Addendum_4_.pdf

Purchasing Services 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way

Building C, Room 303 Viera, Florida 32940

Cell 3 Class I Landfill Base Liner Construction-South Landfill Central Disposal Facility (CDF)

Bid# B-7-26-11 March 11, 2026

ADDENDUM 4

TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS

This is an Addendum to and shall be considered as part of the original bid package for the above-mentioned bid. Please acknowledge receipt of Addendum 4 in space provided on the Bid Proposal Form- Addendum Acknowledgement. Bids submitted without the required acknowledgement will be considered non-responsive.

As indicated in Addendum 2, Bid due date has been extended to TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2026, 11:00 AM. Bids received after this date and time will NOT be accepted.

ATTACHMENTS:

OPINION OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST

EXHIBIT 1 – GT REPORT

EXHIBIT 2 – ELECT GROUNDING DETAIL

EXHIBIT 3 – ELECT PANEL MOUNTING DETAIL

ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND REVISIONS:

1. ATTACHMENT F- DRAWINGS

a. SHEET C-2- Monitoring Well 121SU located in the Yard Waste Mulching Area is deleted from this construction.

b. SHEET C-3- MW-121SU is deleted from Proposed Monitoring Well Table.

2. ATTACHMENT E- TECHNCIAL SPECIFICATIONS- SECTION 31 62 16

a. PART 2- PRODUCTS- PARA 2.02 A.8- Revised.

8. The vinyl sheet pile shall conform to the following average performance requirements. The values listed in the table below are representative of Models SG- 625 and SG-525 SG-825 manufactured by Crane Materials International, or approved equal:

Test Requirements

Section Modulus ≥15 in3/ft Section Thickness ≥0.275 in

Section Depth ≤12 in Section Width ≥24 in

Moment of Inertia ≥60 in4/ft Impact Strength ≥ 13,000 in-lbs/in2 616 in-lbs

RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED:

Question 1: In referencing item 7 on the price sheet document, it appears that we will submit pricing for Demolition and Clear and Grub, but the item description and measurement and payment include stripping as well. Should the stripping be included in the Clear and Grub number? Do the demolition and clear grub numbers need to total up to equal the total dollars in the attachment b bid form lump sum item 7 for Clear, Grubbing, Stripping, and Demolition.

Response 1: See Addendum 2. The “Price Sheet” Excel file is deleted from the advertised Bid Documents. Disregard the Excel file entirely. This is a Lump Sum Bid and all costs to the Contractor shall be included in the Part A of the Bid Schedule included in Attachment B and submitted with the bid. A table included in Attachment B is for breakdown of the Lump Sum Bid. Please refer to Specification Section 01 29 00, Measurement and Payment, for description of each item in the table for Breakdown of the Lump Sum Bid. The breakdown of lump sum bid table does not serve as a time/material price sheet

Question 2: Regarding Price Sheet item #9 Stormwater System, plan sections sheets C-9, C-10, C- 26, and C-28 reference new installed Storm Drain RCP to be 48" Class III RCP. Item #9 on the price sheet references those items as 54" RCP with no reference to any 48" Class III RCP on the job. Only 1 section of New 54" Class V RCP is mentioned on plan sheet C-9, while the rest are 48" Class III.

There seems to be a discrepancy between the Price Sheet and the Job Plans. Where should the contractor show cost for the 48" RCP shown on the plans?

Response 2: As indicated on Addendum 2, the Excel file with the “Price Sheet” is deleted from the Bid documents. Disregard the Excel file entirely. This is a Lump Sum Bid and all costs to the Contractor shall be included in the Part A of the Bid Schedule included in Attachment B and submitted with the bid. A table included in Attachment B is for breakdown of the Lump Sum Bid. Please refer to Specification Section 01 29 00, Measurement and Payment, for description of each item in the table for Breakdown of the Lump Sum Bid.

Question 3: We ask that the bid date, as well as the deadline for submitting questions, for this bid proposal be delayed by two weeks. This will give all Bidders, along with our potential subcontractors and suppliers, more time to ask questions pertaining to the bid. It will also allow us more time to evaluate potential products and services and match them properly to the project specifications. We believe that the additional time will result in more competitive bid pricing for this project.

Response 3: As indicated on Addendum 2, the bid due date has been extended to Tuesday, March 31, 2026 @ 11AM.

Question 4: Can the Owner share the Engineer’s cost estimate for the project?

Response 4: The Owner has prepared an opinion of estimated construction cost for this project. The construction cost for Part A- Lump Sum portion of the Bid for Cell 3 base liner and ancillary features as advertised complete in place is estimated to be approximately $44,400,000.00. The value for Part B - Owner’s Contingency Fund remains at $750,000.00. The Owner’s opinion of the estimated construction cost portion for this project is posted.

Question 5: Will it be permissible for the Contractor to dispose of project related construction debris onsite? If so, will it be necessary for the Contractor to weight such debris or pay tipping fees?

Response 5: Yes. Project generated Class I or Class III solid waste can be transported and disposed of at the working face of the landfill by the Contractor. No weighing at the scale house or payment of disposal fee is required.

Question 6: It is our understanding that the project area had a wildlife survey conducted on it already. Will that survey still be valid upon mobilization of the Contractor to the site? If not, would the wildlife survey need to be repeated and, if so, who would be responsible for doing it?

Response 6: A Gopher Tortoise survey was performed, and the project site was cleared. A copy of the survey report is attached to Addendum No. 4 as Exhibit-1. However, the survey is valid for 90 days. If necessary, a new round of wildlife surveys will be performed at Owner’s expense prior to the pre-construction meeting with the selected contractor.

Question 7: Where onsite will the Contractor be allowed to acquire water for construction purposes (dust control and soil moisturizing)?

Response 7: The selected contractor may obtain water for construction purposes from the West Stormwater Pond directly north of Cell 2. The pond banks or any traffic area erosion is to be repaired and restored as part of substantial completion.

Question 8: In the event that unsuitable subgrade soils are discovered in the work area that would need to be removed and replaced, how would payment for such work be handled?

Response 8: Based on soils borings and the report of geotechnical investigations for this project, the County does not expect any unsuitable soils in this project. Any surplus fill from this project is to be stored on site as directed by the County. Copies of the soils borings and geotechnical reports submitted as part of the permitting process are available on the FDEP website.

Question 9: In Specification Section 01 29 00, Measurement and Payment, under 1.01 Description, paragraph H, Partial Payment for Stored Materials and Equipment, Item 1, it states that “Partial payments may be made for materials and equipment delivered to and stored on site in an acceptable manner. Partial payment will be made based on documented invoice amounts for the materials or equipment stored on site. To receive partial payment, the actual invoice indicating the cost of the material or equipment must be furnished with the pay application. Payment will be made on a percentage complete of the respective pay item that correlates to the cost of the stored equipment or materials.” Does this mean that the full cost of the invoice for stored materials will be eligible for payment as a percentage of the overall pay item prior to installation? The last sentence with the phrase “percentage complete” makes the overall paragraph confusing.

Response 9: Please see Attachment C, Article 15 for Payment to Contractor.

Question 10: Specification Section 44 42 56.04 Leachate Pumping Systems lists QED as the approved manufacturer for the electric submersible leachate pumps. However, QED stated they are unable to quote these pumps and are “No Bidding” them because the electric pump and panel requirements are more than they can reasonably provide. Additionally, they stated that the specifications contain several custom items that we would not be able to get quoted in time for the required timeline. Please provide another approved manufacturer(s) that we may contact to provide quotes for equipment suitable for this project.

Response 10: Refer to Specifications Section 44 42 56.04 which indicates "Approved-Equal" pumps. Bidder is allowed to base pricing on QED and other approved equal pumps. For purposes of bidding, QED and EPG are acceptable pump manufacturers. Per the specifications 44 42 56.04 Paragraph 2.02, pumps, control panels, and level switches shall come as a complete package from a single supplier. A single manufacturer for pumps, control panels, and level switches is not required.

Question 11: Regarding Paved and Unpaved Access Road quantities from the Price Sheet, quantities seem high when considering access ramp areas for Sump PS #'s 3 and 4 noted on the plan sheet C-5. Are paved quantities included in the temporary ramp areas, and if not where are these paved and unpaved ramps located?

Response 11: Unpaved ramps are not part of this Project. Disregard any reference to unpaved driveways or ramps. With respect to pavement quantities, the Contractor is responsible, as part of preparation of his bid, to make his own quantity take-off and independent verification of quantities.

Question 12: Regarding Plan Sheet C-5 Dewatering Plans & Notes, the scale seems to be off by a factor of 2, where the actual measurement is 1"-100' instead of the 1"-200' scale that is indicated.

Please advise.

Response 12: The correct scale for Sheet C-5 is 1” = 100’.

Question 13: Item 29 on the pricing sheet has an item listed under it for 3500 LF of sdr 9 2 inch pipe, but is the only item listed under item 29 should this carry the entire cost for item 29? If yes why break it out in a different row from item 29 in the row above it?

Response 13: See Response to Question No. 2 above.

Question 14: On both Leachate Pump Stations, a Manual Transfer Switch is to be installed. Please provide the acceptable manufacturer for these Transfer Switches.

Response 14: Acceptable manufacturers include: Square D, Eaton, ABB, or approved equal.

Question 15: On both Leachate Pump Stations, a Generator Receptacle is to be installed on the Manual Transfer Switches. Please provide the acceptable make and model for these receptacles.

Response 15: Generator receptacle shall be 480V, 100A Model PS4100R72.

Question 16: Panelboards P3 and P4 are to be installed in Pump Station 3 and Pump Station 4 respectively. Please provide the acceptable manufacturers and panel schedules for P3 and P4.

Response 16: Acceptable manufacturer shall be Square D, Eaton, ABB or approved equal.

Question 17: A 7.5KVA Mini Power Zone is to be installed at each Pump Station. Please provide the acceptable manufacturers and panel schedules for these Mini Power Zones.

Response 17: Please refer to the riser diagrams on Sheets E4 and E6. All 120 V loads shall be fed from the Mini Power Zone. Acceptable manufacturers include Square D, Eaton, ABB, or approved equal.

Question 18: Per single line diagrams, all Transfer Switches, MPZs, and Panels are to have a Surge Protection Device. Please provide the acceptable manufacturers for these SPDs.

Response 18: Acceptable manufacturers include Square D, Eaton, ABB, or approved equal.

Question 19: The single line diagram on sheet E-4 shows that the MTS in Pump Station 3 is to be fed from “Existing Panel P1”. Sheet E-6 shows that the MTS in Pump Station 4 is to be fed from “Panel P1”. Sheet E-2 shows the proposed conduit routing from Existing Panel P1 to Pump Station 3, a proposed conduit route from P1 to Pump Station 4, and three existing 2” conduits routed from Existing Panel P1. Sheet E-2 also shows an unidentified location with the callout “Locate two spare conduit and extend to Sump PS #4”. Please confirm:

a. If Pump Station 4 is to be fed from existing panel P1.

b. If so, is it to be fed through existing conduits?

c. If so, do these conduits end at the location of Pump Station 4? Or at the location with the callout to extend them?

Response 19:

a. Yes, Pump Station 4 is to be fed from existing Panel P1

b. Yes, it is intended that one of the existing spare conduits from P1 that terminates at Pump Station 2 shall be used for the power conductors between Panel P1 and Pump Station 4.

c. The two existing spare conduits from Panel P1 currently end at Pump Station 2.

The work for this contract requires that the two existing spare conduits be extended to Pump Station 4. One of those two extended conduits shall be used for the Pump Station 4 power conductors from Panel P1. The other spare conduit shall be capped near Pump Station 4 and remain as a spare empty conduit.

Question 20: The price sheet does not have a price line for the electrical equipment. Where should this cost be included?

Response 20: See Response to Question No. 2 above regarding the pricing sheet.

Question 21: On sheets E-4 the one-line diagram shows a MPZ (mini power zone) being fed from Panel P3, but sheet E-3 does not show the location of the MPZ. Where is the MPZ to be located?

Response 21: The MPZ shall be located at the leachate pump station electric panel rack assembly.

Question 22: On sheets E-6 the one-line diagram shows a MPZ (mini power zone) being fed from Panel P4, but sheet E-5 does not show the location of the MPZ. Where is the MPZ to be located?

Response 22: The MPZ shall be located at the leachate pump station electric panel rack assembly.

Question 23: What size and type pull boxes are required to be installed?

Response 23: Pull boxes shall be concrete and 36”x36”x48” deep. Pull box cover shall be A- 36 steel with hot dip galvanized finish and rated for H-20 wheel loading.

Question 24: What is the owner’s generator receptacle type, service rating and voltage?

Response 24: See response to question No. 15 above.

Question 25: Sheet E-2 shows existing conduits with 4-4/0 and 1-4 GRD P400 and P423 currently installed to Sump PS #4, but it also shows locating and extending 2 spare conduits to Sump PS #4 with conduit labels P400 and P423. What is the current location of these conduits and wire?

Response 25: See Response to Question No. 19 above.

Question 26: Are the branch circuit breakers to feed Panel P3 and Panel P4 existing in Panel P1? If not, what is the manufacturer and breaker type needing to be supplied?

Response 26: The manufacturer and circuit breaker type can be verified during construction.

Question 27: Are there panel schedules for panel P3 and P4 to show quantity and sizes of branch circuit breakers needed?

Response 27: No, panel schedules are not provided. Bidder shall refer to Sheets E-4 and E-6 and make their independent determination of the quantity and sizes of the circuit breakers.

Question 28: Sheet E-3 indicates the spare 2” conduit to be stubbed up and capped. Sheet E-4 indicates this conduit to be terminated in the manual transfer switch. Which location should this be terminated?

Response 28: See Response to Question No. 19c. above. The exact termination point of the spare conduit can be verified during construction.

Question 29: Sheet E-5 indicates the spare 2” conduit to be stubbed up and capped. Sheet E-6 indicates this conduit to be terminated in the manual transfer switch. Which location should this be terminated?

Response 29: See Response to Question No. 19c. above. The exact termination point of the spare conduit can be verified during construction.

Question 30: Storm Sheets C-9 & C-10: Plans show 12 EA 48” MES and 4 EA 54” MES. The bid form only lists 16 EA 54” MES. Do we combine the 48” MES with the 54” MES line item?

Response 31: See Response to Question No. 2 above regarding the pricing sheet.

Question 32: M&P Items #9 mentions RCP Class's III and V but only Class 5 is listed in the stormwater section of Excel Price Sheet provided.

Response 32: See Addendum No. 2. The “Price Sheet” Excel file is deleted from the advertised Bid Documents.

Question 33: Where in Attachment E, are the specifications listed for the new 24" RCP with FFCRS culverts to be installed on the southern berm of Cell 3? Don't seem to be temporary berm culverts

Response 33: See Specifications Section 33 41 01. For the FFCRS, see Specifications Section 03 22 00.

Question 34: Attachment A – Price Sheet lists “54-inch RCP” and “54-inch MES” under Bid Item 9.

Stormwater System. The plans appear to call out 54-inch RCP only once, on DWG. C-9 at the West Operations Ramp; the rest of the plans, including the details for the West Operations Ramp call out 48-inch RCP and MES. All of the other plan and detail references to RCP and MES appear to be 48-inch diameter. Please clarify all the sizes of RCP and MES, as well as their location and footages.

Response 34: See Response to Question No. 2 above regarding the pricing sheet.

Question 35: Attachment A – Price Sheet lists on only one size of RCP and MES, but he plans also show 48” and 24” RCP and MES. Can the attachment be revised to show separate bid items for each size of RCP and MES?

Response 35: See Response to Question No. 2 above regarding the pricing sheet.

Question 36: What is the class type for the two (2) 24” RCP and MES at the south perimeter ditch and interim swale shown on Dwg. C-14 and at the southeast perimeter ditch and interim swale shown on Dwg. C-15?

Response 36: The 24” RCP and MES shown on Sheet C-14 shall be Class III.

Question 37: The 48” RCP culverts for the leachate pump station access ramps are called out as both Class III and Class IV, and the 54” RCP culverts for the operations access ramps are called out as Class V. Is this correct? Or, are all RCP and MES to be the same class?

Response 37: See Sheets C-9 and C-10. The culverts at the leachate pump station access ramps shall be 48” Class III RCP. The culverts at the west operations access ramp shall be 54” Class V RCP and the culverts at the east operations access ramp shall be 48” Class V RCP.

Question 38: Please confirm that total quantity of existing groundwater monitoring wells that are to be abandoned. We are unable to locate twelve (12) on the plans, as the quantity lists on Attachment A – Price Sheet.

Response 38: See Addendum No. 2. The “Price Sheet” Excel file is deleted from the advertised Bid Documents.

Question 39: Are any electrical conduits to be installed in duct banks?

Response 39: No duct banks are required for this Project.

Question 40: The Legends on Dwg. E-1 are difficult to read. Can we get a copy that better distinguishes new from old equipment, work, etc.?

Response 41: The electronic version supplied in the bid documents is legible.

Question 42: Is there any lighting required to be installed anywhere on this project? If so, please provide the locations of the lights.

Response 42: No lighting is required to be installed for this Project.

Question 43: Regarding Panel P-1, where both power for Cell 3 and Cell 4 will be coming from, the existing panel P-1 will not except a 200amp breaker as the plans are calling for 200amps at each cell.

The existing cells are at 100amps, and the existing panel will accept 2-100amp breakers. The existing generator plugs are 100amps also, instead of 200amps. Can you confirm that we are going to run 100amps to cell 3 and cell 4?

Response 43: Confirming 100-amp circuits to Sump Pump Stations 3 and 4.

Question 44: Can you confirm that generator plugs are to be rated for 100amps?

Response 44: See response to question No. 15 above.

Question 45: We are unable to find the specifications for the stormwater sump pump to be installed in each leachate pump station headwall/slab. Please tell us where we can find that specification or provide it if it is not included in the bid documents we were provided.

Response 45: See Specification Section 44 42 56.04, Paragraph 2.08.

Question 46: Specification Section 40 27 00.14 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe provides a small reference regarding dual contained pipe. Is there any dual contained pipe on this project? If so, please provide the location, size, etc.

Response 46: There is no dual contained pipe on this Project.

Question 47: Regarding Specification Section 44 42 56.04, 1.05, it states furnish one spare pump for each type of pump. One spare Primary Leachate Collection Pump, and one Secondary Leachate Detection Pump for each Leachate Pump Station, or one each total?

Response 47: Contractor shall provide one spare Primary Leachate Collection Pump, one spare Secondary Leachate Detection Pump, and one spare Stormwater Sump Pump for each leachate pump station.

Question 48: Regarding Specification Section 44 42 56.04, 1.05, it states liquid level transducers: two of each type used. Two for each pump station, or two total?

Response 48: Contractor shall provide two liquid level transducers total.

Question 49: Regarding Specification Section 44 42 56.04, 2.03, F, 2, for each pump, provide two pressure transmitters measuring absolute pressure, one to measure the gas pressure and one to measure the liquid level. An absolute gas pressure transmitter is not part of the pump assembly and is not described or shown elsewhere on the drawings. Provide details of the specific transmitter (if required).

Response 49: Provide a gas vapor pressure transducer/transmitter as required. Gas vapor pressure transducer/transmitter shall be Omega PX 309 Series or Approved Equal.

Question 50: Regarding Specification Section 44 42 56.04, 2.03, F, 4, 8, provide a generator receptacle which receives external 480-volt, 3-phase power. This is shown on Drawing E-4 to be part of the service entrance manual power transfer switch. Should the Pump Control Panels (PCP-3/PCP-

4) also have generator plug receptacles and transfer switches?

Response 50: Generator plug receptacles and transfer switches are not required at the pump control panels.

Question 51: Will the County consider alternatives to what is called out in the specs.?

Response 51: Yes. See General Conditions for procedures for substitution.

Question 52: How high is the water table and how much groundwater is anticipated? Basically, will well point dewatering be needed outside of the new environmental cutoff wall limits?

Response 52: Refer to the geotechnical information issued as part of Addendum 2. The need to dewater outside of the environmental cutoff wall is at the discretion of the Contractor. The Contractor shall make their independent determination of dewatering needs during construction that is effective to meet Project requirements and shall develop a project specific dewatering plan for submittal.

Question 53: Is the profile on C-39 trying to show pipe on both sides of the ditch? Profile is unclear and the lack of color makes it hard to follow.

Response 53: Yes, the profile is intended to show pipe on both sides of the ditch. The pipe with the 1.32% slope is on the west side of the ditch. The pipe with the 1.07% slope is on the east side of the ditch and connects directly to the condensate sump.

Question 54: Who is supplying the Sump Pump Control box, Sump Junction box, Pump Control Panel, RTU3, RTU4 for Pump Stations 3 and 4 ?

Response 54: It is the Contractor’s responsibility to furnish all material and equipment to complete all work.

Question 55: On the Instrumentation and Control wire schedule E-4 and E-6 , Circuit numbers P305, P306, P317 in the Function column mentions a ground triangle, can you provide a detail for said ground triangle?

Response 55: Please see detail on Exhibit 2 to Addendum 4.

Question 56: On drawings E-3 and E-5 at stations 3 and 4 electrical equipment layout shows squares for electrical box mounting, who is supplying these 4 posts at each station?

Response 56: It is the Contractor’s responsibility to furnish all material and equipment to complete all work.

Question 57: There is no detail for these posts at the electrical equipment stations 3 and 4, Can you supply details and material used to construct and anchoring requirements for these posts?

Response 57: Please see details on Exhibit 3 to Addendum 4.

Question 58: There are no details for lights, receptacles or switches on the drawings for both stations, are there lighting, receptacles, switches for these equipment stations? Details, locations, light specifications and circuit numbers are needed.

Response 58: There are no lights required for this Project. For all other electrical components, see electrical drawings.

Question 59: On the Instrumentation and Control wire schedule E-4 and E-6 in the Analog column, CFWE is mentioned, are these venders supplied cables? And who will install them? There is no detail to CFWE on the drawings.

Response 59: CFWE indicates that these equipment items are typically supplied from the manufacturer with the power cord or signal wiring assembled with the equipment at the factory. It is the Contractor's responsibility to install all materials and equipment.

Question 60: Please supply specifications and or drawings for all Vendor supplied equipment and instrumentation.

Response 60: Please see Attachment E- Technical Specifications.

Question 61: Power conduits, P423, P400, P300 and P323 on drawing E-2, are these conduits concrete encased from Existing Power Panel P1 for Station #3, And for Station #4, when extended from the existing conduits and existing box?

Response 61: No concrete duct banks are required for this Project.

Question 62: If encased, can you provide details of concrete duct banks?

Response 62: No concrete duct banks are required for this Project.

Question 63: As stated in the drawing E-1 , PVC Coated conduit for above ground routing, are fittings to be PVC Coated? (Example, seal-offs entrance hubs, straps, etc.)

Response 63: Yes, fittings shall be PVC coated also.

Question 64: Is there a detailed Scope of Work available?

Response 64: Yes. Please see Attachment E-Technical Specifications Section 01 11 00 Summary of Work.

Question 65: On the Instrumentation and Control wire schedule E-4 and E-6, circuit number C301, in the analog column reads, 30#14 in a 1 inch conduit. Please clarify, is it 3c/#14 cable or 3 #14 single conductors?

Response 65: Per the drawing, provide 30 #14, however, instead of one 1-inch conduit, use two 1-inch conduits with 15 #14 in each conduit.

Question 66: Price sheet presents a quantity of 14,000 CY for the “Class I Waste Relocation”. How was that quantity calculated if the plans still depict the grading contours for cell 2 and not the current conditions of waste in that cell?

Response 66: See Response to Question No. 2 above. Contractor is responsible to make his independent determination of quantities.

Question 67: Drawing C-19 is showing the grade of the existing waste at 3:1 on detail 2, but the contours in the plans are closer to 4:1. Has there been a change to the elevation of the South slope of the waste fill on cell 1?

Response 67: The Contractor shall perform a topographic survey of the Project site prior to construction which will determine current elevations of the Cell 3/Cell 1 and Cell 3/Cell 2 connection points.

Question 68: Drawing C-19 detail 5 shows a MES at the end of the 36” pipe on the West side of the SW Diversion swale but not at the end of the 36” pipe on the East side. Will a MES be required for that?

Response 68: Bidders are directed to bid the 36” pipe installations as shown on the plans.

Question 69: Attachment A Introduction and Submittal Information to Bidders Article 7 Submission of Bids states, "Bidder’s attention is also drawn to the form entitled “Contract Timeline Reference Form” as set forth in the Contract Forms which delineates in a checklist format, basic Contract submittal requirements." Will this be provided with the contract in a future addendum as noted on the draft contract cover page?

Response 69: Please see Attachment D for contract forms including the Contract Timeline, Checklists and other forms the County intends to use during the course of construction.

Question 70: Will the "Major Subcontractor’s Qualification Statement – AIA Document 305, 2020 Edition" be provided via addendum or with the notice of Apparent Low Bidder?

Response 70: The Major Subcontractor’s Qualification Statement – AIA Document 305 (2020 Edition) is not required to be submitted with the bid at this time. This document will be requested from the apparent low bidder following the formal bid opening and determination. Accordingly, it is not part of the current bid submission requirements.

Please note as referenced in Addendum 2, the bid opening date HAS BEEN EXTENDED to Tuesday, March 31, 2026 @ 11:00 AM.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Sincerely, Mary Bowers Purchasing Manager

END OF ADDENDUM 4