Attachment 7 PPQ 20210113.pdf

PDF 663 KB Posted

Attached to
JBER MACC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA500021R0023
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractors for a multiple award construction contract at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska. The solicitation seeks contractors to provide construction services on an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity basis for repair, alteration, and construction of real property improvements. Respondents will be evaluated on metrics including on-time performance, cost control, quality processes, business relations, continuity of key personnel, and safety history based on responses to the questionnaire. Completed questionnaires are due to the 673d Contracting Office by the specified dates and will be kept confidential as a source selection factor for awarding contracts under the multiple award construction contract.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to JBER MACC, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 29 QA CAO 7 Jul 21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment FA500021R00230005 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA500021R00230004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 28 SUPPLEMENTAL HAZMAT SPECS Seed Proj 20-5254.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Seed Project FXSB 20-5254 Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 Seed Project FXSB 21-1058 Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment 27 AF Form 66 Seed Proj FXSB 21-1058.pdf PDF
Attachment 29 QA CAO 24 Jun 21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 17 Teaming consent 20201208.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 FOPR-Seed Project FXSB 20-5254.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 MACC SOW(CAO 25 June 21).pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Seed Proj FXSB 21-1058 SOW SPECS DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
Attachment 24 FOPR-Seed Project FXSB 21-1058.pdf PDF
Attachment 25 Seed Proj FXSB 20-5254 EXHIBITS 09-JUN-2021.pdf PDF
Attachment 26 AF Form 66 Seed Proj FXSB 20-5254.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA500021R00230001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA500021R00230003 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA500021R00230002.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA500021R00230002 (Summary of Changes).pdf PDF
Amendment 2 Attachment 1 - Site Visit Sign in Sheets FXSB 20-5254 and 21-1058.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Seed Proj FXSB 21-1058 SOW SPECS DRAWINGS v2.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment No. 1_FA500021R00230001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 MACC SOW(CAO 3 May 21).pdf PDF
Attachment 8 Past Performance Tabs A-B 20210401.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 13 JBER Richardson IFS_PreFinal.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 JBER Hazardous Waste Management Plan - 7 May 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 NAFI General Provisions and Clauses.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 DD1354 _ FILLABLE Template _ AUG2013.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Seed Project FXSB 20-5254 Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 JBER Richardson IFS_Pre-Final.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 Teaming consent 20201208.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 Financial Data Form 20201208.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA500021R0023.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Seed Proj FXSB 20-5254 SOW SPECS DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Seed Proj FXSB 21-1058 SOW SPECS DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 Seed Project FXSB 21-1058 Price Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 673ABW3 Dig Permit (2020 Version).pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Weather Data.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 JBER Telecommunications Installation Standards18DEC2018.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 Contractors Fire Safety Guide.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 ENV_PRECON Checklist_2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 21 REVISED JBER CAD GIS RECORD DRAWING DESIGN AND AS BUILT STANDARD Dec 2019.pdf PDF
Attachment 22 PPCL 20210519.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTION PAGE

Please complete the following questionnaire concerning evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance. Your response to this evaluation will be utilized for the procurement of a construction firm to provide all supervision, labor, materials and equipment necessary under a Multiple Award Construction Contract, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract vehicle for construction services located primarily at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER)

AFB, AK.

Increased emphasis in our procurements is placed on past performance as a source selection factor. Your complete response is critical as this will be relied on by the Government in the selection of a firm for the proposed construction project. Please answer all questions by checking only one (1) response per question. It is strongly recommended that additional information is placed in the space provided.

You will be required to sign this evaluation at the end of the questionnaire and your initials are required on each page of this questionnaire, as well as on this instruction page.

Government personnel may contact you concerning responses made by you in this questionnaire.

If you have any questions and/or concerns, please send them to john.jeffrey.1@us.af.mil and lauren.mitchell.5@us.af.mil.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED

SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

The completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire(s), applicable Consent Letter(s), and Client Authorization Letter(s) shall be emailed to: john.jeffrey.1@us.af.mil and lauren.mitchell.5@us.af.mil or mailed to the address listed below. If mailing (USPS, FedEx, UPS, etc.), the outside envelope must be marked as follows:

NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY

673d Contracting Office/PKA Attn: Mr. John Jeffrey, Contracting Officer 10480 Sijan Ave

JBER AFB, AK 99506

Note: Electronic submission is preferred.

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

Attachment 7 - PPQ mailto:@ mailto:frank.gonzales.14@us.af.mil mailto:jennifer.wilterdink@us.af.mil mailto:frank.gonzales.14@us.af.mil

Contractor being evaluated:

Owner Name (Organization Name, Evaluator Name, Address, Zip, and Telephone Number)

Name, Location, and Description of Project - Use additional sheets if necessary.

Award Amount:

Original: $

Final: $

Percentage of Final Contract Amount resulting from owner initiated changes:

Status of project: Active 100% complete

If active, expected completion date:

If complete, completion date:

Would you award a contract to this firm again for similar work? Yes No

For each of the questions appearing on the attached sheets, please place an “X” next to the statement which best represents your evaluation in response to the subject questions. Please note any comments which will add value to your markedresponse.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

Attachment 7 - PPQ

A: On time - timeliness of performance

1. Did the contractor complete the project on schedule?

Contractor completed project prior to originally scheduled completion date Contractor completed project by original scheduled completion date Contractor completed within agreed to extended completion date Contractor failed to meet project completion date.

Comments:

2. How responsive was the contractor in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

Contractor consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

Contractor demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

Contractor rarely demonstrated a pro-active approach.

Contractor never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

Comments:

3. Were the contractor submittals completed on time?

Contractor consistently made submissions ahead of schedule.

Contractor made some submissions ahead of schedule and all others on time.

Contractor made majority of submissions on time.

Contractor submissions were usually behind schedule.

Comments:

4. Did the contractor deliver DD1354s to the Contracting Officer correct, complete, and on-time?

Contractor consistently delivered DD1354s correct, complete, and on-time Contractor mostly delivered DD1354s correct, complete, and on-time Contractor sometimes delivered DD1354s correct, complete, and on-time Contractor did not deliver DD1354s correct, complete, and on-time

Comments:

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

B: Cost Control

1. Did the contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals?

Contractor consistently submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

Contractor typically submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

Contractor submitted fair & reasonably priced proposals some of the time.

Contractor rarely submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

Comments:

C: Quality Processes

1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?

Contractor consistently surpassed contract requirements.

Contractor exceeded contract requirements.

Contractor met the minimum requirements.

Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.

Comments:

2. Was the contractor responsive in completing punch list items? Contractor completed punch list items after initial notification. Contractor completed most punch list items after initial notification. Contractor eventually completed all punch list items.

Some punch list items were never completed by contractor.

Comments:

3. Did the contractor have a program to monitor quality?

Contractor has an established, comprehensive program which he uses on every project with individuals employed specifically for quality control.

Contractor set up a satisfactory quality control program to comply with the requirements for your project.

Contractor has an established program which he uses on every project.

Contractor’s quality control program was ineffective on your project.

Comments:

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

4. Did the contractor comply with all Federal, State, and local environmental regulations?

Contractor consistently complied with all regulations Contractor mostly complied with all regulations Contractor sometimes complied with all regulations Contractor consistently did not comply with all regulations

Comments:

5. Did the contractor responsibly dispose of all Contractor generated hazardous waste?

Contractor consistently disposed of all generated hazardous waste Contractor mostly disposed of all generated hazardous waste Contractor did not dispose of generated hazardous waste Contractor was not responsible for disposing of hazardous waste

Comments:

D: Business Relations/Project Management

1. How well did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors/representatives?

Contractor was extremely cooperative.

Contractor was very cooperative.

Contractor was generally cooperative.

Contractor was not cooperative.

Comments:

2. How effective was the contractor's on site management team?

Contractor's team was extremely effective.

Contractor's team was very effective.

Contractor's team was generally effective.

Contractor's team was ineffective.

Comments:

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

E: Continuity of Key Personnel

1. Did the contractor maintain a consistent project team throughout the duration of the project?

No adjustments were made to the project team throughout the project.

Minor adjustments were made to the project team during the project.

Significant changes to the project team were made during the project.

Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.

Comments:

2. Did the contractor adequately staff the project?

Contractor’s staff was extremely effective.

Contractor’s staff was very effective.

Contractor’s staff was generally effective.

Contractor’s staff was ineffective.

Comments:

F: Safety History of Each Project

1. Did the contractor carry a satisfactory safety plan for your project?

Contractor set up a satisfactory safety plan specific to the requirements Contractor adapted a generic safety plan that meets project needs.

Contractor has a generic safety plan which he uses on every project; no adaptations.

Contractor’s safety plan was ineffective for my project.

Comments:

Signature and Date:

Name and Title:

Organization:

FA500021R0023-JBER MACC

ATTACHMENT 7
NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY
Note: Electronic submission is preferred.
Award Amount:
Percentage of Final Contract Amount resulting from owner initiated changes:
If active, expected completion date:
B: Cost Control
C: Quality Processes
D: Business Relations/Project Management
E: Continuity of Key Personnel
F: Safety History of Each Project
Signature and Date: Name and Title: Organization:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .