J-10_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 659 KB Posted

Attached to
USS MT WHITNEY FY '17 ESLP Availability Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-16-R-4601
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Attachment J-10

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USS MT WHITNEY FY '17 ESLP Availability, newest first.
File Type Posted
16-R-4601_Additional_Hand_Delivery_Instructions.docx DOCX document
N32205-16-R-4601_AMEND_0005.pdf PDF
J-6_Contractor_Price_Breakdown_REV-3.xls XLS spreadsheet
0210_A_1A_and_1B_Boiler_Repairs.docx DOCX document
Section_B_REV-2.pdf PDF
0504_A_CHT_Cross_Connect_Tank_Installation_REV-1.docx DOCX document
Neoprene.PNG PNG image
0516_A_Sea_Water_Strainer_Installations_REV-1.docx DOCX document
16-R-4601_Q A__7.docx DOCX document
N32205-16-R-4601_AMEND_0004.pdf PDF
0219_A_Main_Reduction_Gears_Inspection_REV-1.doc DOC document
DEC_Report_1518.103 _MTW_Brg_Loads_June_27 _2015_After_LSB_Adjust_.pdf PDF
DEC_Report_1518.104 _MTW_Cold__Brg_Loads_June_30 _2015.pdf PDF
Distribution_Statement_Tech_Data.pdf PDF
16-R-4601_Q A__6.docx DOCX document
DEC_Report_1518.105 _MTW_Dock_Trial_Loads_July_1 _2015.pdf PDF
J-6_Contractor_Price_Breakdown_REV-2.xls XLS spreadsheet
N32205-16-R-4601_AMEND_0003.pdf PDF
0125_A_Main_Deck_Steel_Renewal_REV-1.pdf PDF
0802_B_HVAC_Duct_Replacement_REV-1.pdf PDF
16-R-4601_Q A__5.docx DOCX document
N32205-16-R-4601_AMEND_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-1_REV-1_AMEND_0002.pdf PDF
N32205-16-R-4601_AMEND_0001.pdf PDF
Section_B_REV-1.pdf PDF
J-6_Contractor_Price_Breakdown_REV-1.xls XLS spreadsheet
16-R-4601_Q A__3.docx DOCX document
16-R-4601_Q A__4.docx DOCX document
16-R-4601_Q A__1.docx DOCX document
16-R-4601_Q A__2.docx DOCX document
J-6_Contractor_Price_Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-4_Schedule_of_Government_Furnished_Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-5_Manhour_Chart.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-1_Work_Item_(WI)_Package_(Specifications)(Base) —
RFP_N32205-16-R-4601_MTW_ESLP.pdf PDF
J-6_Contractor_Price_Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-3_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_(CDRLs).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-7_MSC_Drydock_Eval_Form.doc DOC document
J-2_WI_Package_(Specifications)(Post_Shakedown_Avail) —
J-9_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
J-11_Technical_Non_Disclosure_Agreement.docx DOCX document
J-8_Request_for_Spec_Clarification.doc DOC document
USS_MTW_Shipcheck_Opportunity_Notice.docx DOCX document
Show all 43

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO:

FACSIMILE:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (Insert Date and Time) to (Insert Contract Specialist Name and fax Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of XXXXXXXXXX at XXX-XXX-XXXX. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, Name

Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Name and address

Contract Specialist

From:

(Name and Address of Organization)

(Point of Contact Name)

(Facsimile/Phone Number)

(E-mail Address)

To (Point of Contact Name)

XXXXXXX

(Facsimile Number)

XXXXXXX

(E-mail Address)

XXXXXX@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD:

DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1.

Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

MSC V1.1 (23 July 2013)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .