Attachment 29 Past Performance Evaluation Survey 6-15-2026.docx

DOCX document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
WJHTC Armed Security Guard Services
Solicitation number
692M15-25-R-00012
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Evaluation Survey template used to assess offerors' prior contract performance for the WJHTC Armed Security Guards solicitation (692M15-25-R-00012).

The survey is divided into two parts: Part I is completed by the offeror providing reference information about the performing contractor and the relevant project, while Part II is completed by the reference contact (government Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer's Representative, or Project Manager) who evaluates the contractor's performance. References must submit completed surveys directly via email to sarah.e.mccarty@faa.gov by the proposal submission deadline specified in the SIR. Offerors are required to send surveys for projects with performance ongoing or completed within five years of the SIR closing date and are responsible for follow-up with references to ensure submission. The evaluation categories assess Quality of Service (compliance, accuracy, personnel knowledge and capability, service effectiveness), Timeliness of Performance (reliability, responsiveness, schedule adherence), Cost Control (billing accuracy, cost-to-actual relationships, cost effectiveness), Program Management (management plans, team dedication, subcontractor management, performance metrics), Customer Relationship (subcontract management, cooperation, responsiveness, problem notification, flexibility), and Overall Customer Satisfaction. Raters assign ratings of Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U) based on detailed performance guidelines provided as Exhibit 1, with requirements to provide supporting commentary for Outstanding and Unsatisfactory ratings.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
25-R-00012 redcated Guards Site Visit sign-in sheet 9-29-2026.pdf PDF
692M15-25-R-00012 AMD 0001 conform 10-21-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 28 Corporate Experience Info Sheet 6-15-2026.docx DOCX document
Attachment 01 Statement of Work 10-15-2026.pdf PDF
AMD 0001 WJHTC Guards SIR Q and A 10-15-2026.pdf PDF
WJHTC Seniority List.pdf PDF
Attach 02 Pricing Schedule-Attach 30 ODCs-Attach 31 SCLS Comp-Attach 33 FFP Buildup 10-15-2026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 05 GFE List 6-4-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 06 Cert of Review of Guard Orders and Contractor Guard Manual 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 Certification of Physical Qualifications Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 28 Corporate Experience Info Sheet 6-15-2026.docx DOCX document
Attachment 11 Initial Checklist for Contractor Personnel 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 27 SIR Q and A template 6-15-2026.docx DOCX document
Attachment 09 Contract Security Officer Firearms Qualification Course of Fire (CoF) and Cert 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
692M15-25-R-00012 WJHTC Guards 9-14-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 32 SCLS Compliance Certification 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 Daily Desk Log Sample Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 29 Past Performance Evaluation Survey 6-15-2026.docx DOCX document
Attachment 10 Lautenberg Amendment IAW 18 USC 922 and Certification Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 NJ Title 2C-NJ Code of Criminal Justice Section 2C3-4 - 2C3-9 Use of Force 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 Facility Buildings List 10-24-2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 Statement of Work 6-22-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 26 CBA - Centerra - CBA-2025-181 5-1-2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 21 Lost and Found Report Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 Incident Report Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 DOD Contract Security Classification Specification Form DD254 7-21-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 Certification of Drug Testing Form 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 Active Shooter Training Example 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attach 02 Pricing Schedule-Attach 30 ODCs-Attach 31 SCLS Comp-Attach 33 FFP Buildup 6-22-2026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 25 CBA - Hana - CBA-2025-180 5-1-2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 Contractor Vehicle Security Decal Placement 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 08 New Jersey Revised Statutes Title 2C58-4 Handgun Permit 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 Certification of Citizen-Edu-Age-Comm Skills 6-15-2026.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

692M15-25-R-00012 WJHTC Armed Security Guards 15 June 2026

Attachment 29 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS SENDING REFERENCE SURVEY FORMS:

Part I must be completed by the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the surveys. The Offeror must send the surveys for relevant projects with performance that was ongoing or completed within five (5) years of the SIR closing date. The Offeror must send the surveys to the individuals who will provide the reference. For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer (CO), Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), or Project Manager. For state and municipal references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to follow-up and encourage references to submit the survey. The completed survey must be submitted via e-mail directly from the person providing the reference, not from the Offeror as part of the Offeror’s proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS TO PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE:

In order to assess potential vendors under the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) William J. Hughes Technical Center Armed Security Guards competition, the FAA Contracting Office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Part I of this survey, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete Part II of the survey as thoroughly as possible and submit to sarah.e.mccarty@faa.gov no later than the due date and time specified in SIR Section L.7 Proposal Submission. Please indicate in the subject line in the submission e-mail: WJTHC armed Security Guards Past Performance Evaluation Survey Submission for <Company Name> and the message must originate from the reference’s government (federal, state, municipal) e-mail system.

In addition to this survey, you may receive a follow-up phone call or e-mail to confirm or clarify information. This is a major FAA acquisition and your input into this evaluation is greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this survey or require assistance, please submit inquiries to sarah.e.mccarty@faa.gov.

Sincerely, Sarah McCarty Contracting Officer Federal Aviation Administration

692M15-25-R-00012 WJHTC Armed Security Guards 15 June 2026

Attachment 29 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Offeror Name:

Offeror Address:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATIONOFFEROR COMPLETE

Performing Contractor Name (if other than Offeror Name above):

Performing Contractor Address (if other than Offeror Name above):

Project Title:

Contract Number:

Agency/Customer:

Agency/Customer POC Name:

Agency/Customer POC Email:

Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:

PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Provide commentary to support all Outstanding and Unsatisfactory ratings on the last page.

Assign each area a rating of Outstanding (O), Good (G), Satisfactory (S), and Unsatisfactory (U). Use the attached Rating Guidelines which is provided as Exhibit 1 as guidance in making these evaluations. Enter the appropriate rating for each Category number.

A. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDENT

Name:

Title:

Phone:

Address:

Email:

B. EVALUATION

QUALITY OF SERVICE:

#
Category
Rating
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
1
Compliance with contract requirements
2
Accuracy of reports
3
Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel
4
Capability of personnel to perform required services
5
Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services
6
Overall quality of service

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

#
Category
Rating
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
1
Reliability
2
Responsive to technical direction
3
Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines

COST CONTROL:

#
Category
Rating
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
1
Current, accurate and complete billings
2
Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals
3
Cost effectiveness

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

#
Category
Rating
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
1
Adequate and complete management plan
2
Specific management team dedicated to this project
3
Indications that the provided team had experience in subcontractor management and surveillance
4
Process, or metrics, for the evaluation of their own overall management performance

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP:

#
Category
Rating
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
1
Effective management, including subcontracts
2
Reasonable/cooperative behavior
3
Responsive to contract requirements
4
Notification of problems
5
Flexibility
6
Proactive vs. reactive

OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

#
Category
Response
Yes
No
1
The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, including support for all Outstanding and Unsatisfactory ratings:

Exhibit 1: Rating Guidelines Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

RATING
DEFINITION
NOTE
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
To justify an Exceptional rating, there must have been multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there must have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
To justify a Very Good rating, there must have been a significant event that was a benefit to the Government. There must have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, there must have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There must have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
To justify Marginal performance, there must have been a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming that impacted the Government. A
Unsatisfactory (U)
Performance does not meet one or more contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, there must have been multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming that impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .