3

FEMA flood elevations in the area were revised June 19, 2020 and show elevation 8.

Please confirm we are to use Elevation of 8 as the BFE.

The draft FIRM maps are included to assist the Contractor in determining the minimum FFE as described in the RFP as it relates to rising sea level. The Contractor is responsible in determining the

BFE.

038 Part 3.2, Chapter

3.1.2.1 Demolition

Page 3 (Pg 807 of 2078, PDF 1of3)

Site, para 3 The RFP states:

“The existing gravel pedestrian path along both sides of Julian C Smith Street within the project limits must be removed and replaced with an 8’ concrete sidewalk.” It is not clear from the site plan provided what the limits are for these new 8’ conc paths along Smith Street.

Reference Part 6, Chapter C.2.1, keynote 5.

039 Part 3.3 Chapter 3.1.1

Utilities The RFP states:

“Sanitary sewer exists on the opposite side of Gonzalez Blvd at the northwest corner of the adjacent barracks, but the depth and flow direction is unknown at this time.” Can the base provide location pipe size and pipe invert elevation on this sewer line?

Otherwise, should the possibility of connecting a gravity sewer here from the new building be ruled out?

An 8" sanitary line terminates between (barracks) buildings FC561 and FC565 outside the survey boundary found on Part 6, Chapter B.1 (Survey drawing V- 118). The sanitary sewer continues in a southern direction picking up buildings FC555 and FC 571.

Invert elevations are unknown.

040 Part 3.2 Para 1 The RFP states: “A storm system on the opposite side of Julian C Smith Street…generally appears to need attention and must be analyzed further to determine if improvements can be made accompanying this project.” It is not clear where this work is shown within the project’s limits on the site plan. Please clarify the scope of this analysis and the limits and scope of the improvements that are to be included as part of the project.

Issued images of Storm Drainage System Inlet by addendum

041 Part 2 01 30 00.05 20 states 1 qualified Project Manager and 1 on-site superintendent per Construction site (not including demolition only sites). 01 35 26.05 20 and 01 45 00.05 20 do not note the same “Per construction site” language for the QC Manager and SSHO.1 – Please confirm the “Per construction site” is per building and not necessarily per MILCON project as P1801 has multiple sites.2 – Please confirm the Project Manager and Superintendent must be full-time onsite. Please confirm the SSHO and QC Manager are also required “Per Construction Site.”

Pending

042 RFP 02 of 03 Part 6, Attachments, Chapter B Drawings

V-128 and V-

In the SOW, numerous maps were provided as pdfs, however Existing Conditions- Wallace Creek V- 128 and V-131 are duplicate sheets.

Please replace V- 128 with the appropriate sheet and send to the bidders.

RFP Part 6, Chapter B.1.3, Reissue Wallace Creek survey drawing V-128 reissued as addendum.

043 RFP 02 of 03 Part 6, Attachments, Chapter B and Chapter C n/a In the SOW, numerous maps were provided as pdfs. Can CAD files be provided of them?

No. Graphic instruments contained within the RFP are for bidding purposes only. The Contractor is required to resurvey the project.

044 RFP 02 of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a Please clarify the extents and scope of the on-site and off-site transportation improvements for P1800. Phase 1 of the Kimley-Horn study appears to show the on-site access drive as part of the 1800 project.

Regarding the $12 million dollar cost that Kimley-Horn noted for the Phase 1 improvements, please confirm if this includes all of the 1800 site and the road down to Holcomb Boulevard, but not the connection to Holcomb, including the traffic signal and deceleration/turn lane.

Transportation limits of P1800 include on-site access roadways tying into Parachute Tower Rd.

improvements to the north, and to the future north-south roadway connecting Parachute Tower Rd.

with Holcomb to the east. The connector road between Parachute Tower Rd. and Holcomb including the traffic circle east of the P1800 site is funded/constructed by a separate MILCON.

045 RFP xx of 03 DD1391 n/a Please clarify the work included in the $7.46M "paving and site improvements" line item in the DD1391. This cost does not seem to agree with the costs identified in the Kimley-Horn Traffic Study.

Paving and site improvements referenced in the Kimley-Horn Traffic study are not part of the P1800 MILCON. The Kimley- Horn Traffic study was included in the RFP to provide an awareness of and coordination with the future MILCON.

046 RFP xx of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a Please confirm there are no off-site road improvements, as described in the phases 2 or 3 of the Kimley-Horn study, in the P1800 project. This study includes 3 Course of Actions (COAs), which appears to require an extensive list of

Reference response to PPI no. 45.

off-site working such as new traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, roadway re-striping, roundabout construction, etc.

047 RFP 02 of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a There is a long access road along the western edge of the 1800 site in the Kimley-Horn study that provides 2 access points to the site and a connection to Parachute Tower Road and Holcomb Boulevard, with a roundabout in the middle. Will NAVFAC consider eliminating the roundabout since the layout options on the Kimley- Horn plan are considerably different than what is shown on the P1800 Conceptual Site Plan? On the Conceptual Site Plan, the one leg of the roundabout only serves the Container storage area and one loading dock.

These small areas would not likely generate the traffic volume to justify the roundabout.

No. Reference response to PPI no.

45.

048 RFP 02 of 03 Part 6, Chapter C, C.3.1

C3.1 Please clarify if the loading docks shown on the

P1800 MEF

Conceptual Site Plan are a standard 4 foot depressed loading docks or are they at-grade?

Vehicle areas in front of the loading docks are a standard 4 foot depressed area.

049 RFP xx of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a Please clarify that no traffic counts or traffic studies are required to be collected for this project. If required, please provide a scope for this work.

Traffic counts or traffic studies are not part of this RFP.

050 RFP xx of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a The Kimley-Horn traffic study included a sheet title "Reconfiguring the Site". Please confirm that both the East/West and North/South orientations of the P1800 site can be considered by the bidders.

Configuration of the P1800 is to be determined by the Contractor.

051 RFP xx of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a Please confirm the need to construct the turn lane on Holcomb Boulevard as shown on the Kimley Horn traffic study sheet.

Refer to PPI response no. 45.

052 RFP xx of 03 Part 6, Chapter

A, A.5 MEB

Traffic Study by Kimley- Horn n/a Please provide the traffic study supporting the off-site road improvements.

A traffic study in unavailable.

053 Each RFP, 1-3 (MEF) Part 3.1 –Chapter 2.3- Project Specific Priorities) n/a RFP lists “FEMA FIS and FIRM documents including the pending mapping released 30 Jun 2016” – as documents to consider. The flood mapping located for the project for Onslow County is dated June 2020, which is more recent than the referenced 2016 data. Please provide clarification.

The draft FIRM maps are included to assist in determining the minimum FFE as described in the RFP as it relates to rising sea level. Both the 2016 and 2020 versions are draft and not yet released.

054 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

The following spaces for MLG HQ have a Room Data Sheet to reference but are not listed in the space tabulations;

Male Head, Female Head, Break Room, Janitor Closet, SIPR Café Vault. Are these required to be added and if so at what SF's and where?

Male Head, Female Head, Janitor Closet, and Vending/Break Room square footages are included in the building grossing factor. SIPR Café square footage is identified in Part 3.3, Chapter 4.

055 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

For the MLG HQ, please differentiate what Conference Rooms are designated as "Command Conference Rms" and which are "Conference Rooms" as these differ in finishes.

The Command Conference Room spatial relationship is referenced in Part 3.3, Chapter 4.2. Other Conference Room space associated with other activities within the MLG HQ.

056 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

The following spaces for the MLG HQ are listed in the Space Tabulations but do not have Room Data sheets to reference;

Departmental Head.

Use Room Requirements titled "Single Head".

057 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

The following spaces for II MEF HQ are listed in the Space Tabulations but do not have Room Data sheets to reference; Waiting Rooms, Ready Room, Protocol Storage, "Head" (what type?), Plans, Visiting, Man Trap, Checkpoint and Instructor Office.

Waiting Room – use "Open Office" Room Requirements - Omit printers and plotters Ready Room - use "Workroom Room" Room Requirements;

include (3) large gear lockers (min) Protocol Storage - use "Storage Room" Room Requirements Head - use "Single Head" Room Requirements Plans - use "Work Room" Room Requirements - Include a 5' x 12' worktable with closed front cabinets beneath.

Visiting - is a “Secured" Visitors Area - use "Shared Office" Room Requirements

Man Trap - use "Quarterdeck" Room Requirement - Omit Glazed interior door.

Checkpoint - use "Private Office - Small" Room Requirements.

Instructors Office - use "Open Office" Room Requirements

058 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

For the II MEF HQ, please differentiate what Conference Rooms are designated as "Command Conference Rms" and which are "Conference Rooms" as these differ in finishes.

Reference PPI response no. 55

059 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

For the II MEF HQ Please confirm that Private Heads and Single Heads constitute the same space.

Confirmed.

060 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

For the II MEF HQ Please confirm that the Office - Large and Office - Small listed on the space tabulations are Private Offices Large and Small. If not please issue a room data sheet.

Confirmed.

061 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

The following spaces for

MARDIV HQ

have a Room Data Sheet to reference but are not listed in the space tabulations; Private Office -X-Large, Mail Room, SIPR Café Vault, Male

Private Office – X- Large, Mail Room, Quarterdeck, and Disintegrator are listed in Part 3.2, Chapter 4.1. Delete "A/V Room" Room requirement. SIPR Café Vault is G-4 Logistics Shared Office with 3 seats. Male head, female head, and janitors closet areas are included in the building grossing factor.

Head, Female Head, Janitor Closet, Quarterdeck, A/V Room, and Disintegrator. Are these required to be added and if so at what SF's and where?

062 Part 3 Room Data Sheets and Space Tab.

The following spaces for the MARDIV HQ are listed in the Space Tabulations but do not have Room Data sheets to reference;

Training Room.

2nd MARDIV "Training Room" Room Requirement is included in Part 3.2, Chapter 5.

063 Part 6 Please provide any additional information on existing Building 2 at Hadnot Point.

Provided drawings from the renovation in 1999 provide a general description of the structural elements but do not go into enough actual description to run any required analysis.

Drawings from the 1999 renovation are the only information available. The Contractor is to provide a code analysis for the facility.

064 Is the renovation and addition of building 2 at Hadnot Point limited to the use of reinforced CMU exterior walls? Or is a steel frame with non-load bearing CFS and masonry veneer acceptable? The mission statement provided in the RFP has conflicting information.

Please advise on the allowable site

Exterior wall construction requirements are found in Part 6, Chapter A.1, Camp Lejeune BEAP and UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings.

wide exterior wall construction type.

065 Part 3 3.1.1 Existing Site Conditions

There are modular and shed like buildings inside of the existing PMO impound lot and loads of other trash left behind inside of this lot.

Nowhere in the RFP does it reference anything to be demolished in this area. What is the contractors scope with these items since they are not referenced in the RFP demolition responsibility.

Demolition of structures associated with P1800 are referenced in Part 6, Chapter B.6.

066 Part 3 F201008

EQUIPMENT &

FURNISHINGS

This section for II MEF states to "Refer to as-built drawings located in Part 6 “Attachments” for more information on existing equipment. The building has been cleared of existing furniture as the battalion has been relocated to mobile units until construction of the new HQ is complete." This section seems to apply to MARDIV HQ and not II MEF as H1 is still occupied. Please clarify what equipment is existing and what we are doing with it.

Any equipment and FF&E left behind when II MEF and 2nd MARDIV vacate the premesis is to be demolished. Note that II MEF and 2nd MARDIV will not move until their new facilities are complete; activities will not relocate into mobile units.

067 Part 3 G306003

LIQUID FUEL

STORAGE

TANKS

All 3 HQ's state to "Provide aboveground storage tanks for fuel." please confirm that this section applies to only self-contained generator tanks and no other fuel tanks should be anticipated.

Above ground fuel storage tanks are for emergency generators only.

068 Part 3 G306001

LIQUID FUEL

DISTRIBUTION

PIPING

Please confirm that for all 3 HQ sites that Piedmont (Duke Energy) will be providing the natural gas service to the buildings and that the contractor owns the scope of work from the meter base inside the 5' line.

Refer to See D301002 Gas Supply System

069 Part 3 3.1.2.3 New Site Work & 1.0 Project Description

In part 3, the 2nd

MARDIV HQ

building has it listed in several areas that a minimum of 295 POV spaces is required. However, in 1.0 Project description it lists 279 POV spaces.

Which is correct 295 or 279?

The 2nd MARDIV HQ site must accommodate 295 POV parking spaces.

070 Please consider granting a lead or self lead access to walk the H1, H1B, H17, H17N, H21, H21A, H22, H84, S770, S770A buildings as well as Building 2 so that selective demolition and demolition scope can be better defined. The as-builts accompanying part 6 are limited and the contractor needs to be able to review conditions which will reduce risk and contingency.

071 Part 3 G102004

BUILDING

RELOCATION

Under this section of the II MEF HQ, it states to "Relocate building elements as indicated on the drawings in Part 6.

Refer to Section F2020, "Hazardous Component Abatement" for requirements related to removal of hazardous components."

Please confirm what components of the old site are relocated as this part F is a electrical section and the F2020 section does not exist.

Electrical componentry will not be relocated.

072 Part 3 G102004

BUILDING

RELOCATION

Under this section of the 2nd MARDIV HQ, it states to "Relocate building elements as indicated on the drawings in Part 6.

Refer to Section F2020, "Hazardous Component Abatement" for requirements related to removal of hazardous components."

Please confirm what components of the old site are relocated as this part F is a electrical section and the F2020 section does not exist.

Electrical componentry will not be relocated.

073 Part 3 4.3 Exterior Character & B301001 Steep Slope Roofing System

For the 2nd MARDIV HQ, the allowable roof slopes are stated between 4:12 and 6:12. With the massing of this building and the shape of the building it may be beneficial to allow a 3:12 slope to keep the building from having a giant roof and taking away from the exterior aesthetic.

Comply with Part 6, Chapter A.1, Camp Lejeune BEAP.

074 Part 3 4.3 Exterior Character & B301001 Steep Slope Roofing System

For the II MEF HQ the RFP states that low slope roofs are not allowed.

However it seems to allow for a 3:12 sloped roof or steeper. Please confirm that a 3:12 sloped roof or steeper in the Wallace Creek area is acceptable as this would be a efficient design.

The contractor must comply with Part 6, Chapter A.1, Camp Lejeune BEAP.

075 Part 3 4.3 Exterior Character & B301001 Steep Slope Roofing System

For the 2nd MLG HQ the RFP states that low slope roofs are not allowed.

However it seems to allow for a 3:12 sloped roof or steeper. Please confirm that a 3:12 sloped roof or steeper in the French Creek area is acceptable.

Refer to PPI response no. 74.

076 In light of the fact that existing structural drawings for P1801 Building 2 have not been provided, it is not possible to know the existing roof diaphragm and roof framing nor is it possible to know the connections between roof framing or between roof framing members and the supporting building framing. Therefore we request that the requirement for roof diaphragms , diaphragm connections to roof framing members and diaphragm-to-wall connections be evaluated and repaired in high wind regions be omitted from this scope of work or please provide us with a rough scope of work we can price.

077 In light of the fact that existing structural drawings for P1801 Building 2 have not been provided, it is not possible to perform a structural seismic evaluation and retrofit at this time.

Therefore we request that the requirement for a seismic evaluation and retrofit per Chapter 4 of UFC 3-301-01 be omitted from this scope of work or please provide us with a rough scope of work we can price.

Pending

078 Part 3.2, Chapter 1- 2nd MARDIV-P1801

SOW includes 279 POV parking spaces. Further in the RFP - Part

3.1.2.3 New Site

Work (page 816 of 2078), there is a

Refer to PPI response 069.

requirement for minimum of 295 total spaces. Please confirm minimum required number of POV parking spaces.

079 Part 3.2, Chapter 2- 2nd MARDIV-P1801

2.3.6 Antiterrorism Criteria

In accordance with Standard 14: Roof Access, the facility must be designed without any external roof access. Further in RFP - Part 3.2- Chapter 6 - B301006 Roof Openings and Supports (page 940 of 2078), there is requirement for "Roof hatch to provide access roof mounted equipment and antennas." Please clarify if any roof equipment and/or antennas are allowed? If yes, how it will be accessed?

Roof mounted equipment and antennas are not allowed.

080 Part 3.3, Chapter 2.4 Part 3.3, Chapter

2.4 states that "Building Architecture should be Georgian or Colonial revival in classification as defined by the BEAP" for the P1801 - 2nd MLG HQ Building.

However, as summarized in Part 3.3, Chapter 4.3 the BEAP calls for Contemporary Architectural Style.

Refer to BEAP Section 4.4 French Creek stating that "Contemporary massing, rather than traditional

Building aesthetics must comply with Part 6, Chapter A.1 historic massing, is required for the French Creek district" and BEAP Section 3.3.3 Architectural Components listing Contemporary as "yes" and Georgian and Colonial as "no". Please confirm that Contemporary Architectural Style is also permitted for the P1801 - 2nd MLG HQ building.

081 Chapter C1.3 P1801 - MLG:

C1.2 Affinity Diagram for the second floor shows a space labeled "DV/VIP Office" near the center of the building which does not appear in the Part 3.3, Chapter 5 Room Requirements.

Please clarify if this space is required and if so, please provide Room Requirements for it.

Use "Private Office - Large" Room Requirement

082 Part 3.3, Chapter 5 A quantity of 10 shower receptors are required for the Male Head. Please confirm that this means 10 total showers including one accessible shower for the Male Head.

The Contractor is required to comply with UFC 3-420-01, Plumbing Systems, and the ABA.

084 Part 3.3, Chapter 5 A quantity of 2 lockers per shower are required for the Male Head. Please confirm that this means a total of ten 12"x18"x72" double tier locker units for the Male

Lockers inside Heads will be 12" x 18 x 36" half high lockers (stacked).

Head.

085 Part 3.3, Chapter 5 A quantity of 4 shower receptors are required for the Female Head.

Please confirm that this means 4 total showers including one accessible shower for the Female Head.

Refer to PPI response 082

086 Part 3.3, Chapter 5 A quantity of 2 lockers per shower are required for the Female Head.

Please confirm that this means a total of four 12"x18"x72" double tier locker units for the Female Head.

Refer to PPI response 084.

087 Part 3.3, Chapter 4.1 Basing plumbing fixture quantities on occupant loads for egress per building code would result in large fixture quantities. Please confirm that required plumbing counts for the Male and Female Heads can be based on the number of seats shown in the Area Tabulation or the "Maximum Occupancy" listed in Part 3.3, Chapter 2.5.2.

Pending

088 Chapter C1.3 P1801 - MLG:

C1.2 Affinity Diagram for the second floor shows a space labeled "Flex/Storage" adjacent to G-4 which does not appear in the Part 3.3, Chapter 5 Room

Use "Storage Room" Room Requirement

Requirements.

Please clarify if this space is required and if so, please provide Room Requirements for it.

089 Volume 2, page 261 of 557

Site Survey for 2nd

MARDIV

Headquarters show an existing exercise area located near the north side parking. The RFP does not provide any information if the exercise area is to be relocated and where to store the existing equipment, if any.

Exercise area is to be demolished.

090 Part 3.2, Chapter 6.0 D101002 Is elevator required at Existing building?

No.

091 Part 3.2, Chapter 6.0 D101002 Is Duty Hut required for elevator in addition?

Duty Hut is required only in existing building.

092 Part 3.2, Chapter 2.3.1

Sustainable Action Plan /Table- Enhance Indoor Environmental Quality: "Occupant health and wellness must be optimized, to the extent possible within the scope of the project, to promote opportunities for physical activity. " Please clarify requirement. Are indoor and /or outdoor exercise rooms/areas are required?

Indoor and /or outdoor exercise rooms/areas are not required?

093 Part 3.2 Rear view of the existing Building 2 clearly shows that some windows have been removed, and wall infilled. Would it

Alteration of existing building must be approved by SHPO.

be allowed to install new windows at the place of the old windows to allow natural light into offices

094 Part 3.2, Chapter 4, and Part 6, Chapter C Page 831 & 832 of 2078)

4.1 Space

Tabulation

Departments G-2 and G-2 call out 3 conference rooms - G-2 one and G-3 two. Affinity Diagram shows 2 shared conference rooms. Are shared conferenced rooms in addition to 3 listed in Space Tabulation, or are interchangeable.

Shared conference rooms are additional; locate outside of departmental boundaries.

095 Part 3.2, Chapter 3 Room Requirements(Page 877 & 880 of 2078)

Per Room Requirements, 16 showers are required for Male Head and 6 for Female Head.

Please confirm that those requirements are combined numbers for both, existing building and addition, and that includes accessible showers.

Refer to PPI response no. 082.

096 Part 3.2, Chapter 2 2.5.2 Staffing Occupancy

Please confirm that max occupancy of 406 PN is for both existing building and addition, and that occupant load is to be used for determining plumbing fixture count

Contractor is to comply with NFPA 101 when determining building occupancy and FU 3-420- 01 when determining fixture count.

097 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Please provide height requirements for flagpoles.

20'

098 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Is lighting required for the flagpoles?

Yes.

099 RFP G204001 Can the manufacturer and pictures be provided for the Wilson Gate

Wilson Gate aesthetic provided in addendum fencing that is referenced?

100 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Are there any PA system requirements for the viewing stands?

Yes.

101 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

What are the seating quantity requirements for the viewing stands?

82 seats with two wheel chair accessible seats.

102 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Is there a height requirement for the viewing stands (minimum height to the first row)?

See attached concept drawing for viewing stands

103 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Any shade requirements for the viewing stands?

All seating should be shaded.

104 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

Any lighting or other specific requirements for the gazebos (ex.

Down lighting, ceiling fans, outlets, water fountains, etc.)?

Delete requirement for Gazebos

105 RFP Part 3.1.2.3 New Site Work

The referenced helicopter pad that will be constructed by others; would there be any advanced preparations that should be included as part of this project so that you could avoid possible conflicts

(ex. Conduits, clearance requirements, sidewalk connections, etc.)?

No.

106 Vol 2, 289-331 Part 6 Attachments, Ch B n/a Please confirm the Construction Type for existing Building 2, this does not appear to be noted within the RFP or drawings

Building 2 construction type can be discerned from 1999 renovation drawings.

107 Vol 2, 289-331 Part 6 Attachments, Ch B n/a Please confirm the roof construction for existing Building 2, Reference PPI response no. 012.

whether combustible or noncombustible.

This does not appear to be noted within the RFP or drawings.

Architectural Sections show structural members but do not note their material.

108 Vol 1, 982 & 1252 Part 3.2 & 3.3, Ch 6

D40 ESR D40 for Fire Protection typically requires Knox Boxes at building entrances and at the primary vehicle entry gates. Are these Knox Boxes required to be supervised by the fire alarm system?

Yes, Knox Boxes will be monitored.

109 Vol 1, 983 Part 3.2, Ch 6 D40 ESR D40 for 2nd MARDIV under

DEMOLITION

states that all existing fire sprinkler items are to be demolished, but does not address fire alarm.

It is assumed that all existing fire alarm items are also to be demolished and replaced with new.

Can the government please confirm?

Correct, Fire Alarms are to be demolished and replaced with new.

110 Vol 1, 983 Part 3.2, Ch 6 D40 ESR D40 for 2nd MARDIV under

DEMOLITION

mentions demolition of an existing dry sprinkler system. A dry sprinkler system is also shown for the attic on the existing MARDIV sprinkler drawings located within Part 6

A dry system is required to be installed for the attic.

Chapter B.2.

D4040 makes no mention of a sprinkler system for the attic. Is a sprinkler system required to be installed for the existing attic, and if so, is a dry sprinkler system required?

111 Vol 1, 983 & 1253 Part 3.2 & 3.3, Ch 6

D4010 ESR D4010 for MARDIV and MLG building requires a “dual outlet CAT6 NIPR cables from the nearest telecom room to the Fire Control Panel in each utility room to accommodate energy management systems in accordance with Base Communications Specification 27 10 00 Comm.” Please clarify the intent of this requirement.

This language does not appear in the section 27 10 00 included within Part 5 of the RFP.

This is a request from Base Comm.

112 Vol 1, 986 & 1256 Part 3.2 & 3.3, Ch 6

D4040 ESR D4040

typically states that the use of flexible sprinkler hose is prohibited. UFC 3- 600-01, section 9-

7.6.8 allows flexible sprinkler connections where approved by the AHJ. Would the government be willing to consider allowing flexible sprinkler drops?

Flexible Sprinkler hose is prohibited.

113 Vol 1, 986 & 1256 Part 3.2 & 3.3, Ch 6

D4040 ESR D4040 states seismic protection is required for buildings “with a Seismic Design Category of B.”

NFPA 13 permits omission of seismic bracing where the Seismic Design Category is other than A or B (i.e. C, E, etc.).

Please clarify this requirement, as per the statement, only Category B would require seismic protection. Others, A, C, D, etc.

appear to not require protection per the letter of the

RFP.

Design in accordance with RFP requirements. ESR D4040 indicates "Provide seismic protection in accordance with NFPA 13 on all buildings with a Seismic Design Category of B".

114 Vol 2, 522 & 523 Part 6 Attachments, Ch C n/a Is it the government’s intent that the renovated MARDIV and its new addition be considered as a single building, and served by a single fire service entry and fire alarm/mass notification control panel? Or are separate fire services and control panels required, one for the existing portion and another for the new addition. For example, in Part 6, Affinity Diagram Attachments, sheet C.2.1 appears to show a pair of water lines entering the mechanical room of the new addition. However, sheet C.2.2 shows a room in the

The Buildings (new and existing) shall be treated as two separate buildings with a building connector. Each building will have its own fire service entrance, fire alarm/mass notification panel and fire suppression riser room.

existing building marked #8 as Sprinkler Room.

This does not appear to be otherwise addressed within D40, please clarify.

115 F-6 & 7 Attachment F - Price Proposal Form

1.1 CLINs 0016 and

0017 describe provisions for ICD 705 Compliant Secure Areas for the MARDIV and MLG. No additional ICD 705 fire protection provisions are mentioned within D40 for either building. Please clarify if any additional fire protection provisions are required, including, but not limited to, limitation of secure boundary wall penetrations, dielectric fittings at sprinkler pipe penetrations, fiber optic cables for fire alarm devices, surface mount fire alarm devices on secure boundary walls, separate dedicated fire alarm sub-panel within the secure area with fiber backbone, special locking arrangements which would not permit free egress, fire rated boundary wall construction, etc.

CLIN 0016 and 0017 should include the limitation of secure boundary wall penetrations, dielectric fittings at sprinkler pipe penetrations, fiber optic cables for fire alarm devices, surface mount fire alarm devices on secure boundary walls, separate dedicated fire alarm sub-panel within the secure area with fiber backbone, special locking arrangements which would not permit free egress, fire rated boundary wall construction, etc. IAW ICD 705.

116 01 33 10.05 20 (Page 16)

2.2.2 Section 2.2.2 “b”

identifies 2 Design Development in- Progress submittals, 35 percent and a 50 percent with a 21 calendar day review period per submittal. 2.2.2 “c” then identified a Design Development in-progress submittal with a 21 calendar day government review. Please confirm how may design submittal submissions are required that have a 21 calendar day government review period (i.e. 35% - Design Development, 50% Design- Development Prefinal, and Final submission)

(End of Summary of Changes)

N4008518‐D0601

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

AMENDMENT

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. Attached are PPI responses 18 – 116.

2. Part 3.1, Chapter 6, ESR D20 - Plumbing. General System Requirements. Delete the first sentence in the second paragraph indicating “Provide gas meter with pulse output capability for input into the facility Direct Digital Control (DDC) system.”

3. Part 3.1, Chapter 6, ESR D30 - HVAC. D30600, 1 1.1 Direct Digital Controls (DDC).

3.1 Revise fifth paragraph to read “Contractor must use DDC equipment and Meters selected from base ATO approved equipment listing. Contractor shall allocate time for control panel delivery (and pickup) to cybersecurity team for testing. Only equipment capable of meeting cybersecurity hardening requirements will be accepted for use.”

3.2 Revise seventh paragraph to read “Provide meters, monitored by DDC, on the following incoming utilities of the building: Domestic water and HVAC makeup water. For potable water meter refer to Section G30, Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities, paragraph entitled, Potable Water Distribution.”

3.3 Delete tenth paragraph that reads” Provide ASHRAE Standard 135 building controller as the main interface for the building control system.”

4. Part 3.2, Chapter 6, ESR D20 - Plumbing General System Requirements. Delete the first sentence in the second paragraph indicating “Provide gas meter with pulse output capability for input into the facility Direct Digital Control (DDC) system.”

5. Part 3.2, Chapter 6, ESR D30 - HVAC. D30600, 1 1.1 Direct Digital Controls (DDC).

5.1 Revise fifth paragraph to read, “Contractor must use DDC equipment and Meters selected from base ATO approved equipment listing. Contractor shall allocate time for control panel delivery (and pickup) to cybersecurity team for testing. Only equipment capable of meeting cybersecurity hardening requirements will be accepted for use.”

5.2 Revise seventh paragraph to read, “Provide meters, monitored by DDC, on the following incoming utilities of the building: Domestic water and HVAC makeup water. For potable water meter refer to Section G30, Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities, paragraph entitled, Potable Water Distribution.”

5.3 Delete tenth paragraph that reads, ”Provide ASHRAE Standard 135 building controller as the main interface for the building control system.”

6. Part 3.3, Chapter 6, ESR D20 - Plumbing. General System Requirements. Delete the first sentence in the second paragraph indicating “Provide gas meter with pulse output capability for input into the facility Direct Digital Control (DDC) system.”

N4008518‐D0601

7. Part 3.3, Chapter 6, ESR D30 – HVAC. D30600, 1 1.1 Direct Digital Controls (DDC).

7.1 Revise fifth paragraph to read “Contractor must use DDC equipment and Meters selected from base ATO approved equipment listing. Contractor shall allocate time for control panel delivery (and pickup) to cybersecurity team for testing. Only equipment capable of meeting cybersecurity hardening requirements will be accepted for use.”

7.2 Revise seventh paragraph to read “Provide meters, monitored by DDC, on the following incoming utilities of the building: Domestic water and HVAC makeup water. For potable water meter refer to Section G30, Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities, paragraph entitled, Potable Water Distribution.”

7.3 Delete tenth paragraph that reads” Provide ASHRAE Standard 135 building controller as the main interface for the building control system.”

8. Reissue Part 5 Performance Specifications Section 22 00 00 - Plumbing, General Purpose

9. Reissue Part 5 Performance Specifications Section 23 05 93.00 22 - Testing, Adjusting, and

Balancing for Mechanical Systems

10. Reissue Part 5 Performance Specifications Section 23 09 00.00 22 - Instrumentation and Control for HVAC

11. Reissue Part 5 Performance Specifications Section 23 09 13.00 22 - Instrumentation and Control

Devices for HVAC

12. Reissue Part 5 Performance Specifications Section 23 09 23.02 22 - BACNET Direct Digital Control for HVAC and Other Building Control Systems

13. Part 5, specification section 27 10 00, Building Telecommunication Cabling System. Para.

3.1.1.3, Horizontal Cabling. Add second para. to read “Contractor to provide two CAT 6 UTP cables inside one-inch conduit from the FMCP to the telephone equipment room. Make connections to telephone equipment per the base’s telephone requirements.”

14. Part 6, Chapter E.9. Issue page 1 of Camp Lejeune Mechanical Design Guidance.

15. RFP Part 6, Chapter B.1.3, Reissue Wallace Creek survey drawing V-128.

16. Part 3.1.2.6, Storm Drainage System. Issue images of Storm Drainage System Inlet. (PPI 040).

17. Part 3.1.2.3, New Site Work and ESR G204001 Fencing & Gates. Issue aesthetic of Wilson Gate fence as example for text reference. (PPI 099).

18. Issue concept of P1800 Viewing Stand (PPI 102).

(End of Summary of Changes)

REPLACE II MEF, 2ND MARDIV, AND 2ND MLG HQTRS 20P1800/P1801

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NC ePROJECTS WORK ORDER NO: 1591160/1632589

SECTION 22 00 00

PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

12/07

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING AND REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE (AHRI)

AHRI 1010 (2002) Self-Contained, Mechanically Refrigerated Drinking-Water Coolers

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)

ANSI Z21.22/CSA 4.4 (2015) Relief Valves for Hot Water Supply Systems

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING

ENGINEERS (ASHRAE)

ASHRAE 90.1 - IP (2013) Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SANITARY ENGINEERING (ASSE)

ASSE 1001 (2016) Performance Requirements for Atmospheric Type Vacuum Breakers

ASSE 1003 (2009) Performance Requirements for Water Pressure Reducing Valves for Domestic Water Distribution Systems - (ANSI approved 2010)

ASSE 1010 (2004) Performance Requirements for Water Hammer Arresters (ANSI approved 2004)

ASSE 1011 (2004; Errata 2004) Performance Requirements for Hose Connection Vacuum Breakers (ANSI approved 2004)

ASSE 1012 (2009) Performance Requirements for Backflow Preventer with an Intermediate Atmospheric Vent - (ANSI approved 2009)

ASSE 1013 (2011) Performance Requirements for

SECTION 22 00 00 Page 1

Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Preventers and Reduced Pressure Fire Protection Principle Backflow Preventers - (ANSI approved 2010)

ASSE 1018 (2001) Performance Requirements for Trap Seal Primer Valves - Potable Water Supplied (ANSI Approved 2002

ASSE 1020 (2004; Errata 2004; Errata 2004) Performance Requirements for Pressure Vacuum Breaker Assembly (ANSI Approved 2004)

ASSE 1037 (2015; Reprint Sep 2017) Performance Requirements for Pressurized Flushing Devices for Plumbing Fixtures

AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)

AWWA 10084 (2017) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

AWWA B300 (2010; Addenda 2011) Hypochlorites

AWWA B301 (2010) Liquid Chlorine

AWWA C203 (2008) Coal-Tar Protective Coatings and Linings for Steel Water Pipelines - Enamel and Tape - Hot-Applied

AWWA C651 (2014) Standard for Disinfecting Water Mains

AWWA C652 (2011) Disinfection of Water-Storage Facilities

AWWA D100 (2011) Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage

AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)

AWS A5.8/A5.8M (2011; Amendment 2012) Specification for Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Welding

AWS B2.2/B2.2M (2016) Specification for Brazing Procedure and Performance Qualification

ASME INTERNATIONAL (ASME)

ASME A112.1.2 (2012; R 2017) Air Gaps in Plumbing Systems (For Plumbing Fixtures and Water-Connected Receptors)

ASME A112.14.1 (2003; R 2017) Backwater Valves

ASME A112.19.2/CSA B45.1 (2018; ERTA 2018) Standard for Vitreous China Plumbing Fixtures and Hydraulic Requirements for Water Closets and Urinals

SECTION 22 00 00 Page 2

ASME A112.19.3/CSA B45.4 (2017; Errata 2017) Stainless Steel Plumbing Fixtures

ASME A112.19.5 (2017) Flush Valves and Spuds for Water Closets, Urinals, and Tanks

ASME A112.36.2M (1991;…