RFP_Questions_Answers_(24_Apr_13).pdf

Question

Number

Solicitation

Reference

PWS

Reference

Additional/

Cross Reference Discussion Question Response

1 Page 53;

Sect. L.1.4.

RFP states: "Questions pertaining to this Request For

Proposal (RFP), or any of its attachments, shall be submitted in writing, using the Solicitation Question and

Comment sheet found in Attachment 9 and e-mailed to the

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer identified below not later than 8 Apr 13."

The "8 Apr 13" date has passed. Will this date be revised?

An ammendment was posted in FedBizOpps on 17

Apr 13, changing the date to submit questions to 25

Apr 13.

2 Page 65, para 3.1.1

Appendix 3B, para 11

PWS reference indicates training in Forks WA but Appendix 3B does not include this requirement.

Should the offeror include costs for deployment to

Forks WA, and if so, what is the deployment frequency, duration and number of people required?

The offeror should not include deployment cost for any deployments. The travel cost will paid under cost rembursable CLIN X0003, Travel Costs.

3 Page 66, para

3.1.3.1.4

Appendix 3B, para 11

Paras 3.1.3.1.4 and 3.1.4.5 indicate deployment of aircraft approximately 6 days per week to TCP, while Appendix

3B indicates duration is 5 days per week.

For accurate staffing and costing purposes, please clarify the duration of the weekly deployment to

TCP.

The normal TSP deployment duration is six days, leave Sunday with a Friday return. The Government will correct this PWS inconsistancy.

4 Page 67, para 3.1.4.5

Appendix 3B, para 11

PWS reference indicates deployment requirements of 50 weeks per year to TCP, while Appendix 3B shows 52 weeks per year.

Should the offeror include costs for 50 or 52 scheduled deployments to TCP?

Cusisk deployment is approximately 50 weeks per year. The Government will correct this PWS inconsistancy.

5 Appendix

2D

Appendix 2E Both references are entitled "Required Reports". Is there a reason the USG separated required reports into two appendices, and if so, what significance are SPs to extract from it?

The Government will consolidate required reports into one Appendix and this change will be reflected in the PWS.

6 Page 52;

Sect. L.1.1

Volume II Past Performance Information due 25 April 13 Would the government consider extending the due date for the Past Performance Volume to coincide with the Technical & Price Volumes?

Amendment was posted on 24 Apr 13 changing the

Vol II submission date to 10 May 13.

7 L.3.2.3 N/A N/A L.3.2.3. Past Performance Information Sheets. Each offeror shall complete and submit, as part of their proposal, a Past

Performance Information Sheet in accordance with the format contained in Attachment 7, on no more than four

(4) contracts total (including proposed major subcontractors, teaming partners, joint venture partners proposed to perform 20% or more of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price, or perform aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance) that you consider relevant consistent with the criteria in Section M in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort.

Would the Government please clarify, when asking for the PPI information in the format containted in Attachment 7, are you suggesting we populate the attachment and insert into our response, or are we able to organize the information into our own space efficient table/format for submission?

In reference to L.3.2.3., the provided PPI (atch 7) shall be completed and submitted as part of the proposal. In addition to the PPI, the offeror may submit additional information (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc), which is limited to 5 pages.

8 L.1.1. N/A N/A Volume II Past Performance Information No relevant Past Perfomance information for submission.

In the event offerors have no relevant past performance, the offerors shall submit Volume II, Past Performance Information, indicating such.

This is the Question and Comment worksheet for the Fairchild Aircraft Maintenance Services solicitation, FA3002-12-R-0022

Attachment 9