Attachment 27 - EZSource PresentPast Performance Relevancy Table .docx

RFP FA446021R0009

ATTACHMENT 27

EZSource PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY TABLE (To be Completed by Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ and Critical Subcontractor) (Complete for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool)

Request the offeror/joint venture member/and Critical Subcontractor include if applicable complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool. This table, in addition to the information provided by the offeror in the PPI Tool, will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirements. Offerors/joint venture members shall only complete column three. Offerors’/joint venture members’ answers are applicable only to the efforts identified in the PPI Tool, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

If the contract being submitted is an ordering type contractual vehicle (for example, including but not limited to an Indefinite Delivery “D” type contract per FAR 16.5), only after issuance of a delivery/task order does performance occur. The Contract Number, Total Contract Dollar Value, Period of Performance, Quantities produced/repaired, Type and Complexity of Data Deliverable submitted here should be for the order or series of orders, the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle.

If a series of orders is being submitted, the offeror shall include a list that includes the order numbers, each order’s Total Contract Dollar Value, each order’s Period of Performance, each order’s Quantity Produced/Repaired, and the Type and Complexity of Data Deliverables on each order. If the series of orders contains more than 5 orders, include this information on a separate attachment. See Section L-900 Paragraph L-2.3 Part II Paragraph 3 for more information on proposal submission and Section M-900 Paragraph M-3.2 for evaluation information.

Offeror Name:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Basic Contract Number and each Order Number or Order Number within the a Series of Orders)

Program Title:

Contractor/Agency/Customer:

Original Total Contract Dollar Value: PCO Note: Tailor to match what you have identified for Programmatic/Logistical evaluation in Section M-900, Paragraph II.D.4 Note.

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Original Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Current Total Contract Dollar Value: PCO Note: Tailor to match what you have identified for Programmatic/Logistical evaluation in Section M-900, Paragraph II.D.4 Note.

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Current Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Period of Performance:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Period of Performance for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Quantities Produced/Repaired:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Quantity Produced/Repaired for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Type/Complexity of Data Deliverables:

If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Type/Complexity of Data Deliverables for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill in for the Effort Identified in Paragraph B Above (Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor completes) The effort in Paragraph B required:

Facility 2: production

6. Program Similarity

7. Program Complexity

10. Other

Was this contract effort (as identified above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous name of installation procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.