Amendment A001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

N/A

PAGE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

A001 12/21/2023 N/A See Box 14

6. ISSUED BY CODE N/A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE N/A

Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 610 East Fifth Street Vancouver WA 98661-3801

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and Zip Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

69056723R000013

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12/14/2023

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

N/A

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE: N/A FACILITY CODE: N/A N/A

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

| X | The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers (__ ) is extended, ( x ) is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

N/A

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN

ITEM 10A.

N/A

B THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (Such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

N/A

C THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

N/A

D OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) N/A

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor n/a is not, n/a is required to sign this document and return n/a copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

69056723R000013, Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding area MATOC 2024

See page 2.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15a. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 15a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

N/A

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY_________________________________________ BY N/A___________________________ N/A (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment No. A001, dated 12-21-2023 69056723R000013 Solicitation No. 69056723R000013 Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Page 2 Surrounding area MATOC 2024

REVISIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

Part III – List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

Page J-1, List of Attachments

1. Revises Attachment J.2 Technical Information Form 1.

2. Adds J.4 Past Performance Form 2.

Part IV – Representations and Instructions

Page L-5, Proposal Submittal Instruction.

1. Revises Technical Submittal

Pages M-1 through M-2, Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award.

1. Revises Construction Element (7).

Page M-4, Factor 3: Past Performance.

1. Revises Past Performance Evaluation Process.

ENCLOSURES

Attachments:

J.2 J.4

Pages:

L-5 M-1 through M-2 M-4

J-1

SECTION J – List of Attachments Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

Part III – LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

J.1 Master Subcontracting Plan (will be incorporated into MATOC Awards)

J.2 Technical Information Form 1_A001 (will not be incorporated into MATOC Awards)

J.3 Sample Project: MT NPS YELL 12(5), Northeast Entrance Road, Seed Project (will not be incorporated into MATOC Awards)

J.4 Past Performance Form 2 (will not be incorporated into MATOC Awards)

Revised by Amendment A001

L-5

SECTION L – Instruction, Conditions and Notices to Offerors or Respondents Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

L.4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTION

Proposals must be received not later than the date and time specified in the Request for Proposals (see page A-3 block 13). Proposal submission includes both a hard copy and an electronic duplicate copy. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8, FHWA will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. FHWA will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals.

PROPOSAL

Information includes General Information, Technical submittal, and Price submittal.

General Information Includes the following information:

• Authority to sign

• SF1442 Solicitation Offer & Award (Pages A-3 and A-4) o Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 19, 20A and 20B. Sign block 20B.

• Section K - Representations and Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors or

Respondents

• Attachment J.1 Master Subcontracting Plan (large businesses only)

NOTE: Submit or update your Online Representations and Certifications in your System for Award Management entity record at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ before proposal submittal.

Technical Submittal Includes the following information:

• Attachment J.2 Technical Information Form 1 for each project.

• For projects that are not 100% complete, submit documentation demonstrating the offeror has earned at least 50% of the awarded contract value as of the date of proposal submission letter indicating current bonding limits from an acceptable surety.

• Past Performance information made available from project owners, if applicable.

• Attachment J.4 Past Performance Form 2 for each project submitted for evaluation factor

1 where no CPARS or owner equivalent form exists.

Information submitted that was not requested in this solicitation will not be evaluated.

Narratives in the Technical Information Forms must meet the following requirements:

• Submitted on 8 ½” by 11” sheets of paper;

• No more than 4 pages (2 sheets of paper) for each submitted project under Factor 1;

The first two pages of Attachment 2 count towards the 4 pages (2 sheets of paper) maximum.

• Double-sided;

• Minimum 12-point font;

• Use of bold face type for paragraph headings is acceptable; and

• Each page of each copy should contain the following legend in the footer: “Source

Selection Information”.

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

M-1

Source Selection Information | See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 | (Applicable when filled‐in) SECTION M – Evaluation Factors for Award Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Factor 1: Proposed Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience Projects submitted for this factor must meet the requirements defined below and the offeror must have been the prime contractor for the project.

Minimum Project Requirements A minimum of one and maximum of five projects performed by the offeror as the prime contractor meeting the following requirements:

(1) Completed after December 14, 2018, or the offeror has earned at least 50% of the awarded contract value as of the date of proposal submission; AND

(2) 50% of the work performed by the offeror as the prime contractor (25% if a bridge project); AND

(3) Work included road reconstruction or new road construction; AND

(4) $6 million minimum contract award amount

Each individual project must meet all four of the above requirements to be considered.

Individual projects that do not meet all four of the above requirements will not be further evaluated with the exception of bridge projects. Bridge projects must be 50% completed after December 14, 2013.

Construction Elements In addition, each individual project (with the exception of bridge project(s)) must include a minimum of four of the following construction elements to be considered for evaluation.

(1) Roadway reconstruction of 2-mile or more corridor, 2-lane with ADT 3,000 vehicles/day or greater, AND with no available detours or closures.

(2) Protection of wetlands or Class 1 waters within 20-feet of construction limits.

(3) Protection or preservation of cultural resources such as: historic features or sites;

archeological sites; or historic stone masonry such as found in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks.

(4) Reassembly or new construction of stone masonry features such as: headwalls, curbing or rock facing.

(5) Performance where material sources were 60 miles or greater from the construction site.

(6) Paving – 8000 tons minimum.

(7) Bridge construction of a vehicular bridge, 100-feet or longer, in a single span or multiple spans. (This element does not apply to a contractor that is a small business under NAICS 237310).

Each individual project (except bridge projects) must include a minimum of four of the above construction elements. Individual projects that do not contain at least four of the above construction elements will not be further evaluated . This minimum requirement does not apply to bridge construction projects. Bridge construction projects do not need to contain construction elements 1 thru 6 to be evaluated (i.e., bridge construction projects only need to contain construction element 7).

M-2

Source Selection Information | See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 | (Applicable when filled‐in) SECTION M – Evaluation Factors for Award

Submittal

Complete J.2 Technical Information Form 1 (Attachment 2) for each project that contains the requirements specified above.

Submit documentation demonstrating that 50% of the awarded contract value has been earned for projects that are not 100% complete.

Contact Information – Submit the name of the contracting agency/private sector company, the name of the primary person responsible for the contract, phone number, address, and e-mail address. Failure to provide a Point of Contact for a contract may eliminate that associated project from consideration under Factors 1 and 3. Failure to provide Points of Contact for all of the contracts may eliminate the Offeror from further consideration.

Evaluation Process The Government will review the documents submitted to ensure the contractor meets the requirements listed above. The Government may contact the contracting agency/private company to verify the submitted information. The Government will evaluate Factor 1 according to the following rating criteria.

Rating

Technically Acceptable Based on the Government’s review, the offeror, completed as the prime contractor:

(1) One or more road reconstruction or new construction project(s) with a minimum $6 million contract award amount, that was completed after December 14, 2018 or is at least 50% complete at the date of proposal submission, and 50% of the work was performed by the offeror as the prime contractor (25% performed by the offeror as the prime contractor after December 14, 2013 if a Bridge project); AND

(2) All seven construction elements are represented cumulatively in the project(s) submitted and eligible for evaluation OR if the offeror is a small business under NAICS 237310, construction elements 1-6 are represented cumulatively.

Technically Unacceptable Based on the Government’s review, the offeror:

(1) Does not have one or more road reconstruction or new construction projects with a minimum $6 million contract award amount, that was completed after December 14, 2018 or is at least 50% completed at the date of proposal submission, and 50% of the work was performed by the prime contractor (25% performed by the offeror as the prime contractor after December 14, 2013 if a Bridge project); OR

(2) Does not have project(s) that includes each of the seven elements cumulatively (elements 1-6 in the case of a small business under NAICS 237310).

M-4

Source Selection Information | See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 | (Applicable when filled-in) SECTION M – Evaluation Factors for Award Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

Factor 3: Past Performance - Past performance of the proposed prime contractor

Evaluation Process

Past performance will be evaluated for projects submitted for Factor 1. The Government will be utilizing data retrieved from the CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) and/or information received from other, non-federal agencies. If the final CPARS record for the project is available, it will be used, otherwise any available CPARS record will be used. Evaluation will be made on the following sub factors.

(1) Technical Quality of Product/Service;

(2) Schedule/Timeliness;

(3) Management or business relations;

(4) Regulatory Compliance; and

(5) Small Business subcontracting (applicable only to contracts including a subcontracting plan).

CPARS does not retain records beyond 6 years. Offerors that submit a bridge project performed for a federal agency, that was completed more than six years ago, should submit past performance information made available from the owner as described below.

For projects submitted for the Factor 1 criteria, if there is no past performance information available in CPARS, Offerors shall submit copies of any completed past performance evaluations made available to them from the project owner. Include the name of the contracting agency, the name of the primary person responsible for the contract, phone number, e-mail address, and mailing address. The Government, at its discretion, may verify information provided from project owners. For any project where past performance information is not available in CPARS and the project owner does not have an equivalent past performance evaluation, offerors should submit information made available to them from project owners on past performance evaluation J.4 Past Performance Form 2. If there are no available past performance evaluations for any project, that must be documented in the Offeror’s proposal, include the efforts made to obtain the past performance information.

If past performance information is received on a project where a rating in CPARS exists, the CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes and the submitted past performance information will not be evaluated.

Any project that has an unsatisfactory rating or equivalent for any subfactor will be determined ineligible for consideration and will not be evaluated under evaluation factor 1.

Rating

Technically Acceptable

Source Selection (when completed, this page is considered source selection information, see FAR 2.101 & 3.104) Attachment J.2 Technical Information Form 1 Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

MATOC Proposal Source Selection Information

Solicitation: 69056723R000013

ATTACHMENT J.2 TECHNICAL INFORMATION FORM 1

Technical Evaluation Factor 1 - Recent and Relevant Experience Form

Directions: Complete a copy of this form for at least 1 but no more than 5 projects to satisfy all Factor 1 criteria. If any information is unknown leave blank.

Requirements for each project:

(1) Completed after December 14, 2018 (December 14, 2013 if bridge project) or the project is at least 50% complete as of the date of proposal submission; AND

(2) 50% of the work performed by the Prime (25% if bridge project); AND

(3) Work included road reconstruction or new construction; AND

(4) $6 million minimum contract award amount

Company Information Company Name:

Project Information Project Name

Contract Number

Project Location

Owner/Agency

Owner/Agency Point-of-Contact

Contact Phone & E-mail address

Contract Information for this project Contract Award Date: Construction Start

Date:

Original Completion Date:

Final Completion Date:

Contract award amount: Final contract amount:

Percentage (%) complete if not complete at time of proposal submission

Percentage (%) of work completed as the prime

Source Selection (when completed, this page is considered source selection information, see FAR 2.101 & 3.104)

Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

Recent and Relevant Experience

Directions: In addition to the minimum requirements on page 1 of this form, each individual project must include a minimum of four of the following construction elements; and across all submitted projects all seven of the construction elements must be cumulatively represented. Bridge construction projects do not need to contain any other construction element to be evaluated (i.e., bridge construction projects do not need to contain elements 1 thru 6).

This project satisfies which of the Factor 1 criteria (select all that apply)

Construction Elements

☐ (1) Roadway reconstruction of 2-mile or more corridor, 2-lane with ADT 3,000 vehicles/ day or greater, and with no available detours or closures

☐ (2) Protection of wetlands or Class 1 waters within 20-feet of construction limits ☐ (3) Protection or preservation of cultural resources such as: historic features or sites;

archaeological sites; or historic stone masonry such as found in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks

☐ (4) Reassembly or new construction of stone masonry features such as: headwalls, curbing or rock facing

☐ (5) Performance where material sources were 60 miles or greater from the construction site

☐ (6) Paving – 8,000 tons minimum ☐ (7) Bridge construction of a vehicular bridge 100-feet or longer, in a single span or multiple spans. (This element does not apply to a contractor that is a small business under

NAICS 237310).

Narrative that describes the project in sufficient detail to support the minimum four requirements on page 1 and construction elements that were selected above.

Source Selection (when completed, this page is considered source selection information, see FAR 2.101 & 3.104)

Source Selection (when completed, this page is considered source selection information, see FAR 2.101 & 3.104)

Attachment J.4 Past Performance Form 2

Past Performance Form 2

Subject Line “Source Selection Information: Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 2024

Project: Yellowstone, Grand Teton, & Surrounding Area Multiple Award Task Order Contract

(MATOC) 2024

Evaluation Factor Rating System. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings:

N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory VG=Very Good E=Exceptional

• Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

• Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

• Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

• Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

• Exceptional – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

For ratings of “unsatisfactory” and “Marginal” please provide a brief explanation in the remarks section.

Company Name:

Project Name:

Submitted by:

Name

Phone:

Email:

Agency:

Technical (quality of product or service)

How would you rate the contractor’s quality of workmanship for work performed?

N/A U M S VG E

How would you rate the ability of the contractor to work within an environmentally sensitive area?

N/A U M S VG E

How would you rate the ability of the contractor to provide the right equipment and material to perform the required work?

N/A U M S VG E

Cost control (not applicable for firm-fixed-price or fixed-price with economic price adjustment arrangements).

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to control costs within the confine of the contract?

N/A U M S VG E

Schedule/Timeliness How would you rate the contractor’s adherence to the approved schedule? N/A U M S VG E

Management Did the contractor’s QC program effectively monitor all work? N/A U M S VG E

Did the contractor complete work in accordance with the specifications?

N/A U M S VG E

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to promptly resolve problems?

U

M

S

VG

E

Did the contractor comply with all known laws and regulations?

U

M

S

VG

E

Small Business Contracting Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories?

N/A U M S VG E

Utilized Small Business Concerns and met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order?

N/A U M S VG E

Other:

Customer Satisfaction: Was the Contractor committed to customer satisfaction?

Yes No

Safety: Was the Contractor committed to running a safe operation?

Yes No

Remarks: