Atch_9_Section_M_Amend_3_change_pages.pdf

FA8730-19-R-0005 Amd 0003, Attachment 9, Page 1

ATTACHMENT 9

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M

FOR

FORCE PROTECTION SITE SECURITY SYSTEM SOLUTIONS

(FPS4)

23 JULY 2019

FA8730-19-R-0005 Amd 0003, Attachment 9, Page 4

d. Discussions

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the offeror’s responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision.

e. Small Business This solicitation is intended to result in award of FPS4 IDIQ contracts to all qualifying offerors, in accordance with the Request for Proposal (RFP). This could result in a mix of other than small businesses and small businesses (within the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561621) as FPS4 contract holders. If two or more small businesses are awarded FPS4 contracts, then the Government may set-aside individual FPS4 DOs for small business fair opportunity evaluations in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F), the provisions of FAR Subpart 19.5 as supplemented, and other applicable laws or regulations where appropriate, as determined by the Contracting Officer.

M002 EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Evaluation Factors

The following evaluation factor will be used to evaluate each proposal.

Factor 1: Technical Sub-factor 1: Detection o Intrusion Detection System (IDS) o Immediate Visual Assessment (IVA) o Video Management System (VMS) o Surveillance System

Sub-factor 2: Infrastructure o Communication Infrastructure o Communication Networking o Power Infrastructure

Sub-factor 3: Entry Control o Entry Control (EC) o Access Control System (ACS) o Other identified non-IDS physical & electronic security

Sub-factor 4: Management o Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) o Risk Matrix o Basis of Estimates (BOE) o Verification Approach o Interim Contractor Support (ICS) Approach o Small Business Participation

FA8730-19-R-0005 Amd 0003, Attachment 9, Page 6

Adjectival Rating

Description

Low

Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance.

Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring would likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which might potentially cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring would likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High

Proposal contains a deficiency, or a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses, which would likely cause significant disruption of schedule or degradation of performance to an unacceptable level.

The Government will evaluate the adequacy, efficiency, soundness, reasonableness and inherent risks of the offeror’s technical approach and demonstrated capability to design, install, integrate, verify and deliver a solution to the Sample Problem project requirements. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's Technical Volume demonstrates an adequate approach to the Sample Problem, which demonstrates an adequate understanding of the Technical requirements, with a low or moderate risk, through an assessment of the following:

1. Detection: Adequacy and thoroughness of the offeror’s understanding of the IDS, IVA, VMS and Surveillance System Sample Problem requirements for the protection of assets as demonstrated by the soundness of the offeror’s Sample Problem Design/Install approach, Site Design & Install Drawings and List of Equipment (LOE), and the extent to which it provides an efficient solution to the Sample Problem.

2. Infrastructure: Adequacy and thoroughness of the offeror’s understanding of the communications infrastructure, communications networking and power infrastructure, and Sample Problem assumptions/requirements for the infrastructure/connectivity/networking of Sample Problem areas as demonstrated by the soundness of the offeror’s Sample Problem Design/Install approach, Site Design & Install Drawings, LOE, and network configurations, and the extent to which it provides an efficient solution to the Sample Problem.

3. Entry Control: Adequacy and thoroughness of the offeror’s understanding of the Entry Control, ACS, and other identified non-IDS physical and electronic security (e.g., fencing and badge management systems), and Sample Problem assumptions/requirements for the Entry Control areas as demonstrated by the soundness of the offeror’s Sample Problem Design/Install approach, Site Design & Install Drawings and LOE, and the extent to which it provides an efficient solution to the Sample Problem.

FA8730-19-R-0005 Amd 0003, Attachment 9, Page 7

4. Management: The adequacy and thoroughness of the offeror’s proposed IMS, Risk Matrix, BOEs, Verification Approach, and ICS Approach and extent to which the IMS, Risk Matrix, BOEs, Verification Approach and ICS Approach convey a clear and comprehensive understanding of the assumptions/requirements. The IMS will be evaluated for its realistic schedule, level of detail, schedule critical path, schedule task duration, schedule task relationships, traceability from resource identification/allocation to schedule, and traceability to Contractor Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS). The Risk Matrix will be evaluated for realistic risk identification and risk handling plans. The BOEs will be evaluated for realistic labor hour estimates, labor identifications, labor-skill mix by task, and labor traceability to CWBS. The Verification Approach will be evaluated for the adequacy and thoroughness of the offeror’s verification plan and verification method selections. The ICS Approach will be evaluated for the offeror’s organizational level and depot level support, and Original Equipment Manufacturor (OEM)/sub-contractor sustainment approach. The Government will evaluate the extent to which offerors identify and commit to small business participation for the sample problem in accordance with the FPS4 Small Business Participation Goals included in Section L of this solicitation.

M003 RESERVED

M004 SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors to be eligible for award. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award. Cost will not be evaluated at the IDIQ level, but will be evaluated on individual DOs. Any exceptions to the solicitation’s terms and conditions must be fully explained and justified.