B08_Attach_08_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
MEVE 218998, Rehabilitate Eight Residences and Mus
Solicitation number
140P2025R0094
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for solicitation number 140P20XXRXXXX, designed to evaluate contractor performance on previous federal projects. The document serves as a reference evaluation tool where offerors complete contractor and contract information sections, while references provide performance ratings across multiple criteria.

The questionnaire evaluates contractors in six key areas: Quality (workmanship, quality control adherence, technical submittals), Schedule and Time Management (milestone adherence, responsiveness, timely submissions), Cost Control (handling site conditions, fair pricing for modifications, accurate invoicing, subcontractor payments), Management (project oversight, subcontractor coordination, safety, working relationships), Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards (regulatory compliance, disadvantaged business contracting), and Regulatory Compliance (building and safety codes). Each area uses a five-point rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions provided. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the Contracting Officer at the National Park Service Denver Service Center, and all information is classified as Source Selection Sensitive with specific restrictions on contractor use for promotional purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0006.pdf PDF
Attach_34_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_06_9_18_25_0006.pdf PDF
Attach_33_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_05_9_8_25_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
Attach_32_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_04_9_4_25_(4)_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Attach_31_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_03_0003.pdf PDF
B11_Attach_30_MEVE_Pre_Prop_Slides_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B11_Attach_29_MEVE_218998_-_Pre_Proposal_Conference_Attendance_0002.pdf PDF
MEVE_218998_PreProposalAgenda_2025_08_26_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0094.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_04_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_01_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Final_CD_Specifications_2024_09_20.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_25_MEVE_218998_FIO_Hazardous_Materials_Survey_Report_2023_07_14.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_26_MEVE_218998_FIO_HPG_Final_2023_09_29.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_17_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Closeout_O_M_Reqs_2024_09_20.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_19_MEVE_218998_FIO_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Permit_Assessment_Form_2024_08_02.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_Clauses_Construction_06Aug2025.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Final_CD_Drawings_Part_1_of_2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_03_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Final_CD_Drawings_Part_2_of_2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_06_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_SubKPlan_REQD_RELEASED_v2_Mar25.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_07_Solit_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_23_MEVE_218998_FIO_Sewer_Lateral_CCTV_Inspection_Map_2023_03_30.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_18_MEVE_218998_FIO_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Permit_List_2024_08_02.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_21_MEVE_218998_FIO_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Final_Geotech_Report_2023_11_30.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_11_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_BidBond.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_15_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_StatementOfStructuralTestsSpecialInspections_2024_09_20.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_09_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_Exp_REQD.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_22_MEVE_218998_FIO_Final_Utility_Locate_Report_2023_11_10.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_27_MEVE_218998_FIO_Empire_Electric_Service_2023_09_22.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_20_MEVE_218998_FIO_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Topographic_Survey_2022_12_22.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_13_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_LmtOnSubcontracting_REQD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_14_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Product_File_2024_09_20.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_05_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_ContractPriceSchedule_blank_2024_09_20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_24_MEVE_218998_FIO_Sewer_Lateral_CCTV_Inspection_Report_2023_03_30.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_16_MEVE_218998_Rehab_Chapin_Mesa_Submittal_List___Review_Estimate_2024_09_20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_10_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_Equals_RELEASED_v1_25Feb25.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_12_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.pdf PDF
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P20XXRXXXX

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
Time / Date
Name
CO or CS name
Title
Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .