Atch_6_-_PPQ_(25_Jan_13).docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fairchild Aircraft Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-12-R-0022
About this file
Atch 6 - PPQ
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
PLEASE DO NOT SEND THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTOR.
1. The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the Air Education and Training Command Contracting Squadron, Randolph AFB, TX. You have received this questionnaire because you have been identified as a source of Past Performance Information for that offeror.
2. Please complete the attached questionnaire for the contractor and program described in Section 1. Send the completed questionnaire via email to the following addresses:
(Simply copy and paste the addresses below in to the “To…” box) elizabeth.preston@us.af.mil; belinda.spencer@us.af.mil; antoinette.davis.2@us.af.mil
3. Based upon your knowledge and experience with the contractor’s performance, assign a rating consistent with the rating/description criteria below. Limit your assessment to the particular program referenced in Section 1. Circle the selected rating. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
4. Please discuss each response for which you indicated UN (Unacceptable), or N/A (Not Applicable) in response to the questions below. Space for your comments is provided after each area (use additional sheets, if necessary).
5. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, please provide comments on any other programs for which your activity has contracts with this contractor. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization.
6. Please fill in all sections. Indicate “Not Applicable - N/A” if a question does not apply, or “UNK” if you do not know the answer to a question. Your prompt response will be integral to the successful and timely completion of this source selection and ensuring the Government receives the best value.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Program Title: _____________________________________________________________________
1. Contractor (Company/Division): _______________________________________________________
1. Contractor Cage Code: ______________________________________________________________
1. Contract number: __________________________________________________________________
1. Contract type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPFF): _________________________________________________
1. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes __________ No _________
1. Was this contract set aside for small business? Yes __________ No _________ If Yes, how was it set aside? _______________________________________________
1. Period of performance: _____________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: ________________________________________________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: ___________________________________________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
L. Brief description of effort as ________Prime or ________Subcontractor:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e. local, national, worldwide, other Commands): ___________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's Name: _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Position or Title (e.g., Program Manager, QAE, PCO/ACO): _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Phone/Fax number: _________________________________________________________________________________
| D. | Number of years Evaluator worked on subject contract: _________________________________________________________________________________ |
| E. | Other suggested points of contact: |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
A. MANAGEMENT APPROACH
A.1. Rate the contractor’s ability to identify, track, document trends and analyze corrective action effectiveness.
(For this item, in particular, please detail the techniques the contractor applied to continually improve quality, airworthiness, workmanship, and customer support).
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.2. Rate the contractor’s ability to implement corrective actions to ensure timely and acceptable performance in accordance with the PWS? |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.3. Rate the contractor’s ability to apply trend and risk analysis to effectively prevent problem relapse. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.4. Rate the contractor’s ability to implement a system for recording, computing/assessing performance measurement data, and monitoring corrective actions to ensure successful and timely problem resolution. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.5. Rate the contractor’s approach to ensure thorough data capture, documentation accuracy, completeness and reporting integrity for data systems and forms documentation, including, but not limited to: Maintenance Information System (MIS), Integrated Maintenance Data System Central Database (IMDS CDB), Aircraft Forms, Vital Records, or similar systems. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.6. Rate how well the contractor ensured employee training, certification, and qualification currency. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.7. Rate how well the contractor procured non-Government provided aircraft parts or other consumables in a cost effective manner that met technical order threshold standards. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
A.8. How well did the Contractor support the host base’s Operational Plans, Plans and Support Agreements, e.g., weather evacuation, crashed or damaged aircraft recovery, etc.?
(Please explain, in the Comments section, the reasons for untimely support or extended delays and how they were remedied to prevent future occurrences.)
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
A.9. Rate the Contractor’s responsiveness to modification requests or adjustments in delivery requirements.
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| A.10. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
Comments:
B. TECHNICAL APPROACH
| B.1. Rate the contractor’s ability to expedite recovery from multiple concurrent grounded aircraft situations (caused by factors other than Government provided lack of parts or equipment) to meet flying schedule commitments. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.2. Rate the contractor’s ability to prevent depot, phase, and major scheduled aircraft maintenance from creating aircraft availability conflicts. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.3. Rate the contractor’s ability to schedule and perform the daily workload, to include meeting time change requirements, unscheduled maintenance, pre-flights, basic post flights, special inspections, launch and recovery of aircraft, troubleshooting, on and off equipment repairs that meet PWS requirements. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.4. Rate the contractor’s ability to execute off-station recovery of aircraft in a timely manner while continuing to execute mission requirements at home station. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.5. Rate the accessibility to eTools and/or technical orders by employees, to ensure eTools were maintained with current, accurate, and complete data required by the PWS. (For this item, consider the contractor’s ability to manage/update Technical Orders to ensure that maintenance guidance was current, accurate, complete and accessible to employees). |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
B.6. Rate the contractor’s tool control management execution.
(Please explain, in the Comments section, if the contractor was not able to perform within limitations, what the reasons were for not doing so and identify their remedies for preventing future occurrences.)
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.7. Rate how well the Contractor accomplished the PWS requirements for all functional service areas and integrated throughout the life of the contract. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| B.8. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
Comments:
C. STAFFING AND WORKFORCE PLAN
| C.1. Rate the contractor’s cross-utilization of their workforce. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| C.2. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide adequate backup personnel and provide proper training/certification for “one deep” positions to ensure continuous contract performance. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| C.3. Rate the contractor’s ability to determine workforce composition (e.g. productive/non-productive hours, overtime, weekend shift, proper skills mix for proper work areas, etc.) |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| C.4. Rate the contractor’s ability to maintain adequate staffing to meet changing, unscheduled, urgent, and surge requirements while meeting PWS requirements. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| C.5. Rate the contractor’s ability to sustain trained and qualified personnel, including training management and instructor staffing to meet the requirement throughout the life of contract. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
| C.6. Rate the contractor’s approach to recruit and retain an experienced, motivated labor pool, including replacement of key personnel for the life of the contract. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
C.7. Rate how successfully the Contractor resolved/avoided labor disputes and/or strikes or executed their Strike Plan to ensure no interruption of services interruption of services.
| C.8. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
Comments:
D. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? Or indicate if there is a pending termination?
No ____ Yes ____ For Default ____ For Convenience ____ Pending Terminations ____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc). _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this contract by circling your rating:
| ACC |
| UN |
| N/A |
F. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what was promised in their proposal, I, (mark your response below) , award to them today given that I had a choice.
Would _____________ Would not ______________
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Please provide any additional comments you may have concerning other contracts your agency has with this contractor.
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
| ______________________________________ | _____________________________ | |
| EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE | DATE |
PLEASE DO NOT SEND this completed questionnaire to the Contractor.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!
FA3002-12-R-0022
Attachment 06
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .