J.1(b) Attachment 4 Past Performance Relevancy Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80ARC025R0001
About this file
This document is a PWS (Performance Work Statement) Requirements Matrix and Past Performance Relevancy Matrix for the NASA Ames Research Center Facilities Support Services II (AFSS II) solicitation. The matrix is designed for offerors to detail their proposed work allocation across multiple PWS sections, including management and administration, maintenance, hazardous materials handling, safety, and equipment maintenance. Offerors must specify the percentage of work to be performed by the prime contractor and major subcontractors for each PWS section, with percentages required to total 100% per section.
The matrix also includes a section for past performance references, where prime contractors and major subcontractors must identify their previous contract experience relevant to specific PWS requirements. Contractors must indicate whether they served as a prime or subcontractor and mark which PWS sections their past performance references align with, such as contract management, maintenance programs, reactive maintenance, and safety planning. This detailed matrix helps NASA evaluate the technical capabilities and relevant experience of potential contractors for the facilities support services contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposed PWS Matrix
| Proposed Allocation of PWS Requirements by Team Member | |||||||
| State Percentage of Requirements Proposed to be Performed on this Contract for the Offeror and its Major Subcontractor(s) | |||||||
| PWS | |||||||
| Section | PWS | ||||||
| Description | (Insert Company Name of Prime Offeror) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #1, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #2, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #3, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #4, if proposed) | Total | |
| 5 excluding 5.08.h | Management & Administration | 0% | |||||
| 6.09.a thru 6.09.c (also 11.03) | FMCS Maintenance | 0% | |||||
| 7.02 | Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) | 0% | |||||
| 7.09.b | CMMS - Maximo | 0% | |||||
| 7.03.a thru 7.03.c | Maintenance Program | 0% | |||||
| 8 | Reactive Maintenance (Trouble Calls) | 0% | |||||
| 9.01.c, 9.05.d through 9.05.h) | Hazardous materials handling/support | 0% | |||||
| 5.02.b, 6.08.e, 7.08.e, 11.06 | Lifting Devices and Equipment Maintenance | 0% | |||||
| 5.08.h | Safety & Health Plan | 0% |
Instructions to Offerors:
The Offeror (Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed) must complete this PWS Requirements Matrix to state its proposed approach for which PWS requirements for this contract will be performed by the Prime Contractor, and its Major Subcontractors, if proposed. For each PWS Section above, state the percentage of work the Prime Contractor and each of its Major Subcontractors, if proposed, will perform on this contract. The percentages assigned to the Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed, should sum to 100% for each PWS Section in Column H. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is less than 100% in Column H then the Government will conclude that the remaining percentage of work will be performed by the Offeror's subcontracts that do not meet the criteria to classify as a Major Subcontractor. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is greater than 100% in Column H then the Government will reduce the percentage of work to be performed for that PWS Section for the Prime and each Major Subcontractor by the average percentage over 100% (i.e., (Proposed percentage over 100%/total prime and major subcontracts = amount each prime and major subcontractor proposed to perform). Enter numbers in the green fields only. The template will automatically sum the inputs. The Offeror may add additional columns between current Column E and F if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
Examples to Offeror to Demonstrate How to Provide Inputs in Matrix:
Example 1 (1 Prime/1 Sub): Prime Contractor is proposed to perform all the work for Section 5 Management and Administration. Enter "100" in cell D4 and "0" in cells E4 through H4. Cell I4 will display "100%". Example 2 (1 Prime/2 Major Subs): Major Subs are proposed to perform all the work for PWS 11.06 Lifting Devices and Equipment Maintenance equally. Enter "0" in cell D11, "50" in cell E11, "50" in cell F11, and "0" in cell G11 and H11. Cell I11 will display "100%". Please verify that inputs accurately reflect your proposed breakdown of PWS work before submitting the completed Matrix with the Offerors proposal.
Past Performance Ref Matrix
| Proposed Relevance of Past Performance Contract References in Relations to the Contract PWS Requirements by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors) | ||||||||||
| Identify which PWS Requirements from this Contract were Performed on Each Past Performance Reference by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors) | ||||||||||
| Performed as a Prime or Subcontractor on Past Performance Contract Reference | Contract Management and Administration (PWS 5 excluding 5.08.h) | Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Program (PWS 7.02) | Maintenance Program (PWS 7.03.a thru 7.03.c) | Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) (PWS 7.02.b) | FMCS Operations Support Services (PWS 6.09.a thru 6.09.c and PWS 11.03) | Reactive Maintenance Procedures and Requirements (PWS 8) | Hazardous materials handling/support (PWS 9.01.c, 9.05.d, 9.05.e, 9.05.f, 9.05.h, 9.05.j) | Lifting Devices and Equipment Maintenance and Repair (PWS 11.06) | Safety & Health Plan (PWS 5.08.h) | |
| Prime Offeror Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #1 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #2 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #3 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #4 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
Instructions to Offerors:
Offerors shall complete this past performance contract reference proposed relevancy matrix. In Column A, for each individual past performance contract reference, provide the name of the Prime Contractor or Major Subcontractor the past performance contract reference applies to. Also, include the contract number and contract name for each past performance contract reference. In Column B, include a “P” or “S” to indicate whether the Prime Offeror or its Major Subcontractor(s) was a Prime Contractor or a Subcontractor for that particular past performance contract reference. For all remaining columns, state an “X” in each column where the individual past performance contract reference included similar experience to the requirements in PWS Section identified in Row 3 of Columns B-L. The Offeror may add additional rows after row 23 if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .