About this file

This document contains answers to technical questions regarding Solicitation Number 69056723R000013 for the Yellowstone & Grand Teton Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024. The Federal Highway Administration will not extend the proposal due date in response to a request. Bridge construction experience can include structures with tie backs or wing walls over 100 feet in total length. Past performance evaluations do not require a specific form from state departments that do not normally perform evaluations; the solicitation will provide scoring criteria for owner evaluations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
QA_01-25-2024_2.pdf PDF
QA_01-25-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A005.pdf PDF
J.2 Technical Information Form 1_A004.pdf PDF
QA_01-16-2024_2.pdf PDF
J.4 Past Performance Form 2_A001.pdf PDF
QA_01-16-2024.pdf PDF
J.2 Technical Information Form 1_A004.pdf PDF
Amendment A004.pdf PDF
QA_01-05-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A003.pdf PDF
QA_01-03-2024.pdf PDF
QA_12-28-2023.pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA_12-27-2023.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA_12-18-2023.pdf PDF
RFP_Yellowstone MATOC_Final.pdf PDF
J.3 YELL 12(5)_PLANS_70pct.pdf PDF
J.2 Technical Information Form 1.pdf PDF
J.3 Sample Project YELL 12(5).pdf PDF
J.1 MASTER SUBCONTRACTING PLAN.pdf PDF
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

69056723R000013

Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding area MATOC 2024

# General Technical Question Answer Date

1 X

We are respectfully requesting a bid due date extension of 2 weeks due to the lost time over the holidays. This will allow us and our team to provide the best proposal possible.

At this time the Government does not intend on extending the proposal due date.

12/18/2023

2 X

In regards to the technical proposal (7) Bridge construction of a vehicular bridge 100‐feet or longer, is it acceptable to use a bridge that has a total structure length of over 100 feet with tie backs or wing walls etc. or does the span have to be 100‐feet or longer?

This will be addressed under Amendment

A001.

12/20/2023

3 X

Regarding Factor 3, Past Performance, does

FHWA have a specific form to provide State

DOT’s that do not perform performance evaluations as part of their contract administration? If not, can FHWA provide the scoring criteria they would like an owner to use for the five sub factors listed for the past performance evaluation?

This will be addressed under Amendment

A001.

12/20/2023

Check General or Technical

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .