Attachment G - USCG Base Miami Beach Lead Based Paint Report.pdf

LIMITED INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

FOR

SANDBLAST & PAINT SHOP (BUILDING 9)

U.S. COAST GUARD BASE MIAMI BEACH

100 MAC ARTHUR CAUSEWAY

MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139

AIRQUEST PROJECT NUMBER: 16-15-10592

PREPARED FOR:

MR. ALBERTO PUIG, PM

U.S. COAST GUARD

CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIT

15608 SOUTHWEST 117TH

AVENUE

MIAMI, FLORIDA 33177

PREPARED BY:

AIRQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

6851 SOUTHWEST 45TH

STREET

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314

MAY 9, 2016

REVISED JULY 28, 2016

CERTIFICATION PAGE

LIMITED INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

FOR

SANDBLAST & PAINT SHOP (BUILDING 9)

U.S. COAST GUARD BASE MIAMI BEACH

100 MAC ARTHUR CAUSEWAY

MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139

AIRQUEST PROJECT NUMBER: 16-15-10592

PREPARED FOR:

MR. ALBERTO PUIG, PM

U.S. COAST GUARD

CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIT

15608 SOUTHWEST 117TH AVENUE

MIAMI, FLORIDA 33177

PREPARED BY:

AIRQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

6851 SOUTHWEST 45TH STREET

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314

MAY 9, 2016

REVISED JULY 28, 2016

Carol Gagnon

Lead Inspector FL-I-I147274-1 iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (“AirQuest”) performed a lead-based paint (LBP) inspection to identify surfaces coated with LBP and their general locations on select interior and exterior areas of the Sandblast & Paint Shop (Building 9) at the U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach, located at 100 Mac Arthur Causeway in Miami Beach, Florida 33139 (“the site”). The survey was performed on April 4th and April 20th, 2016 by AirQuest Project Manager, Ms. Carol Gagnon, an EPA-trained Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) certified asbestos inspector.

The inspection was conducted to determine the presence of LBP within Client directed areas of the Sandblast & Paint Shop (Building 9) at the U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach prior to renovation activities.

The LBP inspection was conducted using an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument. LBP was defined as any paint containing more than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) lead as indicated on the XRF.

Based on the results of this LBP inspection, none of the recorded XRF readings was equal to or above the current US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and EPA regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/cm2.

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1 INTRODUCTION AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION 5

2 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROCEDURES 6

3 LEAD-BASED PAINT RESULTS 7

4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8

5 LIMITATIONS 9

TABLES

Table 1- Facility Description

APPENDICES

Appendix I – Certifications Appendix II- Performance Characteristic Sheet Appendix III-LBP Results Table

AirQuest Environmental, Inc.

1 INTRODUCTION AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION

AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (“AirQuest”) performed a lead-based paint (LBP) inspection to identify surfaces coated with LBP and their general locations on select interior and exterior areas of the Sandblast & Paint Shop (Building 9) at the U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach, located at 100 Mac Arthur Causeway in Miami Beach, Florida 33139 (“the site”). The survey was performed on April 4th and April 20th, 2016 by AirQuest Project Manager, Ms. Carol Gagnon, an EPA-trained Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) certified asbestos inspector (see Appendix I).

The inspection was conducted to determine the presence of LBP within Client directed areas of the Sandblast & Paint Shop (Building 9) at the U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach prior to renovation activities.

The report was prepared in general accordance with “Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing” 2012 revision published by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

A summary of the building materials associated with the facility investigated is presented below in Table 1.

Table 1- Facility Description

Each of the following building components was tested if paint was present.

Facility Type: Military Base Date of Construction: 1940 Number of Floors: 4 Windows: NA Doors: Metal

2 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROCEDURES

According to the EPA and HUD, all painted surfaces or components located in or on buildings constructed prior to 1978, are suspected to contain LBP. This assumption can be rebutted if a survey of each suspect painted surface or component has been conducted, and a minimum of one sample of each has been collected and proven not to contain LBP in quantities of greater than 0.5 percent by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) analysis or 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) by a direct reading X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) testing device. In addition, EPA regulations require that LBP be abated prior to undertaking any type of renovations, which could potentially disturb these materials.

The LBP inspection was performed by observing and sampling accessible painted surfaces on the interior and exterior of the building as per the survey methodology established by HUD. The inspector assigned A, B, C or D to the walls based on main entrance side as A, then rotating clockwise. A different visible color does not by itself result in a separate testing combination.

Testing of the samples was performed using the Niton XLp 300A Analyzer (Serial #92053). The XRF is a screening method currently recommended by HUD for analysis of lead levels in paint. The exact number of testing locations per area may vary depending on existing conditions. The XRF instrument exposes the painted surface to gamma radiation, causing the irradiated substance to emit a spectrum of characteristic frequencies. The frequencies which are characteristic of lead are singled out and measured by the instrument and converted into a number representing the amount of lead in the paint per unit area.

At least three (3) calibration check readings were performed prior to and at the completion of each testing session and/or four (4) hour instrument operating period. Calibration checks were performed before the instrument is turned off and again after it has warmed up.

The performance characteristic sheet is included in Appendix II.

3 LEAD-BASED PAINT RESULTS

The results of the LBP inspection are presented in Appendix III. The LBP inspection was performed in the LBP inspection mode. The XRF sample results are reported in mg/cm2.

LBP was defined as any paint containing more than 1.0 mg/cm2 lead as indicated on the XRF.

Based on the results of this LBP inspection, none of the recorded XRF readings were equal to or above the current HUD or EPA regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/cm2.

4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of this LBP inspection, none of the recorded XRF readings were equal to or above the current HUD or EPA regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/cm2.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Information for Contractors

Under the present OSHA lead construction standard, all identified lead-containing materials affected by construction activities falls under the requirements of 29 CFR 1926. There are no current government guidelines defining a lead-based paint (LBP) or lead concentration that creates a hazardous atmosphere when disturbed. Based on current OSHA guidelines, for those employees who will be disturbing lead-containing paint, their employer must make an initial determination by monitoring employee exposure if any employee is exposed to lead at or above 30 micrograms per cubic meter for an eight-hour time weighted average (30 µg/m3 8-hour time weighted average). The employer must implement OSHA prescribed protective measures until they can demonstrate that the employee exposure is not in excess of the action level.

In general, relatively low levels of lead were detected in the various coated surfaces surveyed.

Depending on the degree and type of disturbance of these surfaces (i.e. sanding, cutting, or demolishing), employers may be required to implement varying degrees of OSHA prescribed protective measures. These protective measures must be maintained until it can be demonstrated that employee exposures do not exceed the action level. The employer should also implement and maintain a written compliance program detailing the protective measures they will utilize to control lead exposure during renovation activities.

Disposal Considerations

Lead containing materials may be subject to disposal restrictions. Prior to disposal, the contractor should characterize all wastes so that they are properly disposed in accordance with all local, state and federal regulations.

5 LIMITATIONS

Due to the inaccessibility of some building elements, it is conceivable that all potential LBP may not have been located and identified. The investigations and methodology reflect our best efforts based upon the prevailing standard of care in the environmental industry.

Appendix I Certifications

Appendix II Performance Characteristic Sheet

Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1

Performance Characteristic Sheet

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004 EDITION NO.: 1

MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:

Make: Niton LLC

Tested Model: XLp 300

Source:

Cd

Note: This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated below, for the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, in the XLi and

XLp series:

XLi 300A, XLi 301A, XLi 302A and XLi 303A.

XLp 300A, XLp 301A, XLp 302A and XLp 303A.

XLi 700A, XLi 701A, XLi 702A and XLi 703A.

XLp 700A, XLp 701A, XLp 702A, and XLp 703A.

Note: The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument. The differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available, in addition to Lead-in-

Paint modes. The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are identical for the source, detector, and detector electronics relative to the Lead-in-Paint mode.

FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE

OPERATING PARAMETERS:

Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode.

XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:

0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm (inclusive)

The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm in the NIST

Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm film).

If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds.

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:

For XRF results using Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, substrate correction is not needed for:

Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Metal, Plaster, and Wood

INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:

K+L MODE

READING DESCRIPTION

SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD

(mg/cm

Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate

Brick

Concrete

Drywall

Metal

Plaster

Wood

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:

This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPA/HUD evaluation using archived building components. Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations. The instruments that were used to perform the testing had new sources; one instrument’s was installed in November 2003 with

40 mCi initial strength, and the other’s was installed June 2004 with 40 mCi initial strength.

OPERATING PARAMETERS:

Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION:

Substrate correction is not needed for brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster or wood when using Lead-in-

Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the normal operating mode for these instruments. If substrate correction is desired, refer to Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for substrate bias.

EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:

Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing. Use the K+L variable time mode readings.

Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.

Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below.

Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:

Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. Do not correct the original or retest results for substrate bias. In single-family housing a result is defined as the average of three readings. In multifamily housing, a result is a single reading.

Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units.

Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each testing combination.

Square the average for each testing combination.

Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.

Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.

Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.

Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.

Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.

Compute the average of all ten original XRF results.

Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF results.

Find the absolute difference of the two averages.

If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient.

Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.

TESTING TIMES:

For the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the instrument continues to read until it is moved away from the testing surface, terminated by the user, or the instrument software indicates the reading is complete. The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode. The times have been adjusted for source decay, normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above. Source strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times. At the time of testing, the instruments had source strengths of 26.6 and 36.6 mCi.

Testing Times Using K+L Reading Mode (Seconds)

All Data Median for laboratory-measured lead levels

(mg/cm

Substrate 25 th

Percentile

Median 75 th

Percentile

Pb < 0.25 0.25 < Pb<1.0 1.0 < Pb

Wood

Drywall

4 11 19 11 15 11

Metal

4 12 18 9 12 14

Brick

Concrete

Plaster

8 16 22 15 18 16

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS:

XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the threshold, and negative if they are less than the threshold.

DOCUMENTATION:

A document titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to construct the data in the sheets, and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. For a copy of this document call the National Lead Information Center Clearinghouse at 1-800-424-LEAD.

This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest Research Institute (MRI) and QuanTech, Inc., under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer. HUD has determined that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint Inspection, of HUD’s Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing.

Appendix III LBP Results

LBP Results Collected on April 4, 2016, in the LBP Inspection Mode

Reading

No.

Time Structure Component Color Substrate Wall Location Condition Results

Pb

(mg/cm2)

1 4/4/2016 10:10 SHUTTER_CAL 2.52

2 4/4/2016 10:14 Calibration Exterior Good Positive 1.00

3 4/4/2016 10:14 Calibration Exterior Good Negative 0.90

4 4/4/2016 10:14 Calibration Exterior Good Positive 1.10

5 4/4/2016 10:16 Exterior Wall SE Small Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

6 4/4/2016 10:17 Exterior Wall NE Small Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

7 4/4/2016 10:17 Exterior Wall NE Small Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.05

8 4/4/2016 10:18 Exterior Wall NW Small Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.00

9 4/4/2016 10:19 Exterior Wall SE Large Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

10 4/4/2016 10:19 Exterior Wall NE Large Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.01

11 4/4/2016 10:19 Exterior Wall NE Large Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.02

12 4/4/2016 10:20 Exterior Wall Center Large Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Null 0.00

13 4/4/2016 10:20 Exterior Wall Center Large Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.01

14 4/4/2016 10:21 Exterior Wall NW Large Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.00

15 4/4/2016 10:22 Exterior Wall NW Large Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.01

16 4/4/2016 10:22 Exterior Wall Center Large Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.03

17 4/4/2016 10:23 Exterior Wall SW Large Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.02

18 4/4/2016 10:23 Exterior Wall SW Large Section Beige Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.02

19 4/4/2016 10:24 Exterior Wall Center Large Section Beige Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.01

20 4/4/2016 10:24 Exterior Wall SE Large Section Beige Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.00

21 4/4/2016 10:25 Exterior Wall SW Smaller Section Beige Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.01

22 4/4/2016 10:26 Exterior Wall SE Smaller Section Beige Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.04

23 4/4/2016 10:28 Gutter SW Larger Section White Metal C Exterior Good Negative 0.01

24 4/4/2016 10:30 Roll Up Door Frame SW Larger Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

25 4/4/2016 10:31 Roll Up Door Frame S Center Larger Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.01

26 4/4/2016 10:32 Roll Up Door Frame N Center Larger Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

27 4/4/2016 10:32 Roll Up Door Frame NW Larger Section Beige Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.01

28 4/4/2016 10:33 Roll Up Door Track NW Larger Section Black Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

29 4/4/2016 10:33 Roll Up Door Track N Center Larger Section Black Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

30 4/4/2016 10:34 Fire Hose Cabinet Larger Section White Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.28

31 4/4/2016 10:34 Fire Hose Cabinet Larger Section White Metal D Exterior Good Null 0.50

32 4/4/2016 10:34 Fire Hose Supply Pipe Larger Section Purple Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

33 4/4/2016 10:35 Fire Hose Supply Pipe Larger Section Purple Metal D Exterior Good Negative 0.00

34 4/4/2016 10:35 Fire Hose Supply Pipe NW Larger Section Red Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.00

35 4/4/2016 10:36 Fire Hose Supply Pipe NW Larger Section Red Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.00

36 4/4/2016 10:36 Gutter NW Larger Section White Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.01

37 4/4/2016 10:37 Gutter NE Larger Section White Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.00

38 4/4/2016 10:37 Eye Wash Wall Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.40

LBP Results Collected on April 4, 2016, in the LBP Inspection Mode

No.

Time Structure Component Color Substrate Wall Location Condition Results

Pb

(mg/cm2)

39 4/4/2016 10:38 Eye Wash Wall Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.40

40 4/4/2016 10:38 Eye Wash Pipe Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.90

41 4/4/2016 10:38 Eye Wash Pipe Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Null 0.90

42 4/4/2016 10:39 Eye Wash Pipe Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.90

43 4/4/2016 10:39 Eye Wash Pipe Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.60

44 4/4/2016 10:40 Eye Wash Pipe Bracket Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.80

45 4/4/2016 10:40 Eye Wash Pipe Bracket Larger Section Yellow Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.11

46 4/4/2016 10:41 Roll Up Door Frame W Larger Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.10

47 4/4/2016 10:42 Roll Up Door Frame E Larger Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.05

48 4/4/2016 10:42 Rear Door Slab Larger Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.08

49 4/4/2016 10:43 Rear Door Jamb Larger Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.03

50 4/4/2016 10:43 Rear Door int Frame Larger Section Beige Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.02

51 4/4/2016 10:44 Gutter NE Smaller Section Beige Metal A Exterior Good Negative 0.02

52 4/4/2016 10:45 Compressor Door Slab Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

53 4/4/2016 10:46 Compressor Door Slab Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.04

54 4/4/2016 10:46 Compressor Door Jamb Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.05

55 4/4/2016 10:46 Compressor Door Jamb Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.16

56 4/4/2016 10:46 Compressor Door Interior Frame Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.09

57 4/4/2016 10:47 Compressor Door Interior Frame Smaller Section Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.09

58 4/4/2016 10:48 Paint Locker Door Slab Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

59 4/4/2016 10:48 Paint Locker Door Slab Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

60 4/4/2016 10:49 Paint Locker Door Jamb Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

61 4/4/2016 10:49 Paint Locker Door Jamb Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative -1.43

62 4/4/2016 10:49 Paint Locker Door Interior Frame Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

63 4/4/2016 10:49 Paint Locker Door Interior Frame Smaller Section Grey Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

64 4/4/2016 10:53 Roof Smaller Section Silver Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.01

65 4/4/2016 10:53 Roof Smaller Section Silver Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.01

66 4/4/2016 10:59 Calibration Exterior Good Positive 1.00

67 4/4/2016 11:00 Calibration Exterior Good Positive 1.00

68 4/4/2016 11:01 Calibration Exterior Good Positive 1.00

69 4/4/2016 11:04 SHUTTER_CAL 2.48

Null Reading – Inspector collected a replacement reading. EPA requires reporting the data that the instrument produces.

Mg/cm2- Milligrams per square centimeter Pb- Lead

LBP Results Collected on April 20, 2016, in the LBP Inspection Mode

No. Time Structure Component Color Substrate Wall Location Condition Results

Pb

(mg/cm2)

1 4/20/2016 11:02 SHUTTER_CAL 2.46

2 4/20/2016 11:03 Calibration Positive 1.10

3 4/20/2016 11:04 Calibration Positive 1.00

4 4/20/2016 11:05 Calibration Negative 0.90

5 4/20/2016 11:10 Metal Vent End Underside Gray Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

6 4/20/2016 11:10 Metal Vent End Underside Gray Metal B Exterior Good Null 0.01

7 4/20/2016 11:10 Metal Vent End Underside Gray Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

8 4/20/2016 11:14 Metal Flange Flange Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

9 4/20/2016 11:15 Metal Flange Flange Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

10 4/20/2016 11:15 Pipe Pipe Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

11 4/20/2016 11:15 Pipe Pipe Blue Metal B Exterior Good Negative 0.00

12 4/20/2016 11:20 Building Framing Vertical Right Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.02

13 4/20/2016 11:21 Building Framing Vertical Center Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.02

14 4/20/2016 11:22 Building Framing Vertical Right Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.00

15 4/20/2016 11:22 Building Framing Horizontal Left Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.02

16 4/20/2016 11:23 Building Framing Horizontal Center Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.05

17 4/20/2016 11:23 Building Framing Horizontal Right Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.01

18 4/20/2016 11:24 Building Framing Horizontal Left Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.03

19 4/20/2016 11:25 Building Framing Horizontal Center Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.01

20 4/20/2016 11:25 Building Framing Vertical Right Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.02

21 4/20/2016 11:26 Building Framing Vertical Center Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.03

22 4/20/2016 11:26 Building Framing Vertical Left Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.01

23 4/20/2016 11:27 Building Framing Vertical Left Gray Metal C Interior Good Null 0.04

24 4/20/2016 11:27 Building Framing Vertical Center Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.05

25 4/20/2016 11:28 Building Framing Vertical Right Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.01

26 4/20/2016 11:28 Building Framing Horizontal Right Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.01

27 4/20/2016 11:29 Building Framing Horizontal Center Gray Metal C Interior Good Null 0.00

28 4/20/2016 11:29 Building Framing Horizontal Center Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.00

29 4/20/2016 11:29 Building Framing Horizontal Left Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.01

30 4/20/2016 11:30 Building Framing Horizontal Left Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.13

31 4/20/2016 11:30 Building Framing Horizontal Center Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.05

32 4/20/2016 11:31 Building Framing Horizontal Right Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.04

33 4/20/2016 11:32 Building Framing Vertical Right Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.12

34 4/20/2016 11:32 Building Framing Vertical Center Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.04

LBP Results Collected on April 20, 2016, in the LBP Inspection Mode

No. Time Structure Component Color Substrate Wall Location Condition Results

Pb

(mg/cm2)

35 4/20/2016 11:35 Building Framing Vertical Left Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.06

36 4/20/2016 11:35 Interior Skin Left Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.01

37 4/20/2016 11:36 Interior Skin Center Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.03

38 4/20/2016 11:36 Interior Skin Right Gray Metal D Interior Good Negative 0.01

39 4/20/2016 11:37 Interior Skin Right Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.00

40 4/20/2016 11:37 Interior Skin Center Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.01

41 4/20/2016 11:38 Interior Skin Left Gray Metal C Interior Good Negative 0.00

42 4/20/2016 11:38 Interior Skin Center Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.01

43 4/20/2016 11:38 Interior Skin Left Gray Metal B Interior Good Negative 0.01

44 4/20/2016 11:39 Interior Skin Left Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.02

45 4/20/2016 11:39 Interior Skin Center Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.01

46 4/20/2016 11:40 Interior Skin Right Gray Metal A Interior Good Negative 0.00

47 4/20/2016 12:01 Calibration Positive 1.00

48 4/20/2016 12:02 Calibration Negative 0.90

49 4/20/2016 12:03 Calibration Positive 1.00

50 4/20/2016 12:06 SHUTTER_CAL 2.34

Pb-Lead

Null Reading-Inspector collected a replacement reading. EPA requires reporting the data that the instrument produces.

Mg/cm2-Milligrams per square centimeter.