Q&A_9-5-18.pdf

WA RRP RIDG 100(2)

River S Bridge Replacement

# General Technical Question Answer Date

1 X

The three files listed below were provided for download on the FBO Website as part of this IFB. They appear to have previously been excel files but were converted to xml files when posted so they open as a text file and are unusable. Can these be reposted to FBO as excel spreadsheets?

These files are not Microsoft Excel Files.

They are LandXML files with alignment data for construction.

8/30/18

2 X

Several files posted on FBO.gov for the subject project appear to be corrupt, and will not open or download correctly. The problem files are as follows: 20c_GR14‐15_Geotech_Report;

20d_GR14‐ 15_River_S_Bridge_Replacement_Final_Geotch _Report_Aug_2016; and 21b_Bridge_Inspection_Report. Is it possible to upload correct and complete files?

We successfully opened (online) each of the files you referenced; and after saving these files to a computer hard drive, we successfully opened each of these files again; therefore, we are not planning to reupload the files.

9/4/18

Check General or Technical

3 X

Are 20c_GR14-15 Geotech Report.pdf and 20d_GR14-15 River S Bridge Replacement, Final Geotech Report, Aug 2016.pdf the same document? They appear to be the exact same geotech report (dated August 2016, with 343 pages), but have different file names.

The document 20c_GR14‐15 Geotech Report.pdf is a duplicate of the document 20d_GR14‐15 River S Bridge Replacement, Final Geotech Report, Aug 2016.pdf; hence we recommend downloading the file 20c_GR14‐15 Geotech Report.pdf.

In addition, the document 20a_GM 08‐12 Geotech Memo.pdf is a duplicate of the document 20b_GM 08‐12 Ridgefield Existing Condition Assessment.pdf; hence we recommend downloading the file 20a_GM 08‐12 Geotech Memo.pdf.

A forthcoming amendment will address the physical data listing.

9/5/18