FOM Questions and Answers Week 2.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Facilities Other Maintenance
Solicitation number
FA822425R0011
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file for a Facilities Other Maintenance (FOM) contract opportunity for the 309th Aircraft Maintenance Group. The Q&A addresses critical clarifications about the solicitation, including site visits, equipment provisions, and contract requirements. Key details include confirmation that no additional site visits will occur, government-provided equipment for storing and transporting parts, and clarification that F-22 and F-35 program duties are primary and vital to the contract's performance.

The contract involves managing FOM programs for multiple aircraft types (C-130, F-16, F-22, A-10, T-38, and F-35) at Hill AFB, Utah, and Joint Base San Antonio/Randolph AFB, Texas. The contractor's responsibilities include receiving, issuing, inventorying, and verifying parts and materials for storage with positive control of assets. Notable Q&A points include guidance on document formatting (font sizes for charts), security clearance references, and the government's stance that offerors should use independent expertise to determine appropriate labor mix and pricing, without providing extensive additional historical staffing data.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110012 SF 30.pdf PDF
FOM Follow-on Final Questions.docx DOCX document
Revised TEP worksheet 16 July 2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Hill_Wage_Determination_06092025.pdf PDF
Randolph_Wage_Determination_05292025.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110011 SF 30.pdf PDF
FOM PWS 10 July 2025.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110010 SF 30.pdf PDF
FOM PWS 9 Jul 25.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110009 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110005 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110003 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110006 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110007 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110008 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Signed Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110004 SF 30.pdf PDF
TEP Worksheet Clarifications.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110008 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110007 SF 30.pdf PDF
Revised TEP worksheet 1 July 2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FOM Clarification 06252025.docx DOCX document
FOM PWS 25 June 2025.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110006 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110005 SF 30.pdf PDF
Week 5 Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Revised TEP worksheet 23 June2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Week 6 Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
FOM PWS 23 June 2025.docx DOCX document
Section 52.212 -1 and -2_23 June 2025.docx DOCX document
Combined synopsis_solicitation 2 June 2025.pdf PDF
Revised TEP worksheet 17June2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FOM PWS 16 June 2025.docx DOCX document
RAFB Wage Determination.pdf PDF
HAFB Wage Determination 05052025.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110003 SF 30.pdf PDF
Reworked TEP 06112025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Week 4 FOM Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Combined synopsis_solicitation updated 2 June 2025.pdf PDF
FOM_TEP_2 June_2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FOM Questions and Answers week 3.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA822425R00110001 SF 30.pdf PDF
11950_FOM PWS 29 May 2025.pdf PDF
FOM Solicitation Questions 1.docx DOCX document
FOM CLIN Structure Ammendment 1 05_22_2025.pdf PDF
Show all 48

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Will there be a site visit before the submittal due date?

There was a site visit in September 2024 and another one will not take place.

2. Appendix D (page 33), Historical Workload Data – the 1st table shows an asterisk with clarifying information. Which column does it refer to?

The asterisk in the first table represents the number of planes to be disassembled at a given time.

3. Appendix D (page 33), Historical Workload Data – the 2nd table shows a double asterisk with clarifying information. Which column does it refer to?

The second table double asterisk is “Since FOM assets are stored/ secured away from aircraft, this number only reflects the number of aircraft that will be in assembly.”

4. Is there a descriptive list of the FOM assets the contractor must receive, inventory, store, and issue IAW PWS?

A descriptive list of assets the contractor receives, inventories, and issues is not currently available to share. We will see if we can obtain one if it exists and share it next week.

5. PWS Section 3.1.8.6 (page 8) discusses storing, transporting, and delivering FOM assets, which implies the need for trucks, trailers, forklifts, jacks, dollies, hoists, etc., as well as storage racks, containers, cages, etc. Appendix G (page 36) lists some vertical lift machines, but is there a further list of Govt-furnished vs. contractor-furnished equipment and vehicles?

Our understanding is that all equipment necessary for storing, transporting, and delivering of FOM assets are provided by the government and the government maintains responsibility for them. The contractor should not need to obtain any equipment to perform this work. We will verify this information and respond to it next week.

6. Source = Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 2.2.2: can the Charts and Graphs be in a smaller font, 8/10 rather than 12?

Charts and graphs can use size 8 font if absolutely necessary, 10-point font would be preferred if 12 point font will not work.

7. Regarding PWS 3.1.10, will the government please confirm whether FOM duties under the F-22 and F-35 programs are primary and vital requirements of the contract, or are the duties ancillary to the principal purpose of the procurement?

The duties on the FOM contract are the same regardless of which airplane is being worked on. F-22 and F-35 will have the same duties of receiving airplane parts from the mechanics, preparing them for storage, storing them, inventorying regularly to make sure parts aren’t missing and when needed retrieved from storage to reassemble the airplanes. Therefore, the duties under F-22 and F-35 are primary and vital to successfully performing the contract.

8. Regarding ITO 4.3.2.2. Security Clearance, the paragraph states "IAW PWS Paragraph(s) 2.3.2 and all subparagraphs." There is no paragraph 2.3.2 or further subparagraphs to reference in the PWS. To ensure compliance, is there another intended section in the PWS that should serve as a reference for security clearances?

Paragraphs 3.1.3.2 and 3.1.10 address the need for security clearances. Paragraphs 2.3.2 and it’s subparagraphs were removed during review of the solicitation. Additional information removed from this section has been added to Paragraph 2.2 and its subparagraphs that should not have been removed.

9. Regarding ITO 4.3.1.2. Multiple Site Supervision, the paragraph states, "IAW PWS Paragraphs 1, 1.1, 2.3.3, and 2.3.3.1." There are no corresponding 1.1, 2.3.3, or 2.3.3.1 paragraphs in the PWS for reference. Is there another intended section in the PWS that should serve as a reference for multiple site supervision to ensure compliance?

The PWS underwent some changes at the last minute and the referenced paragraphs have been moved. Paragraphs 1 and 1.1 are typos and should not have been included. Paragraphs 2.3.3 and 2.3.3.1 are now 2.3 and 2.3.1.

10. Regarding the submission of questions for the solicitation, is the intention for vendors to submit questions encrypted? If so, I'm ready to initiate the coordination process to exchange certificates, allowing communication to begin. The instructions in sections 1.1 and 1.2 of the ITO imply that all communications must be encrypted. If not, I will send questions via unencrypted email.

Email communication does not need to be encrypted for questions. If you are emailing something that needs to stay private you should send an encrypted email.

11. Appendix D of the Performance Work Statement includes historical workload and staffing data from the current contractor. However, to develop a comprehensive staffing proposal that aligns with the requirements outlined in section 4.3.2.1 of the PWS, we find that additional information is needed. Specifically, non-incumbent offerors lack sufficient data to determine the necessary personnel to fully meet the contract requirements.

To ensure a level playing field and enable all offerors, including those who are not the incumbent, to submit reasonable and realistic staffing proposals, could the Government please provide further guidance? The current lack of information appears to give the incumbent a considerable advantage.

The Government anticipates that responsible offerors will use their independent expertise to determine the appropriate labor mix and pricing necessary to fulfill the contract requirements. While the Government provided Appendix D as some historical data to help with refining a price volume consistent with each offeror’s unique methods of performance, additional data is not available.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .