C250105_PP_11-20-25_idedits.docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OC Bus Marketing Program
- Solicitation number
- 250105
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is a Procurement Plan document for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) related to Request for Proposal (RFP) 250105 for the OC Bus Marketing Program. The procurement seeks qualified consultants to provide comprehensive marketing services, with an initial contract term of sixteen months effective March 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, followed by one optional two-year renewal term extending from July 1, 2027, through June 30, 2029. The RFP was determined appropriate based on evaluation criteria beyond price, with proposals evaluated on Qualifications of the Firm (20%), Staffing/Project Organization (25%), Work Plan (30%), and Cost (25%). The procurement plan identifies three internal evaluation team members: Edith Monreal (Senior Marketing Specialist), Jason Ko (Section Manager I), and Kevin Khouri (Transportation Analyst).
The initial contract budget is $175,000 with an option term budget of $250,000, funded from local sources rather than Measure M or federal CMAQ funds. The contract will be structured as a Time and Expense arrangement, requiring firms to propose hourly rates for specified services. An independent cost estimate has been received, and Requisition #R000829 has been submitted. No prevailing wage requirements, liquidated damages clauses, retention requirements, or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals apply to this procurement. Evaluation training has been scheduled for team members, and the procurement plan awaits final concurrence signatures from both the Senior Marketing Specialist and the Procurement Section Manager.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Procurement Plan, RFP 250105
Date: November 20, 2025
To: Edith Monreal, Senior Marketing Specialist, Marketing & Customer Service
From: Rhea Aninzo, Contract Administrator, CAMM
Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN – RFP 250105 “OC Bus Marketing Program”
Please review the procurement plan for the subject RFP and advise your concurrence with the evaluation criteria and contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments.
Procurement Type: |X| RFP |_| IFB
Justification (explain the rationale for using the particular procurement type):
An RFP is applicable as the procurement requires evaluation criteria, in addition to price, to be used to select a firm to provide marketing services for the OC Bus Marketing Program.
Evaluation Criteria:
| PROPOSAL |
| WEIGHT |
| Qualifications of the Firm |
| 20% |
| Staffing/Project Organization |
| 25% |
| Work Plan |
| 30% |
| Cost |
| 25% |
Justification:
Qualifications of the firm is weighted at twenty percent (20%) as firms must demonstrate prior experience in developing and implementing various marketing programs and campaigns. Staffing and project organization is weighted at twenty-five percent (25%) as the proposed team must have experience and expertise in executing marketing programs that retain current customers and attract new ones. Work plan is weighted highest at thirty percent (30%) as the firm’s proposed work plan should clearly demonstrate its approach to successfully completing the scope of work. Cost and price is weighted at twenty percent (20%) to ensure OCTA receives the best value for the services.
Contract Type: |X| Time & Expense |_| CTO-Based |_| Firm Fixed Price
Justification (Explain the rationale for using the particular contract type):
Time-and-expense is the appropriate contract type for this effort as firms are required to propose hourly rates for the services specified in the scope of work.
| Retention: |
| |_| Yes |
| % |
| |X| No |
| |_| N/A |
| Prevailing Wages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
| Liquidated Damages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
P.M. to provide support documentation identifying how the LD amount was established.
Procurement Schedule: |X| Attached
Suggested Evaluation Team Members:
Internal Evaluators:
Edith Monreal, Senior Marketing Specialist, Marketing & Customer Service Comment by Rhea Aninzo: Edith reached out to Iris about eval training Comment by Iris Deneau: I will schedule training with her Jason Ko, Section Manager I, Marketing & Customer Engagement Kevin Khouri, Transportation Analyst, Transit Service Planning
Contract Term: (Include Option Years)
Initial sixteen (16)-month term effective March 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027, with one, two (2)-year option term effective July 1, 2027 – June 30, 2029 Comment by Iris Deneau: Why a 16-month initial term rather than a one-year term?
Funding Source: |X| Local |_| Measure M |_| Federal (CMAQ)
Dollar Amount: |X| Term $175,000 |X| Option Term $250,000
Independent Cost Estimate Received: |X| Yes |_| No
Requisition Received: |X| Yes #R000829 |_| No
DBE Goal: |_| Yes |X| No
Project Manager Concurrence:
| _______________________________________________ | ______________ |
| Edith Monreal, Senior Marketing Specialist, Marketing & Customer Service | Date |
CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:
| ___________________________________________ | ______________ | |
| Iris Deneau, Section Manager, Procurement | Date |
Revised: 07/20/2010 Revised: 0720/2010 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .