D_Solution Functional RTM Narrative.docx

DOCX document 96 KB Posted

Attached to
DCYF Enterprise Payment Solution
Solicitation number
24-DCYF-CS-081
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is a Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) Narrative Response Template for RFP No. 24-DCYF-CW-081 issued by the Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) for their Enterprise Payment Solution (DEPS). The template outlines requirements for vendors to describe their approach to implementing various payment system functionalities including general activities, purchase order activities, accounts payable, payment issuance, garnishments processing, audit activities, reporting capabilities, and payment recipient management. Vendors must provide responses directly in the template with a three-page limit per section, without using external references or marketing materials.

The template focuses on technical response requirements rather than pricing or funding details. It requires vendors to detail their implementation approach for ten key functional areas, with specific emphasis on DEPS business processes rather than generic solution capabilities. Each section must reference specific requirement numbers from Attachment C and demonstrate how the proposed solution will meet DCYF's needs for payment efficiency, accuracy, and transparency in supporting vendors and service providers.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
C_Solution Functional RTM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E_Solution Data and Reporting RTM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
I_Non-Functional Requirements RTM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J_Non-Functional RTM Narrative.docx DOCX document
L_Cost Proposal Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DCYF DEPS Business Process Analysis.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CS-081-Amendment 1.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 5.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 6.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 4.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 8.pdf PDF
M_Cost Proposal Narrative.docx DOCX document
O_Cert of Compliance with Negotiation.docx DOCX document
RFP 24-DCYF-CW-081_DEPS_V7.0.docx DOCX document
DCYF DEPS Payment Data Flow.pdf PDF
DCYF SSPS Unisys System Assessment.pdf PDF
DEPS Project Scope.pdf PDF
P_Cert of Compliance.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 3.pdf PDF
A.1_Administrative Review.docx DOCX document
B_Vendor Qual Experience Staffing.docx DOCX document
F_Solution Data Report RTM Narrative.docx DOCX document
G_Solution Technology RTM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H_Solution Technology RTM Narrative.docx DOCX document
K_Experience and Management.docx DOCX document
N_Issues List Template.docx DOCX document
Q_Bidder Certifications and Assurances.docx DOCX document
DCFY DEPS Architecture Plan.pdf PDF
DCYF SSPS Systems Architectural Overview.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 2.pdf PDF
RFP-24-DCYF-CW-081-Amendment 7 with PPT.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

State of Washington | RFP No. 24-DCYF-CW-081 Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) Attachment D DEPS Functional RTM Narrative Response Template

Attachment D:

DEPS Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) Narrative Response Template

Unless otherwise directed, DCYF requires that Vendors use the provided mandatory response templates to prepare responses included in the proposal. DCYF requires that Vendors enter responses directly into templates, and not to insert “see attached file” (or similar statements) in the templates or worksheet to reference separate documents. Proposals not using the mandatory response templates will not be reviewed. Figures and tables must be numbered and referenced in the text of the proposal by that number. DCYF requests that Vendors do not submit marketing materials, product sheets, brochures, customer testimonials, or other pre-printed materials.

Table of Contents

1.0Functional Requirements Approach for the DCYF Enterprise Payment Solution (DEPS)3
1.1General Activities Approach3
1.2Purchase Order Activities Approach4
1.3Accounts Payable Activity Approach5
1.4Payment Issuance Activities Approach6
1.5Process Garnishments Activities Approach7
1.6Audit Activities for Underpayments and Overpayments Approach8
1.7Audit Activities for Aging Claims and Checks (Warrants) Approach9
1.8Generate General Reports Activities Approach10
1.9Tax Reporting and Garnishments Reporting Activities Approach11
1.10Payment Recipient Management Activities Approach12
2.0Functional Requirements Approach Assumptions13

Functional Requirements Approach for the DCYF Enterprise Payment Solution (DEPS) The Vendor must provide a narrative overview of how the proposed solution will meet the DCYF Enterprise Payment Solution (DEPS) Functional Requirements. The following questions pertaining to Functional Requirements are a required portion of the RFP response and will be evaluated by DCYF.

Instructions: Use these response sections to provide specific details of the proposed approach to meeting the Functional Requirements in each functional area. Responses should, when necessary, reference requirements using the appropriate RFP Requirement Numbers from Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM).

Responses in this section must be highly focused on DEPS-specific business processes and requirements and not simply provide generic or marketing descriptions of solution capabilities. DCYF also expects the Vendor to propose its approach for meeting the Functional Requirements included in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM).

General Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to general payment lifecycle activities, including:

Usability Approval Workflow Controlling Vendor Access / Accounts Notifications

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing general payment lifecycle Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Purchase Order Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to purchase order activities, including:

Purchase Order information ingestion and classification Invoice production and tracking Invoice editing and scheduling Invoice assignment and categorization Special handling Alerts and notifications Invoice processing and payment calculation Budget and encumbrance management P-card management Back-end functionality Invoice validation

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Purchase Order Activities Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Accounts Payable Activity Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to accounts payable, including:

Reviewing and modifying payment coding Annotation and regulatory compliance Invoice entry and transaction management Accounting adjustments and credit memos Accounts payable tracking and monitoring Accruals and adjustments Payment distributions Overpayment collections Special payment cases P-card administration Approval workflow Tax calculation Miscellaneous Interfacing with external systems

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Accounts Payable Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Payment Issuance Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to payment issuance activities, including:

Account and fund management Interfacing with external systems Payment approval Payment controls Payment disbursement management Payment tracking and monitoring

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Payment Issuance Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Process Garnishments Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to process garnishments activities, including:

Ingesting garnishment documents Structing ingested data Aligning garnished entities with payment recipients Calculation of garnishment amounts Payment routing

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Process Garnishments Activities Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Audit Activities for Underpayments and Overpayments Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to audit activities for underpayments and overpayments, including:

Triggering of under / over payment reconciliation Categorization and validation of underpayments or overpayments Posting of accounting entries Status tracking, reporting and provider management

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Audit Activities for Underpayments and Overpayments Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Audit Activities for Aging Claims and Checks (Warrants) Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for the business processes related to audit activities for aging claims and checks (warrants), including:

Audit, categorize and report aging status of uncashed checks Issue cancellation request to OneWA Workday and assign to General Ledger 5194 Receive and resolve vendor request for check reissuance

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Audit Activities for Aging Claims and Checks (Warrants) Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Generate General Reports Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for generating general reports activity, including:

Generate list of standard reports View and select reports from dashboard

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Generate General Reports Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Tax Reporting and Garnishments Reporting Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for tax reporting and garnishment reporting activity, including:

Produce information to create tax reporting Generate list of standard reports

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Generate General Reports Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Payment Recipient Management Activities Approach The future state DEPS must be able to support Functional Requirements for payment recipient management activity, including:

Register a new payment recipient on the portal View or update profile information Send, receive and display notifications and information in Portal Provide and receive information to support payment authorization

Instructions: The Vendor must describe its approach to addressing the Payment Recipient Management Activities Functional Requirements as listed in Attachment C: Solution Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM). The response to this question is limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

< Insert Vendor Response >

Functional Requirements Approach Assumptions Instructions: The Vendor must document the assumptions related to this Response Template in Table 1. Add rows as necessary. Do not change any of the completed cells.

Functional Requirements Assumptions

Item #
Reference

(Section, Page, Paragraph)

Description
Rationale

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .