80ARC025R0001 Amendment 00002_Final.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

NASA Ames Research Center M/S 241-1 Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001

ARC-JAC

80ARC025R0001

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment (00002) is to make a revision to the Request for Proposal (RFP).

A summary of changes is provided starting on page 2 of this amendment.

All other aspects of the RFP not covered in this amendment remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Anna M. Foreman, Contract Officer

1 4

80ARC025R0001 Amendment 0002

Continuation of SF 30, Block 14:

The purpose of this amendment (00002) is to revise the RFP to incorporate the following changes (please note that all changes are identified in red font):

1. Attachments J.1(b) Attachments 6 Facilities Capital Cost of Money Factors Computation (FORM CASB-CMF) and Attachment J.1(b) Attachment 7 Contract Facilities Capital Cost of Money (DD Form 1861) were unintentionally omitted from the original RFP posting and are included in this amendment.

2. A revision to Section L.2(a)2 Model Contract is as follows:

Changed From:

Model Contract – Include a completed model contract by submitting the following:

Revised To:

Model Contract - Include a completed model contract by submitting the entire text of Sections A through K of the RFP with all required fill-ins completed. The following items i. though x. are provided as a guide to assist Offerors with identifying the required fill-ins. Offerors are strongly encouraged to review the RFP thoroughly to identify all required fill-ins.

3. Revisions to the first paragraph of Section L.3(a) and the second paragraph of Section M.3 are as follows:

Changed From:

(a) – PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR (VOLUME II) INSTRUCTIONS

An Offeror’s past performance record indicates the relevant quantitative and qualitative aspects of performing services or delivering products similar in size and content to the requirements of this acquisition. For purposes of the past performance factor, “Major Subcontractor” is defined as any subcontractor that is proposed to perform an estimated $15,000,000 or more of the PWS requirements over the five-year performance period of this contract or $3,000,000 or more in any one year of this contract. Additionally, and at the discretion of the Offeror, a “Major Subcontractor” for purposes of the past performance factor can also include any first-tier subcontractor that is specifically identified in Offeror’s proposal that does not meet the aforementioned thresholds for a Major Subcontractor, if (1) said first-tier subcontractor is a small business (as determined under Subpart 19.1 of the FAR); AND (2) the prime Offeror does not independently demonstrate capabilities and past performance necessary for award. In such cases, all of the Past Performance Volume II proposal submission instructions in Section L and Past Performance evaluation instructions in Section M of this solicitation that apply to “Major Subcontractors” who meet the above dollar thresholds will also apply to the proposed first-tier small business subcontractors that do not meet the above dollar value thresholds. If applicable, Offerors may provide the experience or past performance of a parent or affiliated or predecessor company to an Offeror (including Joint Venture prime partner companies and/or a parent or affiliated company that is being otherwise proposed as a Major Subcontractor on this effort) where the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor will affect the performance of the Offeror. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor company (its workforce, management, facilities or other resources) shall be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent or affiliate or resources of the predecessor will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

Revised To:

(a) – PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR (VOLUME II) INSTRUCTIONS

An Offeror’s past performance record indicates the relevant quantitative and qualitative aspects of performing services or delivering products similar in size and content to the requirements of this acquisition. For purposes of the past performance factor, “Major Subcontractor” is defined as any subcontractor that is proposed to perform an estimated $15,000,000 or more of the PWS requirements over the five-year performance period of this contract or $3,000,000 or more in any one year of this contract. Additionally, and at the discretion of the Offeror, a “Major Subcontractor” for purposes of the past performance factor can also include in its Past Performance Proposal any other of its first-tier subcontractors that are small businesses (as determined under Subpart

19.1 of the FAR) that do not meet the aforementioned dollar thresholds to be considered a Major Subcontractor, but only if the combined past performance contract references of the prime Offeror and its Major Subcontractor(s) do not demonstrate relevant past performance in each of the PWS sections identified in the “Past Perf Reference Matrix” Tab of Section J.1(b) Attachment

4. For example, it could be the case that the proposed past performance contract references of the Prime Offeror and its Major Subcontractors, when combined, do not demonstrate relevant experience in each of the PWS Sections that are identified in the “Past Perf Reference Matrix” Tab , thereby leaving gaps. It is with respect to such gaps, and only such gaps, for which a prime Offeror, at its own discretion, can propose the past performance of first-tier small business subcontractors on its team that otherwise do not classify as “Major Subcontractors”. In such cases, all of the Past Performance Volume II proposal submission instructions in Section L and Past Performance evaluation instructions in Section M of this solicitation that apply to “Major Subcontractors” and their past performance references, will also apply to the proposed first-tier small business subcontractors. If applicable, Offerors may provide the experience or past performance of a parent or affiliated or predecessor company to an Offeror (including Joint Venture prime partner companies and/or a parent or affiliated company that is being otherwise proposed as a Major Subcontractor on this effort) where the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor will affect the performance of the Offeror. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor company (its workforce, management, facilities or other resources) shall be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent or affiliate or resources of the predecessor will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

Changed From:

M.3 PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR (VOLUME II) EVALUATION

For purposes of past performance, the term “Offeror” refers to a prime contractor and its Major Subcontractors. Accordingly, the past performance of Major Subcontractors shall also be evaluated and attributed to the Offeror. The past performance of a Major Subcontractor will be compared to the PWS Section(s) proposed to be performed by that subcontractor on the AFSS II contract in assigning the overall past performance Level of Confidence rating to the Offeror. The past performance of any proposed small business first-tier subcontractors below the dollar thresholds stated in Section L for a Major Subcontractor under the past performance factor will only be evaluated if (1) said first-tier subcontractor is a small business; AND (2) the prime offeror does not independently demonstrate capabilities and past performance necessary for award.

Revised To:

M.3 PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR (VOLUME II) EVALUATION

For purposes of past performance, the term “Offeror” refers to a prime contractor and its Major Subcontractors (including first-tier small business subcontractors that meet the criteria identified in Section L.3(a)). Accordingly, the past performance of Major Subcontractors shall also be evaluated and attributed to the Offeror. The past performance of a Major Subcontractor will be compared to the PWS Section(s) proposed to be performed by that subcontractor on the AFSS II contract in assigning the overall past performance Level of Confidence rating to the Offeror.

4. Section J.1(b) Attachment 4 has been deleted and replaced with a new version to correct certain inconsistences between the “Proposed PWS Matrix" and "Past Performance Ref Matrix" tabs and update the instructions in the Proposed PWS Matrix Tab. The updated attachment has been posted under 80ARC025R0001 Amendment 0002.

5. FAR clause 52.234-2 has been deleted from the RFP and clause 52.243-2 has been added.

6. The following PWS attachments have been deleted and replaced with new versions to correct the access issue. These attachments have been posted under RFP amendment 0002.

PWS Section 6 attachments:

J2.06 Operations_Final J2.06.407 FCA Report Sample_Final J2.06.408 - 2 O&M_Final J2.06.412-1 Generators Operating Hours_Final J2.06.412-2 Pumps Operating Hours_Final J2.06.415 Sample Alarm System Report_Final J2.06.427-1 Elevator Certs_Final J2.06.428 Sample Air Compressor Report_Final J2.06.429 Oily Water Separators Report_Final J2.06.430 Sample Calibration Report_Final J2.06.432-3 Failed Devices Report_Final

PWS Section 7 attachments:

J2.07.12 Maximo Definitions_Final J2.07.403 Fire Extinguishers Report_Final

PWS Section 9 Attachments:

J2.09.404-1 Haz Mat Log and Sample_Final

All of the aforementioned attachments have been uploaded in a zip file named "Amendment 0002 Excel Attachments".

End of Amendment 00002