Atch 12 - List Instructions for Cod CDRLs ADPs_06 Feb 2012.pdf
PDF 819 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Clear / Cod Upgrade EWR (UEWR)
- Solicitation number
- HQ0147-11-R-0002
- Issued by
-
DOD Missile Defense Agency
About this file
Atch 12 - List Instructions for Cod CDRLs ADPs_06 Feb 2012
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL) and AUTOMATED DATA PRODUCT (ADP)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. General
Where possible all CDRL and ADP items delivered will be updates to documents generated under the Thule Contract. The contractor shall update the applicable UEWR common documents to incorporate Clear specific information into the baseline. These updates are intended to provide one single library of documents representative of the UEWR sensors and associated impedimenta.
Document Security - Security Instructions found in the DD254 for this contract will apply to CDRLs.
Public Release - All information related to the program must be submitted in accordance with Special Contract
Requirement H-4, Public Release of Information.
Internet - Unclassified controlled MDA information must not be posted in unprotected form, on any system network (WEB site) directly accessible from the public internet.
Encryption - The CDRL defines the data that is to be delivered to the Government by the contractor. This data may be in electronic format and unclassified material may be delivered via the Government IDE Integrated Data
Environment (IDE). Classified material will be delivered via appropriate mail delivery or other Government approved methods.
Automated Data Products (ADP) - ADPs are items that would be listed on the data accession list, available to the
Government as electronic data to be provided via IDE.
Formats - CDRLs and ADPs are to be prepared and delivered on plain backgrounds for ease of downloading and word processing (Microsoft office suite) use. CDRLs will be in the format and contain information specified in the DD Form 1423. ADPs will follow the contractor format. These instructions apply to Exhibit A and to all subsequent Exhibits added to this contract.
2. Data Item Description (DID)
Data Item Descriptions entered on the CDRL, were selected from the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization
Information System (ASSIST) data base available at http://assist .dps.dla.mil.
3. Data Approval Requirements
Selected data requires approval before the submission is considered final. The letter “A” appearing in Block 8 of the
CDRL designates such data. The approving authority shall be the PCO. The absence of an “A” in Block 8 does not forfeit or otherwise affect the Government’s right to comment on the CDRL. Unless otherwise specified, resubmittal of disapproved data, or data approvals which are subject to the incorporation of comments, shall be so identified and delivered by the next CDRL submission or as directed by the PCO. The requirements applicable to the original submittal shall apply to the resubmittal data. Should the Contractor disagree with a resubmittal requirement, the Contractor shall submit comments in writing to the PCO within 15 calendar days of receipt of data disapproval notification.
4. Distribution Statements
The following distribution statement shall be included on the cover page to protect all technical data:
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT F: Further dissemination only as directed by DoD, Missile Defense Agency, ATTN:
Procuring Contracting Officer, MDA/DACX, Building 5222, Martin Road, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898, or higher authority.
5. Data Rights
The Contractor shall affix the following data rights legend to all CDRL or ADP documents.
Any document produced under this contract and posted as an ADP or CDRL shall have a legend asserting Government data rights IAW DFAR 252.227-7013, Rights in technical data—Noncommercial items.
Unlimited Government Data Rights
Contract No.____________________
Contractor Name____________________
Contractor Address____________________
Expiration Date____________________
All data shall be delivered with at least Government purpose rights unless approved by the program office in writing.
Add the following Export Control Statement to all documents assigned distribution Statement F:
WARNING: This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C. Section 2751 et. seq.) or the Executive order 12470. Violation of these export laws is subject to sever criminal penalties
Data which is not available on IDE, such as classified data, shall be delivered via hardcopy, CD or other Government-approved method to MDA/SNU. Additional copies shall be delivered to the following address:
ESC/HSIGS MDA/SNU AFSPC/A5
Document Control (if Classified) Document Control (if classified) 150 Vandenberg St, Suite 1105
1050 E. Stewart Avenue 11 Barksdale Street,Bldg 1614 Peterson AFB, CO 80914-4580
Peterson, AFB CO 80914-2902 Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-1700
CDRL List Approval OPR OCR
B001 Cost Data Summary Report (CDSR) No MDA/SNU MDA/SNU
B002 Functional Cost Hour No MDA/SNU MDA/SNU
B003 Reserved
B004 Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR) No MDA/SNU MDA/SNU
B005 Contract Performance Report (CPR) No MDA/SNU MDA/SNU
B006 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNUA
FSPC/A5F/
A3F
ESC/HSIGS
B007 Program Protection Management Plan (PPMP)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNUA
FSPC/A5F/
A3F/A6S/IP
, 13
SWS/MA
B008 Reserved
B009 Reserved
B010 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNUA
FSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
ESC/HSIGS
B011 Request for Deviations and Waivers Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNUA
FSPC/A5F
B012 Site Security Management Plan (SSMP)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNUA
FSPC/A5F/
A3F/A6S/IP
, 13
SWS/MA
B013 Specification Change Notices (SCNs)
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
ESC/HSIGS
B014 DT&E Test Plans and Procedures
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F
ESC/HSIGS
B015 Software Test Plans and Procedures
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F
ESC/HSIGS
B016 Data Accession List (DAL) No MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F
B017 Technical Data Package (TDP) (AutoCad Compatible)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B018 Facility Design Review Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ADSPC/A5F
B019 Scientific and Technical Reports
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F
B020 Technical Publication Plan
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B021 Software Users Manual (SUM)
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B022 Reserved
B023 Information Assurance Administrators Guide (AG)
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
B024 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) &
Critical Items List (CIL) Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B025 Technical Orders (TOs) for UEWR
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B026 Software Version Description (SVD) Document and
Software Source Code
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
DSC
Contractor and HSV
Labs
B027 Reserved
B028 Delta Design Review (DDR)
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
B029 Reserved
B030 Logistics Data Product
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A4M
B031 Mission Assurance Implementation Plan
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F
B032 Safety Assessment Report
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F
B033 Information Assurance Users Guide
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
AFSPC/A5F/
A3F/A6S
B034 Information Assurance Implementation Plan
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS/
AFSPC /
A5F/A3F/
A6S
B035 Reserved
B036 Risk Management Plan
MDA/SNU/
MDA/DE
B037 Reserved
B038 Small Business Utilization and Participation Data Yes MDA/SB MDA/SB
B039 DIACAP Executive Package
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS/
AFSPC /
A5F/A3F/
A6S
B040 Reserved
B041 Reserved
B042 Reserved
B043 Software Design Description (SDD) for MAS, STS, SPS & REX
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
B044 Software Product Specification (SPS) for MAS, STS, SPS & REX
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
B045 Software Requirements Specification (SRS) for MAS, STS, SPS & REX
Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
B046 Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
B047 Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) Yes MDA/SNU
MDA/SNU
ESC/HSIGS
ADP List
ADP 1 Identification of Required Support Equipment List
ADP 2 Studies & Analysis Reports
ADP 3 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP)
ADP 4 Program Management Review /Monthly Minutes
ADP 5 Construction Schedule - Cape Cod Only
ADP 6 PMT Charts to include Quality / Manufacturing Metrics
ADP 7 Facility Verification & Cross Reference Matrix - Cape Cod Only
ADP 8 Transportation Plan
ADP 9 UEWR Training Plan
ADP 10 Facility Equipment Warranties – Cape Cod Only
ADP 11 Facility Equipment Operator & Maintenance Manuals – Cape Cod Only
ADP 12 Facility Equipment List of Recommended Spares – Cape Cod Only
ADP 13 Facility Equipment Preventive Maintenance Summary – Cape Cod Only
ADP14 Facility As-Built Drawings
ADP 15 Reserved
ADP 16 Software Development Plan (SDP)
ADP 17 Reserved
ADP 18 Software Test Report
ADP 19 Reserved
ADP 20 DT&E Test Reports
ADP 21 Reserved
ADP 22 Quality Assurance Plan
ADP 23 Reliability, Availability, Maintainability And Testability (RAM&T) Program Plan
ADP 24 Corrective Action Reports (CARs)
ADP 25 Foreign Object Elimination (FOE) Program Plan
ADP 26 Reserved
ADP 27 Facility Cable Run Summary – Cape Cod Only
ADP 28 Human Systems Integration Program Plan
ADP29
ICD UEWR Integrated Tactical Warning / Attack Assessment and Space Surveillance
Network Users
ADP 30 Reliability Design Criteria
ADP 31 Maintainability Design Criteria
ADP 32 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Control Plan
ADP 33 Dynamic Object Oriented Requirements System (DOORS) database for delivery
ADP 34 Human System Integration Design Assessment Report
ADP 35 Health Hazard Assessment Report
ADP 36 Environmental / Accident Incident Report (As Required)
ADP 37 Product Parts Plan
ADP 38 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) data summaries
ADP 39 Maintainability Math Models, Allocations and Predictions
ADP 40 Reliability Math Models, Allocations and Predictions
ADP 41 Joint Master Schedule (JMS)
ADP42 Specialty Engineering Management Plan (SpEMP)
ADP43
Interface Design Description (IDD) for Mission Application Software / Simulation & Toll
Software (MAS/STS)
ADP 44 Reserved
ADP45 Reserved
ADP 46 Technical Performance Measures (TPM)
ADP 47 Systems Safety Program Plan
ADP 48 Non-Franchise Distributor - Microcircuits Report
ADP 49 Reserved
ADP 50 Reserved
ADP 51 Contractor Furnished Equipment
ADP 52 Ship Readiness Review
ADP 53 Test Readiness Review
ADP 54 Integrated Support Plan
ADP 55 Facilities Requirements Document Inputs – Clear Only
ADP 56 Hazardous Material Management Program (HMMP)
ADP 57 Contractor Quality Control (CQC) Plan
ADP 58 O&M Training
ADP 59 Reserved
ADP 60 Requirements Verification Traceability Matrix
ADP 61 STIG List
ADP 62 Contractor Configuration Management Plan
ADP 63 Parts Management Process (PMP) Plan
CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO: 012
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B001
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: COST DATA SUMMARY REPORT (DD FORM 1921)
3. SUBTITLE: Contractor Cost Data Report - DD 1921
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-FNCL-81565C/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: Annually
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS Applicability: The contents of this CDRL are applicable to all CLINs.
Block 4 Data shall be submitted to OSD Contractor Cost Data Reporting Program Office (CCDR¬PO) via Electronic Data
Interchange (EDI). Electronic Data Transmission shall be in format consistent with Accredited Standards (AS). The contractor will deliver the 1921 report in a format compatible with Microsoft Excel 2007 or greater. 1921 shall include all contract cost (prime and subcontractor) of system elements as specified in your submission of the CWBS CDRL A003.
Blocks 12 and 13 Contractor will submit 1921 report 60 calendar days after the end of the calendar year, beginning with
CY2012 data. A final submission will be submitted at the end of the contract.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER__X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UERWR CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B002
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: FUNCTIONAL COST HOUR REPORT (DD Form 1921-1)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-FNCL-81566C/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: See Block 16
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy IDE
16. REMARKS: Applicability: The contents of this CDRL are applicable to all CLINs.
Block 4 1921-1 submittals will be reported at the same level as the 1921 reports as defined in Government Cost and
Software Reporting Plan (DD 2794). Submissions will be in a Microsoft Excel 2007 or greater format.
Blocks 10, 12 and 13 Contractor will submit 1921-1 report 60 calendar days after the end of the calendar year beginning with CY2012 data. Following submissions will occur no later than 60 calendar days after the end of the following calendar years. A final submission will be submitted at the end of the contract.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER__X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B003
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: UEWR CONTRACT WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (CWBS) AND
DICTIONARY
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MGMT-81334D/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 30 calendar days after contract definitization
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: IDE
16. REMARKS:
Block 4 Contractor CWBS format acceptable. Contractor will submit CWBS in a form compatible with Windows Office
2007.
Block 13 Subsequent reports are due within 30 calendar days of program changes requiring a revised CWBS.
Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER X
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B004
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT (CFSR)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MGMT-81468/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: Quarterly
11. AS OF DATE: See Block 16
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Applicability: The content of this CDRL is applicable to all CLINs.
Block 4: Include reconciliation with dollar totals in the Contractor Performance Report (CPR) for those months in which the CFSR is submitted. Include summary of all CLINs as well as an individual worksheet for each CLIN.
Projections in blocks 12, 13, and 14 of the CFSR shall be monthly for the next six months, then quarterly for the remainder of the government fiscal year, then by government fiscal year to contract completion.
Block 12 and 13: Initial and subsequent CFSR submissions shall be delivered 20 working days after the end of the contractor’s accounting quarter, beginning with December 2012 data.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO: B005
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: CONTRACT PERFORMANCE REPORT (CPR)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MGMT-81466A/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: Monthly
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS:
a. Electronic copies shall be provided using the United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business
(UN/CEFACT) XML standard. In addition, the submission shall include one human readable backup (XLS, DOC, etc.) of
Formats 1-4. Format 5 may be submitted in a human readable form factor. The same human readable file may be used for
Formats 1-5 (.pdf files are not acceptable). Submissions shall not include macros, program executables, embedded objects or external links. In addition to the monthly CPR, monthly wInsight XML files and periodic submissions of a wInsight history file that contains CPR reporting level EV data from inception is required. The wInsight equivalent to this is the
WSA backup file. Requiring office shall receive an electronic notification from the contractor that the data is available.
All other addressees, shall only receive an electronic notification that the data is available.
b. Format 1 reporting shall be at Level 4 for all elements except Prime Mission Product elements , These WBS element shall be at Level 6 of the CWBS thereby providing visibility of the major hardware, software and integration/assembly components. Lower level reporting may be required for areas of significant technical, cost and /or schedule risk. The contractor, with Government approval, shall update Format 1 reporting levels requirement at major program transitions
(e.g.,program start, PDR, CDR start of test program).
c. Current month and cumulative cost (CV) and schedule variance (SV) explanations are required. Format 5 shall incorporate problem analyses and narrative explanations (highlighting root cause, impact, corrective action and expected recovery) for Format 1 elements when cost/schedule variances fall within the following categories (report the higher value either dollar amount):
- Current period cost variances exceeding $100K
-Current period schedule variances exceeding $100K
-Cumulative cost variances exceeding $500K
- Cumulative schedule variances exceeding $500K
- Variances at completion exceeding $500K
-Other cost and schedule variances or technical performance issues that are causing or are likely to cause significant schedule delays or cost overruns.
-The contractor with Government approval shall review and update threshold levels as required. As required, lower level detail maybe requested.
d. All Budget at Completion (BAC) changes on Format 1 shall be explained in Format 5. All Management Reserve (MR) transactions, including the work scope to be covered by the MR, and the amount of MR distributed to the applicable WBS element shall be explained on Format 5. Undistributed Budget (UB) transactions shall be explained in a similar manner.
The composition of UB, including Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) number and the associated contract modification dollar values (NTEs etc), shall also be listed in Format 5.
e. Specific corrective actions, forecasted closure date, and impact to the Estimate at Completion (EAC) shall be included in each variance narrative. Schedule variance narratives shall identify significant missed milestones, impact to major milestones, and expected recovery dates. Contractor shall go to lowest CWBS level necessary to completely explain the variances.
f. “Best case,” “Worst case,” and “Most Likely” EACs at the total contract level are required.
g. Format 2 of the CPR shall provide the contractor’s functional breakdown structure (e.g. Engineering, Manufacturing, Program Management, Quality, Test) or other organizational breakdown, e.g., by Integrated Product Teams (IPTs). No formal monthly variance analysis is required for Format 2; however, the contractor should be able to correlate the variances in Format 1 to Format 2.
h. Formats 3 and 4 should report the next 6 months in columns 4-9 and quarterly in columns 10-13. Column 14 will have the balance. Format 4 should be EAC headcount. Any change in the Format 3 total Performance Measurement Baseline
(PMB), and/or any change in the current or forecast periods that exceeds 5% shall be explained in detail in Format 5. Any change in current, forecast period, or total manpower for each Format 4 element, that exceeds 10% shall be explained in
Format 5. Explanation of the changes to the PMB shall include the movement of scope, schedule and budget for all periods.
i. The Government reserves the right to review and modify, through negotiations, the variance analysis requirements and reporting levels for Formats 1, 2, 3, and 4 during the performance of the contract.
j. Initial submission, Formats 1-5 are due 23 calendar days after first full accounting period. Formats 1-5, are due 12 days after end of previous monthly reporting period.
k. Format 1 will be reported by WBS, Formats 2 and 4 will be reported by IPT.
Other Notes:
• Block 9: For Official Use Only, exemption b)4) applies.
• Block 11: Last day of contractor’s monthly accounting period.
• Technical data or computer software that is not properly included on a data rights assertion list incorporated into the contract shall NOT be delivered with any restrictive markings.
• Technical data or computer software that is properly included on the data rights assertion list incorporated into the contract and containing "Limited Rights" or "Restricted Rights" legends as specified in DFARS 252.227-7013 and
252.227-7014 shall NOT be delivered under or in conjunction with this CDRL without prior approval of the Contracting
Officer or the Contracting Officer’s Representative.
• Under no circumstance shall technical data or computer software to be delivered under or in conjunction with this CDRL be marked "Proprietary" (or any similar nonconforming marking).
• "Technical data" is defined at DFARS 252.227-7013(a)(14) and means recorded information, regardless of the form or method of the recording, of a scientific or technical nature (including computer software documentation).
• "Computer software" is defined at DFARS 252.227-7014(a)(4).
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP TM OTHER X
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B006
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE
3. SUBTITLE: INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MGMT¬81650/T See Block 16
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.3.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: Monthly
11. AS OF DATE: As Required
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Block 4: Prepare IMS data in electronic format IAW current EVM policy ANSI/EIA – 748, for file format, utilize detailed instructions contained in DID DI-MGMT-81650. Utilize DoD All sub-contractor activities, that meet the the reporting threshold, shall be included in the IMS. Submitted schedules shall be compatible with Microsoft
Project 2003, or higher and in its original format.
Blocks 12 and 13: The contractor shall deliver the updated Integrated Master Plan (IMP) 15 days after contract award.
This will enable the Government to approve the IMP in sufficient time to generate the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS).
The first IMS monthly submission will be due 15 days prior to the Integrated Baseline Review. Subsequent submissions for monthly performance status reporting against the baseline plan, are due no later than fifteen (15) working day after the close of the fiscal month. The Government has Thirty (30) days to review and comment.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___ X __
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B007.
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: UEWR PROGRAM PROTECTION MANAGEMENT PLAN (PPMP)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MISC-80711A/T See Block 16
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.4
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: See Block 16
11. AS OF DATE: See Block 16
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Block 4: Contractor shall update existing UEWR Program Protection Management Plan to address
Clear-unique program protection efforts, utilizing supporting data from the GMD Program Protection Management Plan
(PPMP). The Contractor shall outline how they will assist the Government in protecting the BMDS program; specifically to ensure that the research, development and acquisition (RD&A) of BMDS capabilities, systems and technologies is not hindered, compromised or in any way defeated prior to fielding and, as a result, contribute to the survivability and increased longevity required once fielded. This requires security processes and structures that establish and assure the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of information used in conjunction with BMDS RD&A and supporting contracts.
Contractor security processes include, but are not limited to, identifying: (1) aspects of, or items within, the UEWR program, classified or unclassified, that require protection e.g. Critical Program Information (CPI) systems and/or technology (2) classification management; (3) physical, personnel and operations security; (4) international security, technology transfer and foreign disclosure.
10. Preparation Instructions and Content Requirements - Inputs should conform to the current PPMP format. Contractor format is acceptable but should, as a minimum, contain the following information:
A. System and Program Description, detailing unique UEWR characteristics (e.g. capabilities and structures)
B. Program and related information impacting CPI (e.g. critical information, systems & technologies), and related threats
(e.g. foreign collection threat).
C. Information Assurance Strategy
Blocks 10,11, 12 and 13: Submit PPMP 120 calendar days after contract definitization. Updates annually or as required.
B. EXHIBIT: A
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER_X____
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
1. CONTRACTOR: DATA ITEM NO.: B008
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: UEWR LOGISTICS SUPPORT PLAN (LSP) AND SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSIS
PLAN (SAP)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-ILSS-80095
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 3.6.3
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: Draft 30 calendar days prior to PDR and Final 30 calendar days prior to CDR
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Use the existing support plans as quides to incorporate CLEAR UEWR. LSP will be updated for any major changes in the program.
Contractor format is acceptable. Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide. Including the following:
Deliver an Integrated Logistics Support Plan consistent with the DID with emphasis on documenting and delivery of requirements for supply support, training, computer resources, support equipment, technical order and data requirements, consistent with the Air Force’s two level maintenance concept and program office direction. Review system documentation and recommend design documents and formats for release to the Government. Define manpower and personnel requirements for system sustainment and notify the Government of staffing recommendations and shortfalls against the developers staffing recommendations. Plan for and support transition of the system and it’s impedimenta to the Government for sustainment.
Plan for and design to minimize obsolescence and lifecycle costs. As a minimum the contractor shall provide analysis and documentation of the following:
a) Best practices the contractor has identified to minimize system lifecycle and obsolescence costs
b) Actions the contractor is taking to address the UEWR goals of minimizing lifecycle and obsolescence costs.
c) Analysis of the lifecycle cost impacts of hardware and software decisions.
d) Recommendations and timeline for Government action to address open issues. The contractor is expected to bring issues to the Government’s attention while they are actionable.
e) Self assessment of the contractor’s implementation of obsolescence and lifecycle cost reduction strategies.
f) Technology independence and parts obsolescence risk mitigation plans;
g) Recommendations to reduce life cycle costs by modifying the support concept
Contractor format is acceptable. Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide. Including the following:
Deliver an Integrated Logistics Support Plan consistent with the DID with emphasis on documenting and delivery of requirements for supply support, training, computer resources, support equipment, technical order and data requirements, consistent with the Air Force’s two level maintenance concept and program office direction. Review system documentation and recommend design documents and formats for release to the Government. Define manpower and personnel requirements for system sustainment and notify the Government of staffing recommendations and shortfalls against the developers staffing recommendations. Plan for and support transition of the system and it’s impedimenta to the Government for sustainment.
Plan for and design to minimize obsolescence and lifecycle costs. As a minimum the contractor shall provide analysis and documentation of the following:
a) Best practices the contractor has identified to minimize system lifecycle and obsolescence costs
b) Actions the contractor is taking to address the UEWR goals of minimizing lifecycle and obsolescence costs.
c) Analysis of the lifecycle cost impacts of hardware and software decisions.
d) Recommendations and timeline for Government action to address open issues. The contractor is expected to bring issues to the Government’s attention while they are actionable.
e) Self assessment of the contractor’s implementation of obsolescence and lifecycle cost reduction strategies.
f) Technology independence and parts obsolescence risk mitigation plans;
g) Recommendations to reduce life cycle costs by modifying the support concept
Block 8, 10 and 12: Government review and approval (or disapproval) and comments will be provided within 30 days of the review of each document or CDRL submittal unless otherwise specified.
Blocks 10, 12, & 13: Align the CDRL delivery for delivery prior to Critical Design Review.
Block 14: Post to an accessible data base to distribute in electronic copy
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B010
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSALS (ECPs)
3. SUBTITLE: ECPs and Advance Change/Study Notices (ACSNs)
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-CMAN-80639C, DI-CMAN-80642C, DI-CMAN-80643C, DI-SAFT-80104 & DI-SAFT-80103
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.2.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: As Required
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: This CDRL applies to Specification Change Notices. Interface Change Notices, Notices of Revision, and Advance Change/Study Notices.
Block 4: 10.2 Revise to read as follows: The Engineering Change Proposal shall be in contractor format using ANSI/EIA-
649A as a guide.
Block 16: Contractor approves all Class II ECPs. An ECP is tentatively classified by the contractor. The ACO reviews all
Class II ECPs. If the ACO non-concurs with the tentative Class II determination the ECP becomes a Class I ECP.
This Data Item Description contains the requirements for preparation of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) for changes to the baseline system. An ECP is a change proposal resulting from the work task described by paragraph 5.3 of
ANSI/EIA-649A National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management dated August 1998 and approved by DOD on February 1. 1999. ECP submissions shall be one of three types: Specification Change Notice for a proposed change to the Level I System Baseline (ref: DID-CMAN-80639C & DID DI-CMAN-80643C). Interface Change Notice for a proposed change to an External Interface Control Document (ref: GMD Configuration Control Plan and GMD Interface
Control Plan), or Equipment Change accompanied by a Notice of Revision for a proposed change affecting system design, performance, production or support, ref: DI-CMAN-80642C.
The contractor shall prepare process and submit Advance Change Study Notices (ACSNs) to request a Request for
Proposal, or to suggest a change to the Government- controlled system baseline. The Government and Contractor will agree upon the time period for processing submissions under this CDRL. See additional instructions below.
All ECP paperwork and all blocks on the ACSN form must be completed before submittal, including the technical data
(description of change and identification of Statement of Work that govern the change), and the estimated cost for the effort. An ACSN number (#) may be obtained by calling by the Government Change Management Office, TBD. The
Government Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) will examine letters of transmittal submitted for any ECP/ACSN delivered to the Government. Said letters shall identify:
1. The Technical Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) person(s) (by name and organization), including a telephone number;
2. The suggested Government subject matter Office of OPR person(s) (by name and organization);
3. A suggested OPR (by name);
4. The ECP/ACSN number;
5. A brief technical description of change and associated primary Statement of Work paragraph; and
6. The estimated price.
The lack of any of the above will be cause for the Government PCO to reject the submitted package. Incomplete information will also be a basis for Government rejection of ECPs and ACSNs. Incomplete documents will be returned to the Originator for correction and resubmittal.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B011
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: REQUEST FOR DEVIATIONS AND WAIVERS
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-SAFT-80103, DI-SAFT-80104, DI-CMAN-80640C, DI-
SESS-81732
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.2.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: As Required
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Appendix A
16. REMARKS: The Request for Waiver (RFW) shall be prepared in contractor format.
The Request for Deviation shall be prepared in contractor format. The RFD content shall use ANSI/EIA-649A as a guide.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER____X
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B012
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: SITE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-CMAN-80643B
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.1.4
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
16. REMARKS: Prepare item in Data Item Description (DID) format.
Due 60 calendar days prior to start of on-site hardware installation.
This document prescribes requirements, restrictions, processes and procedures that are necessary to safeguard classified and sensitive program data from unauthorized disclosure at Clear AFS, Alaska and applies to MDA/BMDS Program
Personnel and contractors involved with the UEWR Radar program at Clear. This document does not supersede National
Security Policy. The MDA/SNU Program Office is responsible for the management of this document for the period of development/upgrade. The Site Security Management Plan is to be treated as a “living” document and will be reviewed and updated annually or as required.
Document content shall include guidance related to, incident reporting, security clearances, training (initial and refresher), debriefings, classification and marking/material controls/safeguarding, visit procedures, emergency procedures, camera policy; and any special security requirements, to include COMSEC and TEMPEST.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER_X____
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR.
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B013
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: SPECIFICATION CHANGE NOTICE (SCN)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-CMAN-80643C
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 52.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: As Required
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: As Required
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
16. REMARKS: Prepare item in Data Item Description (DID) format.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER__X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B014
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: DT&E TEST PLANS AND PROCEDURES
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-QCIC-80553A
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.4.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: DT&E Test Plans due 120 calendar days prior to formal test events. DT&E
Test Procedures due 75 calendar days prior to formal test event. Test Readiness Review (TRR) slides are due 7 working days prior to TRR. The Initial TRR is 90 days prior to Test start.
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: Subsequent TRRs are to be conducted 60/30/5 days prior to Test.
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Contractor format acceptable. Test Plans should include Requirements Description, Verification
Strategy, Reference Documents, Test Setup and Descriptions, Acceptance Criteria, and Verification Prerequisites. The detailed test procedure to be used by the Contractor during testing delineates the manner, method, and sequence of tests to be performed IAW test plan. The Test Procedures, as a minimum, shall contain the following information: a) requirement(s) being tested, b) test setup, c) detailed operations to be performed by the test operator d) Test Verification
Matrix mapping test requirements to specified paragraphs e) exact method of verifications, f) conditions to be maintained,
g) success criteria, h) data formats, i) analysis methods, or acceptance criteria. Test Procedures include Test Information
Sheets.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B015
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: SOFTWARE TEST PLANS AND PROCEDURES
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-IPSC-81438A
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.3.1
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 30 calendar days prior to FQT Test Readiness Review (TRR)
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
Submit updates as required. Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR: DATA ITEM NO.: B016
1. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: DATA ACCESSION LIST (DAL)
2. SUBTITLE:
3. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MISC-80711A/T, DI-MGMT-81453A
4. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.2.5.3
5. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
6. DD250 REQ: LT
7. APP CODE: N
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
9. FREQUENCY: Monthly
10. AS OF DATE: N/A
11. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 60 calendar days after contract award
12. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: 20th calendar day of each month
13. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
14. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
15. REMARKS:
16. DAL items shall be submitted or placed on IDE. When electronic media is not available, one hard copy shall be provided to the requester. At a minimum, the DAL shall include the following documents.
DAL items - Internal data encompasses Automated Data Products (ADPs) produced under the contract Statement of Work that is not specifically a CDRL requirement. DAL is to include update of technical documents to reflect the CLEAR
UEWR configuration.
17.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP__X_ TM___ OTHER__ ___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B017
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE (TDP)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): MIL-STD-31000, DI-SESS-81000D
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para: 5.3.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: N
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 30 calendar days prior to Prime Mission Equipment (PME) Ship Readiness Review
(SRR)
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: Final due 90 calendar days prior to formal UEWR transfer (i.e. DD 250)
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Submit updates as required to document system configuration. Prepare in contractor format using the
Data Item Description (DID) as a guide.
The purpose of the TDP is to specify the types of drawings required to substantiate and define the configurations (SEIs) delivered under the governing subcontract/purchase order. Since the governing subcontract/purchase order covers development, production, deployment, and sustaining phases; the primary types of drawings required will be as defined in
MIL-DTL-31000, Paragraphs 3.6.1, 3.6.2, and 3.6.3. An As-Designed Parts, Materials, and Processes List (ADPMPL) shall be included as part of the Associated Lists. The ADPMPL shall comply with basic requirements of DI-MISC-81276, as modified/tailored in accordance with the tailoring specified herein. This PDRD is also intended to cover Seller Class II
Engineering Orders EO(s)/Change Requests CR(s) used to convey Seller dispositioned changes to engineering drawings ands associated lists. All TDP documents, including hardware drawings, will be placed on CD ROMs in AutoCad compatible format.
A. Drawing Requirements and Tailoring for DI-DRPR-81000
Conceptual Drawings: Per Paragraph 3.6.1 of MIL-DTL-31000, in accordance with Seller Best Practices for Format and
Content. Developmental Drawings: Per Paragraph 3.6.2 of MIL-DTL-31000, in accordance with Seller Best Practices for Format and Content. Production Drawings: Per Paragraph 3.6.3 of MIL-DTL-31000, in accordance with the applicable SOW requirements, and paragraphs 3.2.3.1 and 3.2.3.2 of D743-11965-1. Seller format and content is acceptable providing it is commensurate with/satisfies the requirements specified herein and DI-DRPR-81000 tailoring as specified below. DI-DRPR-81000 Tailoring as follows:
Block 3. DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE
3.1 For purposes of this contract, Product Drawings and Associated Lists provide the engineering data to support the delivery requirements of the Seller's End Item, Assembly, and/or Component Part Configurations. These drawings represent the highest level of design disclosure commensurate with the fidelity and usage requirements for the deliverable
End Item, Assembly, and/or Component Part configuration.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER__X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B018
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: DESIGN REVIEWS
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.):
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.6.1
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: As Required
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit B
16. REMARKS: Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER__X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B019
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL REPORTS
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MISC-80711/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.2
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: As Required
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER_X____
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B020
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS PLAN
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-MISC-80711/T
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.7.1
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE:A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 120 days after contract definitization
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
16. REMARKS: Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER_X___
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B021
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: SOFTWARE USERS MANUAL (SUM)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-IPSC-81443A
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.3.1
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: As Required
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 30 calendar days prior to first formal on-site training (e.g. Analyst Training)
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Submit updates as required to incorporate Clear in the UEWR documentation. Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide in accordance with best commercial practices. Data Item includes data reduction user’s manual, special reports and Software Users Manual for all 13 Jobdecks (LOOKALL, POSNEG, FASTSAT, RCS, LRID94p, LRID92i, ALERTS, NONO, SDTL, TASKL/STARRPT, SATMISS, MWOC1A and
OPRACTN)
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER_X____
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B023
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: IA ADMINISTRATORS GUIDE (AG)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DODI-8500.2 Information Assurance Implementation, dated
February 2003; examples of the specific controls/requirements include controls numbers 96 PESP-1 and 102 PRRB-1
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: SOW Para 5.2.6
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: See Block 16
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: 180 calendar days prior to start of on-site hardware installation
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: As Required
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: The Contractor shall provide a one full revision update every year to the IA Admin Guide. In addition, minor revision updates are required no more than quarterly as a result of changes in threats or vulnerabilities.
Special Note: The IA Administrator Guides (AGs) document the administrative procedures, roles, functions, privileges and processes that are necessary to ensure secure system configuration, administration, and operation throughout the system’s life-cycle. As such, preparation and periodic update to the AGs shall be coordinated with system owner, developer, operator/user, and sustainment organizations/teams.
The Administrator Guide (AG) will contain the following:
Component Security Architecture
Component Security Overview
Threats and Security Philosophy
Baseline Security Configuration and Network Security Configuration
Security and Accountability Countermeasures Description
Security Education Procedures
IA Roles & Responsibilities
Information Assurance Officer (IAO)
System Administrator (SA) attributes
Network Administrator/Manager (NA) attributes
Resident Engineer
Maintenance Personnel
Mission Operators
Configuration Management Process
Root Access Procedures
User Accounts Procedures
Auditing Procedures
System Backup Procedures
Monitoring Procedures
Anti-Virus (AV) Management Process
Disaster Recovery and Contingency Planning Process
Incident Response and Reporting Process (IRRP) Planning
The submission will be in Microsoft Word Format and submitted electronically. Contractor format is acceptable.
B. EXHIBIT: B
C. CATEGORY: TDP___ TM___ OTHER___X__
D. SYSTEM/ITEM: CLEAR UEWR
E. CONTRACT/PR. NO:
F. CONTRACTOR:
1. DATA ITEM NO.: B024
2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM: FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMECA) &
CRITICAL ITEMS LIST (CIL)
3. SUBTITLE:
4. AUTHORITY: (Data Acquisition Document No.): DI-ILSS-81495
5. CONTRACT REFERENCE: Sow Para: 5.2.1
6. REQUIRING OFFICE: MDA/SN
7. DD250 REQ: LT
8. APP CODE: A
9. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT REQUIRED: F
10. FREQUENCY: See Block 16
11. AS OF DATE: N/A
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION: See Block 16
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION: See Block 16
14. DISTRIBUTION: See Exhibit A
15. TOTAL COPIES: Electronic Copy on IDE
16. REMARKS: Submit initial document which incorporates Clear configuration in the UEWR documentation. Post to an accessible data library. Prepare in contractor format using the Data Item Description (DID) as a guide in accordance with best commercial practices.
10, 12, 13 SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE The initial submittal of the FMECA, including Criticality Analysis (CA), is due 90 calendar days after REX 1 is delivered to the Clear Deployable String. Subsequent submittals will occur annually.
DESCRIPTION / PURPOSE The Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) report determines by failure mode analysis, the effect of each functional failure on system operation and identifies single failure points, i.e., those failures critical to mission success or personnel safety.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .