Amendment_0010.pdf

ACQR5489062

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. EXTEND the due date for proposals from September 17, 2019 to October 8, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

2. Provide revised price proposal form w hich corrects CLINS under 0001 to include DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.

3. Provide responses to PPIs.

4. ADD FAR Clause 52.243-1, ALT III Changess- Fixed Price

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Aug-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008518R0644

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-May-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Aug-2019

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008518R0644

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

#10 PPI RESPONSES

PRE‐PROPOSAL INQUIRY ATTACHMENT (5.3)

Solicitation Number: N40085‐18‐R‐0644

Contractor Name: AMENDMENT 0010 Contractor POC:

Instructions: DO NOT submit in PDF format. DO submit as a word document

Contractor

PPI#

Section of RFP or Page Number

Paragraph Reference

Drawing Number

Question RESPONSE

12 Part 3, Section 2.3.6

ATFP

Part 3, Section 2.3.6 notes that the “Facility Site is not currently within a controlled perimeter.” UFC 4‐010‐ 01 dated 1 Oct 2013 Par.

2‐4.3.1 specifically states that “perimeter barriers are not required for controlled perimeters.

Controlled perimeters required physical boundaries that channel vehicles to access control points…” The existing base physical boundary has sufficient means to channel vehicles to the access control points with a demonstrated capability to search for and detect explosives.

The definition of controlled perimeters in UFC 4‐010‐01 dated 1 Oct 2013 Pg. 41 also defines the edge of controlled perimeters for shorelines. Question is:

a) Based on the

Based upon the final issue date of this RFP (utilize the 2018 version of UFC 4‐010‐ 01, chapter 3 standards.5 August 2019), the 2018 version of UFC 4‐010‐01 applies. This document no longer makes a distinction about controlled perimeters. Now, the requirement is for a facility to be within an ‘installation perimeter’, whose defined requirements are much simpler and less stringent than a controlled perimeter. This project is within an installation perimeter. Consider the standards in chapter 3 of 2018 UFC 4‐010‐01 for this

MILCON.

above definitions in UFC 4‐010‐01 dated 1 Oct 2013 is the site within a controlled perimeter?

13 Part 2, Section 01 33 10.05

20, 1.2

ATFP

Part 2, Section 01 33

10.05 20, 1.2 “Utilize the latest version of the publications at the date this RFP was issued.”

Questions are:

a) Please confirm the date of issuance is 7, May 2019 as shown on the RFP cover page.

b) Based on the Part 2, Section 01 33

10.05 20, 1.2 statement, please confirm the latest version UFC 4‐010‐01 dated 12 December 2018 shall be utilized.

a) Date of issuance and incorporation of UFC is based on the Phase 2 issuance which was 5 August 2019.

b) Utilize the 2018 version of UFC 4‐010‐01, chapter 3 standards.

14 Part 3 In Part 3 of the RFP, chapter 2 page 5, the RFP requires that, “The O1 and O2 spaces must, as a minimum, have internal noise levels lowered by at least 40 dB due to site’s location within the 85 DNL contour” In Part 3 room requirements, for example, Lobby 01 Level, indicates no special acoustics requirement.

However, in order to achieve the 40 dB reduction in noise, an STC 40 curtainwall is likely necessary.

Please confirm that the external envelop of the O1/O2 space must have acoustic characteristics to reduce external 85dB noise to 40 dB level in the interior. This would likely require OITC rating for roof/ceiling assemblies, STC ratings

PENDING

for walls, doors, windows, curtainwalls and other penetrations.

15 Part 3 Chapter 4.5

In Part 3 – Chapter 4.5 a concept design floor plan was provided. Please provide scaled drawing of this layout for review.

See response to PPI #001 (Amendment 0008).

16 01 33 29.05 20 1.4.4.1 Is Third‐Party Certification required for both the Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and the Paraloft facility?

See response to PPI #002(Amendment 0008).

17 01 33 29.05 20 1.4.4.1 Referenced paragraph requires Third‐Party Certification of "GBI Green Globes for NC 2 globes, or Government‐ approved equivalent TPC sustainability certification or validation." Please confirm that any of the approved TPC listed in ECB 2014‐02 is acceptable.

See response to PPI #003(Amendment 0008).

18 Part 6, Chapter A

ECB 2014‐02 included in this section is out of date; the current version is dated Revised 20 December 2016. Should project teams use the version in the RFP or the most up to date version?

See response to PPI #004(Amendment 0008).

19 01 33 29.05 20 1.6.3 Referenced paragraph states to reduce modeled energy use by 20 percent compared to ASHRAE 90.1 baseline.

Please confirm this should be 30 percent in accordance with federal requirements.

See response to PPI #005(Amendment 0008).

20 Part 3 Ch. 6 ESR G20 Para.

G2020;

Part 3 Ch. 3 Figure 4;

Part 3 Ch. 3 Para. 3.2.3;

Part 3 Ch. 3

Discrepancy with the # of parking spaces required near Paraloft facility.

One part of RFP says provide parking per Figure 4 and any deviation requires Government approval.

See response to PPI #006(Amendment 0008).

Para. 3.2.12 There are 56 parking spaces shown in Figure 4.

Another part says a minimum of 50 spaces and yet another says provide a minimum of 30 POV spaces with 4 motorcycle. Please clarify the minimum required number of parking spaces.

21 Part 3 Ch. 6 ESR G30 Para.

G303090

Per the RFP, effluent of the oil/water separator serving the hangar bay must discharge to the storm sewer system. This contradicts UFC 3‐240‐01 Wastewater Collection Chapter 4 Oil/Water Separators (OWS) which says conventional pollutants such as oil or grease flow through an OWS prior to connection to a wastewater sewer.

Please clarify if it is acceptable to deviate from UFC's and discharge hangar trench drain oil/water separators into storm sewer and not sanitary sewers.

See response to PPI #007(Amendment 0008).

22 Part 3 Ch. 3 Para. 3.2.8;

Part 3 Ch. 6 ESR G30 Para.

G303090;

Part 3 Ch. 3 Para. 3.2.16;

RFP says to provide a rain water detection system for the wash rack pad but Part 3 Chapter 3 Paragraph 3.2.16 Sunshades says to provide a sunshade over the wash rack. Is the rainwater detection & diverter system still required if the pad is covered?

See response to PPI #008(Amendment 0008).

23 Part 6 Attachments Chapter B

Topographic Survey and Demolition Plans do not encompass the entire site plan. Please provide additional survey information for future F‐ 35 parking apron and sunshades. Need

See response to PPI #009(Amendment 0008).

underground utility information across the future parking spaces.

24 Part 3 Ch. 3 Figure 4;

Please provide scaled drawing of Figure 4 Site Plan.

See response to PPI #010(Amendment 0008).

25 Part 3 Chapter 2, Page 6

2.6 Part 3‐Chapter 2‐2.6

"Special Design Challenges" note 5 says the structural steel must be surface‐prepared, primed and painted w/ HP coatings (epoxy primer and polyurethane coatings) in a SHOP setting, not in the field.

Please verify the joists and decking will only require to be prep'd and primed per the joist manufacturer specifications. The joist and deck manufacturers do not offer the HP coatings on their products and the cost to ship to another SSPC specialty coatings facility is extremely costly.

See response to PPI #011(Amendment 0008).

26 Part 3‐Chapter

6/ESR B10

In Part 3‐Chapter 6/ESR B10, B1010 notes a catwalk is required and it is to be galvanized.

Please verify this and any other steel such a ladders and platforms do not require surface prep and paint per Part 3‐ Chapter 2‐2.6.

PENDING

27 Part 3‐Chapter

Please verify what SSPC steel prep is required for the structural steel along w/ primer and finish coat paint types. There are numerous available in the paint tree of MPI.

PENDING

28 Solicitation Amendment

Amendment 0006 set the proposal due date as September 17, 2019.

This is only 6 weeks after

PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS

EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 8,

2019 at 2:00 PM

Amendment 0006 was issued. This project is EXTREMELY large and complex (there are almost 700 drawings and over 1,800 spec pages for P‐235 to review; and roughly 1,700 spec pages for P‐199). The P‐235 project involves a lot of time and effort to digest and understand all of the scope and project phasing. P‐199 requires a lot of design effort to turn the RFP into drawings and details for the marketplace to price.

In order to get a complete and competitive offer for the Navy, we respectfully request a 3‐4 week bid extension.

29 Part 3 Room Requirements

The RFP calls for vertical lift fabric hangar doors.

It has been mentioned lately that fabric hangar doors will no longer be allowed on DOD installations. Are vertical lift fabric doors allowed on this project?

Regardless of type, how many doors do you want per squadron?

UFC 3‐301‐01, with Change 4 is the applicable structural UFC in accordance with implementation instruction in UFC 1‐200‐01 with a date of RFP issuance of 5 August 2019. See Hangar Bay room requirements for required number of doors.

30 Per the RFP we are being asked to provide Vertical Lift Fabric Doors (VLFD).

Per the UFC we are in a windborne debris region.

Fabric doors to not meet windborne debris resistance requirements.

Please confirm if it is acceptable to use VLFD’s?

PENDING

31 Table 7.1, UFC 4‐211‐01 Spr 13, 2017; Part 3 rood data sheets

Per the UFC referenced the hangar clear height is 32.5’ and nothing is allowed to be installed below this elevation

PENDING

including cranes. Per the UFC the hook height needs to be 29.5 feet.

The Room Data sheet for the hangar bay is asking for a hook height of 22’.

1: can the overhead crane structure be built below the 32.5’ elevation? 2: What minimum hook height are you requiring? 22’ or 29.5’?

32 Part 3, chapter 6, d 509002

The RFP says we need to have one generator feeding emergency power for each squadron. Do you want two separate emergency generators feeding two separate emergency back‐up power systems in this hangar?

PENDING

33 Is it your intention to award this project by 30 September 2019? Is this FY 19 money? If not, what date should we use for award when building our schedules for the Phase 2 submission?

PROPOSAL DUE DATE

EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 8,

2019. INTENT TO AWARD

BY OCTOBER 31, 2019.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

The following have been added by reference:

52.243-1 Alt III Changes--Fixed Price (Aug 1987) - Alternate III APR 1984

(End of Summary of Changes)