Revised Attachment 10-BMB Past Performance Survey-dated 6-29-2020.pdf
PDF 154 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MMAC Base Maintenance Renovation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-20-R-00062
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a federal contract opportunity to renovate the Base Maintenance Building at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center. The solicitation number is 6973GH-20-R-00062 issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Non-Franchise Acquisition Services. Offerors are required to provide all labor, supplies, equipment, material and equipment to complete the renovation in accordance with the specifications and drawings. The survey collects performance ratings and comments on a contractor's previous work on a similar project. It asks for details of the prior contract and ratings on quality, scheduling, cost control, management of subcontractors, and an overall recommendation. Responses are due by July 20, 2020.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-20-R-00062 BMB Renovation
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Attachment 9 (3/11/2020)
To: _______________________________________________________________________
Organization:_____________________________________________________________
Fax No.: _________________________ E-mail Address:_________________________
Date: __________________________ Number of Pages (including this sheet): 5 in total
Your name was provided as a point of contact for the following:
Contractor Name:_______________________________________________________
Contract Number: _______________________________
Project Title: ___________________________________________________________
In regard to the above contractor’s performance on the referenced contract, please complete the attached Past Performance Survey and return as follows:
Send to: Cynthia Cooper, Contracting Officer
E-mail Address: cynthia.cooper@faa.gov
For questions, please contact me at telephone 405-954-2601.
Please provide your response no later than July 20, 2020 2:00 p.m. CST
Thank you!
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-20-R-00062 BMB Renovation
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Attachment 9 (3/11/2020)
Offeror to complete this page:
1. Name of Contractor: ____________________________________________________
2. Provide a brief description of the renovation project; e.g., multi-story office, single story office building, hospital, school, warehouse, square footage?
3. Type of contract; e.g., firm fixed-price, cost-reimbursable: __________________________________________
4. Contractor Role (circle one): Prime Contractor, Mechanical Subcontractor, Electrical Subcontractor
4. Contract Number (if applicable): _______________________________________________
5. Total Contract Amount (if a Subcontract, then include value of subcontract):$_______________________
6. Date of Contract Award: ______________________________________________________
7. Contract Period of Performance: Start Complete _________________
8. Was project completion date consistent with the contract completion date? ___________
9. Was a deficiency notice issued? ___________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? ___________
10. Was a Cure Notice issued? _____________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? _____________
11. Was a Show Cause issued? _____________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? _____________
Name of Responding Point of Contact: _____________________________________________________
Agency/Organization: _________________________________________________________________
Mailing Address: __________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: __________________________________
E-mail Address: __________________________________
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-20-R-00062 BMB Renovation
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Attachment 9 (3/11/2020)
Customer to complete the following pages:
A five level assessment rating system will be used for the following questions as defined below:
Rating Definition Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the
Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The category being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The category being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The category being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The category being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The category being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
1. Quality of Project.
a. How would you rate the quality of the project?
Exceptional ( ) Very Good ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory ( ) NOTE: If you provide a rating above or below “Satisfactory” you will need to document your rationale for the use of your rating.
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-20-R-00062
BMB Renovation
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Attachment 9 (3/11/2020)
2. Scheduling of Project.
a. How would you rate the scheduling of the project?
Exceptional ( ) Very Good ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory ( ) NOTE: If you provide a rating above or below “Satisfactory” you will need to document your rationale
3. Cost Control of Project Modifications.
a. How would you rate the contractor’s cost control of project modifications?
Exceptional ( ) Very Good ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory ( ) NOTE: If you provide a rating above or below “Satisfactory” you will need to document your rationale
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-20-R-00062
BMB Renovation
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Attachment 9 (3/11/2020)
4. Management of Subcontractors. (Only answer this question if the contractor being evaluated is the general contractor and not a subcontractor)
a. How would you rate the subcontract management demonstrated by the general contractor
Exceptional ( ) Very Good ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory ( ) NOTE: If you provide a rating above or below “Satisfactory” you will need to document your rationale
5. Would you recommend awarding similar contracts or using the offeror again for future work?
( ) Yes ( ) No
6. Please provide any other comments you may have.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .