ESBD_487720_1773773049220_PM-1415_CSP Summary Tab.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PM-1415 PPHM Roof Replacement & Coating State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- PM-1415
- Issued by
- Ochiltree County, Texas
About this file
This is a Best Value Scoring Summary Tab for a Texas state and local contract opportunity (Project PM-1415) for roof replacement and coating services at the Panhandle Plains Historic Museum. The project, designated as Package C (PPHM Roof Replacement & Coating), involves evaluation of seven contractors based on weighted scoring criteria including total bid amount (51%), construction time (10%), technical proposal (24%), litigation and claims history (5%), safety and risk assessment (5%), and quality control (5%). Contractors submitted bids ranging from $533,473.25 to $3,317,650.00, with construction timelines ranging from 45 to 180 days.
AG & Sons ranked first overall with a score of 9.10 but was not awarded the contract due to non-compliance with solicitation requirements, specifically failure to provide a required 20-year warranty letter. Lydick-Hooks, ranking second with a score of 7.66 and a base bid of $590,186.00 with a 110-day construction timeline, was selected as the contractor offering next best value while meeting all compliance requirements including submission of the mandatory warranty documentation. The award decision represents an acceptable deviation from strict best value ranking due to the disqualification of the top-ranked bidder for failure to meet mandatory solicitation requirements.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ESBD_487720_1770331458668_PM-1415_Notice of Project_TAMU-Regions.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_Pkg C - PPHM Roof Replacement & Coating_Project Manual.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_CSP Part 2 00 45 16.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_Notice of Project_TAMU-Regions.pdf | ||
| Uniform General and Supplementary Conditions.pdf | ||
| Performance Bond.docx | DOCX document | |
| ESBD_487720_1771276855688_PM-1415_Armko_Addendum No. [#1].pdf | ||
| ESBD_487720_1770331458883_PM-1415 Bid Package.zip | ZIP file | |
| PM-1415_Pkg C - PPHM Roof Replacement & Coating_Construction Drawings.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_CSP Instructions 00 21 00.pdf | ||
| Certificate of Insurance (COI) Requirements_TAMU-Regions.pdf | ||
| SAMPLE Master Vendor Agreement_TAMU-Regions.pdf | ||
| ESBD_487720_1770827656552_PM-1415_Addendum No. [#1]_SOW Clarification.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_CSP Part 3 00 45 17.pdf | ||
| PM-1415_CSP Part 1 00 42 13.pdf | ||
| Payment Bond.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROJECT NAME/DESCRIPTION: Pkg C - PPHM Roof Replacement & Coating
PROJECT NUMBER: PM-1415
PROJECT LOCATION: Panhandle Plains Historic Museum
OVERALL RANKING
Contractor Score Rank LBK Roofing 5.96 5 CS Advantage 7.38 3
Tecta 7.30 4
AG & Sons 9.10 1 Advantage USAA 5.38 6 Lydick-Hooks 7.66 2 Mikocorp 3.87 7
COST
Contractor Base Bid Total Alt. Total Bid LBK Roofing $709,467.17 $0.00 $709,467.17 CS Advantage $750,000.00 $0.00 $750,000.00 Tecta $630,500.00 $0.00 $630,500.00
Lydick-Hooks $590,186.00 $0.00 $590,186.00 Mikocorp $3,317,650.00 $0.00 $3,317,650.00 AG & Sons $533,473.25 $0.00 $533,473.25 Advantage USAA $1,257,000.00 $0.00 $1,257,000.00
Min Bid $533,473.25 Max Bid $3,317,650.00
SCHEDULE
Contractors Base Time Total Alt. Time Total Time
Tecta 120 0 120 CS Advantage 90 0 90 LBK Roofing 64 0 64
Lydick-Hooks 110 0 110 Mikocorp 180 0 180 Advantage USAA 160 0 160 AG & Sons 45 0 45
Min Time 45 Max Time 180
BEST VALUE SCORING
Category Value Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Total Bid 51% 9.04 4.61 7.52 3.83 1.61 0.82 7.11 3.63 10.00 5.10 8.46 4.32 4.24 2.16 Construction Time 10% 4.09 0.41 7.03 0.70 2.50 0.25 5.00 0.50 10.00 1.00 3.75 0.38 2.81 0.28 Technical Proposal 24% 6.83 1.64 3.85 0.92 5.40 1.30 7.28 1.75 6.27 1.50 6.70 1.61 5.98 1.44 Litigation/Claims 5% PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 Safety/Risk Assessment 5% FAIL 0.00 FAIL 0.00 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 FAIL 0.00 PASS 0.50 Quality Control 5% PASS 0.50 FAIL 0.00 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50 PASS 0.50
TOTAL SCORES 100% 7.66 5.96 3.87 7.38 9.10 7.30 5.38
AG & Sons was not awarded the project due to non-compliance with solicitation requirements.
Lydick-Hooks will be awarded the job as they provided the letter for the 20 year warranty and provide next best value.
LBK Roofing
ACCEPTABLE Examples: 1) Contract agreement cannot be reach with top ranked contractor (terms & conditions or VE).
2) After interviews, it is determined that a contractor does NOT have everything needed in their proposal that represents an accurate price and they are disqualified/they'd like to withdraw their proposal, etc.
UNACCAPTABLE Examples: Client wants a particular contractor that isn't the best value contractor per rankings below.
CSP: FINAL BEST VALUE RANKING (Tab 9)
Tecta Advantage USAALydick-Hooks Mikocorp CS Advantage AG & Sons
Notes/Comments/Remarks: Information can be entered below to document how/why the best value contractor (as shown below) did not end up being the final contractor selected…
9. Final BV Ranking&Scores
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .